Genome-wide meta-analysis implicates variation affecting mast cell biology in urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Urticaria is characterized by inappropriate mast cell degranulation leading to the development of wheals and/or angioedema. Twin and family studies indicate that there is a substantial heritable component to urticaria risk. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify genomic loci at which common genetic variation influences urticaria susceptibility. METHODS: Genome-wide association studies of urticaria (including all subtypes) from 3 European cohorts (UK Biobank, FinnGen, and the Trøndelag Health Study [HUNT]) were combined through statistical meta-analysis (14,306 urticaria cases and 650,664 controls). Cases were identified via electronic health care records from primary and/or secondary care. To identify putative causal variants and genes, statistical fine-mapping, colocalization, and interrogation of publicly available single-cell transcriptome sequencing resources were performed. RESULTS: Genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10-8) were identified at 6 independent loci. These included 2 previously reported association signals at 1q44 and the human leucocyte antigen region on chromosome 6. Genes with expected or established roles in mast cell biology were associated with the 4 other genome-wide association signals (GCSAML, FCER1A, TPSAB1, and CBLB). Colocalization of association signals consistent with the presence of shared causal variants was observed between urticaria susceptibility and increased expression of GCSAML (posterior probability of colocalization [PPcoloc] = 0.89) and FCER1A (PPcoloc = 0.91) in skin. CONCLUSION: Common genetic variation influencing the risk of developing urticaria was identified at 6 genomic loci. The relationship between genes with roles in mast cell biology and several association signals implicates genetic variability of specific components of mast cell function in the development of urticaria.

Lifetime incidence and healthcare disparities in alopecia areata: A UK population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune-mediated form of hair loss that can occur at any age, often with a significant mental health burden. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide estimates of the lifetime incidence of AA, and the impacts on mental health, healthcare utilisation and work-related outcomes, assessing variation across major sociodemographic subgroups. METHODS: AA cases were identified in primary care from the UK population-based Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre database (2009-2018). Lifetime incidence of AA was estimated at age 80 using modified time-to-event models with age as the timescale, overall and stratified by sex, ethnicity, deprivation, and geography. Mental health, healthcare utilisation and work-related outcomes were assessed in the two years after AA diagnosis compared to matched unaffected controls, and stratified by the same sociodemographic subgroups . RESULTS: 6,961 people developed AA during the study period. Overall lifetime incidence of AA was 2.11% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.06, 2.16%). Females had a higher lifetime incidence 2.35% (95%CI 2.28, 2.43%) than males 1.88% (95%CI 1.81, 1.94%). Lifetime incidence was higher in those of Asian ethnicity 5.87% (95%CI 5.51, 6.24), other 4.47% (95%CI 3.63, 5.31), mixed 4.44% (95%CI 3.50, 5.37) and black 3.03% (95%CI 2.63, 3.42) ethnicity, compared to white ethnicity 1.74% (95%CI 1.68, 1.80). Lifetime incidence was highest in those with the greatest deprivation; most-deprived quintile 2.92% (95%CI 2.77, 3.07%) compared to least-deprived 1.68% (95%CI 1.59, 1.78%). Across sociodemographic subgroups, people with AA of black ethnicity were most likely to have anxiety (adjusted Odds Ratio versus matched controls 2.92, 95%CI 1.71, 4.91), and had the greatest risk of time off work (adjusted Hazard Ratio versus matched controls 2.54, 95%CI 1.80, 3.56). CONCLUSIONS: AA affects around 1 in 50 people over their lifetime. Incidence and the impact of AA on mental health and work outcomes, is highest in ethnic groups other than white. Clinicians should be aware of the marked heterogeneity in the incidence and impact of AA, and support targeted healthcare to groups at the highest risk of alopecia and its consequences.The study protocol for this retrospective observational study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05727306).

Physical urticaria: Clinical features, pathogenesis, diagnostic work-up, and management.

Physical urticaria is a type of urticaria in which recurrent wheals and/or angioedema occur following exposure of the skin to a physical stimulus. It is classified according to its triggers, which may be mechanical (friction, pressure, and vibration), thermal (cold and heat), or solar electromagnetic radiation. Symptoms of different physical urticarias can develop following specific activities that expose patients to an eliciting stimulus and may be variably accompanied by mucosal involvement and systemic symptoms, including nausea, headache, or even anaphylaxis. Differentiation of physical urticaria from other chronic urticarias requires careful clinical assessment and confirmatory provocation testing, which in turn can inform appropriate management. This clinical review provides an evidence-based summary of the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, diagnostic work-up, and management of physical urticaria.

