Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 143
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(2): 86-88, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38230858

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rapid cycling (RC) at least 4 recurrent episodes per year in bipolar disorder (BD) has been recognized since the 1970s. We now comment on our recent review of the topic and extensive RC analysis in a large clinical cohort, emphasizing therapeutics research. COMMENTS: Prevalence of RC-BD averages 36% for any year versus 22% in the preceding year. Rapid cycling is not a consistent feature over many years, although average long-term, annual recurrence rates are greater in RC-BD patients. Risk of RC may be somewhat greater among women and with older ages. It is also associated with cyclothymic temperament, prominent depression, and mood-switching with antidepressant treatment and is associated with increased suicidal risk. Treatment of individual episodes in RC-BD and effective long-term prevention remain inadequately studied, although antidepressant treatment can worsen RC. Some research supports treatment with aripiprazole, lamotrigine, and lithium, and interest in second-generation antipsychotics is emerging. All such options are used in various inadequately evaluated combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid cycling is prevalent among BD patients but seems to vary in risk over time without evidence of progressive worsening. Treatment of acute episodes in RC-BD patients and effective long-term preventive management require much more intensive investigation.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtorno Bipolar , Humanos , Feminino , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Lítio/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico
2.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 2024 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922810

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anticipating diagnostic change from major depressive (MDD) to bipolar disorder (BD) can support better prognosis and treatment, especially of depression but is challenging and reported research results are inconsistent. We therefore assessed clinical characteristics associated with diagnostic change from MDD to BD with antidepressant treatments. METHODS: We compared characteristics of 3212 initially MDD patients who became (hypo)manic during antidepressant treatment to those with stable MDD diagnoses as well as with cases of stable, spontaneous BD, using standard bivariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: Among MDD patients, 6.69% [CI: 5.85-7.61] changed to BD, mostly type II (BD2, 76.7%). BD-converters had higher rates of familial mood disorders (74.1% vs. 57.1%) or BD (33.7% vs. 21.0%) and 2.8-years younger onset than stable MDD patients. They also had more prior depressive recurrences/year, years-of-illness, mood-stabilizer treatment, divorces, fewer children, more suicide attempts and drug-abuse, and higher intake cyclothymia, YMRS and MDQ scores. Predictors independently associated with diagnostic conversion were: more familial BD, depressions/year, unemployment, cyclothymic temperament, suicidal ideation or acts, and fewer children. BD-converters vs. spontaneous BD cases had significantly more suicide attempts, BD2 diagnoses, and affected relatives. Converting to vs. spontaneous BD1 was associated with more ADHD, more suicidal ideation or behavior, MDI course, and younger onset; converting to vs. spontaneous BD2 had more episodes/year, unemployment, ADHD, substance abuse, suicidal ideation or attempts, and more relatives with BD. CONCLUSIONS: Few (6.69%) initially MDD subjects converted to BD, most (76.7%) to BD2. Independent predictive associations with diagnostic change included: familial BD, more depressions/year, unemployment, cyclothymic temperament, suicidal behavior and fewer children. Notably, several characteristics were stronger among those changing to BD during antidepressant treatment vs. others with spontaneous BD.

3.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 150(2): 91-104, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643982

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical profiles of bipolar disorder (BD) patients could be differentiated more clearly using the existing classification by diagnostic subtype or by lithium treatment responsiveness. METHODS: We included adult patients with BD-I or II (N = 477 across four sites) who were treated with lithium as their principal mood stabilizer for at least 1 year. Treatment responsiveness was defined using the dichotomized Alda score. We performed hierarchical clustering on phenotypes defined by 40 features, covering demographics, clinical course, family history, suicide behaviour, and comorbid conditions. We then measured the amount of information that inferred clusters carried about (A) BD subtype and (B) lithium responsiveness using adjusted mutual information (AMI) scores. Detailed phenotypic profiles across clusters were then evaluated with univariate comparisons. RESULTS: Two clusters were identified (n = 56 and n = 421), which captured significantly more information about lithium responsiveness (AMI range: 0.033 to 0.133) than BD subtype (AMI: 0.004 to 0.011). The smaller cluster had disproportionately more lithium responders (n = 47 [83.8%]) when compared to the larger cluster (103 [24.4%]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypes derived from detailed clinical data may carry more information about lithium responsiveness than the current classification of diagnostic subtype. These findings support lithium responsiveness as a valid approach to stratification in clinical samples.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Compostos de Lítio , Fenótipo , Humanos , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/classificação , Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise por Conglomerados , Compostos de Lítio/farmacologia , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Antimaníacos/farmacologia
4.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 42(6): 530-535, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36066391

