Comparison of clinical features and drug therapies among European and Latin American patients with juvenile dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the demographic features, presenting manifestations, diagnostic investigations, disease course, and drug therapies of children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) followed in Europe and Latin America. METHODS: Patients were inception cohorts seen between 1980 and 2004 in 27 paediatric rheumatology centres. The following information was collected through the review of patient charts: sex; age at disease onset; date of disease onset and diagnosis; onset type; presenting clinical features; diagnostic investigations; course type; and medications received during disease course. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety patients (65.5% females, mean onset age 7.0 years, mean disease duration 7.7 years) were included. Disease presentation was acute or insidious in 57.1% and 42.9% of the patients, respectively. The course type was monophasic in 41.3% of patients and chronic polycyclic or continuous in 58.6% of patients. The more common presenting manifestations were muscle weakness (84.9%), Gottron's papules (72.9%), heliotrope rash (62%), and malar rash (56.7%). Overall, the demographic and clinical features of the 2 continental cohorts were comparable. European patients received more frequently high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine, while methotrexate and antimalarials medications were used more commonly by Latin American physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The demographic and clinical characteristics of JDM are similar in European and Latin American patients. We found, however, several differences in the use of medications between European and Latin American paediatric rheumatologists.

Clinical assessment in juvenile dermatomyositis.

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a multisystem inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that affects primarily the skin and muscles. Although the prognosis of JDM has improved considerably in the last three decades, a number of patients may develop irreversible damage due to the disease activity or its treatment. This damage may cause permanent disability and affect the quality of life of patients and their families. In the clinical management of patients with JDM, there is, therefore, the need of monitoring the level of disease activity, the accrual of organ damage, and the impact of the illness on patients' daily living. A reliable assessment of these different aspects of disease requires the availability of well-designed and standardized clinical tools. In the recent years, there has been increasing collaborative effort to devise new assessment measures and these measures have been included into disease activity and damage core sets of outcome variables that have been developed through international consensus. In addition, preliminary definitions of clinical improvement for patients with JDM and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies have been created. In this review, the latest advances in the development of standardized instruments for the clinical assessment of JDM patients are illustrated and the recent international efforts that have led to the development of core sets of outcome measures and to preliminary definitions of improvement for JDM clinical trials are summarized.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of juvenile dermatomyositis: a multinational, multicenter study of 490 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) through a multinational, multicenter study. METHODS: Patients consisted of inception cohorts seen between 1980 and 2004 in 27 centers in Europe and Latin America. Predictor variables were sex, continent, ethnicity, onset year, onset age, onset type, onset manifestations, course type, disease duration, and active disease duration. Outcomes were muscle strength/endurance, continued disease activity, cumulative damage, muscle damage, cutaneous damage, calcinosis, lipodystrophy, physical function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: A total of 490 patients with a mean disease duration of 7.7 years were included. At the cross-sectional visit, 41.2-52.8% of patients, depending on the instrument used, had reduced muscle strength/endurance, but less than 10% had severe impairment. Persistently active disease was recorded in 41.2-60.5% of the patients, depending on the activity measure used. Sixty-nine percent of the patients had cumulative damage. The frequency of calcinosis and lipodystrophy was 23.6% and 9.7%, respectively. A total of 40.7% of the patients had decreased functional ability, but only 6.5% had major impairment. Only a small fraction had decreased HRQOL. A chronic course, either polycyclic or continuous, consistently predicted a poorer outcome. Mortality rate was 3.1%. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the marked improvement in functional outcome of juvenile DM when compared with earlier literature. However, many patients had continued disease activity and cumulative damage at followup. A chronic course was the strongest predictor of poor prognosis. These findings highlight the need for treatment strategies that enable a better control of disease activity over time and the reduction of nonreversible damage.

Validation of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire in active juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ) as a measure of disability in patients with active juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Of 557 patients with juvenile SLE included in the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) database, 504 (90.5%) were included in the present study and underwent C-HAQ assessment at the time of a major therapeutic intervention and then after 6 months. Validation procedures, according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter for outcome measures in rheumatology, included assessment of responsiveness, feasibility, internal consistency, construct validity, collinearity, and discriminative ability. Response to therapy was evaluated with the PRINTO/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) juvenile SLE definition of improvement. RESULTS: At baseline, patients showed a high level of disease activity (mean physician global 5.8) and moderate disability (mean C-HAQ 0.83); both disease activity and disability improved after 6 months of treatment. The change in C-HAQ score correlated moderately with the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (r(s) = 0.42), parent's global assessment of pain and well-being (r(s) = 0.55 and 0.53, respectively), and the physical summary score of the Child Health Questionnaire (r(s) = -0.61), and poorly with other clinical and laboratory parameters. The absolute change in C-HAQ demonstrated a significant ability to discriminate between patients who improved and those who did not improve based on the PRINTO/ACR definition of improvement. Responsiveness of the C-HAQ was moderate (standardized response mean 0.74). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96). CONCLUSION: The C-HAQ showed moderate responsiveness to clinical change, construct validity, good feasibility, internal consistency, and discriminative ability. These findings demonstrate that the C-HAQ represents a good measure to capture disability in patients with active juvenile SLE.

The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization/American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the definition of improvement.

OBJECTIVE: To use the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) core set of outcome measures to develop a validated definition of improvement for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Thirty-seven experienced pediatric rheumatologists from 27 countries, each of whom had specific experience in the assessment of juvenile SLE patients, achieved consensus on 128 patient profiles as being clinically improved or not improved. Using the physicians' consensus ratings as the gold standard measure, the chi-square, sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and false-negative rates, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and kappa level of agreement for 597 candidate definitions of improvement were calculated. Only definitions with a kappa value greater than 0.7 were retained. The top definitions were selected based on the product of the content validity score multiplied by its kappa statistic. RESULTS: The definition of improvement with the highest final score was at least 50% improvement from baseline in any 2 of the 5 core set measures, with no more than 1 of the remaining worsening by more than 30%. CONCLUSION: PRINTO proposes a valid and reproducible definition of improvement that reflects well the consensus rating of experienced clinicians and that incorporates clinically meaningful change in core set measures in a composite end point for the evaluation of global response to therapy in patients with juvenile SLE. The definition is now proposed for use in juvenile SLE clinical trials and may help physicians to decide whether a child with SLE responded adequately to therapy.