Alopecia areata and risk of atopic and autoimmune conditions: population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) has features of both autoimmune and atopic pathogenesis, but information on the risk of people with AA developing autoimmune and atopic conditions is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and incidence of atopic and autoimmune conditions in people with AA. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study of 8051 adults with newly diagnosed AA (AA group) and 32 204 adults in the matched control group, using the UK Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) network primary care database, 2009-2018 (trial registration number: NCT04239521). Baseline prevalence of common atopic and autoimmune conditions, and risk of new-onset atopic and autoimmune disease, were estimated. RESULTS: Atopic and autoimmune conditions were more prevalent in the AA group than the control group (atopic 37.2% vs. 26.7%, autoimmune 11.5% vs. 7.9%). The AA group were 43% more likely to develop any new-onset atopic condition [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.43. 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.61] and 45% more likely to develop any autoimmune condition (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.28-1.66) compared with the control group. When examining individual conditions, the AA group were at increased risk of atopic dermatitis (aHR 1.91, 95% CI 1.67-2.19), allergic rhinitis (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.54), autoimmune hypothyroidism (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.02), systemic lupus erythematosus (aHR 4.51, 95% CI 1.88-10.82) and vitiligo (aHR 2.39, 95% CI 1.49-3.82). There was no evidence for a higher incidence of other conditions examined. CONCLUSION: People with AA have an increased burden of atopic and autoimmune comorbidity. This supports previous work suggesting that both T helper cell (Th)1 and Th2 immune responses may be implicated in the pathogenesis of AA.

Alopecia areata and risk of common infections: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether alopecia areata (AA) is associated with a greater or reduced risk for infection. AIM: We undertook a population-based study exploring associations between AA and common infections. METHODS: We extracted primary care records from the UK Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre database (trial registration: NCT04239521). The incidence of common and viral infection composite outcomes, and individual respiratory, gastrointestinal (GI), skin, urinary tract, genital and herpes infections, were compared in people with AA (AA group, n = 10 391) and a propensity-matched control group (n = 41 564). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), controlling for sociodemographic and clinical covariates, and comorbidities were used to estimate the association between AA and each infection over 5 years. RESULTS: The incidence (per 100 person-years) of common infections was slightly higher in the AA group [14.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-14.6] than the control group (11.7, 95% CI 11.5-11.9). In adjusted analysis, positive associations were observed for composite outcomes (common infections aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17; viral infections aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.16) and with respiratory tract, GI, skin and herpes simplex infections (aHR range 1.09-1.32). Excluding people in the control group without a recent consultation with their general practitioner showed no association between AA and infection (common infections aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.05, viral infections aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: The association between AA and common infection may represent a higher propensity of people with AA to engage with healthcare services (and thereby to have infections recorded), rather than a true association between AA and infection. Overall our findings suggest that AA is not associated with a clinically significantly increased or decreased incidence of common infections.

Pathogenesis of solar urticaria: Classic perspectives and emerging concepts.

Solar urticaria is a rare, immunologically mediated photodermatosis in which activation of cutaneous mast cells is triggered by specific wavelengths of solar electromagnetic radiation. This manifests clinically as the rapid development of cutaneous itch, erythema and wheal formation after several minutes of sun exposure. Disease mechanisms in solar urticaria remain incompletely elucidated and there have been few recent investigations of its pathobiology. Historic passive transfer experiments performed during the twentieth century provide support for a 'photoallergy' model of disease pathogenesis, wherein molecular alteration of a putative chromophore by solar electromagnetic radiation produces mast cell activation via an IgE-dependent mechanism. However, this model does not account for several observations made during passive transfer experiments nor does it explain a range of subsequent clinical and photobiological observations made in solar urticaria patients. Furthermore, increased understanding of the molecular dynamics underpinning cutaneous mast cell responses highlights the need to reformulate our understanding of solar urticaria pathogenesis in the context of this contemporary scientific landscape. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of solar urticaria pathogenesis and, by incorporating recent scientific and clinical observations, develop new hypotheses to drive future investigation into this intriguing disorder.

