Laparoscopy as an educational and recruiting tool.

BACKGROUND: General surgeons can supplement traditional gross anatomy instruction by using laparoscopy to provide clinical correlations. Early, positive interaction with surgeons may stimulate student interest in this field. METHODS: Basic laparoscopy was performed on fresh cadavers for first year medical students in gross anatomy over 2 consecutive years. Surgical residents reviewed anatomy of the abdomen, and students manipulated intra-abdominal organs using laparoscopic instruments. Students completed pre- and post-demonstration questionnaires that were compared independently. RESULTS: More than 95% of responding students agreed the demonstration enhanced their understanding of abdominal anatomy. Regardless of planned area of specialization, students felt the demonstration reinforced the clinical relevance of gross anatomy. Among students already anticipating surgical careers, 88.2% said the demonstration increased their interest in general surgery; this was significantly higher than among those intending careers in internal medicine (27.3%) or other fields (23.5%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cadaver-based laparoscopy demonstrations by general surgeons supplement didactic sessions and enhance learning in gross anatomy. Furthermore, such demonstrations may stimulate student interest in general surgery at an early point in their medical education, particularly in those already interested in a surgical career.

Video self-assessment of basic suturing and knot tying skills by novice trainees.

BACKGROUND: Self-assessment is important to learning but few studies have utilized video self-assessment of basic surgical skills. We compared a video self-assessment of suturing and knot tying skills by novice trainees to the assessment by a senior attending surgeon. METHODS: Sixteen senior medical students and 7 beginner surgical interns were video-recorded while performing five suturing and knot tying tasks. All videos were analyzed using an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) metrics (1-5 scale; 1 = novice, 5 = expert). Video self-assessment was carried out within 4 weeks of an instructional session and subsequently by one senior surgery instructor (blinded to the individual). Both a Global score and total combined OSATS scores were analyzed. Total possible OSATS scores were: interrupted suture-30, subcuticular closure-30, one and two-handed knot tying-25 each, tying in a restricted space 20; maximum combined score-130 points). Confidence levels in performing the tasks pre-test and the value of video self-assessment were rated on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 = low and 5 = high). Data are mean±SD and statistical significance was evaluated using Friedman's test. RESULTS: Self-assessment scoring was significantly higher than the assessment by a senior instructor for three tasks by global score and all five tasks by combined OSATS score (self-assessment 71.8±16.7 vs attending assessment 56.7±11.0, p = 0.007). Mean self-assessment Global scores ranged from 2.5 to 2.8 for all tasks performed compared to 1.8-2.3 for attending surgeon assessment (p<0.05). Confidence levels demonstrated no correlation to performance speed or proficiency. The video self-assessment was rated as a highly valuable (mean 4.3±0.8) component to skills training. CONCLUSIONS: Novice trainees over-estimate their basic technical skills performance compared to the assessment by a senior surgeon. Video self-assessment may be a valuable addition to a pre-residency and surgical internship preparatory curriculum in basic suturing and knot tying.

Year one outcomes assessment of a masters suturing and knot-tying program for surgical interns.

PURPOSE: We implemented and evaluated the outcomes of a proficiency-based program to enhance basic suturing and knot-tying skills in surgical interns. METHODS: A suturing and knot-tying "masters program" was implemented for 9 surgical interns. Assessment consisted of timed and videotaped technical performance (TP) of 6 suturing (simple interrupted, subcuticular, and vertical mattress) and tying tasks (1-handed, 2-handed, and tie on pass) preinstruction (baseline) and at 4 months. Feedback and remediation were done after 4 months, and interns were retested until goals were met. TP was scored on a 1-5 scale (1 = novice, 3 = proficient, and 5 = expert). The results were compared with 6 end of PGY2 year residents and rotation evaluations, case numbers, and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores. The data are mean ± standard deviation (SD); statistical analysis was by 1-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: The total combined task times improved significantly from initial (1289 ± 301 seconds) to final assessment (770 ± 139 seconds, p = 0.0003) and between 4-month assessment (1092 ± 253 seconds) and final assessment (p = 0.0237), but not baseline to 4-month assessment (p = 0.213). Final TP scores were improved significantly (baseline, 1.87 ± 0.81; 4-month assessment, 2.63 ± 0.75; and final assessment 3.51 ± 0.39 [p < 0.001]. All interns reached proficiency on 6/6 tasks but not until 10.1 months (range, 4-12 months) and 2.4 assessment sessions (range, 1-3). No significant differences in final total task times or TP scores were found between interns (770 ± 139 seconds and TP, 3.51 ± 0.39) and end of PGY-2 residents (677 ± 109 seconds and TP, 3.6 ± 0.43). The total task time and rotation technical comments were associated significantly, but TP scores, case numbers, and ABSITE scores were not. CONCLUSIONS: Training, feedback, and remediation are necessary to reach proficiency in basic suturing and knot tying. This program provides an objective assessment of interns' skills not discernible by conventional measures.