Defining the surgical management for non-colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is indicated for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but it is controversial for non-colorectal liver metastases (NCLM). This study aimed to compare survival outcomes of patients with resection of NCLM versus CLM and to identify prognostic factors for resection of NCLM. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of liver metastases at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from January 1989 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with resected NCLM were compared to those with CLM. Overall and recurrence-free survival were determined. Subgroup analyses with patients grouped according to the year of liver resection, from 1989 to 2004 and from 2005 to 2019, were conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 674 patients included, 151 (22.4%) had NCLM while 523 (77.6%) had CLM. There were no statistically significant differences in median overall survival (65.2 vs 43.6 months, p = 0.555) and recurrence-free survival (12.5 vs 11.7 months, p = 0.425). The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 89.8% vs 91.5%, 59.4% vs 58.8%, 50.6% vs 38.7% and 34.1% vs 26.3% in NCLM and CLM groups, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall survival between resection of NCLM versus CLM in both time intervals. In the NCLM group, better overall survival was found in liver metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) origin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.138, p = 0.003) and with a longer time interval from resection of primary tumour to resection of NCLM (HR 0.982, p = 0.042). Poor prognostic factors were presence of blood transfusion (HR 5.588, p = 0.013) and post-operative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa or above (HR 74.853, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of NCLM had comparable survival outcomes with CLM. With appropriate patient selection, the indication of liver resection could be expanded to NCLM.

Transferability of Liver Transplantation Experience to Complex Liver Resection for Locally Advanced Hepatobiliary Malignancy-Lessons Learnt From 3 Decades of Single Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of LT experience on the outcome of CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite evolution in LT knowledge and surgical techniques in the past decades, there is yet data to evaluate the significance of LT experience in performing CLR. METHODS: Postoperative outcome after CLR between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed and correlated with LT experience in a single center with both LT and CLR service. CLR was defined as hepatectomy with vasculobiliary reconstruction, or multivisceral resection, central bisectionectomy (S4/5/8), or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Spearman rank correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to define the association between CLR-related outcomes and LT experience. RESULTS: With cumulative single-center experience of 1452 LT, 222 CLR were performed during the study period [hepatectomy with biliary (27.0%), or vascular (21.2%) reconstruction, with multivisceral resections (9.9%), with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (18.5%)] mainly for hepatocellular carcinoma (53.2%), and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (14%). Median tumor size was 7.0 cm. Other features include macrovascular invasion (23.4%), and juxta-visceral invasion (14%). Major postoperative complication rate was 25.2% and mortality rate was 6.3%. CLR-complication rate was inversely associated with LT experience (R = -0.88, P < 0.005). Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed the cutoff for LT experience to have the greatest influence on CLR was 95 with a sensitivity of 100% and Youden index of 1. Multivariable analysis showed that blood transfusion, prolonged operating time, LT experience < /=95 were associated with major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: LT experience was complimentary to CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy with improved postoperative outcome.

Routine use of ICG to enhance operative safety in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that ICG fluorescence cholangiography (ICG-FC) helps to identify critical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and hence reduce biliary injuries and conversions. In LC, biliary injury and conversion often happen if the biliary anatomy is misidentified. METHODS: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial from 2017 to 2019. Patients with acute cholecystitis requiring LC were assessed for eligibility for the trial. Patients in the trial were randomized to undergo either conventional LC (conventional arm) or LC with ICG-FC (ICG arm). Conversion rate and biliary injury incidence were outcome measures. RESULTS: Totally 92 patients participated (46 patients in each arm). The median age was 61 years in both arms (p = 0.472). The conventional arm had 22 men and 24 women; the ICG arm had 24 men and 22 women (p = 0.677). The two arms were comparable in all perioperative parameters. The time from ICG injection to surgery was 67 (16-1150) min. Both arms had an 8.7% conversion rate (p = 1.000). The median operative time was 140.5 min in the conventional arm and 149.5 min in the ICG arm (p = 0.086). The complication rate was 15.2% in the former and 10.9% in the latter (p = 0.536), and both had a 2.2% bile leakage rate. The median hospital stay was 3.5d in the former and 4.0d in the latter (p = 0.380). CONCLUSION: ICG-FC did not make any difference in conversion or complication rate. Its routine use in LC is questionable. However, it may be helpful in difficult cholecystectomies and may be used as an adjunct. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Institutional Review Board of University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster ( http://www.med.hku.hk/en/research/ethics-and-integrity/human-ethics ). REGISTRATION NUMBER: UW17-492.

