Effect of the novel dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on night-time respiratory function and sleep in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep is often fragmented while, conversely, the use of sleep medications is of concern in these patients due to potential impairment of nocturnal breathing. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the new dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on night-time respiratory function and sleep in patients with moderate COPD. In each period, the highest Phase-III dose of 50 mg daridorexant or placebo was administered once daily in the evening for 5 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) during total sleep time (TST) after last dosing. Night-time respiratory function and sleep were further evaluated based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), sleep duration, and objective sleep parameters. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also assessed. Primary endpoint analysis revealed no significant mean treatment difference (i.e. daridorexant - placebo) for SpO2 during TST as it was 0.18% (90% confidence interval: -0.21 to 0.57). There was also no difference from placebo for SpO2 during non-rapid eye movement (REM) and REM sleep at Night 5 and after first dosing. The AHI was slightly increased compared to placebo, but not to a clinically meaningful extent. In addition, daridorexant improved objective sleep parameters (i.e. prolonged TST, increased sleep efficiency, and decreased wake after sleep onset), reached expected plasma concentrations, and was safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, single and multiple doses of 50 mg daridorexant do not impair night-time respiratory function and improves sleep in patients with moderate COPD.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of single-dose subcutaneous administration of selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.

AIMS: To study the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist for subcutaneous administration, in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this double-blind, randomized study of 345 patients with CCS on background oral antiplatelet therapy, subcutaneous selatogrel (8 mg, n = 114; or 16 mg, n = 115) was compared with placebo (n = 116) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03384966). Platelet aggregation was assessed over 24 h (VerifyNow assay) and 8 h (light transmittance aggregometry; LTA). Pharmacodynamic responders were defined as patients having P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) <100 at 30 min post-dose and lasting ≥3 h. At 30 min post-dose, 89% of patients were responders to selatogrel 8 mg, 90% to selatogrel 16 mg, and 16% to placebo (P < 0.0001). PRU values (mean ± standard deviation) were 10 ± 25 (8 mg), 4 ± 10 (16 mg), and 163 ± 73 (placebo) at 15 min and remained <100 up to 8 h for both doses, returning to pre-dose or near pre-dose levels by 24 h post-dose. LTA data showed similarly rapid and potent inhibition of platelet aggregation. Selatogrel plasma concentrations peaked ∼30 min post-dose. Selatogrel was safe and well-tolerated with transient dyspnoea occurring overall in 7% (16/229) of patients (95% confidence interval: 4-11%). CONCLUSIONS: Selatogrel was rapidly absorbed following subcutaneous administration in CCS patients, providing prompt, potent, and consistent platelet P2Y12 inhibition sustained for ≥8 h and reversible within 24 h. Further studies of subcutaneous selatogrel are warranted in clinical scenarios where rapid platelet inhibition is desirable.

Impact of the organic cation transporter 2 inhibitor cimetidine on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor lucerastat in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Lucerastat is an orally available glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor with a potential to provide substrate reduction therapy for Fabry patients independent of their α-galactosidase A genotype. In humans, lucerastat is mainly eliminated as unchanged parent compound through renal excretion both by active secretion and passive filtration. In vitro studies indicated that lucerastat is a substrate of human organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) mainly expressed in the kidney. METHODS: Therefore, this clinical study, conducted in 14 healthy male subjects, investigated the effect of 800 mg twice-daily oral administration of the OCT2 inhibitor cimetidine at steady state on the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of 500 mg lucerastat. The safety and tolerability of lucerastat administered alone and concomitantly with cimetidine were also evaluated. RESULTS: Exposure to lucerastat was slightly higher upon co-administration of cimetidine indicated by geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) ratio of 1.22 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.28). Cimetidine delayed the time to reach maximum lucerastat concentrations (tmax) by 1 h but did not affect its elimination half-life (t½) or maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) as geometric mean ratios were 1.00 (0.91-1.10) and 1.04 (0.92-1.17), respectively, at cimetidine steady state. Lucerastat was safe and well tolerated when given alone and in combination with cimetidine. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the single-dose PK of lucerastat are not changed to a clinically relevant extent by cimetidine-mediated OCT2 inhibition, allowing the concomitant use of OCT2 inhibitors with lucerastat without any need for dose adjustment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2017-003725-14; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03380455.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of the P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel after subcutaneous administration in healthy subjects.

