Perceived stigma and its correlates among Asian patients with advanced cancer: A multi-country APPROACH study.

OBJECTIVES: Perceived cancer-related stigma can affect mental health and potentially treatment choices for patients with cancer. Nevertheless, perceived stigma is not very well understood in Asia. This study investigated across six developing Asian countries: (1) the prevalence of perceived stigma among advanced cancer patients, (2) its risk factors, and (3) its association with patient treatment preferences. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited patients receiving oncology care across major hospitals in Bangladesh, China, India, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Vietnam. Participants (N = 1358) were adults diagnosed with stage IV metastatic solid cancer who completed self-reported surveys. Multi-variable logistic regression and ordered logit models examined the associations with perceived stigma and variables of interest. RESULTS: Across the countries, 35%, 95% CI [32%, 38%] of patients reported experiencing at least one facet of cancer-related stigma often or always, while 60% [57%, 63%] reported it occurring occasionally. Top-endorsed facets of perceived stigma across the Asian countries suggest a distinct pattern. Having knowingly engaged in health-risk behaviours (OR = 2.03-2.24, 95% CI [1.14-1.19, 3.43-4.41]), unemployment (2.64 [1.67, 4.19]) and body image change (1.57 [1.00, 2.45]) were associated with higher odds of perceived stigma, while time mitigated perceived stigma (0.49-0.65 [0.30-0.45, 0.76-0.92]). Perceived stigma was associated with lower odds of preference for life-extending treatments, although the associations did not hold up in the adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived stigma is unique among Asian advanced cancer patients. Stigma is important to assess and address, taking into consideration the various sociodemographic, clinical and psychological factors of cancer patients.

Socio-economic inequalities in suffering at the end of life among advanced cancer patients: results from the APPROACH study in five Asian countries.

BACKGROUND: A systematic understanding of socio-economic inequalities in end-of-life (EOL) suffering among advanced cancer patients is required to inform efforts to reduce these inequalities as part of Universal Health Coverage goals. AIMS: To assess inequalities in multiple domains of EOL suffering among advanced cancer patients - physical, functional, psychological, social, and spiritual -, using two socio-economic status (SES) indicators, education and perceived economic status of the household. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from surveys of stage IV cancer patients (n = 1378) from seven hospitals across five countries (China, Sri Lanka, India, Vietnam and Myanmar). We conducted separate multivariable linear regression models for each EOL suffering domain. We also tested interactions between the two SES indicators and between each SES indicator and patient age. RESULTS: Patients living in low economic status households /with fewer years of education reported greater suffering in several domains. We also found significant interaction effects between economic status of the household and years of education for all EOL suffering outcomes. Age significantly moderated the association between economic status of the household and social suffering and between years of education and psychological, social, and spiritual suffering (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Results highlight that SES inequalities in EOL suffering vary depending on the suffering domain, the SES indicator assessed, and by patient age. Greater palliative care resources for patients with low SES may help reduce these inequalities.

Opioid Access among Advanced Cancer Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Asia.

CONTEXT: Most cancer-associated pain is experienced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to inequitable access to opioids. OBJECTIVE: To determine opioid access as estimated by both patients and providers and to understand patient and facility-level factors influencing access among patients with advanced cancer in LMICs in Asia using the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. METHODS: The APPROACH cross-sectional study was conducted in seven LMICs in Asia, involving in-depth surveys with providers and advanced cancer patients. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used to assess predisposing (i.e. individual factors), enabling (i.e. health care system and facility-level resources) and need (i.e. pain severity) factors predicting opioid access. RESULTS: Among patient participants (n=1,933), approximately 40% reported opioid use. Meanwhile 80% of facilities, as reported by providers, indicated at least half of their advanced cancer patients receive oral morphine prescriptions. Predisposing characteristics factored in the least in the model, with patient education positively associated with access (Odds ratio (OR): 1.01; 95% CI=1.00, 1.03). Facility-level enabling resources, factoring the most, included oral morphine prescription duration >14 days (OR: 1.27; 95% CI=1.05, 1.53) and the extent of physician palliative care training (extensive (>160 hours) OR: 3.95; CI=3.19, 4.88; basic (up to 40 hours) OR: 1.03; CI=1.03, 1.04). Patient need as indicated by greater pain severity predicted access (OR: 1.55; CI=1.47, 1.64). CONCLUSION: Study findings emphasize the importance of palliative care training-even a minimal amount-in supporting access to opioids for advanced cancer patients. This study also highlights pragmatic site-level policies, such as extended morphine prescription durations, enabling access.