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several second-generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAs) have evidence of benefit for acute major depressive episodes in bipolar disorder (BD) patients. However, their comparative efficacy in types I vs II BD (BD1 vs BD2) remains uncertain. METHODS: We carried out a systematic literature search for randomized, double-blinded, controlled treatment trials for acute major depressive episodes involving head-to-head comparisons of BD1 versus BD2 subjects, followed by meta-analyses and meta-regression modeling. RESULTS: Seven reports met out inclusion criteria, yielding 22 comparisons of SGA versus placebo averaging 8.3 weeks in duration. All trials involved quetiapine, which was much more effective than placebo (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.76 [95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.12], P < 0.0001). Estimated % improvement averaged 53.5% [46.5-60.5] with quetiapine vs 39.8% [34.2-45.4] with placebo ( P < 0.0001); their ratio was somewhat larger with BD1 (1.56 [1.26-1.86]) versus BD2 subjects (1.22 [1.07-1.37], P = 0.04; as was SMD (BD1: 2.35 [1.83-2.86]; BD2: SMD = 1.44 [1.05-1.82]). Meta-regression found diagnosis (BD1 > BD2) to be the only factor significantly associated with the meta-analytic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Although data are limited, depressed BD1 patients may respond somewhat better to quetiapine than BD2. Additional head-to-head diagnostic comparisons are needed with other SGAs, as well as evaluation of monotherapy versus various combinations that include SGAs in both short- and long-term use.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtorno Bipolar , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/farmacologia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Depressão , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
5.
Bipolar Disord ; 24(7): 720-725, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35319801

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Time to a new episode of bipolar disorder (BD) is shorter after discontinuing lithium rapidly. We now address this and other factors associated with the risk of early illness after discontinuing lithium. METHODS: We compared factors for association with recurrences of BD within 12 months of discontinuing long-term lithium treatment, using bivariate and multivariable analyses, as well as survival analysis to evaluate latency to new episodes versus rate of lithium-discontinuation and prior treatment duration. RESULTS: Among 227 BD subjects who received lithium for 4.47 [CI: 3.89-5.04] years and then discontinued, rapid treatment-discontinuation, and stopping for medical reasons were strongly associated with new illness-episodes within 12 months, as were diagnosis (BD-I > BD-II), greater morbidity during lithium-treatment, and less education, but neither longer treatment nor serum lithium concentrations. Discontinuation rate was strongly associated with shorter median latency to a new episode (rapid: 3.50; gradual [≥2 weeks]: 10.6 months), even with very early recurrences excluded to avoid potential contributions of emerging illness to treatment-discontinuation. Early recurrence was not associated with treatment-duration of ≥2 or ≥5 years or less. In multivariable logistic regression, rapid discontinuation, stopping for medical reasons, and BD-I diagnosis remained significantly, independently associated with early illness after lithium-discontinuation, with no effect of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Early recurrence risk was again much greater after rapid discontinuation of lithium and discontinuing for medical reasons, somewhat greater with BD-I than BD-II, and following greater morbidity during lithium-treatment, but not related to dose or duration of preceding treatment exposure.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Lítio , Humanos , Lítio/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
6.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 146(5): 456-467, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36059155

