Actigraphy measures show sleep improvement after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.

IMPORTANCE: The symptoms of primary hyperparathyroidism are often subtle, such as fatigue, mood changes, and sleep disturbances. After parathyroidectomy, patients often report improvement in sleep and mood; however, objective data supporting these improvements is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This prospective study uses standard measures to objectively and subjectively assess sleep in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroidectomy. DESIGN: A longitudinal prospective study was conducted over three one-week-long periods: pre-parathyroidectomy, 1-week post-parathyroidectomy, and three months post-parathyroidectomy. During each time point, patients wore an actigraphy device, recorded a sleep diary, and completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures models to compare the average measures among the three time points and test for trends over time. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism from ages 18 to 89 years old. EXPOSURE: Parathyroidectomy between September 2020 and January 2024. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Actigraphy data, consensus sleep diary, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21 Items (DASS). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled, and 34 patients completed the study. Actigraphy data showed a significant negative trend in average sleep latency (p = 0.045) and average time in bed (p = 0.046). Sleep diary data showed additional differences in the number of awakenings (p = 0.002), wake after sleep onset (p < 0.001), sleep quality (p < 0.001), and sleep efficiency (p = 0.02) among the three time points and/or as a significant negative trend. PSQI and ISI scores were significantly different among the three time points (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) and also declined significantly over time (p = 0.008 and p = 0.007, respectively). DASS depression, anxiety, and stress scores were significantly different among the three time points (p < 0.001, p = 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively), and stress also declined significantly over time (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study represents the most extensive prospective study demonstrating objective and subjective sleep and mood improvement in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy.

Facility volume and survival: Human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the impact of facility volume on survival for human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) patients. METHODS: Patients treated for HPV+ OPSCC from 2010 to 2017 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Facilities of average annual case volume <50th percentile were categorized as low-volume (LV) and >95th percentile as high-volume (HV). RESULTS: 11,546 were included, with 10,305 patients (89.3 %) treated at LV and 1241 (10.7 %) at HV facilities. A greater proportion of cases involving resection of base of tongue and lingual tonsil were treated at HV (30.3 %) compared to LV (22.3 %) facilities (p < 0.001). Patients treated at a HV facility had greater percentage of clinical T4 (11.2 % vs. 8.6 %, p = 0.001) and N+ disease (90.5 % vs. 85.7 %, p < 0.001) patients. Survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference between five-year overall survival rates by facility volume (p = 0.388) for all patients. On multivariable analysis, facility volume was not associated with survival (HR: 0.968 [0.758-1.235], p = 0.791). These trends were found for both patients undergoing primary surgery or chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our data indicates that patients with HPV+ OPSCC do not experience a survival benefit with treatment at HV facility, suggesting these patients may be adequately treated at LV centers.

Applying Machine Learning to Determine Popular Patient Questions About Mentoplasty on Social Media.

PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction in esthetic surgery often necessitates synergy between patient and physician goals. The authors aim to characterize patient questions before and after mentoplasty to reflect the patient perspective and enhance the physician-patient relationship. METHODS: Mentoplasty reviews were gathered from Realself.com using an automated web crawler. Questions were defined as preoperative or postoperative. Each question was reviewed and characterized by the authors into general categories to best reflect the overall theme of the question. A machine learning approach was utilized to create a list of the most common patient questions, asked both preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 2,012 questions were collected. Of these, 1,708 (84.9%) and 304 (15.1%) preoperative and postoperative questions, respectively. The primary category for patients preoperatively was "eligibility for surgery" (86.3%), followed by "surgical techniques and logistics" (5.4%) and "cost" (5.4%). Of the postoperative questions, the most common questions were about "options to revise surgery" (44.1%), "symptoms after surgery" (27.0%), and "appearance" (26.3%). Our machine learning approach generated the 10 most common pre- and postoperative questions about mentoplasty. The majority of preoperative questions dealt with potential surgical indications, while most postoperative questions principally addressed appearance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of mentoplasty patient questions were preoperative and asked about eligibility of surgery. Our study also found a significant proportion of postoperative questions inquired about revision, suggesting a small but nontrivial subset of patients highly dissatisfied with their results. Our 10 most common preoperative and postoperative question handout can help better inform physicians about the patient perspective on mentoplasty throughout their surgical course. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Assessing Patient Satisfaction Following Blepharoplasty Using Social Media Reviews.