The associated burden of mental health conditions in alopecia areata: a population-based study in UK primary care.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common cause of nonscarring hair loss that can have a profound psychological impact. OBJECTIVES: To assess the co-occurrence of depression and anxiety in adults with AA compared with the general population, and to evaluate the mental health treatment burden and impact on time off work and unemployment. METHODS: In total, 5435 people with newly diagnosed AA in UK primary care were identified from the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre network database, and matched to 21 740 controls. In cases and controls, we compared the prevalence and incidence of depressive episodes, recurrent depressive disorder and anxiety disorder, rates of time off work and unemployment, and, in those with pre-existing mental health conditions, rates of mental health-related prescribing and referral rates. This observational was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04239521). RESULTS: Depression and anxiety were more prevalent in people diagnosed with AA than in controls (P < 0·001). People with AA were also more likely to subsequently develop new-onset depression and anxiety: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for recurrent depressive disorder 1·38 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·13-1·69], depressive episodes aHR 1·30 (95% CI 1·04-1·62) and anxiety disorder aHR 1·33 (95% CI 1·09-1·63); to be issued time off work certificates (aHR 1·56, 95% CI 1·43-1·71); and to be recorded as unemployed (aHR 1·82, 95% CI 1·33-2·49). Higher rates of antidepressant prescribing were also seen in people with AA. CONCLUSIONS: People with AA have higher rates of depression and anxiety than those without AA. This impacts deleteriously on mental health treatment burden, time off work and unemployment. Evidence-based mental health treatment programmes are needed for people with AA.

Perforin, COVID-19 and a possible pathogenic auto-inflammatory feedback loop.

During COVID-19 infection, reduced function of natural killer (NK) cells can lead to both compromised viral clearance and dysregulation of the immune response. Such dysregulation leads to overproduction of cytokines, a raised neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and monocytosis. This in turn increases IL-6 expression, which promotes scar and thrombus formation. Excess IL-6 also leads to a further reduction in NK function through downregulation of perforin expression, therefore forming a pathogenic auto-inflammatory feedback loop. The perforin/granzyme system of cytotoxicity is the main mechanism through which NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes eliminate virally infected host cells, as well as being central to their role in regulating immune responses to microbial infection. Here, we present epidemiological evidence suggesting an association between perforin expression and resistance to COVID-19. In addition, we outline the manner in which a pathogenic auto-inflammatory feedback loop could operate and the relationship of this loop to genes associated with severe COVID-19. Such an auto-inflammatory loop may be amenable to synergistic multimodal therapy.

Lichen planus and lichenoid dermatoses: Conventional and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Having reviewed the diverse clinical subtypes of lichenoid disease and the postulated molecular basis thereof in the first article in this 2-part continuing medical education series, we discuss herein the existing and emerging treatment strategies in the most common clinical forms of lichenoid inflammation and provide an overview of their pharmacodynamics and evidence base. The scope of this review is not to exhaustively discuss treatment modalities for all lichenoid variants discussed in the previous article of this series. Instead, the focus will be on frequently encountered subtypes of lichen planus and on linking mechanisms of disease with mechanisms of drug action. Future directions and potential avenues for translational research will also be discussed.

Lichen planus and lichenoid dermatoses: Clinical overview and molecular basis.

Deriving from the Greek word λειχήν for "tree moss" and the Latin word planus for "planar," lichen planus is a relatively uncommon and heterogeneous cutaneous disorder that typically develops in middle-aged adults. Despite the significant clinical burden associated with the disorder, little well-conducted molecular research has been undertaken, possibly because of heterogeneity impeding consistent and confident phenotyping. The multiple variants of lichenoid disease bear overlapping clinical and pathologic features despite manifesting as distinct clinical disorders. The first article in this 2-part continuing medical education series provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical and pathologic characteristics of cutaneous lichenoid dermatoses and links these manifestations to recent advances in our understanding of the underlying pathobiology of such diseases.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia: reflections and hypotheses on aetiology and pathogenesis.

Since first described by Kossard in 1994, frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has been something of an enigma. The clinical heterogeneity of FFA, its apparent rarity and investigators' suboptimal access to phenotypically consistent patient cohorts may all have had a negative impact on delineating disease pathogenesis. Moreover, there is a relative paucity of epidemiological, interventional and basic research studies, and there have been no advances in translational therapeutics, unlike for other inflammatory dermatoses, such as alopecia areata (AA). Dermatologists anecdotally describe an increasing incidence in FFA over the last decade, which has led to the notion that the disorder may be induced by unknown environmental triggers. On the other hand, segregation of FFA in some families lends support to an unexplored genetic element implicated in disease pathogenesis. We herein review what is known about the pathobiology of FFA and formulate working hypotheses to advance insight into this intriguing hair disorder.