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research findings on factors associated with onset-age (OA) with bipolar (BD) and major depressive disorders (MDD) have been inconsistent, but often indicate greater morbidity following early OA. METHODS: We considered factors associated with OA in 1033 carefully evaluated, systematically followed mood disorder subjects with DSM-5 BD (n = 505) or MDD (n = 528), comparing rates of descriptive and clinical characteristics following early (age <18), intermediate (18-40), or later onset (≥40 years), as well as regressing selected measures versus OA. Exposure time (years ill) was matched among these subgroups. RESULTS: As hypothesized, many features were associated with early OA: familial psychiatric illness, including BD, greater maternal age, early sexual abuse, nondepressive first episodes, co-occurring ADHD, suicide attempts and violent suicidal behavior, abuse of alcohol or drugs, smoking, and unemployment. Other features increased consistently with later OA: %-time-depressed (in BD and MDD, women and men), as well as depressions/year and intake ratings of depression, educational levels, co-occurring medical disorders, rates of marriage and number of children. CONCLUSIONS: OA averaged 7.5 years earlier in BD versus MDD (30.7 vs. 38.2). Some OA-associated measures may reflect maturation. Associations with family history and suicidal risk with earlier OA were expected; increases of time-depressed in both BD and MDD with later OA were not. We conclude that associations of OA with later morbidity are complex and not unidirectional but may be clinically useful.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Idade de Início , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Criança , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia
7.
Bipolar Disord ; 23(1): 14-23, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33037692

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Excess mortality is a critical hallmark of bipolar disorder (BD) due to co-occurring general medical disorders and especially from suicide. It is timely to review of the status of suicide in BD and to consider the possibility of limiting suicidal risk. METHODS: We carried out a semi-systematic review of recent research reports pertaining to suicide in BD. FINDINGS: Suicide risk in BD is greater than with most other psychiatric disorders. Suicide rates (per 100,000/year) are approximately 11 and 4 in the adult and juvenile general populations, but over 200 in adults, and 100 among juveniles diagnosed with BD. Suicide attempt rates with BD are at least 20 times higher than in the adult general population, and over 50 times higher among juveniles. Notable suicidal risk factors in BD include: previous suicidal acts, depression, mixed-agitated-dysphoric moods, rapid mood-shifts, impulsivity, and co-occurring substance abuse. Suicide-preventing therapeutics for BD remain severely underdeveloped. Evidence favoring lithium treatment is stronger than for other measures, although encouraging findings are emerging for other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide is a leading clinical challenge for those caring for BD patients. Improved understanding of risk and protective factors combined with knowledge and close follow-up of BD patients should limit suicidal risk. Ethically appropriate and scientifically sound studies of plausible medicinal, physical, and psychosocial treatments aimed at suicide prevention specifically for BD patients are urgently needed.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Adulto , Transtorno Bipolar/complicações , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio
8.
Mol Psychiatry ; 24(2): 198-217, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679069

RESUMO

We summarize evidence supporting contemporary pharmacological treatment of phases of BD, including: mania, depression, and long-term recurrences, emphasizing findings from randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). Effective treatment of acute or dysphoric mania is provided by modern antipsychotics, some anticonvulsants (divalproex and carbamazepine), and lithium salts. Treatment of BD-depression remains unsatisfactory but includes some modern antipsychotics (particularly lurasidone, olanzapine + fluoxetine, and quetiapine) and the anticonvulsant lamotrigine; value and safety of antidepressants remain controversial. Long-term prophylactic treatment relies on lithium, off-label use of valproate, and growing use of modern antipsychotics. Lithium has unique evidence of antisuicide effects. Methods of evaluating treatments for BD rely heavily on meta-analysis, which is convenient but with important limitations. Underdeveloped treatment for BD-depression may reflect an assumption that effects of antidepressants are similar in BD as in unipolar major depressive disorder. Effective prophylaxis of BD is limited by the efficacy of available treatments and incomplete adherence owing to adverse effects, costs, and lack of ongoing symptoms. Long-term treatment of BD also is limited by access to, and support of expert, comprehensive clinical programs. Pursuit of improved, rationally designed pharmacological treatments for BD, as for most psychiatric disorders, is fundamentally limited by lack of coherent pathophysiology or etiology.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/metabolismo , Adulto , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lítio/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêutico
9.
Int Rev Psychiatry ; 32(5-6): 466-470, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32172612

