RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) collections can occur downrange for immediate administration. An important aspect of these collections is determining when the unit is sufficiently full. This project tested a novel method for determining when a field collection is complete. METHODS: The amount of empty space at the top of WB units, destined to become LTOWB or separated into components, that were collected at blood centers or hospitals was measured by holding a WB unit off the ground and placing the top of a piece of string where the donor tubing entered the bag. The string was marked where it intersected the top of the column of blood in the bag and measured from the top. The WB units were also weighed. RESULTS: A total of 15 different bags, two of which were measured in two different filling volumes, from 15 hospitals or blood centers were measured and weighed. The most commonly used blood bag, Terumo Imuflex SP, had a median string length of 9 mm (range: 2-24 mm) and weighed a median of 565.1 g (range: 524.8-636.7 g). CONCLUSION: Pieces of string can be precut to the appropriate length depending on the type of bag before a mission where field WB collections might be required and a mark placed on the bag before the collection commences to indicate when the unit is full.
Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue , Humanos , Bancos de Sangue , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: 6-mercaptopurine is a cornerstone of maintenance therapy for pediatric ALL. Response to 6MP is typically determined by the ANC. Therapeutic ANC range while receiving 6MP is between 500 and 1500/µL. In addition to desired myelosuppression, 6MP is associated with multiple adverse drug effects. Increased doses of 6MP can lead to therapeutic ANC values; however, patients may experience adverse effects before obtaining therapeutic myelosuppression, often deemed "skewed metabolism." Allopurinol may potentially correct skewed 6MP metabolism. PROCEDURE: Pediatric patients with ALL with 6MMP and 6TGN metabolites drawn during maintenance therapy were analyzed for allopurinol use. The primary outcome evaluated the percentage of time spent in therapeutic ANC range before and after allopurinol initiation. In addition, the difference in 6MMP:6TGN ratios before and after allopurinol initiation, incidence of hepatotoxicity, and rates of relapse, were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included for analysis. Thirty-two (34%) patients received allopurinol. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the patients who received allopurinol and those who did not. When comparing ANC values pre- and post-allopurinol initiation, a statistically significant increase in the percentage of time spent in therapeutic range was observed (27% vs. 43%; p = .03). In addition, when comparing metabolite ratios pre- and post-allopurinol initiation, a statistically significant decrease in 6MMP:6TGN metabolite ratio values was observed (86.7 vs. 3.6; p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol significantly increased the percent time in therapeutic ANC range and can be safely utilized to significantly lower the ratio of 6MMP:6TGN metabolites, alleviating the undesirable side effects of 6MMP, and optimizing the anti-leukemic effects associated with 6TGN.
RESUMO
Aims: We aimed to identify the distinctive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) features of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of presumed non-ischaemic aetiology. The secondary aim was to determine whether these individuals exhibit characteristics that could potentially serve as predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery as compared with patients without LBBB. Methods and results: We prospectively recruited patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%) on echocardiography who were referred for early CMR examination. Patients with an established diagnosis of coronary artery disease and known structural or congenital heart disease were excluded. LV recovery was defined as achieving ≥10% absolute improvement to ≥40% in LVEF between baseline evaluation to CMR. A total of 391 patients were recruited including 115 (29.4%) with LBBB. Compared with HF patients without LBBB, those with LBBB exhibited larger left ventricles and smaller right ventricles, but no differences were observed with respect to LVEF (35.8 ± 12 vs. 38 ± 12%, P = 0.105). The overall rate of LV recovery from baseline echocardiogram to CMR (70 [42-128] days) was not significantly different between LBBB and non-LBBB patients (27.8% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.47). Reduced LVEF remained an independent predictor of LV non-recovery only in patients with LBBB. Conclusion: Patients presenting with HFrEF and LBBB had larger LV cavities and smaller RV cavities than those without LBBB but no difference in prevalence of scar or ischaemia. The rates of LV recovery were similar between both groups, which supports current guidelines to defer device therapy until 3-6 months of guideline-directed medical therapy, rather than early CMR and device implantation.