The P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel which exhibits rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation following subcutaneous administration is in development for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.This human ADME study was performed in six healthy male subjects to determine the routes of elimination and to identify/quantify the metabolites of selatogrel at a therapeutically relevant dose of 16 mg [14C]-radiolabelled selatogrel.The median tmax and t1/2 of selatogrel was 0.75 h and 4.7 h, respectively. It was safe and well tolerated based on adverse event, ECG, vital sign and laboratory data.Geometric mean total recovery of [14C]-radioactivity was 94.9% of which 92.5% was recovered in faeces and 2.4% in urine.Selatogrel was the most abundant entity in each matrix. In plasma, no major metabolite was identified. In excreta, the glucuronide M21 (14.7% of radioactivity) and the mono-oxidized A1 (6.2%) were the most abundant metabolites in urine and faeces, respectively.Overall, none of the metabolic pathways contributed to a relevant extent to the overall elimination of selatogrel, i.e. by more than 25% as defined per regulatory guidance. Hence, no pharmacokinetic interaction studies with inhibitors or inducers of drug-metabolizing enzymes are warranted for clinical development of selatogrel.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of cenerimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator in healthy subjects.

Cenerimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator under development for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.This single-centre, open-label, single-dose study investigated the mass balance and excretion routes and aimed at identifying and quantifying cenerimod metabolites in plasma, urine, and faeces after oral administration of 2 mg/100 µCi (3.7 MBq) of 14C-cenerimod.Total mean cumulative recovery was 84% of the administered dose (58-100% in faeces and 4.6-12% in urine). In a 0-504 h cross-subject area under the curve plasma pool, cenerimod and two metabolites were detected accounting for 78, 6.0, and 4.9% of total radioactivity, respectively, i.e. no major metabolite was identified in plasma. Cenerimod was only detected in faeces and accounted for 17% of the radioactivity excreted in this matrix. The metabolite M32 was detected in both urine and faeces and represented 23% and 66% of radioactivity excreted in these matrices, respectively. Other metabolites of unknown structure were detected in small amounts. Overall, M32 and cenerimod accounted for 52% and 13%, respectively, of the total radioactivity recovered.Among the excreted metabolites, only the non-enzymatically formed M32 represented more than 25% of total drug-related material. Therefore, no pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies are foreseen.

Interaction potential of the dual orexin receptor antagonist ACT-541468 with CYP3A4 and food: results from two interaction studies.

PURPOSE: ACT-541468 is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) under development for the treatment of insomnia. In vitro studies suggested a significant role of CYP3A4 in ACT-541468 metabolism and an impact on CYP3A4 activity. METHODS: Subsequently, two clinical cross-over studies investigated the victim (n = 14 healthy subjects) and perpetrator (n = 20) potential of 25 mg ACT-541468 with respect to CYP3A4. The effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of ACT-541468 was also investigated. RESULTS: Moderate CYP3A4 inhibition by diltiazem (240 mg/day) increased the Cmax and AUC0-∞ of ACT-541468 by 1.4-fold (90% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-1.6) and 2.4-fold (90% CI: 2.0-2.8), respectively, and prolonged t½ by 80% (90% CI: 60-90) without affecting tmax. Single- and multiple-dose administration of 25 mg ACT-541468 had no impact on the pharmacokinetics of the sensitive substrate midazolam and its main metabolite 1-hydroxy midazolam indicated by 90% CI of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC within bioequivalence criteria and by an unchanged tmax. After a high-fat high-calorie breakfast, the pharmacokinetic profile of 25 mg ACT-541468 showed a decrease of Cmax by 24% (90% CI: 17-31) and a delay of tmax by approximately 2 h (90% CI: 1.4-2.4), whereas t½ and AUC0-24 remained essentially unchanged. ACT-541468 given alone or in combination with diltiazem, midazolam, or food was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ACT-541468 has been determined as CYP3A4 substrate but without any perpetrator drug-drug interaction potential regarding CYP3A4 in humans. Food affected ACT-541468 absorption without modifying overall exposure.