RESUMO

Many efforts have been made to develop coherent and clinically useful categories of depressive illness, especially to facilitate prediction of morbidity and guide treatment-response. They include proposals to resurrect the ancient concept of melancholia, as a form of severe depression with particular symptomatic and proposed psychobiological characteristics. However, modern research is inconsistent in supporting differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression. In our recent study of over 3200 patient-subjects with DSM-5 major depressive episodes with/without melancholic characteristics, and matched for illness severity, prevalence of melancholic features was 35.2% with remarkably few clinical and demographic differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic subjects. Also, our systematic review of trials comparing melancholic and nonmelancholic subjects found little difference in responses to antidepressant treatments. These findings indicate that the concept of melancholia may have limited value for clinical prediction and treatment-selection. Overlap of symptoms in melancholic and nonmelancholic depression, based on DSM criteria, may limit distinction of melancholia; alternative definitions can be sought, and psychomotor retardation is a particularly strong differentiating feature. For now, however, melancholia seems best considered a state-dependent depression-type strongly associated with greater symptomatic severity, rather than a distinct syndrome. Its DSM-5 current status as a depression-type specifier seems appropriate, and it may be a logical target for genetic and other biomedical studies.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/genética , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Prevalência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
10.
Br J Psychiatry ; : 1-6, 2019 Jul 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31292010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rates and risk factors for suicidal behaviour require updating and comparisons among mood disorders.AimsTo identify factors associated with suicidal risk in major mood disorders. METHOD: We considered risk factors before, during and after intake assessments of 3284 adults with/without suicidal acts, overall and with bipolar disorder (BD) versus major depressive disorder (MDD), using bivariate comparisons, multivariable regression modelling and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Suicidal prevalence was greater in BD versus MDD: ideation, 29.2 versus 17.3%; attempts, 18.8 versus 4.78%; suicide, 1.73 versus 0.48%; attempts/suicide ratio indicated similar lethality, 10.9 versus 9.96. Suicidal acts were associated with familial BD or suicide, being divorced/unmarried, fewer children, early abuse/trauma, unemployment, younger onset, longer illness, more dysthymic or cyclothymic temperament, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), substance misuse, mixed features, hospital admission, percentage time unwell, less antidepressants and more antipsychotics and mood stabilisers. Logistic regression found five independent factors: hospital admission, more depression at intake, BD diagnosis, onset age ≤25 years and mixed features. These factors were more associated with suicidal acts in BD than MDD: percentage time depressed/ill, alcohol misuse, >4 pre-intake depressions, more dysthymic/cyclothymic temperament and prior abuse/trauma. ADHD and total years ill were similar in BD and MDD; other factors were more associated with MDD. By ROC analysis, area under the curve was 71.3%, with optimal sensitivity (76%) and specificity (55%) with any two factors. CONCLUSIONS: Suicidal risks were high in mood disorders: ideation was highest with BD type II, attempts and suicides (especially violent) with BD type I. Several risk factors for suicidal acts differed between BD versus MDD patients.Declaration of interestNo author or immediate family member has financial relationships with commercial entities that might appear to represent potential conflicts of interest with the information presented.

