Downstream resource utilization following SPECT: Impact of age and gender.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified a downstream referral age and gender bias for invasive coronary anatomy evaluation after single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI). The present study evaluates if such bias still persists despite advancements in SPECT MPI and angiography. We hypothesized that women and patients ≥80 years old are less likely to undergo invasive coronary angiography after adjusting for clinical and scan variables. METHODS: Patients (n = 3824) who referred to a nuclear cardiology laboratory at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively identified. Regression analysis tested age (<55; 55-69; 70-79; ≥80 years) and gender as predictors of diagnostic angiogram at 90 days post-SPECT after adjustment for known CAD, CAD risk equivalent, SSS, SDS, and LVEF. RESULTS: Younger patients were more likely to undergo an angiogram as compared to octogenarians (77% more likely if <55 years old, 69% if 55-69 years old, and 52% if 70-79 years old). No effect was found for gender. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients were less likely to be referred for angiogram as compared to their younger counterparts. Further study is needed to determine which factors guide this decision-making process in older adults and the influence of these factors on the referral bias.

The long-term impact of an interprofessional humanistic faculty development programme: A qualitative investigation.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: While it has long been supported that faculty development programmes serve as a means to improving practical knowledge, professional skills, and identity formation for faculty, significantly less research is focused on how learning that occurs in faculty development programmes is actually employed in the workplace and ingrained in day-to-day activities. The present study qualitatively explored the long-term impact of the Mentoring and Professionalism in Training (MAP-IT) programme, a longitudinal, interprofessional faculty development curriculum designed to enhance clinicians' humanistic mentoring skills, specifically nurses and physicians. METHOD: Participants included 21 former high-potential mentors and facilitator leaders who had graduated from the MAP-IT programme from 2014 to 2016. Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted between August and September of 2017 to collect participant experiences of the impact of MAP-IT skills on their professional roles (with colleagues and patients) in their clinical environments. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis methodology. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses using an editing analysis style resulted in nine major themes, including incorporation into clinical practice, self-care, team building and conflict resolution, mindfulness, mentorship, professionalism, interprofessional collaboration, humanism, and appreciative inquiry. CONCLUSION: The personal and professional development instilled through the MAP-IT programme was found to remain important over time, years after participation in the programme had concluded, supporting its "durability." Implications are also discussed.

A Mixed-Methods Approach to Humanistic Interprofessional Faculty Development.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Mentoring and Professionalism in Training (MAP-IT) program, a longitudinal, interprofessional faculty development curriculum designed to enhance clinicians' humanistic mentoring skills, specifically nurses and physicians. METHODS: During 2014 to 2016, two consecutive cohorts of nurses and physicians completed the MAP-IT program. Participants included 169 high potential mentors (HPMs) and 61 facilitator leaders. Each 10-month program consisted of small group work, experiential learning, and critical reflection aimed at enhancing humanistic mentoring skills. Throughout the program, facilitator leaders served as mentors for the HPMs. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected to measure changes in skill levels specific to humanistic teaching practices, as well as overall evaluation of the program's curriculum and logistics. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, descriptive statistics, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Qualitative data assessing the overall impact and applicability of the program to the clinical setting were analyzed using content analysis methodology. RESULTS: Across cohorts, HPMs demonstrated significant increases in perceptions of humanistic teaching skills. During objective structured teaching simulations, significant increases were also found in HPMs' self-reported mentoring skills and their skills as rated by a standardized RN/MD. Qualitative analyses revealed themes of the program to be skill development and application, mentorship, humanism, mindfulness, self-care, and acknowledgment of overlapping interprofessional roles. DISCUSSION: Utilizing an interprofessional education approach, the MAP-IT program was determined to be a feasible strategy to positively impact the personal and professional development of nurses and physicians.

Comparison of the Diameters of the Major Epicardial Coronary Arteries by Angiogram in Asian-Indians Versus European Americans <40 Years of Age Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) rates are higher in Asian-Indians than in Caucasians. CAD occurs at an earlier age in this group, with about a quarter of all myocardial infarctions occurring under the age of 40. Previous reports have suggested smaller coronary artery size in Asian-Indians as a major cause for increased CAD in this population. This study sought to evaluate the size of normal "atheroma-free" segments of the epicardial coronary arteries in Asian-Indians and Caucasians aged ≤40 years undergoing coronary artery intervention in other diseased segments. A total of 69 consecutive patients (41 whites, 28 Asian-Indians) aged ≤40 years were evaluated. Angiograms were analyzed using standard quality control analysis software with digital acquisition. The arteries measured were the left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and the right coronary artery. Conventional risk factors, including hypertension, smoking, and diabetes, that could influence coronary size were also assessed. The coronary arteries of Asian-Indian patients showed significantly smaller values in the mean diameters of the left main (2.96 mm vs 4.04 mm, p = 0.0004), left anterior descending (2.48 mm vs 3.24 mm, p = 0.0005), left circumflex (2.52 mm vs 3.06 mm, p = 0.00002), and right coronary artery (2.71 mm vs 3.65 mm, p = 0.0008) as compared with Caucasians. Even after correction for body surface area, a statistically significant difference remained in coronary artery diameters. In conclusion, statistically significant difference in the mean diameter size even after correction for body surface area in Asian-Indians has implications for predisposition to atherosclerosis, and more challenging performance of procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting, stent implantation, or atherectomy.