Patient-Reported Roles in Decision-Making Among Asian Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicountry Study.

Purpose. We investigated 1) perceived roles in decision-making among advanced cancer patients in 5 Asian countries 2) associations of patient characteristics with these roles, and 3) the association of perceived roles with quality of life and perceived quality of care. Methods. We surveyed 1585 patients with stage IV solid cancer. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to analyze associations of patient characteristics with decision-making roles. Multivariate regressions were used to analyze associations of decision-making roles with quality of life and care. Results. The most common perceived-role was no patient involvement. Most patients (73%) reported roles consistent with their preferences. Being male, nonminority, higher educated, aware of advanced cancer diagnosis, and knowledge of cancer diagnosis for ≥1 year were associated with higher levels of patient involvement in decision-making. Compared to no patient involvement, joint decision-making (together with physicians/family) was associated with higher social (ß = 2.49, P < 0.01) and spiritual (ß = 2.64, P < 0.01) well-being, and better quality of physician communication (ß = 9.73, P < 0.01) and care coordination (ß = 13.96, P < 0.01) while making decisions alone was associated with lower emotional (ß = -1.43, P < 0.01), social (ß = -2.39, P < 0.01), and spiritual (ß = -2.98, P < 0.01) well-being. Conclusions. Findings suggest that a substantial number of advanced cancer patients were not (and preferred not to be) involved in decision-making. Despite this finding, joint decision-making together with physicians/family was associated with better quality of life and care. Implications. Physicians should explain the benefits of shared decision making to patients and encourage participation in decision-making, while ensuring that patients feel supported and do not find decision-making overwhelming.

Relapsed Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Single-Institution Experience.

Background Even though the treatment outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved recently, relapse of the disease still remains a challenge in developing countries. This study aims to analyze the incidence of relapse and survival rates in childhood ALL. Methods A retrospective study of 156 children with de novo ALL between 2012-2018 was conducted. Data on age, gender, relapse type, and relapse time were analyzed. Results A total of 26 (16.7%) patients experienced relapse, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.71:1. The relapse rate in the high-risk group was 1.6 times greater than that in the standard-risk group (61.5% vs. 38.5%). The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 29.3 months (38.5% in the early stage, 26.9% in the intermediate, and 34.6% in the late stage). The most common relapse site was bone marrow (38.5%), followed by the isolated central nervous system (CNS, 23.1%) and CNS plus bone marrow (23.1%); the least common site was testicle with or without bone marrow or CNS (15.2%). The median post-relapse survival time was 7.5 months. Conclusion Modification of the protocol to use escalated methotrexate dose and providing new therapies such as stem cell transplantation can improve the overall survival rates in relapsed ALL patients.

Volume-Staged Radiosurgery for Large Arteriovenous Malformation.

Large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenges in management because of outcomes and adverse affects. Volume-staged radiosurgery has been an appropriate approach when removal resection and embolization are not recommended. A 53-year-old gentleman was diagnosed with a large intracranial AVM with persistent headache and short-term seizure. Brain magnetic resonance and angiograph showed a bulky volume of AVM nidus. Removal resection and embolization were not recommended because of high risk of adverse affects. The patient was treated by volume-staged radiosurgery. One year post-treatment, obliteration for right internal carotid artery was completed. Volume-staged radiosurgery is a potential treatment option for large AVM with controlled and obliteration efficacy, especially to AVMs which are not appropriate for removal surgery and embolization.