Cardiodynamic Interactions between Two S1P1 Receptor Modulators in an Experimental Clinical Setting: Different Pharmacokinetic Properties as an Opportunity to Mitigate First-Dose Heart Rate Effects.

A decrease in heart rate (HR) is a well-established first-dose effect of sphingosine-1-phosphate subtype 1 receptor (S1P1R) modulators. For compounds with a short half-life (t1/2), this can be mitigated by gradual up-titration to therapeutic doses, whereas this is not required for compounds with a long t1/2 due to the less pronounced first-dose-related negative chronotropic effects. Based on this conceptual framework, this mechanistic study investigated whether first-dose HR effects of ponesimod (t1/2 ~32 h) can be mitigated by prior administration of cenerimod (t1/2 ~415 h). Healthy subjects (n = 12) were randomly assigned to active or placebo (2:1 ratio). Active treatment consisted of a single dose of 10 mg ponesimod on Day 1, 18, and 37 and multiple-dose administration of 2 mg once daily cenerimod (Day 9-36). Placebos of cenerimod and ponesimod were used as reference treatment. Cardiodynamic parameters were derived from 24 h Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) assessments on Day 1, 9, 10, 18, 36, and 37. Ponesimod (10 mg) alone triggered a transient mean decrease from baseline in hourly mean HR of 17 bpm. In contrast, decreases of 5.0 and 4.8 bpm were observed when ponesimod was given at near half steady-state (Day 18) or steady-state (Day 37) cenerimod, respectively. Hourly mean HR decreased after first administration of cenerimod and placebo was 7.4 and 4.0 bpm, respectively. Treatment with ponesimod and cenerimod alone or in combination was safe and tolerated. First-dose-related negative chronotropic effects of ponesimod were less pronounced when administered after initiation of cenerimod suggesting mitigation of this class-related liability.

In vitro studies and in silico predictions of fluconazole and CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism impact on siponimod metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to investigate the enzyme(s) responsible for siponimod metabolism and to predict the inhibitory effects of fluconazole as well as the impact of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 genetic polymorphism on siponimod pharmacokinetics (PK) and metabolism. METHODS: In vitro metabolism studies were conducted using human liver microsomes (HLM), and enzyme phenotyping was assessed using a correlation analysis method. SimCYP, a physiologically based PK model, was developed and used to predict the effects of fluconazole and CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism on siponimod metabolism. Primary PK parameters were generated using the SimCYP and WinNonlin software. RESULTS: Correlation analysis suggested that CYP2C9 is the main enzyme responsible for siponimod metabolism in humans. Compared with the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype, HLM incubations from CYP2C9*3/*3 and CYP2C9*2/*2 donors showed ~ 10- and 3-fold decrease in siponimod metabolism, respectively. Simulations of enzyme contribution predicted that in the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype, CYP2C9 is predominantly responsible for siponimod metabolism (~ 81%), whereas in the CYP2C9*3/*3 genotype, its contribution is reduced to 11%. The predicted exposure increase of siponimod with fluconazole 200 mg was 2.0-2.4-fold for CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype. In context of single dosing, the predicted mean area under the curve (AUC) is 2.7-, 3.0- and 4.5-fold higher in the CYP2C9*2/*2, CYP2C9*2/*3 and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes, respectively, compared with the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype. CONCLUSION: .Enzyme phenotyping with correlation analysis confirmed the predominant role of CYP2C9 in the biotransformation of siponimod and demonstrated the functional consequence of CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism on siponimod metabolism. Simulation of fluconazole inhibition closely predicted a 2-fold AUC change (ratio within ~ 20% deviation) to the observed value. In silico simulation predicted a significant reduction in siponimod clearance in the CYP2C9*2/*2 and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes based on the in vitro metabolism data; the predicted exposure was close (within 30%) to the observed results for the CYP2C9*2/*3 and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes.