12.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 51(5): 177-188, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672801

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Suicidal behavior is strongly associated with depression in major depressive (MDD) and bipolar (BD) disorders, especially with associated behavioral activation, dysphoria, or agitation. A rare intervention with evidence of suicide risk-reducing as well as mood-stabilizing effects in mood disorder patients is lithium. METHODS: We reviewed available research evidence on associations of long-term treatment with lithium with risk of suicidal behavior. We meta-analyzed 12 randomized trials in 10 reports (with at least 1 suicide in either treatment arm) including both BD and MDD subjects, with particular attention to comparisons of lithium with placebo or other pharmacological treatments. We also summarized ecological studies on lithium concentration in local drinking water and reported suicide rates. RESULTS: We found substantial reduction of risks of suicide and attempts with long-term lithium treatment, particularly in depressive phases of BD and in MDD. Risk of suicidal behavior was higher in mixed (agitated-dysphoric) states than in manic or hypomanic periods. Risk of suicide fatality, specifically, was lower with lithium than with placebo and probably with mood-altering anticonvulsants or antidepressants. DISCUSSION: Long-term treatment with lithium has growing evidence of suicide- and attempt-sparing effects, probably greater than with anticonvulsants or antidepressants; antipsychotics remain to be tested adequately. However, the ethical and scientifically adequate design and conduct of trials of treatments aimed at suicide prevention remain challenging and underdeveloped.


Assuntos
Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Transtornos do Humor/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos do Humor/psicologia , Prevenção do Suicídio , Humanos
13.
Vertex ; 29(137): 72-77, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30605198

RESUMO

From the ancient Greeks (V to III centuries BC), through Hippocrates to the Roman physician Aulo Cornelius Celso (I century), the term paranoia has been used as a manifestation of mental illness. After many centuries, Robert Burton in 1621 introduces the concept with a more modern meaning. Only with Heinroth (1818) the syndrome enters into the psychiatric nosology as a disorder of thought with unaltered perceptions. French and German psychiatry agree on the concept of paranoia as a partial psychosis with a maintained level of functioning and absence of deterioration. With this meaning the term is introduced in the modern psychiatry in Kahlbaum's work (1863). Jasper contributes with the introduction of paranoid development that can be influenced by the environment or previous experiences (1910). But to Kraepelin (1921) is owed the most precise description in a specifc essay based on his clinical experience. The German psychiatrist speaks of both a psychogenic and a more biological component. In modern psychiatric classifcations gradually the syndrome has disappeared and encompassed in the generic delusional disorder, clearly distinct from schizophrenia, and only if the delusions are understandable. The consequences of the absence of a diagnostic recognition implies that there is no specific research on this syndrome with difficulties in developing psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments.


Assuntos
Psiquiatria , Transtornos Psicóticos , Delusões , História do Século XVII , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História Antiga , História Medieval , Humanos , Transtornos Paranoides , Psiquiatria/história , Transtornos Psicóticos/história , Esquizofrenia Paranoide
14.
Vertex ; XXIX(139): 172-177, 2018 May.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30778406

RESUMO

The objective of the study was to assess the emotional impact on healthcare professionals and changes in their behavior as a result of patients' suicide in Argentina. An anonymous survey was e-mailed to healthcare professionals registered in CEMIC University Institute Department of Psychiatry database. A total of 250 responses were obtained. Among respondents, 50.6% had provided treatment to patients that committed suicide. The rate rose to 62.5% among psychiatrists. The professionals that gave an affirmative response were assessed with Horowitz Impact of Event Scale to determine the severity of trauma. The mean score for the sample was 19.6 (mild severity), with a higher mean observed in women (21.2). A difference was found in the group of younger professionals (20-29 years), who revealed a higher impact of event, with moderate severity (29.0). This difference was numerical and failed to be statistically significant (chi2 (4)=8.2110 p=0.084). Only 11.5% of respondents referred to the need to undergo treatment as a result of a patient's suicide-related death. However, 41.5% experienced a negative impact on their physical or mental health. About 60% of professionals made changes in their clinical practice after a patient's suicide. About 80% of respondents admitted they had not received enough training about suicide. Acknowledging these difficulties and providing support to healthcare professionals is crucial to face these challenges.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Psiquiatria , Suicídio , Argentina , Emoções , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino
16.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 18(9): 88, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27542851

