Pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail in pretreated patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical or endometrial carcinoma: Results of the phase II PRIMMO study.

A phase II study (PRIMMO) of patients with pretreated persistent/recurrent/metastatic cervical or endometrial cancer is presented. Patients received an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail (IDC) consisting of low-dose cyclophosphamide, aspirin, lansoprazole, vitamin D, and curcumin starting 2 weeks before radioimmunotherapy. Pembrolizumab was administered three-weekly from day 15 onwards; one of the tumor lesions was irradiated (8Gyx3) on days 15, 17, and 19. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate per immune-related response criteria (irORR) at week 26 (a lower bound of the 90% confidence interval [CI] of > 10% was considered efficacious). The prespecified 43 patients (cervical, n = 18; endometrial, n = 25) were enrolled. The irORR was 11.1% (90% CI 2.0-31.0) in cervical cancer and 12.0% (90% CI 3.4-28.2) in endometrial cancer. Median duration of response was not reached in both cohorts. Median interval-censored progression-free survival was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1-25.7) in cervical cancer and 3.6 weeks (95% CI 3.6-15.4) in endometrial cancer; median overall survival was 39.6 weeks (95% CI 15.0-67.0) and 37.4 weeks (95% CI 19.0-50.3), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10 (55.6%) cervical cancer patients and 9 (36.0%) endometrial cancer patients. Health-related quality of life was generally stable over time. Responders had a significantly higher proportion of peripheral T cells when compared to nonresponders (p = 0.013). In conclusion, PRIMMO did not meet its primary objective in both cohorts; pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an IDC had modest but durable antitumor activity with acceptable but not negligible toxicity.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03192059) and EudraCT Registry (number 2016-001569-97).

The potential and controversy of targeting STAT family members in cancer.

The Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) family of proteins consists of transcription factors that play a complex and essential role in the regulation of physiologic cell processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and angiogenesis, and serves to organize the epigenetic landscape of immune cells. To date, seven STAT genes have been identified in the human genome; STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b and STAT6. They all account for diverse effects in response to extracellular signaling proteins, mainly by altering gene transcription in the effector cells. Members of the STAT family have been implicated in human cancer development, progression, metastasis, survival and resistance to treatment. Particularly STAT3 and STAT5 are of interest in cancer biology. They are currently considered as oncogenes, but their signaling is embedded into a complex and delicate balance between different (counteracting) transcription factors, and thus, in some contexts they can have a tumor suppressive role. Assessing STAT signaling mutations as well as screening for aberrant STAT pathway activation may have a role to predict sensitivity to immunotherapy and targeted STAT inhibition. In the present comprehensive review of the literature, we discuss in-depth the role of each STAT family member in cancer, assemble cutting-edge information on the use of these molecules as potential biomarkers and targets for treatment, and address why their clinical implementation is controversy.

Targeting the PD-1 Axis with Pembrolizumab for Recurrent or Metastatic Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Brief Update.

Even though cervical cancer is partly preventable, it still poses a great public health problem throughout the world. Current therapies have vastly improved the clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients, but progress in new systemic treatment modalities has been slow in the last years. Especially for patients with advanced disease this is discouraging, as their prognosis remains very poor. The pathogen-induced nature, the considerable mutational load, the involvement of genes regulating the immune response, and the high grade of immune infiltration, suggest that immunotherapy might be a promising strategy to treat cervical cancer. In this literature review, we focus on the use of PD-1 blocking therapy in cervical cancer, pembrolizumab in particular, as it is the only approved immunotherapy for this disease. We discuss why it has great clinical potential, how it opens doors for personalized treatment in cervical cancer, and which trials are aiming to expand its clinical use.

Acceptability of quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer: results of an online survey.