Effect of mavoglurant (AFQ056), a selective mGluR5 antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of a combination oral contraceptive (OC) when given alone or concomitantly with the selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist mavoglurant (AFQ056). METHODS: This open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study included 30 healthy female subjects aged 18-40 years. In period 1, a single oral dose of an OC containing 30 µg ethinyl estradiol (EE)/150 µg levonorgestrel (LNG) was administered alone. In period 2, the OC was administered with a clinically relevant multiple dose of mavoglurant 100 mg b.i.d. under steady-state conditions. Plasma concentrations of EE and LNG were measured up to 72 hours post administration, and the PK parameters Cmax and AUClast were estimated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios of EE Cmax and AUClast obtained with and without mavoglurant were 0.97 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.06) and 0.94 (90% CI: 0.86-1.03), respectively. The corresponding Cmax and AUClast for LNG were 0.81 (90% CI: 0.75-0.87) and 0.68 (90% CI: 0.63-0.73), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, EE PK was unchanged, whereas Cmax and AUClast of LNG were 19% and 32% lower, respectively, when given with mavoglurant Further investigation regarding the impact on contraceptive efficacy is warranted.

Endocrine profile of the kisspeptin receptor agonist MVT-602 in healthy premenopausal women with and without ovarian stimulation: results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical tricals.

BACKGROUND: Kisspeptin is an essential regulator of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone release and is required for physiological ovulation. Native kisspeptin-54 can induce oocyte maturation during in vitro fertilization treatment, including in women who are at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. MVT-602 is a potent kisspeptin receptor agonist with prospective utility to treat anovulatory disorders by triggering oocyte maturation and ovulation during medically assisted reproduction (MAR). Currently, the endocrine profile of MVT-602 during ovarian stimulation is unreported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the endocrine profile of MVT-602 in the follicular phase of healthy premenopausal women (phase-1 trial), and after minimal ovarian stimulation to more closely reflect the endocrine milieu encountered during MAR (phase-2a trial). DESIGN: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding trials. SETTING: Clinical trials unit. PATIENTS: Healthy women aged 18-35 years, either without (phase-1; n = 24), or with ovarian stimulation (phase-2a; n = 75). INTERVENTIONS: Phase-1: single subcutaneous dose of MVT-602 (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 µg) or placebo, (n = 6 per dose). Phase-2a: single subcutaneous dose of MVT-602 (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 µg; n = 16-17 per dose), triptorelin 0.2 mg (n = 5; active comparator), or placebo (n = 5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Phase-1: safety/tolerability; pharmacokinetics; and pharmacodynamics (luteinizing hormone [LH] and other reproductive hormones). Phase-2a: safety/tolerability; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics (LH and other reproductive hormones); and time to ovulation assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. RESULTS: In both the trials, MVT-602 was safe and well tolerated across the entire dose range. It was rapidly absorbed and eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life of 1.3-2.2 hours. In the phase-2a trial, LH concentrations increased dose dependently; mean maximum change from baseline of 82.4 IU/L at 24.8 hours was observed after administration of 3 µg MVT-602 and remained >15 IU/L for 33 hours. Time to ovulation after drug administration was 3.3-3.9 days (MVT-602), 3.4 days (triptorelin), and 5.5 days (placebo). Ovulation occurred within 5 days of administration in 100% (3 µg), 88% (1 µg), 82% (0.3 µg), and 75% (0.1 µg), of women after MVT-602, 100% after triptorelin and 60% after placebo. CONCLUSIONS: MVT-602 induces LH concentrations of similar amplitude and duration as the physiological midcycle LH surge with potential utility for induction of oocyte maturation and ovulation during MAR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRA-CT: 2017-003812-38, 2018-001379-20.

Metabolism and disposition of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist (mGluR5) mavoglurant (AFQ056) in healthy subjects.

