Decomposition of nitrous oxide in hydrated cobalt(I) clusters: a theoretical insight into the mechanistic roles of ligand-binding modes.

Hydrated cobalt(i) cluster ions, [Co(H2O)n]+, can decompose the inert nitrous oxide molecule, N2O. Density functional theory suggests that N2O can anchor to Co+ of [Co(N2O)(H2O)n]+ through either O end-on (η1-OL) or N end-on (η1-NL) coordinate mode. The latter is thermodynamically more favorable resulting from a subtle π backdonation from Co+ to N2O. N2O decomposition involves two major processes: (1) redox reaction and (2) N-O bond dissociation. The initial activation of N2O through an electron transfer from Co+ to N2O yields anionic N2O-, which binds to the metal center of [Co2+(N2O-)(H2O)n] also through either O end-on (η1-O) or N end-on (η1-N) mode and is stabilized by water molecules through hydrogen bonding. From η1-O, subsequent N-O bond dissociation to liberate N2, producing [CoO(H2O)n]+, is straightforward via a mechanism that is commonplace for typical metal-catalyzed N2O decompositions. Unexpectedly, the N-O bond dissociation directly from η1-N is also possible and eliminates both N2 and OH, explaining the formation of [CoOH(H2O)n]+ as observed in a previous experimental study. Interestingly, formation of [CoO(H2O)n]+ is kinetically controlled by the initial redox process between Co+ and the O-bound N2O, the activation barriers of which in large water clusters (n ≥ 14) are higher than that of the unexpected N-O bond dissociation from the N-bound structure forming [CoOH(H2O)n]+. This theoretical discovery implies that in the present of water molecules, the metal-catalyzed N2O decomposition starting from an O-bound metal complex is not mandatory.

Toward Closing the Gap between Hexoses and N-Acetlyhexosamines: Experimental and Computational Studies on the Collision-Induced Dissociation of Hexosamines.

Motivated by the fundamental difference in the reactivity of hexoses and N-acetylhexosamines under collision-induced dissociation (CID) mass spectrometry conditions, we have investigated the CID of two hexosamines, glucosamine (GlcN) and galactosamine (GalN), experimentally and computationally. Both hexosamines undergo ring-opening and then dissociate via the 0,2A and the 0,3A (0,3X) cross-ring cleavage channels. The preference for the ring-opening is similar to the behavior of N-acetylhexosamines and explains why the two anomers of the same sugar give the same mass spectrum. While the spectrum for GlcN is dominated by the 0,2A signal, the signal intensities for both 0,2A and the 0,3A (0,3X) dissociation channels are comparable for GalN, which allows GlcN and GalN to be distinguished easily. Calculations at MP2 level of theory indicate that this is related to the differences in the relative barrier heights for the 0,2A and the 0,3A (0,3X) cross-ring cleavage channels. This, in return, reflects the circumstance that the 0,2A cross-ring cleavage barriers are different for the two sugars, while the barriers of all other dissociation channels are comparable. While the mechanisms of the cross-ring dissociation channels of hexoses are well described using the retro-aldol mechanism in the literature, this study proposes a new mechanism for the 0,3A (0,3X) cross-ring cleavage of hexosamines that involves the formation of an epoxy intermediate or a zwitterionic intermediate.