BACKGROUND: Measuring quality indicators (QI's) is a tool to improve the quality of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of 36 QI's, defined after a literature search for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer. Relevant specialists in the field of interest were surveyed. METHODS: To quantify the opinions of these specialists, an online survey was sent out via mailing to members of gynaecological or oncological societies. The relevance of each QI was questioned on a scale from one to five (1 = irrelevant, 2 = less relevant, 3 = no opinion/neutral, 4 = relevant, 5 = very relevant). If a QI received a score of 4 or 5 in 65% or more of the answers, we state that the respondents consider this QI to be sufficiently relevant to use in daily practice. RESULTS: The survey was visited 238 times and resulted in 53 complete responses (29 Belgian, 24 other European countries). The majority of the specialists were gynaecologists (45%). Five of the 36 QI's (13,9%) did not reach the cut-off of 65%: referral to a tertiary center, preoperative staging of endometrial cancer by MRI, preoperative staging of cervical cancer by positron-emission tomography, incorporation of intracavitary brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer, reporting ASA and WHO score for each patient. After removing the 5 QI's that were not considered as relevant by the specialists and 3 additional 3 QI's that we were considered to be superfluous, we obtained an optimized QI list. CONCLUSION: As QI's gain importance in gynecological oncology, their use can only be of value if they are universally interpreted in the same manner. We propose an optimized list of 28 QI's for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer which responders of our survey found relevant. Further validation is needed to finalize and define a set of QI's that can be used in future studies, audits and benchmarking.

RANK-RANKL Signaling in Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Review.

RANK ligand (RANKL) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor alpha superfamily of cytokines. It is the only known ligand binding to a membrane receptor named receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK), thereby triggering recruitment of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor associated factor (TRAF) adaptor proteins and activation of downstream pathways. RANK/RANKL signaling is controlled by a decoy receptor called osteoprotegerin (OPG), but also has additional more complex levels of regulation. The existing literature on RANK/RANKL signaling in cervical cancer was reviewed, particularly focusing on the effects on the microenvironment. RANKL and RANK are frequently co-expressed in cervical cancer cells lines and in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. RANKL and OPG expression strongly increases during cervical cancer progression. RANKL is directly secreted by cervical cancer cells, which may be a mechanism they use to create an immune suppressive environment. RANKL induces expression of multiple activating cytokines by dendritic cells. High RANK mRNA levels and high immunohistochemical OPG expression are significantly correlated with high clinical stage, tumor grade, presence of lymph node metastases, and poor overall survival. Inhibition of RANKL signaling has a direct effect on tumor cell proliferation and behavior, but also alters the microenvironment. Abundant circumstantial evidence suggests that RANKL inhibition may (partially) reverse an immunosuppressive status. The use of denosumab, a monoclonal antibody directed to RANKL, as an immunomodulatory strategy is an attractive concept which should be further explored in combination with immune therapy in patients with cervical cancer.

Establishment and characterization of uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma patient-derived xenograft models.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine sarcomas (US) and carcinosarcomas (CS) are rare, aggressive cancers. The lack of reliable preclinical models hampers the search for new treatment strategies and predictive biomarkers. To this end, we established and characterized US and CS patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. METHODS: Tumor fragments of US and CS were subcutaneously implanted into immunocompromised mice. Engrafted xenograft and original tumors were compared by means of histology, immunohistochemistry, whole-genome low-coverage sequencing for copy number variations, and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Of 13 implanted leiomyosarcomas (LMS), 10 engrafted (engraftment rate of 77%). Also 2 out of 7 CS (29%) and one high-grade US (not otherwise specified) models were successfully established. LMS xenografts showed high histological similarity to their corresponding human tumors. Expression of desmin and/or H-caldesmon was detected in 8/10 LMS PDX models. We noticed that in CS models, characterized by the concomitant presence of a mesenchymal and an epithelial component, the relative distribution of the components is varying over the generations, as confirmed by changes in vimentin and cytokeratin expression. The similarity in copy number profiles between original and xenograft tumors ranged from 57.7% to 98.2% for LMS models and from 47.4 to 65.8% for CS models. Expression pattern stability was assessed by clustering RNA expression levels of original and xenograft tumors. Six xenografts clustered together with their original tumor, while 3 (all LMS) clustered apart. CONCLUSIONS: We present here a panel of clinically annotated uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma PDX models, which will be a useful tool for preclinical testing of new therapies.

Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the risk of metastasis in the remaining non-SLNs when the SLN is positive and to identify the factors that can predict this risk. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent primary surgery for endometrial carcinoma with lymphadenectomy and SLN mapping (November 2010-November 2013) in our center. SLNs were ultra-staged on final pathology. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were included. Overall, 43/268 patients (16%) were found to have SLN metastasis: macro-metastasis in 24 patients, micro-metastasis in 7 and ITC in 12. Non-SLN metastases were found in 15 of the 43 patients (34.8%) with positive SLN. Size of the SLN metastasis was the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of non-SLN metastasis (p=0.005). When the size of the SLN metastasis was ≤2mm, the risk of having another positive lymph node was only 5%, conversely, when the size of the SLN metastasis was >2mm, the risk of having another positive lymph node was 60.8% (p<0.0001). Histologic type, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, cervical stromal invasion and CA-125 were not predictive. CONCLUSION: When the SLN is positive, the risk of metastasis in the remaining non-SLNs was 34.8%. Size of the metastasis within the SLN was the only factor that could predict the risk of non-SLN metastasis; 2mm seems to be the cutoff size below which the risk of non-SLN metastasis is low.

Sentinel node mapping with indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer. A pilot study and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: Indocyanine green (ICG) with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging is a new tracer modality used for lymphatic mapping. We report our initial experience with ICG for SLN mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer using a new endoscopic fluorescence imaging system. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent primary surgery for early-stage endometrial and cervical carcinoma with SLN mapping using fluorescence imaging followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy from February to July 2014. Intracervical injection of ICG at 3 and 9 o'clock was performed in all cases. SLNs were ultrastaged on final pathology. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in the study (42 endometrial and 8 cervical cancers). The median age was 62 (24-88) and median BMI 29 (19-56). The median SLN count was 3.1 (0-7) and median lymph node count was 15 (2-37). The overall and bilateral detection rate was 96% (48/50) and 88% (44/50). Positive SLNs were identified in 22% of patients (11/50), including 8 isolated tumor cells (ITC), 2 micrometastasis and 1 macrometastasis. There was one side-specific false negative case. Sensitivity, specificity and NPV were 93.3%, 100% and 98.7% respectively per side. Paraaortic node dissection was performed in 22% of cases. Two had paraaortic node metastasis both in patients with positive pelvic SLN. There were no allergic reactions to the ICG. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our pilot experience, NIR fluorescence imaging with ICG is an excellent and safe tracer modality for SLN mapping with a very high overall (96%) and bilateral (88%) detection rate.

Is a More Comprehensive Surgery Necessary in Patients With Uterine Serous Carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer that shares similarities to serous ovarian cancer, with a propensity for spread to the upper abdomen, a high recurrence rate, and a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the traditional surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer was adequate for USC or whether a more extensive surgery, similar to the staging procedure for ovarian cancer, needs to be performed. Specifically, the roles of omentectomy and sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping were evaluated. METHODS: We retrospectively identified cases of presumed clinical stage I USC at our institution from April 2005 to March 2014. Medical records were reviewed for the following information: age at diagnosis, preoperative imaging, operative findings, surgical procedure, and final histology with definitive International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients with presumed clinical stage I USC were identified. According to the final pathology report, the surgical stage was as follows: 17 stage IA (44%), 8 stage IB (20%), 3 stage II (8%), 2 stage IIIA (5%), 6 stage IIIC1 (15%), 1 IIIC2 (3%), and 2 stage IVB (5%). Therefore, 14 patients (36%) were surgically upstaged, but none of the patients had their clinical disease upstaged by virtue of finding microscopic metastatic disease in an otherwise normal-looking omentum. Sentinel lymph node mapping was performed in 19 patients (42%). Sensitivity and negative predictive value of SLN mapping were 100% when at least 1 SLN was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of microscopic disease in radiologically and clinically normal-appearing omentum seems to be rare in USC. Sentinel lymph node mapping seems to be valuable in the serous subtype of endometrial cancer. A less extensive surgery may be possible in patients with USC as it seems to provide the same information as a more extensive surgery.