The disposition and biotransformation of (14)C-radiolabeled mavoglurant were investigated in four healthy male subjects after a single oral dose of 200 mg. Blood, plasma, urine, and feces collected over 7 days were analyzed for total radioactivity, mavoglurant was quantified in plasma by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and metabolite profiles were generated in plasma and excreta by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and radioactivity detection. The chemical structures of mavoglurant metabolites were characterized by LC-MS/MS, wet-chemical and enzymatic methods, NMR spectroscopy, and comparison with reference compounds. Mavoglurant was safe and well tolerated in this study population. Mavoglurant absorption was ≥50% of dose reaching mean plasma Cmax values of 140 ng/ml (mavoglurant) and 855 ng-eq/ml (total radioactivity) at 2.5 and 3.6 hours, respectively. Thereafter, mavoglurant and total radioactivity concentrations declined with mean apparent half-lives of 12 and 18 hours, respectively. The elimination of mavoglurant occurred predominantly by oxidative metabolism involving primarily 1) oxidation of the tolyl-methyl group to a benzyl-alcohol metabolite (M7) and subsequently to a benzoic acid metabolite (M6), and 2) oxidation of the phenyl-ring leading to a hydroxylated metabolite (M3). The subjects were mainly exposed to mavoglurant and seven main metabolites, which combined accounted for 60% of (14)C-AUC0-72 h (area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity). The primary steps of mavoglurant metabolism observed in vivo could partially be reproduced in vitro in incubations with human liver microsomes and recombinant cytochrome P450 enzymes. After 7 days, the mean balance of total radioactivity excretion was almost complete (95.3% of dose) with 36.7% recovered in urine and 58.6% in feces.

Relationship of drug metabolizing enzyme genotype to plasma levels as well as myelotoxicity of cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The cytotoxic drug cyclophosphamide (CP) is bioactivated into 4-hydroxy-cyclophosphamide (4-OH-CP) through cytochrome P450 enzymes and cleared through aldehyde dehydrogenase and glutathione S-transferase. This prospective study analyzes the influence of drug metabolizing enzyme genotype on (1) plasma 4-OH-CP:CP ratio and (2) myelotoxicity in breast cancer patients on 500 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide. METHODS: Sixty-eight female breast cancer patients on FAC (fluorouracil, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) were included. Genotyping of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH3A1), and glutathione S-transferase (GSTA1) was done either through RFLP or pyrosequencing. Plasma CP and 4-OH-CP were measured immediately and 1 and 2 h after the end of infusion through LC-MS. The leukocyte count was determined on day 10 and 20 after chemotherapy. RESULTS: At CP dose of 500 mg/m(2), the 4-OH-CP:CP ratio was negatively affected by CYP2C19*2 genotype (p = 0.039) showing a gene-dose effect. Moreover ALDH3A1*2 genotype increased 4-OH-CP:CP ratio (p = 0.037). These effects did not remain significant in a univariate analysis of variance including all genotypes. GSTA1*B carriers were at increased risk of severe leucopenia (OR 6.94; 95% CI 1.75-27.6, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The myelotoxicity in patients receiving FAC is related to the activity of the phase-II enzyme GSTA1 but is independent of the formation of 4-OH-CP.

Abuse potential assessment of the new dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant in recreational sedative drug users as compared to suvorexant and zolpidem.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Abuse potential properties have been reported for the dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) suvorexant and lemborexant. Daridorexant is a new DORA currently in late-stage clinical development. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled six-period crossover study assessed its abuse potential in healthy recreational sedative drug users (n = 63). METHODS: In each study period, a single, oral, morning dose of either daridorexant (50, 100, and 150 mg), placebo, or active control, i.e. suvorexant (150 mg) or zolpidem (30 mg), was administered. Primary pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint was the Emax of the drug-liking visual analog scale (VAS) assessed over 24 h. Several secondary subjective and objective PD endpoints were also assessed. RESULTS: Study validity was confirmed based on drug-liking of suvorexant and zolpidem greater than placebo applying a predefined 15-point validity margin (p < 0.0001). Drug-liking VAS Emax (mean; 95% confidence interval) of daridorexant at 50 mg (73.2; 69.0-77.5) was significantly lower compared to suvorexant (80.7; 77.0-84.5) and zolpidem (79.9; 76.2-83.5) (p < 0.001), but similar at 100 mg (79.1; 75.0-83.3) and 150 mg (81.3; 77.7, 84.8). Such dose-related patterns were also observed for most secondary endpoints. At each daridorexant dose, Drug-liking VAS scores were greater than placebo. Both control drugs and daridorexant were safe and the pharmacokinetics of daridorexant was consistent with earlier trials indicating quick absorption and elimination. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, valid human abuse potential study, daridorexant showed dose-related drug-liking among recreational sedative drug users with lower effects at the highest phase-3 dose, and similar effects at higher doses compared to supratherapeutic doses of suvorexant and zolpidem. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study to Evaluate the Abuse Potential of ACT-541468 in Healthy Recreational Drug Users, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03657355?term=ACT-541468&draw=3&rank=18, NCT03657355.