Long-term survival in colorectal liver metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the best treatment option for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). A 10-year follow-up can reflect the true curative potential of resection. This retrospective study investigated factors for long-term survival of CRLM patients. METHOD: Data of patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM without extrahepatic disease from 1990 to 2012 at our hospital were reviewed. Patients who survived for > 10 years were compared with those who survived for < 10 years. RESULTS: Totally, 315 patients were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups: < 10-year group and > 10-year group. Patients in the < 10-year group had more tumor nodules (P = 0.016), more bilobar involvement (P = 0.004), narrower resection margin (P < 0.001), and worse disease-free and overall survival (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, low preoperative hemoglobin level, large number of tumor nodules, and bilobar involvement were poor prognostic factors for overall survival, while adjuvant chemotherapy was a favorable factor. Further analysis of patients with bilobar disease showed that perioperative blood transfusion was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival while adjuvant chemotherapy was a favorable one. In patients with multiple bilobar tumor nodules, adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive impact on disease-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who survived for > 10 years after liver resection for CRLM tended to have normal preoperative hemoglobin level, unilobar disease, fewer tumor nodules, and have received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy favorably affected long-term survival of CRLM patients.

Adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy for margin-positive resection of hepatocellular carcinoma-a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatectomy is a well-established curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the role of adjuvant therapy is controversial. This study examines the efficacy of adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The data of hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing curative hepatectomy was reviewed. Those with adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy were matched with those without using propensity score analysis, by tumour size and number, indocyanine green retention rate, disease staging and Child-Pugh grading. The groups were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatectomy received adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy (TAC group), and were matched with 870 patients who did not (no-TAC group). The groups were largely comparable in patient and disease characteristics, but the TAC group experienced more blood loss, higher transfusion rates, narrower margins and more positive margins. The two groups were found to be comparable in disease-free and overall survival rates. In margin-positive patients, those given TAC survived longer than those without, and margin-positive patients in the TAC group had overall survival rates similar to margin-negative patients in the no-TAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Margin involvement is an adverse factor for survival in HCC. Adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy may offer survival benefits to hepatocellular carcinoma patients with positive surgical margins.

Relevance of chemotherapy and margin status in colorectal liver metastasis.

PURPOSE: This retrospective, single-center study aimed to investigate the importance of chemotherapy and to come up with the optimal liver resection margin length for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). METHODS: Patients who had undergone any form of liver resection for CRLM were reviewed and analyzed. The analyses were broken down into three parts: (1) overall effect of chemotherapy, (2) effect of chemotherapy with positive/negative resection margin, and (3) result of discriminative analysis with optimal margin length analysis. RESULTS: In total, 381 patients were studied. Among them, 279 received chemotherapy whereas 102 did not. Survival was significantly better in patients with chemotherapy (5-year, 43.6% vs. 25.8%) (p < 0.001). Patients who received chemotherapy (n = 93) with negative margins had better survival than patients (n = 8) with positive margins (5-year, 28.1% vs. 0%) (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, margin involvement was the poor prognostic factor for survival. Patients who had chemotherapy (n = 238) with negative margin showed a trend of better survival than patients (n = 41) with positive margins (5-year, 45.7% vs. 29.3%) (p = 0.085). Patients (n = 93) with negative margin and no chemotherapy and patients (n = 41) with positive margin and chemotherapy had comparable survival at 5 years (p = 0.422). On multivariate analysis, tumor number was the prognostic factor for survival. By the discriminant method, 1.09 cm (sensitivity 0.242, specificity 0.718) was determined as the cut-off for optimal margin length. Patients who had margin ≥ 1.09 cm (n = 81) enjoyed significantly better survival (5-year, 54.3% vs. 33.5%) (p = 0.041). On multivariate analysis, margin length ≥ 1.09 cm was the prognostic factor for favorable survival. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated the important effect of perioperative chemotherapy and negative margin liver resection in management of patients suffered from CRLM.

Defining the optimal bilirubin level before hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the management of operable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) patients with hyperbilirubinemia, preoperative biliary drainage is a measure to bring down the bilirubin to a certain level so as to avoid adverse postoperative outcomes that would otherwise result from hyperbilirubinemia. A cutoff value of bilirubin level in this context is needed but has not been agreed upon without controversy. This retrospective study aimed to identify a cutoff of preoperative bilirubin level that would minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Data of patients having hepatectomy with curative intent for HC were analyzed. Discriminative analysis was performed to identify the preoperative bilirubin level that would make a survival difference. The identified level was used as the cutoff to divide patients into two groups. The groups were compared. RESULTS: Ninety patients received hepatectomy with curative intent for HC. Their median preoperative bilirubin level was 23 µmol/L. A cutoff preoperative bilirubin level of 75 µmol/L was derived from Youden's index (sensitivity 0.333; specificity 0.949) and confirmed to be optimal by logistic regression (relative risk 9.250; 95% confidence interval 1.932-44.291; p = 0.005), with mortality shown to be statistically different at 90 days (p = 0.008). Patients were divided into Group A (≤75 µmol/L; n = 82) and Group B (> 75 µmol/L; n = 8). Group B had a higher preoperative bilirubin level (p < 0.001), more intraoperative blood loss (3.12 vs 1.4 L; p = 0.008), transfusion (100% vs 42.0%; p = 0.011) and replacement (2.45 vs 0.0 L; p < 0.001), more postoperative renal complications (p = 0.036), more in-hospital deaths (50% vs 8.5%; p = 0.004), and more 90-day deaths (50% vs 9.8%; p = 0.008). Group A had a longer follow-up period (p = 0.008). The groups were otherwise comparable. Disease-free survival was similar between groups (p = 0.142) but overall survival was better in Group A (5-year, 25.2% vs 0%; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, preoperative bilirubin level and intraoperative blood replacement were risk factors for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: A cutoff value of preoperative bilirubin level of 75 µmol/L is suggested, as the study showed that a preoperative bilirubin level ≤ 75 µmol/L resulted in significantly less blood replacement necessitated by blood loss during operation and significantly better patient survival after surgery.

Anatomical Versus Nonanatomical Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical resection (AR) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is disputable. We investigated the impact of AR on short-term outcomes and survival in CLM patients. METHODS: Patients having hepatectomy with AR or nonanatomical resection (NAR) for CLM were reviewed. Comparison was made between AR and NAR groups. Group comparison was performed again after propensity score matching with ratio 1:1. RESULTS: AR group (n = 234 vs n = 89 in NAR group) had higher carcinoembryonic antigen level (20 vs 7.8 ng/mL, p ≤ 0.001), more blood loss (0.65 vs 0.2 L, p < 0.001), more transfusions (19.2% vs 3.4%, p = 0.001), longer operation (339.5 vs 180 min, p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (9 vs 6 days, p < 0.001), more tumors (p < 0.001), larger tumors (4 vs 2 cm, p < 0.001), more bilobar involvement (20.9% vs 7.9%, p = 0.006), and comparable survival (overall, p = 0.721; disease-free, p = 0.695). After propensity score matching, each group had 70 patients, with matched tumor number, tumor size, liver function, and tumor marker. AR group had more open resections (85.7% vs 68.6%, p = 0.016), more blood loss (0.556 vs 0.3 L, p = 0.001), more transfusions (17.1% vs 4.3%, p = 0.015), longer operation (310 vs 180 min, p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (8.5 vs 6 days, p = 0.002), comparable overall survival (p = 0.819), and comparable disease-free survival (p = 0.855). CONCLUSION: Similar disease-free survival and overall survival of CLM patients were seen with the use of AR and NAR. However, AR may entail a more eventful postoperative course. NAR with margin should be considered whenever feasible.

Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 110 Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with background cirrhosis. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been gaining popularity, but has not been widely accepted, because published data were gathered from small numbers of patients. METHODS: Data of patients diagnosed with HCC and cirrhosis treated by hepatectomy were reviewed. The outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy were compared with those of open hepatectomy. Propensity score matching of patients in a ratio of 1:3 was conducted. RESULTS: There were 110 patients and 330 patients in the laparoscopic group and the open group, respectively. The laparoscopic group had less blood loss (150 vs 400 mL; P < 0.001), shorter operation time (185 vs 255 minutes; P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (4vs 7 days; P < 0.001). The median overall survival was 136 months in the laparoscopic group and 120 months in the open group. The 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.9%, 89.8%, and 83.7%, respectively, in the laparoscopic group, and 94%, 79.3%, and 67.4%, respectively, in the open group (P = 0.033). The median disease-free survival was 66.37 months in the laparoscopic group and 52.4 months in the open group. The 1, 3, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87.7%, 65.8%, and 52.2%, respectively, in the laparoscopic group, and 75.2%, 56.3%, and 47.9%, respectively, in the open group (P = 0.141). CONCLUSIONS: Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC can be carried out safely with favorable short-term and long-term outcomes even in cirrhotic patients at high-volume liver cancer centers.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Right Posterior Sectionectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Liver: A Single-Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Right hepatectomy (RH) instead of right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is commonly performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic livers located lateral to the right hepatic vein in order to ensure adequate resection margin. This potentially increased the risk of postoperative liver failure. This study aims to compare survival outcomes and surgical morbidities between RH and RPS. METHODS: All patients between 2003 and 2013 with resection for solitary HCC in cirrhotic livers at segment 6/7 were reviewed. Baseline demographics, liver function, perioperative outcomes, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between RH and RPS. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in this study. Thirty-two patients had RH and forty-nine with RPS were selected as controls. Majority of the HCC patients (91.4 %) suffered from chronic hepatitis B. There was no significant difference in age, gender and Child-Pugh grade between the two groups. The median tumour size of RH group was 6 vs. 4 cm in the RPS group (p < 0.0001). Both groups had no statistical difference in resection margin and their associated morbidities. The 5-year OS for RH and RPS was 76 and 83.8 %, respectively (p = 0.766), whereas their corresponding DFS was 52.6 and 52.2 % (p = 0.859). Despite the discrepancy of tumour size among the two groups, there was no statistical difference in subgroup analysis based on their corresponding stage of disease. CONCLUSION: RPS can achieve similar OS and DFS as RH for HCC, and should be considered as the treatment of choice in order to optimise the postoperative remnant parenchymal liver functions.

Radiofrequency ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas sized 5-8 cm.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective review was conducted to compare the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with that of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating large (5-8 cm) unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). METHODS: Patients with large unresectable solitary HCCs primarily treated by RFA or TACE were reviewed. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were tumour response, time to disease progression, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in the RFA group. Of these, 12 achieved complete ablation, one had ablation site recurrence, and five developed complications. Median disease-free survival in this group was 13.0 months (range: 2.8-38.0 months). The TACE group included 26 patients, of whom four obtained a partial response, none achieved a complete response, and five developed complications. The median time to disease progression in this group was 8.0 months (range: 1.0-68.0 months). There were no hospital deaths in this series. Median survival was 39.8 months in the RFA group and 19.8 months in the TACE group (P = 0.257). Rates of 1-, 2- and 5-year survival were 93.3%, 86.2% and 20.9%, respectively, in the RFA group and 73.1%, 40.6% and 18.3%, respectively, in the TACE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both RFA and TACE are feasible treatments for large unresectable solitary HCCs. Both modes show comparable rates of complications and longterm survival, but RFA achieves better initial tumour control and results in better short-term survival.

Pilot study of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation as a bridging therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients wait-listed for liver transplantation.

The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation as a bridging therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had been wait-listed for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Adult patients with unresectable and unablatable HCCs within the University of California San Francisco criteria who had been wait-listed for DDLT were screened for their suitability for HIFU ablation as a bridging therapy if they were not suitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Treatment outcomes for patients receiving HIFU ablation, TACE, and best medical treatment (BMT) were compared. Fifty-one patients were included in the analysis. Before the introduction of HIFU ablation, only 39.2% of the patients had received bridging therapy (TACE only, n = 20). With HIFU ablation in use, the rate increased dramatically to 80.4% (TACE + HIFU, n = 41). The overall dropout rate was 51% (n = 26). Patients in the BMT group had a significantly higher dropout rate (P = 0.03) and significantly poorer liver function as reflected by higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores and higher Child-Pugh grading. Clinically relevant ascites was found in 5 patients in the HIFU group and 2 patients in the BMT group, but none was found in the TACE group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). The TACE and HIFU groups had comparable percentages of tumor necrosis in excised livers (P = 0.35), and both were significantly higher than that in the BMT group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). In conclusion, HIFU ablation was safe even for HCC patients with Child-Pugh C disease. Its adoption increased the percentage of patients receiving bridging therapy from 39.2% to 80.4%. A randomized controlled trial for further validation of its efficacy is warranted.

Survival analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy vs. transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a non-invasive treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), but long-term survival analysis is lacking. This study was to analyse its outcome compared to that of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS: From October 2003 to September 2010, 113 patients received HIFU ablation as a treatment of HCCs at our hospital. Twenty-six patients had HCCs sized 3-8 cm. Fifty-two patients with matched tumour characteristics having TACE as primary treatment were selected for comparison. Short-term outcome and long-term survival were analysed. RESULTS: In the HIFU group (n = 26), 46 tumours were ablated. The median age of the patients was 69 (49-84) years. The median tumour size was 4.2 (3-8) cm. In the TACE group (n = 52), the median age of the patients was 67 (44-84) years. The median tumour size was 4.8 (3-8) cm. There was no hospital mortality in any of the groups. In the HIFU group, the rates of complete tumour response, partial tumour response, stable disease and progressive disease were 50%, 7.7%, 25.6% and 7.7% respectively, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. The TACE group had the corresponding rates at 0%, 21.2%, 63.5% and 15.4% respectively (P < 0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 84.6%, 49.2% and 32.3% respectively, in the HIFU group and 69.2%, 29.8% and 2.3% respectively, in the TACE group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: HIFU ablation is a safe and effective method for unresectable HCCs. A survival benefit is observed over sole TACE.

Good longterm survival after primary living donor liver transplantation for solitary hepatocellular carcinomas up to 8 cm in diameter.