Extra-anogenital giant cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas require multidisciplinary management.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a highly prevalent cancer and the majority of cSCC have a good prognosis. However, a subset of cSCC can progress to advanced disease. We present the first reported case of a giant cSCC located on the breast. In addition, a systematic literature search on extra-anogenital giant (EAG) cSCC was performed using Pubmed and MEDLINE databases. Thirty-one articles could be retained which were relevant for this review. A total of 42 well-described cases were identified. Median age at presentation was 70 years (range 9-100 years). Twenty-four (57%) patients were male, eighteen were female (43%). The estimated median delay of treatment was 12 months (range 1 to >240 months). In 27 patients (64%) the giant cSCC was localized on the neck, face or scalp, 6 on the thoracic wall or back (14%), 4 on the lower limb (10%), 2 on the hip or buttock (5%), 2 on the upper limb (5%), one (2%) on the breast. Tumor stage at presentation was T2, T3 and T4 in respectively 26 (62%), 11 (26%) and 5 (12%) cases. Lymph node metastases were identified in 1 patient (2%) and distant metastases in another patient (2%). In 34 out of 42 cases (81%) primary radical surgical excision was performed, 3 received radiotherapy, 2 chemotherapy and 3 palliative care. In the cases with reported follow-up, four patients (4/30: 13%) died of disease. The treatment of EAG cSCC poses many problems, making a multidisciplinary approach of paramount importance.

The Evolution and Prognostic Role of Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Peripheral Blood-Based Biomarkers in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of breast cancer (BC) in which the (prognostic) role of stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) and the peripheral circulating immune cells in patients with residual disease (RD) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not clearly established. METHODOLOGY: To describe the evolution of sTIL and some peripheral inflammation markers (Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio) after NACT in IBC, we retrospectively collected clinicopathological variables for 125 stage III IBC patients. sTILs were scored by three different researchers on an H&E slide of the mastectomy specimen. A cohort of subtype-matched non-IBC breast cancer patients (nIBC) treated with NACT was included for comparison. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the pre- and posttreatment sTIL scores between IBC and nIBC and in both groups the number of sTIL was significantly lower after NACT. However, the IBC phenotype did correlate with a stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.073-0.76, p = 0.018). The change in the peripheral immune markers was not significantly different between IBC and nIBC. After NACT, 75 patients had residual disease. In this group, a high number of sTIL before NACT (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.05-1.02, p = 0.05) was prognostic for a longer OS, while a low number of sTIL after NACT (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.98, p = 0.046) and a low residual cancer cellularity (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08-0.52, p < 0.001) was associated with a longer DFS. CONCLUSIONS: IBC is associated with a significantly stronger decrease of sTIL after NACT compared to nIBC. Furthermore, a high number of sTIL after NACT was associated with a worse prognosis in IBC.

SARS-CoV-2 and cancer: Are they really partners in crime?

The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has overwhelmed health care systems in many countries. The clinical presentation of the SARS-CoV-2 varies between a subclinical or flu-like syndrome to that of severe pneumonia with multi-organ failure and death. Initial reports have suggested that cancer patients may have a higher susceptibility to get infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus but current evidence remains poor as it is biased by important confounders. Patients with ongoing or recent cancer treatment for advanced active disease, metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies are at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 respiratory disease that requires hospitalization and have a poorer disease outcome compared to individuals without cancer. However it is not clear whether these are independent risk factors, or mainly driven by male gender, age, obesity, performance status, uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease and various other medical conditions. These often have a greater influence on the probability to die due to SARS-CoV-2 then cancer. Delayed diagnosis and suboptimal cancer management due to the pandemic results in disease upstaging and has considerable impact cancer on specific death rates. Surgery during the peak of the pandemic seems to increase mortality, but there is no convincing evidence that adjuvant systemic cancer therapy and radiotherapy are contraindicated, implicating that cancer treatment can be provided safely after individual risk/benefit assessment and some adaptive measures. Underlying immunosuppression, elevated cytokine levels, altered expression of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE-2) and TMPRSS2, and a prothrombotic status may fuel the effects of a SARS-CoV-2 in some cancer patients, but have the potential to be used as biomarkers for severe disease and therapeutic targets. The rapidly expanding literature on COVID-19 should be interpreted with care as it is often hampered by methodological and statistical flaws.

Relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients is associated with a gene expression signature characteristic for inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We hypothesize that a gene expression profile characteristic for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with rapid cancer dissemination and poor survival, might be related to tumor aggressiveness in non-IBC (nIBC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RNA from 17 IBC samples and 40 nIBC samples was hybridized onto Affymetrix chips. A gene signature predictive of IBC was identified and applied onto 1,157 nIBC samples with survival data of 881 nIBC samples. Samples were classified as IBC-like or nIBC-like. The IBC signature classification was compared with the classifications according to other prognostically relevant gene signatures and clinicopathologic variables. In addition, relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared by the Kaplan-Meyer method. RESULTS: Classification according to the IBC signature is significantly (P < 0.05) associated with the cell-of-origin subtypes, the wound healing response, the invasive gene signature, the genomic grade index, the fibroblastic neoplasm signature, and the 70-gene prognostic signature. Significant associations (P < 0.01) were found between the IBC signature and tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, ErbB2 status, and patient age at diagnosis. Patients with an IBC-like phenotype show a significantly shorter RFS interval (P < 0.05). Oncomine analysis identified cell motility as an important concept linked with the IBC signature. CONCLUSIONS: We show that nIBC carcinomas having an IBC-like phenotype have a reduced RFS interval. This suggests that IBC and nIBC show comparable phenotypic traits, for example augmented cell motility, with respect to aggressive tumor cell behavior. This observation lends credit to the use of IBC to study aggressive tumor cell behavior.

Quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Measuring quality indicators improves the quality of care. The aim of this review is to identify a set of quality indicators (QIs) that can be used to measure the standard of treatment for patients with endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in the Pubmed and Google Scholar database. Articles related to the field of interest, which covered QIs for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer, were included if they were written in English and available in full text. Articles related to prevention, screening, diagnosis, quality of life and patient satisfaction were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 57 suitable articles was found: 13 for endometrial cancer, 17 for cervical cancer and 27 for ovarian cancer. An overview of the selected QIs was made and classified by type of indicator. Relevant QIs related to the structural organisation of health care are: referral to high volume specialists in high volume hospitals, treatment by specialized gynecological oncologists and discussion of treatment plan by a multidisciplinary team according to current guidelines. Important process measures are: a patient report of high quality, an adequate pretreatment staging and an adherence to treatment guidelines. The ultimate goal is to reduce treatment related morbidity and increase the survival rate, which can be measured as outcome indicators. CONCLUSION: The proposed set of QIs should be validated and can be implemented into quality assurance programmes to improve the quality of care and the outcome of patients with a gynecological cancer.

The association between type of endocrine therapy and development of estrogen receptor-1 mutation(s) in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer has, due to its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular type of breast cancer is the luminal subtype, which expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors and is typically treated with surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and ET represents a major treatment modality in ERα-positive cancers. However, resistance to different ET evolves frequently, leading to disease progression or recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. Acquired mutations in the Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) of the ERα referred as ESR1 mutations; could be selected by ET itself leading to resistance over the course of ET therapy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review is to estimate the effect of Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs), Tamoxifen (TAM) and Fulvestrant (FUL) on the development of ESR1 mutations in hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of qualitative studies published between January 1st, 2007 and March 1st, 2019 was conducted using the PubMed and Thomas Reuters Web of Science databases. Search terms included ESR1 mutations, estrogen receptor, breast cancer, recurrent, metastatic disease, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant and tamoxifen. Only full-text studies in English concerning the development of ESR1 mutations and their outcomes on disease progression were included. Selection of studies was performed using predefined data fields, taking study quality indicators into consideration. Inclusion criteria of the study populations were: Ghoncheh et al. (2016) [1] female patients above 18 years; Nielsen et al. (2011) [2] Estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in the advanced setting; Reinert et al. (2017) [3] previous exposure to endocrine therapy including SERDs (preferably Fulvestrant), SERMs (preferably Tamoxifen) or Aromatase Inhibitors. RESULTS: The current review enrolled 16 articles, including 4 multicentre double blinded RCTs and 12 cohorts and comprising a total of 2632 patients. The overall incidence rate of the ESR1 mutation was 24% (95% CI: 18%-31%). We observed that D538G was the most frequent ESR1 mutation. Several studies showed that prior endocrine therapy (AIs, TAM, FUL) could result in an ESR1 mutation and therapy resistance leading to disease progression or recurrence. Different mechanisms had been implied to explain the underlying ET resistance. One of the key findings of this work is the significant difference in ESR1 mutation incidence between patients with and without AI therapy (OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 3.28-26.62, P ≤.001). CONCLUSION: ESR1 mutations are not uncommon phenomenon in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. There is a significant higher incidence rate of ESR1 mutations in patients with previous AI-containing therapeutic regimens, compared to those who received non-AI containing regimes. These ESR1 mutations could lead to the development of complete endocrine resistance to AI, whereas only partial resistance is seen in case of TAM or FUL.

