RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: : The aims of this study were to estimate the hepatitis B vaccination coverage levels among nurses and understand the reasons for receiving or not receiving the preventive vaccination. METHODS: : This cross-sectional study was based on a self-reported questionnaire, which was administered to 788 nurses working in 17 hospitals in Greece. RESULTS: : Overall, 606 out of 784 participants (77.3%) completed the survey. Of these, 63.2% nurses reported that they were fully vaccinated. The majority of immunized nurses (66%) were female (P = 0.008), and 72.6% of the fully-vaccinated nurses were working in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). CONCLUSIONS: : This study showed that almost 40% of nurses are not protected against hepatitis B infection. There is a need for a more aggressive approach to increase the vaccination coverage among nurses.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) in neutropenic patients often cause considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the surveillance and early identification of patients at high risk for developing BSIs might be useful for the development of preventive measures. The aim of the current study was to assess the predictive power of three scoring systems: Infection Probability Score (IPS), APACHE II and KARNOFSKY score for the onset of Bloodstream Infections in hematology-oncology patients. METHODS: A total of 102 patients who were hospitalized for more than 48 hours in a hematology-oncology department in Athens, Greece between April 1st and October 31st 2007 were included in the study. Data were collected by using an anonymous standardized recording form. Source materials included medical records, temperature charts, information from nursing and medical staff, and results on microbiological testing. Patients were followed daily until hospital discharge or death. RESULTS: Among the 102 patients, Bloodstream Infections occurred in 17 (16.6%) patients. The incidence density of Bloodstream Infections was 7.74 per 1,000 patient-days or 21.99 per 1,000 patient-days at risk. The patients who developed a Bloodstream Infection were mainly females (p = 0.004), with twofold time mean length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), with fourfold time mean length of neutropenia (p < 0.001), with neutropenia < 500 (p < 0.001), suffered mainly from acute myeloid leukemia (p < 0.001), had been exposed to antibiotics (p = 0.045) and chemotherapy (p = 0.023), had a surgery (p = 0.048) and a Hickman catheter (p = 0.025) as compared to the patients without Bloodstream Infection. The best cut-off value of IPS for the prediction of a Bloodstream Infection was 10 with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 70.9% CONCLUSION: Between the three different prognostic scoring systems, Infection Probability Score had the best sensitivity in predicting Bloodstream Infections.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neutropenia/complicações , APACHE , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIM: To assess the predictive power of three systems: Infection Probability Score, APACHE II and KARNOFSKY score to the onset of healthcare-associated infections in haematology-oncology patients. BACKGROUND: The high incidence of healthcare-associated infections is a frequent problem in haematology-oncology patients that affects morbidity and mortality of these patients. DESIGN: A retrospective surveillance survey. METHOD: The survey was conducted for seven months in the haematology unit of a general hospital in Greece to assess the predictive power of Infection Probability Score, APACHE II and KARNOFSKY score to the onset of healthcare-associated infections. The sample consisted of 102 hospitalised patients. The diagnosis of healthcare-associated infections was based on the definitions proposed by CDC. RESULTS: Among the participants, 53 (52%) were males and 49 (48%) were females with a mean age of 53.30 (SD 18.59) years old (range, 17-85 years). The incidence density of healthcare-associated infections (the number of new cases of healthcare-associated infections per 1000 patient-days) was 21.8 infections per 1000 patient-days. Among the 102 patients, healthcare-associated infections occurred in 32 (31.4%) patients who had a total of 48 healthcare-associated infections (47.5%). Among the 38 patients with neutropenia, 26 (68.4%) had more than one healthcare-associated infection. Of the 48 detected healthcare-associated infections, the most frequent type was blood-stream infection (n = 17, 35.4%), followed by Clostridium difficile infection (n = 11, 22.9%) and respiratory tract infection (n = 8, 3.4%). The best cut-off value of Infection Probability Score (IPS) for the prediction of a healthcare-associated infection was 10 with sensitivity of 59.4% and specificity of 74.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Between the three different prognostic scoring systems, IPS had the best sensitivity in predicting healthcare-associated infections. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: IPS is an effective tool and should be used from nurses for the early detection of haematology-oncology patients who are susceptible to the onset of a healthcare-associated infection.
Assuntos
APACHE , Doenças Hematológicas/complicações , Infecções/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Neoplasias/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Doenças Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Probabilidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: to assess the predictive power of three systems: Infection Probability Score, APACHE II and KARNOFSKY score for the onset of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in hematology-oncology patients. METHODS AND SAMPLE: A retrospective pilot surveillance survey was conducted in the hematology unit of a general hospital in Greece. Data were collected by using an anonymous standardised case-record form. The sample consisted of 102 hospitalized patients. RESULTS: The majority of the patients (33.3%) suffered from acute myeloid leukemia. The cumulative incidence of CDAD was 10.8% and the incidence rate of C difficile associated diarrhea was 5 per 1000 patient-days (14.2 per 1000 patient-days at risk). Patients with CDAD had twofold higher time of mean length of hospital stay compared with patients without CDAD (38.82 ± 23.88 vs 19.45 ± 14.56 days). Additionally patients with CDAD had received a greater number of different antibiotics compared to those without CDAD (5.18 ± 1.99 vs 2.54 ± 2.13), suffered from diabetes, from non Hodgkin's lymphoma, had a statistically significant higher duration of neutropenia ≥3 days and had received antifungal treatment. The best cutoff value of IPS for the prediction of CDAD was 13 with a sensitivity of 45.5% and a specificity of 82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: IPS is an early diagnostic test for CDAD detection.