OBJECTIVES: There is controversy over whether hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should be primarily treated with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) if liver resection (LR) can be effective. This retrospective study was conducted to compare survival outcomes in patients treated with either modality for solitary HCC measuring ≤8 cm in diameter. METHODS: Outcomes in patients with solitary HCC primarily treated by LDLT were analysed. Patients with solitary HCC of similar sizes with or without microvascular invasion primarily treated with LR were selected at a ratio of 6 : 1 for comparison. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality amounted to 0% and 1.3% in the LDLT (n = 50) and LR (n = 300) groups, respectively (P = 0.918). Complication rates were 34% and 20% in the LDLT and LR groups, respectively (P = 0.027). Rates of 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival were 98%, 94%, 89% and 83%, respectively, in the LDLT group and 95%, 85%, 76% and 56%, respectively, in the LR group (P = 0.013). Rates of 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year disease-free survival were 96%, 90%, 87% and 81%, respectively, in the LDLT group and 81%, 64%, 57% and 40%, respectively, in the LR group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Living donor liver transplantation surpassed LR in survival outcomes, achieving a 10-year overall survival rate 1.5 times as high and a 10-year disease-free survival rate twice as high as those facilitated by LR. However, it entailed more complications, in addition to the inevitable risks to the donor.

Retrohepatic vena cava deroofing in living donor liver transplantation for caudate hepatocellular carcinoma.

The removal of tumor together with the native liver in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma is challenged by a very close resection margin if the tumor abuts the inferior vena cava. This is in contrast to typical deceased donor liver transplantation where the entire retrohepatic inferior vena cava is included in total hepatectomy. Here we report a case of deroofing the retrohepatic vena cava in living donor liver transplantation for caudate hepatocellular carcinoma. In order to ensure clear resection margins, the anterior portion of the inferior vena cava was included. The right liver graft was inset into a Dacron vascular graft on the back table and the composite graft was then implanted to the recipient inferior vena cava. Using this technique, we observed the no-touch technique in tumor removal, hence minimizing the chance of positive resection margin as well as the chance of shedding of tumor cells during manipulation in operation.

Survival analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a non-invasive treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). At present, data on the treatment's long-term outcome are limited. This study analysed the survival outcome of HIFU ablation for HCCs smaller than 3 cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with HCCs smaller than 3 cm received HIFU treatment between October 2006 and September 2010. Fifty-nine patients who received percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were selected for comparison. The two groups of patients were compared in terms of pre-operative variables and survival. RESULTS: More patients in the HIFU group patients had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (34% versus 8.5%; P = 0.001). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of patients whose tumours were completely ablated in the HIFU group compared with the RFA group were 97.4% versus 94.6% and 81.2% versus 79.8%, respectively (P = 0.530). The corresponding 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 63.6% versus 62.4% and 25.9% versus 34.1% (P = 0.683). CONCLUSIONS: HIFU ablation is a safe and effective method for small HCCs. It can achieve survival outcomes comparable to those of percutaneous RFA and thus serves as a good alternative ablation treatment for patients with cirrhosis.

The impact of family history of hepatocellular carcinoma on its patients' survival.

BACKGROUND: Family history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been identified as a risk factor for the development of the disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of such a history on HCC patients' survival. METHODS: Data of all HCC patients (n=4532) managed at our center from 1989 to 2008 were prospectively collected. The patients were quizzed on their various characteristics including family HCC history. RESULTS: Totally 475 (10.48%) patients had a family history of HCC. They presented the disease at a significantly earlier age (median 53 vs 59 years, P<0.0001) and at an earlier stage (the United Network for Organ Sharing staging system). They had significantly better liver function in terms of Child-Pugh classification and serum albumin and bilirubin levels. Significantly more of them presented the disease without symptoms (44.0% vs 29.4%, P<0.0001). They also had significantly better overall survival under these specifications: patients in the whole study cohort, patients who had minor hepatectomy, patients with stage I disease, patients with stage II disease, and patients with stage III disease. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to what is generally believed, we found in this study cohort that patients with a family history of HCC had better overall survival than those without such a history. We believe this was in part due to earlier diagnosis of the disease and better liver function in this group of patients. However, the effects of genetic factors on the risk of HCC cannot be overlooked and are yet to be identified.

A case report of tumor lysis syndrome after stage-one ALPPS.