BACKGROUND: Because patient satisfaction is a significant qualitative consideration in measuring aesthetic surgery outcome, it is important to characterize the individual factors that shape the patient perspective about blepharoplasty. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed reviews by blepharoplasty patients on the aesthetic surgery social media platform RealSelf.com to determine which aspects of the surgical process have the most significant impact on patient satisfaction. METHODS: Blepharoplasty reviews were gathered from RealSelf.com with an automated web crawler. These reviews were characterized as positive or negative, then given a specific category that more specifically defined the theme of the review. Additional variables, including the specialty of the reviewed physician and any patient self-reported ratings, were documented. RESULTS: A total of 1991 reviews pertaining to blepharoplasty were collected. Among reviews with self-reported "worth it" ratings, 93.5% were positive. Following categorization of all reviews, 1865 (93.7%) were positive and 126 (6.3%) were negative. Of the positive reviews, the most common overall themes were bedside manner (n = 899, 48.2%), aesthetic result (n = 859, 46.1%), and overall comfort (n = 58, 3.1%). Among negative reviews, most pertained to aesthetic result (n = 100, 79.4%), and bedside manner (n = 14, 11.1%). The most frequently encountered physician specialties performing blepharoplasty were plastic surgery (n = 1101, 55.3%), ophthalmology (n = 634, 31.8%), and otolaryngology (n = 69, 3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of reviews were positive. The most prominent factor driving positive reviews was bedside manner, followed by aesthetic results. Negative reviews were most frequently attributed to suboptimal aesthetic results. Most blepharoplasties in our study cohort were performed by plastic and oculoplastic surgeons.

Characterizing Patient Questions Before and After Rhinoplasty on Social Media: A Big Data Approach.

BACKGROUND: As an aesthetic surgery, a successful rhinoplasty is often assessed by patient satisfaction, subject to a diverse array of qualitative factors including patient expectations and happiness with care provided. While substantial effort has been dedicated to understanding patients' post-operative concerns, addressing patients' pre-operative questions has been comparatively less studied. This study analysed pre- and post-operative questions about rhinoplasty on social media to gain insights into patients' concerns and develop targeted educational material. METHODS: The most viewed rhinoplasty questions on Realself.com, a social media platform for discussions about cosmetic surgeries, were collected and analysed. Questions were then stratified into pre- and post-operative and further assigned categories based on common topics found in the data. Using a machine learning approach, the most common pre- and post-operative questions were determined. RESULTS: 2014 rhinoplasty questions were collected in total, with 957 pre-operative and 1057 post-operative. The most commonly asked pre-operative questions were about appearance (n = 441, 46.1%), function (n = 102, 10.7%), and cost (n = 94, 9.8%). The most commonly asked post-operative questions were about appearance (n = 502, 47.5%), behaviour allowed/disallowed (n = 283, 26.8%), and symptoms after surgery (n = 235, 22.2%). An educational handout with the 10 most common pre- and post-operative questions was developed using machine learning analysis, with the majority of questions about appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients primarily expressed concern about appearance when asking questions about rhinoplasty on social media, along with other aspects of their pre- and post-operative course. The educational handout developed by this study can be applied to address commonly asked patient questions during pre-operative education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Natural History of Untreated Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: Although corticosteroids and other treatments for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) have been described, understanding its prognosis without intervention provides valuable information for patient management. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive, quantitative statistical analysis of the natural history of untreated idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). STUDY TYPE AND DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analyses. METHODS: Two independent searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 30, 2022, were performed. Adults with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss who received placebo or were untreated and had audiometric outcome measures in all study types were reviewed. These data indicative of the natural history of ISSNHL were analyzed, as were study characteristics related to risk of bias. Heterogeneity as assessed via I2 and random effects analyses were performed. RESULTS: Six studies meeting the inclusion criteria yielded 319 untreated patients whose natural history could be assessed. Heterogeneity among studies was moderate, with a variety of reported outcomes. A hearing improvement of at least 30 dB HL was observed in 36% (95% CI 0.28-0.44) of untreated patients, and of at least 10 dB HL was observed in 70% (95% CI 0.57-0.82) of untreated patients at 3 months. The mean hearing gain among untreated patients was 24.0 dB HL (95% CI 2.65-45.37) at 2-3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The observed natural history of ISSNHL suggests that patients can regain some hearing without active treatment. In the absence of future studies collecting prospective natural history data from untreated or placebo-treated ISSNHL patients, the data presented here provide the best available historical control data for reconsideration of results in past ISSNHL studies, as well as a roadmap for design and interpretation of future ISSNHL treatment clinical trials. Furthermore, knowing there is a statistically significant mean hearing gain of 24.0 dB HL in the untreated/placebo group provides an ethical basis for future placebo study of ISSNHL. The current status on ISSNHL management calls for a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with validated outcome measures to provide science-based treatment guidance. Laryngoscope, 2024.