RESUMO

Suicidal behavior is strongly associated with depression, especially if accompanied by behavioral activation, dysphoria, or agitation. It may respond to some treatments, but the design of scientifically sound, ethical trials to test for therapeutic effects on suicidal behavior is highly challenging. In bipolar disorder, and possibly also unipolar major depression, an underprescribed medical intervention with substantial evidence of preventive effects on suicidal behavior is long-term treatment with lithium. It is unclear whether this effect is specifically antisuicidal or reflects beneficial effects of lithium on depression, mood instability, and perhaps aggression and impulsivity. Antisuicidal effects of anticonvulsant mood stabilizers (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproate) appear to be less than with lithium. Further evaluation is needed for potential antisuicidal effects of atypical antipsychotics with growing evidence of efficacy in depression, particularly acute bipolar depression, while generally lacking risk of inducing agitation, mania, or mood instability. Short-term and long-term value and safety of antidepressants are relatively secure for unipolar depression but uncertain and poorly tested for bipolar depression; their effects on suicidal risk in unipolar depression may be age-dependent. Sedative anxiolytics are virtually unstudied as regards suicidal risks. Adequate management of suicidal risks in mood disorder patients requires comprehensive, clinically skillful monitoring and timely interventions.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Transtornos do Humor , Psicotrópicos , Prevenção do Suicídio , Suicídio , Sintomas Comportamentais/diagnóstico , Sintomas Comportamentais/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Transtornos do Humor/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Humor/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos do Humor/psicologia , Psicotrópicos/classificação , Psicotrópicos/farmacologia , Risco Ajustado , Ideação Suicida , Suicídio/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Bipolar Disord ; 17(1): 1-16, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25329791

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder is associated with a high risk of suicide attempts and suicide death. The main objective of the present study was to identify and quantify the demographic and clinical correlates of attempted and completed suicide in people with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Within the framework of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide, a systematic review of articles published since 1980, characterized by the key terms bipolar disorder and 'suicide attempts' or 'suicide', was conducted, and data extracted for analysis from all eligible articles. Demographic and clinical variables for which ≥ 3 studies with usable data were available were meta-analyzed using fixed or random-effects models for association with suicide attempts and suicide deaths. There was considerable heterogeneity in the methods employed by the included studies. RESULTS: Variables significantly associated with suicide attempts were: female gender, younger age at illness onset, depressive polarity of first illness episode, depressive polarity of current or most recent episode, comorbid anxiety disorder, any comorbid substance use disorder, alcohol use disorder, any illicit substance use, comorbid cluster B/borderline personality disorder, and first-degree family history of suicide. Suicide deaths were significantly associated with male gender and first-degree family history of suicide. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reports on the presence and magnitude of the correlates of suicide attempts and suicide deaths in bipolar disorder. These findings do not address causation, and the heterogeneity of data sources should limit the direct clinical ranking of correlates. Our results nonetheless support the notion of incorporating diagnosis-specific data in the development of models of understanding suicide in bipolar disorder.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Sociedades Médicas , Prevenção do Suicídio , Tentativa de Suicídio , Suicídio , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/complicações , Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos da Personalidade/epidemiologia , Psiquiatria Preventiva , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Suicídio/psicologia , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Tentativa de Suicídio/prevenção & controle , Tentativa de Suicídio/psicologia , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 49(11): 1006-20, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26175498