The prevalence of estrogen receptor-1 mutation in advanced breast cancer: The estrogen receptor one study (EROS1).

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer has, due its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular variety of breast cancer is luminal subtype that expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and hormonal therapy represents a major treatment modality in all stages of ER positive breast cancers. Acquired mutations in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ERα, referred as ESR1 mutation, result in resistance to different endocrine therapies leading to disease progression or recurrence. Recent studies reviled that these ESR1 mutations lead to constitutive activity of the estrogen receptor ER, meaning that the receptor is active in absence of its ligand conferring resistance against endocrine therapy and tumor growth. Published studies have not yet been able to determine the exact prevalence rate of ESR1 mutations, but set the outer boundaries between 11-55%. PURPOSE: The goal of the present study is to determine the frequency rate of ESR1 mutations in ER positive recurrent breast cancer by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp University Hospital. The seven most common ESR1mutations (c.1138G>C (p. (E380Q)), c.1610A>G (p.(Y537C)), c.1613A>G (p.(p.D538G)), c.1607T>G (p.(L536R)), c.1387T>C (p.S463R)), c.16410A>C (p.(Y537S)), c.609T>A (p.(Y537N)) were assessed in available baseline plasma samples of 21 patients with ER positive recurrent breast cancer. Inclusion criteria for study participation were: female, age above 18 years, ER positive breast cancer, 5years adjuvant hormonal therapy of primary disease, and disease recurrence or metastasis during or after stop of endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS: cfDNA was obtained from 21 patients with recurrent breast cancer. ESR1 mutations were found in 4/21 (19%; 95% CI, 5%-42%). The test sensitivity was lower than the targeted value <0.1% in 29% of patients (6/21). No significant statistical difference in baseline clinical characteristics was observed in patients with wild-type and mutant ER (p>0.05). Adjuvant endocrine therapy for primary disease was Tamoxifen (TAM) for 57% of patients (12 of 21) of whom 8 patients had received aromatase inhibitor (AI) after two years, while 43% of patients (9 of 21) had received AI as first line adjuvant hormonal therapy. All the patients had received aromatase inhibitor AI therapy in first or second line therapy with initially a variable period of good response. CONCLUSION: ESR1 mutation analysis could be determined in archived plasma samples using simple non-invasive methods. In the future, screening for mutation status could improve the therapeutic strategies in controlling ER signaling before the occurrence of wide spread disease metastasis.

Potential new biomarkers for squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

AIM: An in silico pathway analysis was performed in an attempt to identify new biomarkers for cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Three publicly available Affymetrix gene expression data sets (GSE5787, GSE7803, GSE9750) were retrieved, vouching for a total 9 cervical cancer cell lines, 39 normal cervical samples, 7 CIN3 samples and 111 cervical cancer samples. An Agilent data set (GSE7410; 5 normal cervical samples, 35 samples from invasive cervical cancer) was selected as a validation set. Predication analysis of microarrays was performed in the Affymetrix sets to identify cervical cancer biomarkers. We compared the lists of differentially expressed genes between normal and CIN3 samples on the one hand (n=1923) and between CIN3 and invasive cancer samples on the other hand (n=628). RESULTS: Seven probe sets were identified that were significantly overexpressed (at least 2 fold increase expression level, and false discovery rate <5%) in both CIN3 samples respective to normal samples and in cancer samples respective to CIN3 samples. From these, five probes sets could be validated in the Agilent data set (P<0.001) comparing the normal with the invasive cancer samples, corresponding to the genes DTL, HMGB3, KIF2C, NEK2 and RFC4. These genes were additionally overexpressed in cervical cancer cell lines respective to the cancer samples. The literature on these markers was reviewed. CONCLUSION: Novel biomarkers in combination with primary human papilloma virus (HPV) testing may allow complete cervical screening by objective, non-morphological molecular methods, which may be particularly important in developing countries.

The role of Nuclear Factor-kappa B signaling in human cervical cancer.

Background The Nuclear Factor kappaB (NF-kB) family consists of transcription factors that play a complex and essential role in the regulation of immune responses and inflammation. NF-kB has recently generated considerable interest as it has been implicated in human cancer initiation, progression and resistance to treatment. In the present comprehensive review the different aspects of NF-kB signaling in the carcinogenesis of cancer of the uterine cervix are discussed. NF-kB functions as part of a network, which determines the pattern of its effects on the expression of several other genes (such as crosstalks with reactive oxygen species, p53, STAT3 and miRNAS) and thus its function. Activation of NF-kB triggered by a HPV infection is playing an important role in the innate and adaptive immune response of the host. The virus induces down regulation of NF-kB to liquidate the inhibitory activity for its replication triggered by the immune system leading a status of persistant HPV infection. During the progression to high grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer NF-KB becomes constitutionally activated again. Mutations in NF-kB genes are rare in solid tumors but mutations of upstream signaling molecules such as RAS, EGFR, PGF, HER2 have been implicated in elevated NF-kB signaling. NF-kB can stimulate transcription of proliferation regulating genes (eg. cyclin D1 and c-myc), genes involved in metastasis, VEGF dependent angiogenesis and cell immortality by telomerase. NF-kB activation can also induce the expression of activation-induced cytodine deaminase (AID) and the APOBEC proteins, providing a mechanistic link between the NF-kB pathway and mutagenic characteristic of cervical cancer. Inhibition of NF-kB has the potential to be used to reverse resistance to radiotherapy and systemic anti-cancer medication, but currently no clinicaly active NF-kB targeting strategies are available.

The thoughts of breast cancer survivors regarding the need for starting hormone replacement therapy.

UNLABELLED: There is not only a need for scientific data regarding the risk of recurrence of breast cancer by starting hormone replacement therapy (HRT) but also regarding the patients' needs for HRT. OBJECTIVES: To examine the severity of climacteric complaints in breast cancer patients and to examine if they are willing to take HRT. METHODS: In November 2003, a questionnaire was sent to 469 breast cancer survivors. The survey examined on a scale base the severity of climacteric complaints and the patient's opinion on starting HRT. RESULTS: More than 76% of the patients complained that they experience or had experienced hot flushes or night sweating. More than half (53%) of this group found the inconvenience severe to extreme, affecting the patient's quality of life. A majority (80.5%) patients who had already taken HRT, found that it improved their quality of life substantially. When the results of observational studies were explained regarding HRT in breast cancer survivors, a majority said they would take or would consider taking HRT (57.9%). CONCLUSION: While physicians are more reserved in prescribing HRT in breast cancer survivors, a combination of severe symptomatic climacteric complaints and the willingness of the patient to be treated should at least result in a "consideration" of prescribing HRT.

The thoughts of physicians regarding the need to start hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how physicians felt about HRT use in breast cancer survivors a half year after the WHI trial. METHODS: In December 2002, a questionnaire was conducted in Flanders (Belgium). The survey contained a presentation of a 35-year-old breast cancer survivor who presented with climacteric symptoms after treatment with tamoxifen. RESULTS: With a response rate of 33.65%, a majority of the physicians did not prescribe classical oral HRT (5.40%) in this patient. Physicians prefer to prescribe tibolone (30.68%) or other alternative treatment (50.00%). The main reason was the fear for increased recurrence of breast cancer. Furthermore the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial and its attention in the media, a half year prior to the survey, influenced one-third of the physician's prescribing attitude. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of the physicians did not change prescribing attitude after the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial. HRT is a well proven effective treatment in breast cancer survivors with severe climacteric complaints, but a majority of physicians is not convinced of its safety in breast cancer survivors. Therefore, a majority of physicians do not find the need to prescribe HRT in breast cancer survivors.