Facility Volume and Changing Facilities for Postoperative Radiotherapy in Salivary Gland Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Changing location of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after treatment at a high-volume facility (HVF) is associated with worse survival in various head and neck cancers. Our study investigates this relationship in salivary gland cancer (SGC). METHODS: The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for all cases of adult SGC treated with surgery and PORT with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with multiple cancer diagnoses, metastatic disease, or unknown PORT facility were excluded. Reporting facilities with >95th percentile annual case volume were classified as HVFs, the remainder were classified low-volume facilities (LVFs). RESULTS: A total of 7885 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 418 (5.3%) were treated at an HVF. Patients treated at an HVF had higher rates clinical nodal positivity (18.2% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001) and clinical T3/T4 (27.3% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.001) disease. Patients at HVFs changed facility for PORT at lower rates (18.9% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009). Patients treated at an HVF had higher 5-year overall survival (5-OS) than those treated at an LVF (79.0% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.042). Patients treated at an HVF that changed PORT facility had worse 5-OS (60.8% vs. 83.2%, p < 0.001). Radiation facility change was an independent predictor of worse survival in patients treated at an HVF (HR: 8.99 [3.15-25.67], p < 0.001) but not for patients treated at a LVF (HR: 1.11 [0.98-1.25], p = 0.109). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at an HVF changing facility for PORT for SGC experience worse survival. Our data suggest patients treated surgically at an HVF should be counseled to continue their PORT at the same institution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Machine learning analysis of online patient questions regarding breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Social media has become a dominant educational resource for breast reconstruction patients. Rather than passively consuming information, patients interact directly with other users and healthcare professionals. While online information for breast reconstruction has been analyzed previously, a robust analysis of patient questions on online forums has not been conducted. In this study, the authors used a machine learning approach to analyze and categorize online patient questions regarding breast reconstruction. METHODS: Realself.com was accessed and questions pertaining to breast reconstruction were extracted. Data collected included the date of question, poster's location, question header, question text, and available tags. Questions were analyzed and categorized by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 522 preoperative questions were analyzed. Geographic analysis is displayed in Figure 1. Questions were often asked in the pre-mastectomy period (38.3%); however, patients with tissue expanders currently in place made up 28.5%. Questions were often related to reconstructive methods (23.2%), implant selection (19.5%), and tissue expander concerns (16.7%). Questions asked in the post-lumpectomy period were significantly more likely to be related to insurance/cost and reconstructive candidacy (p < 0.01). The "Top 6″ patient questions were determined by machine learning analysis, and the most common of which was "Can I get good results going direct to implant after mastectomy?" CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of online questions provides valuable insights and may help inform our educational approach toward our breast reconstruction patients. Our findings suggest that questions are common throughout the reconstructive process and do not end after the initial consultation. Patients most often want more information on the reconstructive options, implant selection, and the tissue expansion process.

Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma.