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Many factors influence the likelihood of suicide attempts or deaths in persons with bipolar disorder. One key aim of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide was to summarize the available literature on the presence and magnitude of effect of these factors. METHODS: A systematic review of studies published from 1 January 1980 to 30 May 2014 identified using keywords 'bipolar disorder' and 'suicide attempts or suicide'. This specific paper examined all reports on factors putatively associated with suicide attempts or suicide deaths in bipolar disorder samples. Factors were subcategorized into: (1) sociodemographics, (2) clinical characteristics of bipolar disorder, (3) comorbidities, and (4) other clinical variables. RESULTS: We identified 141 studies that examined how 20 specific factors influenced the likelihood of suicide attempts or deaths. While the level of evidence and degree of confluence varied across factors, there was at least one study that found an effect for each of the following factors: sex, age, race, marital status, religious affiliation, age of illness onset, duration of illness, bipolar disorder subtype, polarity of first episode, polarity of current/recent episode, predominant polarity, mood episode characteristics, psychosis, psychiatric comorbidity, personality characteristics, sexual dysfunction, first-degree family history of suicide or mood disorders, past suicide attempts, early life trauma, and psychosocial precipitants. CONCLUSION: There is a wealth of data on factors that influence the likelihood of suicide attempts and suicide deaths in people with bipolar disorder. Given the heterogeneity of study samples and designs, further research is needed to replicate and determine the magnitude of effect of most of these factors. This approach can ultimately lead to enhanced risk stratification for patients with bipolar disorder.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Comitês Consultivos , Comorbidade , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
19.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 49(9): 785-802, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26185269

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder is associated with elevated risk of suicide attempts and deaths. Key aims of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide included examining the extant literature on epidemiology, neurobiology and pharmacotherapy related to suicide attempts and deaths in bipolar disorder. METHODS: Systematic review of studies from 1 January 1980 to 30 May 2014 examining suicide attempts or deaths in bipolar disorder, with a specific focus on the incidence and characterization of suicide attempts and deaths, genetic and non-genetic biological studies and pharmacotherapy studies specific to bipolar disorder. We conducted pooled, weighted analyses of suicide rates. RESULTS: The pooled suicide rate in bipolar disorder is 164 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval = [5, 324]). Sex-specific data on suicide rates identified a 1.7:1 ratio in men compared to women. People with bipolar disorder account for 3.4-14% of all suicide deaths, with self-poisoning and hanging being the most common methods. Epidemiological studies report that 23-26% of people with bipolar disorder attempt suicide, with higher rates in clinical samples. There are numerous genetic associations with suicide attempts and deaths in bipolar disorder, but few replication studies. Data on treatment with lithium or anticonvulsants are strongly suggestive for prevention of suicide attempts and deaths, but additional data are required before relative anti-suicide effects can be confirmed. There were limited data on potential anti-suicide effects of treatment with antipsychotics or antidepressants. CONCLUSION: This analysis identified a lower estimated suicide rate in bipolar disorder than what was previously published. Understanding the overall risk of suicide deaths and attempts, and the most common methods, are important building blocks to greater awareness and improved interventions for suicide prevention in bipolar disorder. Replication of genetic findings and stronger prospective data on treatment options are required before more decisive conclusions can be made regarding the neurobiology and specific treatment of suicide risk in bipolar disorder.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Encéfalo/patologia , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Comitês Consultivos , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/genética , Transtorno Bipolar/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Neuroimagem , Fatores de Proteção , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 17(8): 1343-52, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24621827

RESUMO

Drug-placebo differences (effect-sizes) in controlled trials of antidepressants for major depressive episodes have declined for several decades, in association with selectively increasing clinical improvement associated with placebo-treatment. As these trends require adequate explanation, we tested the hypothesis that decreasing trial-dropout rates may be an important contributor. We gathered reports of peer-reviewed, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants (1980-2011) by computerized literature searching, and applied meta-analysis, meta-regression and multiple linear regression methods to evaluate associations of dropout rates and other factors of interest, to reporting year and reported efficacy [standardized mean drug-placebo difference (SMD) as Hedges' g-statistic]. In 56 trials meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, we confirmed significant overall efficacy of antidepressants but declining drug-placebo contrasts over the past three decades. Among other changes, there was a corresponding increase in placebo-associated improvement with a decline in placebo-dropout rate, mainly for lack of efficacy. These effects were found only when last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analyses were used. Other trial-design and subject factors, including drug-responses and drug-dropout rates, were much less associated with efficacy. We propose that declining placebo-dropout rates ascribed to inefficacy combined with use of LOCF analyses led to increasing improvement in placebo-arms that contributed to declining antidepressant-placebo contrasts in controlled treatment trials since the 1980s.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/tendências , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeito Placebo , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa