Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy With the Controlled Antegrade Retrograde Subintimal Tracking (CART) or Reverse CART Technique for Long Infrainguinal Occlusions.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes associated with the controlled antegrade retrograde subintimal tracking (CART) or reverse CART (r-CART) technique to the conventional retrograde approach in the treatment of patients with long infrainguinal occlusions. METHODS: From May 2008 to April 2014, 121 patients failed antegrade recanalization and underwent a retrograde approach to recanalize long infrainguinal occlusions. Patients who underwent successful endovascular therapy (EVT) by the conventional retrograde approach (CRA group) were compared to patients who had successful EVT using the CART/r-CART technique (CART group) after failure of a bidirectional approach. The efficacy, safety, vessel patency, and other clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (mean age 71.6 ± 12.2 years; 32 men) underwent successful EVT (47.9%, 58/121) using the conventional retrograde approach (CRA group), while 44 patients (mean age 70.8 ± 11.1 years; 31 men) among the 50 patients who underwent the CART/r-CART technique were successfully treated (88.0%, 44/50). Both groups had similar average occlusion lengths and gained 100% immediate hemodynamic success after EVT. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding procedure-related complications. During follow-up, 28 patients died (p=0.380), but there were no differences in the rates of major (p=0.279) or minor amputation (p=0.417) between the groups. There was no difference in the 2-year primary patency (31% vs 24%, p=0.686), assisted primary patency (66% vs 76%, p=0.251), target vessel revascularization (65% vs 54%, p=0.845), or sustained clinical success (52% vs 46%, p=0.995) rates between the CRA and CART groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on acceptable safety, efficacy, and follow-up results in this study, the CART/r-CART technique can salvage patients with long peripheral occlusions after failure of the conventional antegrade or retrograde approach.

The feasibility of Kimny guiding catheter for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The Kimny guiding catheter is a single universal guiding catheter used for performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in both the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left coronary artery (LCA). Although this guiding catheter has been shown to yield high procedural success rates in nonemergent conditions, its feasibility for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unknown and therefore needs to be further investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 62 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI using the Kimny guiding catheter from January 2016 through December 2017. We then evaluated the rates of engagement and procedural success for PCI of the LCA and RCA with the Kimny guiding catheter. RESULTS: Primary PCI of the infarct-related artery (IRA) by means of the Kimny guiding catheter proved to be successful in 61 of the STEMI patients (98.3%). Besides, the procedural success rate was found to be 100% (44/44) for the LCA and 94.4% (17/18) for the RCA (P = 0.293). With regard to contralateral (non-IRA) angiography, engagement rates of 97.4% (38/39) and 100% (18/18) were obtained for the RCA and LCA, respectively, (P = 1.0). No coronary artery ostial dissection was observed during the procedures. The mean number of total catheters used for each patient turned out to be only 1.035. CONCLUSION: Using the Kimny guiding catheter for primary PCI is feasible and results in high procedural success rates, particularly for the treatment of the LCA, with fewer catheters, and at a lower cost.