Objectives: Accurate diagnosis of cholesteatomas is crucial. However, cholesteatomas can easily be missed in routine otoscopic exams. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have performed well in medical image classification, so we evaluated their use for detecting cholesteatomas in otoscopic images. Study Design: Design and evaluation of artificial intelligence driven workflow for cholesteatoma diagnosis. Methods: Otoscopic images collected from the faculty practice of the senior author were deidentified and labeled by the senior author as cholesteatoma, abnormal non-cholesteatoma, or normal. An image classification workflow was developed to automatically differentiate cholesteatomas from other possible tympanic membrane appearances. Eight pretrained CNNs were trained on our otoscopic images, then tested on a withheld subset of images to evaluate their final performance. CNN intermediate activations were also extracted to visualize important image features. Results: A total of 834 otoscopic images were collected, further categorized into 197 cholesteatoma, 457 abnormal non-cholesteatoma, and 180 normal. Final trained CNNs demonstrated strong performance, achieving accuracies of 83.8%-98.5% for differentiating cholesteatoma from normal, 75.6%-90.1% for differentiating cholesteatoma from abnormal non-cholesteatoma, and 87.0%-90.4% for differentiating cholesteatoma from non-cholesteatoma (abnormal non-cholesteatoma + normal). DenseNet201 (100% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity), NASNetLarge (100% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity), and MobileNetV2 (94.1% sensitivity, 100% specificity) were among the best performing CNNs in distinguishing cholesteatoma versus normal. Visualization of intermediate activations showed robust detection of relevant image features by the CNNs. Conclusion: While further refinement and more training images are needed to improve performance, artificial intelligence-driven analysis of otoscopic images shows great promise as a diagnostic tool for detecting cholesteatomas. Level of Evidence: 3.

Unilateral Cordotomy: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Glottic obstruction may arise secondary to bilateral vocal fold immobility (BVFI). Treatment options include a tracheostomy to bypass the site of obstruction as well as unilateral transverse cordotomy to alleviate the obstruction. The objective of this review is to determine the efficacy, adverse event profile, and long-term outcomes, including the need for tracheostomy, in patients undergoing unilateral cordotomy. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Systems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for this systematic review. A literature search of unilateral cordotomy was performed by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Articles presenting cases of BVFI treated with unilateral cordotomy were included. Review articles, animal studies, non-English-language articles, and abstracts were excluded. Articles presenting cases of bilateral cordotomy or cordotomy with arytenoidectomy were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies and 291 patients undergoing unilateral cordotomy. Sixty-eight patients had a prior tracheostomy in place at the time of cordotomy. The most common post-operative complication was granulation tissue formation (n = 39). Thirty-one patients developed glottic edema with subsequent dyspnea. Three patients developed scarring of the primary cordotomy site with the return to an obstructed airway. Nine patients required a post-cordotomy tracheostomy due to these complications. Five patients required a long-term tracheostomy and were unable to be decannulated. CONCLUSION: Unilateral cordotomy is an effective treatment for glottic obstruction with high post-operative decannulation rates. Adverse events including worsening glottic obstruction are uncommon, although edema and granulation tissue may develop in the post-operative period and necessitate close post-operative monitoring. Laryngoscope, 133:6-14, 2023.

A machine learning analysis of patient concerns regarding mastopexy.

BACKGROUND: Social media plays an important role in connecting patients and plastic surgeons. We utilized patient inquiries regarding mastopexy from an online social media site to determine the most prevalent patient concerns, while employing a machine-learning algorithm to generate the questions representative of the dataset. OBJECTIVE: This data allow plastic surgeons to better tailor their preoperative consultations to address common concerns, set realistic expectations, and improve overall satisfaction. METHODS: A total of 2,011 inquiries from the mastopexy section of Realself.com were obtained using an open-source web crawler. Each inquiry was manually categorized as preoperative or postoperative and classified into subcategories based upon the free text entry. Lastly, questions were analyzed using machine learning to determine ten questions most representative of the inquiry pool. RESULTS: Of the 2,011 inquiries analyzed, 52.91% were preoperative and 47.09% were postoperative. Most preoperative questions asked about procedure eligibility (309, 29.04%), surgical techniques and logistics (260, 24.44%), and the best type of breast lift for the user (259, 24.34%). Among postoperative questions, questions regarding appearance were the most common (491, 51.85%), followed by symptoms after surgery (197, 19.75%) and behavior allowed/disallowed (145, 15.31%). Appearance was further subcategorized with the most common categories being appearance of the nipple (98, 19.86%), skin discoloration (88, 17.92%), and scarring (74, 15.07%). CONCLUSION: By utilizing the data that social media websites, like Realself.com, provide, plastic surgeons can better understand common patient concerns. This data aid in optimizing the preoperative consultation process to address the common concerns, recalibrate unrealistic expectations, and improve overall satisfaction.