RATIONALE: Tumor lysis syndrome is a potentially lethal condition caused by rapid cell death, releasing a high level of toxic cytokines. It is common in patients with hematological malignancy but rare in solid tumors. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 64-year-old patient presented to our unit with a 17.3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma and marginal liver reserve. The first-stage operation of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) was performed. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was found to be anuric with grossly deranged electrolytes after the first-stage operation. Tumor lysis syndrome was diagnosed. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for aggressive fluid administration and continuous venovenous hemofiltration for the management of tumor lysis syndrome. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered and then underwent the second-stage operation of ALPPS with extended right hepatectomy 8 days after the initial operation without any long-term sequelae. LESSONS: ALPPS is a relatively new technique in liver surgery, entailing an increased risk of tumor lysis syndrome due to an in situ tumor after the first-stage operation. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion regarding this potentially lethal complication with prompt management.

Alpha-Fetoprotein in Predicting Survival of Patients with Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection.

Background/Aim: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) had been used as a prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma but it was unknown what level of AFP could predict the survival of patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) after resection. This retrospective study was to identify the best cutoff value of AFP for this prediction.Methods: Data of patients having hepatectomy for rHCC from 1989 to 2015 were reviewed. The receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden's index were used to identify the cutoff value of AFP affecting survival. The patients were then divided into two groups by the cutoff for comparison.Results: Totally 114 patients were included. An AFP level of 256 ng/ml was found to affect survival (area under curve 63.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.514-0.748, p = 0.027; sensitivity 0.6, specificity 0.706). The 114 patients were divided into Group A (AFP < 256 ng/ml, n = 56) and Group B (AFP ≥ 256 ng/ml, n = 58). The median AFP level was 13.0 ng/ml (range, 2-253 ng/ml) in Group A and 11206.5 ng/ml (range, 259-481,000 ng/ml) in Group B (p < 0.001). Group A had a larger proportion of patients receiving transarterial embolization at the time of rupture, and the time to hepatectomy was longer in this group. Patients in Group B had more blood loss, more complications, larger tumors, and more cases of macrovascular/microvascular invasion. Overall survival (p = 0.013) and disease-free survival (p = 0.024) were significantly better in Group A. On multivariate analysis, AFP ≥ 256 ng/ml was an independent risk factor for overall survival.Conclusion: AFP ≥ 256 ng/ml had an adverse impact on the survival of patients with rHCC after resection.

Modulation of graft vascular inflow guided by flowmetry and manometry in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Survival of the partial graft after living donor liver transplantation owes much to its tremendous regenerative ability. With excellent venous outflow capacity, a graft within a wide range of graft-to-standard-liver-volume ratios can cope with portal hypertension that is common in liver transplant recipients. However, when the ratio range is exceeded, modulation of graft vascular inflow becomes necessary for graft survival. The interplay between graft-to-standard-liver-volume ratio and portal pressure, in the presence of portosystemic shunt or otherwise, requires individualized modulation of graft portal and arterial inflows. Boosting of portal inflow by shunt ligation can be guided by transonic flowmetry, whereas muting of portal inflow by splenic artery ligation can be monitored by portal electronic manometry. METHOD: We describe four cases to illustrate the above. RESULTS: One patient had hepatic artery thrombosis resulting from splenic artery steal syndrome which was the sequela of small-for-size syndrome. Emergency splenic artery ligation and re-anastomosis of the hepatic artery successfully muted the portal inflow and boosted the hepatic arterial inflow. Another patient with portal vein thrombosis underwent thrombendvenectomy. Portal inflow was boosted with ligation of portosystemic shunt, which is often present in these patients with portal hypertension. The coexistence of splenic aneurysm and splenorenal shunt required ligation of both in the third patient. The fourth patient, with portal pressure and flow monitoring, avoided ligation of a coronary vein which became a main portal inflow after portal thrombendvenectomy. CONCLUSION: Management of graft inflow modulation guided selectively by transonic flowmetry or portal manometry was described.