Racial Disparities in Charges, Length of Stay, and Complications Following Adult Inpatient Epistaxis Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although recent studies have identified an association between race and adverse outcomes in head and neck surgeries, there are limited data examining the impact of racial disparities on adult inpatient outcomes following epistaxis management procedures. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between race and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients undergoing epistaxis treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the 2003 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify cases with a primary diagnosis of epistaxis that underwent a procedure for epistaxis control. Cases with missing data were excluded. Higher total charges and prolonged length of stay (LOS) were indicated by values greater than the 75th percentile. Demographics, hospital characteristics, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and complications were compared among race cohorts using univariate chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The independent effect of race on adverse outcomes was analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression while adjusting for the aforementioned variables. RESULTS: Of the 83 356 cases of epistaxis included, 80.3% were White, 12.5% Black, and 7.2% Hispanic. Black patients had increased odds of urinary/renal complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.148, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.797-2.569, P < .001) compared to White patients. Additionally, Black patients experienced higher odds of prolonged LOS (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.101-1.367, P < .001) and higher total charges (OR 1.257, 95% CI 1.109-1.426, P < .001) compared to White patients. Similarly, Hispanic patients were more likely to experience urinary/renal complications (OR 1.605, 95% CI 1.244-2.071, P < .001), higher total charges (OR 1.519, 95% CI 1.302-1.772, P < .001), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.157, 95% CI 1.007-1.331, P = .040) compared to White patients. CONCLUSION: Race is an important factor associated with an increased incidence of complications in hospitalized patients treated for epistaxis.

Effect of Hospital Safety Net Burden on Survival for Patients With Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with hospital safety net burden and its impact on survival for patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING: National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. METHODS: SNSCC cases were identified in the National Cancer Database. Hospital safety net burden was defined by percentage of uninsured/Medicaid patients treated, namely ≤25% for low-burden hospitals, 26% to 75% for medium-burden hospitals, and >75% for high-burden hospitals (HBHs). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and overall survival. RESULTS: An overall 6556 SNSCC cases were identified, with 1807 (27.6%) patients treated at low-burden hospitals, 3314 (50.5%) at medium-burden hospitals, and 1435 (21.9%) at HBHs. On multivariate analysis, Black race (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.028-1.868), maxillary sinus primary site (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.036-1.643), treatment at an academic/research program (OR, 20.63; 95% CI, 8.868-47.980), and treatment at a higher-volume facility (P < .001) resulted in increased odds of being treated at HBHs. Patients with grade III/IV tumor (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.513-0.949), higher income (P < .05), or treatment modalities other than surgery alone (P < .05) had lower odds. Survival analysis showed that hospital safety net burden status was not significantly associated with overall survival (log-rank P = .727). CONCLUSION: In patients with SNSCC, certain clinicopathologic factors, including Black race, lower income, treatment at an academic/research program, and treatment at facilities in the West region, were associated with treatment at HBHs. Hospital safety net burden status was not associated with differences in overall survival.

Impact of Facility Volume on Patient Safety Indicator Events After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of facility volume on Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) events following transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TSPS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: National Inpatient Sample database (2003-2011). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for TSPS cases from 2003 to 2011. Facility volume was defined by tertile of average annual number of TSPS procedures performed. PSIs, based on in-hospital complications identified by the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, and poor outcomes, such as mortality and tracheostomy, were analyzed. RESULTS: An overall 16,039 cases were included: 804 had ≥1 PSI and 15,235 had none. A greater proportion of male to female (5.8% vs 4.3%) and Black to White (7.0% vs 4.5%) patients experienced PSIs. There was an increased likelihood of poor outcome (odds ratio [OR], 3.1 [95% CI, 2.5-3.7]; P < .001) and mortality (OR, 30.1 [95% CI, 18.5-48.8]; P < .001) with a PSI. The incidence rates of PSIs at low-, intermediate-, and high-volume facilities were 5.7%, 5.1%, and 4.2%, respectively. Odds of poor outcome with PSIs were greater at low-volume facilities (OR, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.4-4.4]; P < .001) vs intermediate (OR, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1-4.2]; P < .001) and high (OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.7-3.8]; P < .001). Odds of mortality with PSIs were greater at high-volume facilities (OR, 43.0 [95% CI, 14.3-129.4]; P < .001) vs intermediate (OR, 40.0 [95% CI, 18.5-86.4]; P < .001) and low (OR, 17.3 [95% CI, 8.0-37.7]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: PSIs were associated with a higher likelihood of poor outcome and mortality following TSPS. Patients who experienced PSIs had a lower risk of poor outcome but increased mortality at higher-volume facilities.

Elective Neck Dissection for cT1-4 N0M0 Head and Neck Verrucous Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) over neck observation in cT1-4 N0M0 head and neck verrucous carcinoma (HNVC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The 2006 to 2017 National Cancer Database. METHODS: Patients with surgically resected cT1-4 N0M0 HNVC were selected. Linear, binary logistic, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized. RESULTS: Of 1015 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 223 (22.0%) underwent END. The majority of patients were male (55.4%) and white (91.0%) with disease of the oral cavity (67.6%) classified as low grade (90.0%) and cT1-2 (81.8%). The minority of ENDs (4.0%) detected occult nodal metastases. The rate of END increased from 2006 to 2017 for both cT1-2 (16.3% vs 22.0%, p = .126, R2 = 0.405) and cT3-4 (41.7% vs 70.0%, p = .424, R2 = 0.232) disease but these trends were not statistically significant. Independent predictors of undergoing END included treatment at an academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.55), cT3-4 disease (aOR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.16-5.07), and tumor diameter (aOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19) (p < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients treated with and without END was 71.3% and 70.6%, respectively (p = .661). END did not significantly reduce the 5-year hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.91-1.71, p = .172). END did not significantly improve 5-year OS in univariate and multivariate analyses stratified by several patient, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics. CONCLUSION: END does not confer an appreciable survival benefit in HNVC, even after stratifying univariate and multivariate analyses by several patient, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Analysis of Care and Outcomes for Epistaxis Weekend Admissions.

OBJECTIVES: To study differences in care of patients admitted for epistaxis during the weekend compared to the weekday. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: 2003 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. METHODS: Patients admitted for a primary diagnosis of epistaxis were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to assess differences in patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes between weekend and weekday admissions. RESULTS: A total of 39,329 cases were included in our study cohort, with 28,458 weekday admissions and 10,892 weekend admissions. There was no significant difference in patient race, gender, insurance status, hospital ownership status, or location between weekend and weekday admissions (p > .05). Most weekend admissions were emergent (82.2%) and were treated with packing (51.8%). Upon performing logistic regression, the likelihood of emergent admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-1.51, p < .001) and prolonged length of stay (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, p < .001) was higher for weekend admissions versus weekday admissions. Moreover, odds of packing for epistaxis were significantly higher (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.19, p < .001) on the weekend, while odds of ligation (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97, p = .013) and endovascular arterial embolization (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.84, p < .001) were lower. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, patient discharge disposition, and total hospital charges (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Patients primarily admitted for epistaxis over the weekend were more likely to be emergent, experienced prolonged length of stay, and be treated nonoperatively with packing, than weekday admissions. No significant differences in patient insurance or hospital ownership were identified.

Analysis of the Treatment and Survival of Sinonasal Extramedullary Plasmacytoma.

BACKGROUND: While extramedullary plasmacytomas are infrequently encountered plasma cell malignancies, most cases occur in the head and neck, with a predilection for the sinonasal cavity. Due to the rarity of this disease, the majority of studies on sinonasal extramedullary plasmacytoma (SN-EMP) are case reports or small retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of patient, disease, and treatment factors on the survival of patients with SN-EMP. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for all patients with SN-EMP between 2004-2016 (N = 381 cases). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival. RESULTS: The majority of SN-EMP patients were over 60 years old (57.0%), male (69.8%), and white (86.2%). The most common treatment modality was radiotherapy alone (38.6%), followed by surgery plus radiotherapy (37.8%). Five-year overall survival was 74.0% and median survival was 9.1 years. Accounting for patient demographics and tumor characteristics in a multivariate model, the following groups had worse prognosis: 60 and older (HR 1.99, p = 0.031) and frontal sinus primary site (HR 11.56, p = 0.001). Patients who received no treatment (HR 3.89, p = 0.013), chemotherapy alone (HR 5.57, p = 0.008) or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (HR 2.82, p = 0.005) had significantly lower survival than patients who received radiotherapy alone. Patients who received surgery with radiotherapy (HR 0.57, p = 0.039) had significantly higher survival than patients who received radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: In patients with SN-EMP five-year overall survival was found to be 74.0% with decreased survival associated with a frontal sinus primary site and being aged 60 or older. Patients receiving no treatment, chemotherapy alone, or radiotherapy with chemotherapy was associated with lower survival. Receiving surgery plus radiotherapy was associated with the highest five-year overall survival.

Trends in HPV Testing for Patients With Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze national trends in human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for patients diagnosed with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING: National Cancer Database (2010-2016). METHODS: Cases from 2010 to 2016 with a primary SNSCC diagnosis and known HPV testing status were extracted from the National Cancer Database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed to assess differences in socioeconomic, hospital, and tumor characteristics between tested and nontested patients. RESULTS: A total of 2308 SNSCC cases were collected, with 1210 (52.4%) HPV tested and 1098 (47.6%) not tested. On univariate analyses, patient age, insurance, income quartile, population density, treatment facility location, and tumor grade were significantly associated with HPV testing status. After multivariate logistic regression modeling, living in a suburban area had lower odds of HPV testing as compared with living in urban areas (odds ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]; P = .041), while tumor grade III/IV had higher odds than grade I (odds ratio, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.29-2.33]; P < .001). HPV-tested patients had a similar 5-year overall survival to nontested patients (48.3% vs 45.3%, log-rank P = .405). A sharp increase in HPV testing rates was observed after 2010 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with SNSCC, those with high-grade tumors were more likely to be tested for HPV, while patients with a suburban area of residence were less likely. Additionally, there was no significant survival benefit to HPV testing, with tested and nontested groups having similar overall survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Inpatient Sinus Surgery Patient Morbidity and Outcomes: A National Analysis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in the inpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for all ESS between 2008 and 2014. Using All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG) codes, cases with APR-DRG codes under Major Diagnostic Category 3 (Diseases and Disorders of the Ear, Nose, Mouth, and Throat) were designated as patients with primary otolaryngology diagnoses undergoing ESS (ORL), and all other codes were designated as patients with non-otolaryngology pathologies as their primary reason for admission but undergoing ESS (non-ORL). A univariate analysis and a logistic regression were used to compare patient demographics, comorbidities, disease severity, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 8,305 ORL patients and 6,342 non-ORL patients. ORL patients were more likely to be elective admissions (61.3% vs. 48.5%, P < .001), have a deviated nasal septum (17.9% vs. 12.3%, P < .001), nasal polyps (15.8% vs. 5.0%, P < .001), obstructive sleep apnea (10.7% vs. 5.2%, P < .001), and pulmonary disease (15.9% vs. 10.5%, P < .001). Non-ORL patients had a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 6.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.29-11.78, P < .001), length of stay in the highest quartile (OR 2.43, 95% CI 2.16-2.74, P < .001), and a higher proportion had APR-DRG subclasses indicating extreme severity of illness (19.3% vs. 4.3%, P < .001) or extreme risk of mortality (12.5% vs. 2.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ESS in the inpatient setting have a higher than expected mortality rate which can be associated with a non-otolaryngology pathology as the primary reason for their admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1523-1529, 2022.