Transition from Syringe to Autoinjector Based on Bridging Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist Selatogrel in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selatogrel is a potent, reversible, and selective antagonist of the platelet P2Y12 receptor currently developed for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In the completed Phase I/II studies, selatogrel was subcutaneously (s.c.) administered as a lyophilizate-based formulation by syringe by a healthcare professional. In the Phase III study, selatogrel will be self-administered s.c. as a liquid formulation with an autoinjector at the onset of AMI symptoms to shorten treatment delay. This clinical bridging study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of selatogrel between the different formulations. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, three-period, cross-over Phase I study in 24 healthy subjects. In each period, a single subcutaneous dose of 16 mg selatogrel was administered as (1) a Phase III liquid formulation by autoinjector (Treatment A), (2) a Phase III liquid formulation by prefilled syringe (Treatment B), or (3) a Phase I/II reconstituted lyophilizate-based formulation by syringe (Treatment C). PK parameters including area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax(tmax), and terminal half-life (t1/2) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters were estimated using PK/PD modeling, including the time of first occurrence of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) ≥ 80% (tonset), duration of IPA above 80% (tduration), and responder rate defined as the percentage of subjects with tonset ≤ 30 min and tduration ≥ 3 h. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Comparing Treatment A to Treatment C, the exposure (AUC0-∞) was bioequivalent with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval) of 0.95 (0.92-0.97) within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). Absorption following Treatment A was slightly slower with a tmax occurring approximately 30 min later and a 20% lower Cmax. The autoinjector itself had no impact on the PK of selatogrel, as similar values of Cmax and AUC0-∞ were determined after administration as a Phase III liquid formulation by autoinjector or by prefilled syringe (i.e., GMR [90% confidence interval] of 1.06 [0.97-1.15] and 0.99 [0.96-1.03] for Cmax and AUC0-∞, respectively). PK/PD modeling predicted that the median tonset will occur slightly later for Treatment A (7.2 min) compared to Treatment C (4.2  min), while no relevant differences in tduration and responder rate were estimated between the two treatments. Selatogrel was safe and well tolerated following all three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: PK and simulated PD effects of selatogrel were similar across treatments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04557280.

Assessment of the effect of the dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on various indices of disease severity in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant did not impact nighttime respiratory function as assessed by the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) and nocturnal oxygen saturation (SpO2) and improved sleep in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These analyses were supplemented with further evaluations of various indices of OSA severity and sleep variables. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study, 50 mg daridorexant or placebo was administered every evening for 5 days to 28 patients with mild to moderate OSA. Treatment differences (daridorexant - placebo) were explored for indices of OSA severity including the number and duration of apneas and hypopneas, mean and lowest nocturnal SpO2, sleep duration during each hour of polysomnography recording, and the number and mean and longest duration of awakenings. RESULTS: After repeated-dose daridorexant, more respiratory events were observed compared to placebo, ie., treatment difference of 16.4 events (90% confidence interval: -0.4, 33.2) which is explained by a longer total sleep time. However, no treatment difference was detected for the longest duration of apneas and hypopneas (1.5 s [-8.3, 11.2] and 8.2 s [-6.6, 23.0], respectively), and lowest SpO2 (0.9% [-0.3, 2.1]). The number of awakenings was similar between daridorexant and placebo while daridorexant shortened the longest duration by 16.2 min (8.5, 23.8). Overall, results were similar after single and repeated dosing for both respiratory and sleep aspects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest safe use of daridorexant in patients with mild to moderate OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03765294. A study to investigate the effects of ACT-541468 on nighttime respiratory function in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03765294.

Impact of ABCC2 genotype on antiepileptic drug response in Caucasian patients with childhood epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic treatment response has been suggested to be modulated by genetic polymorphisms of drug efflux transporters, in particular ABCB1. Recently, we found a significant association of ABCC2 -24C>T with nonresponse, primarily in the context of generalized epilepsy. Moreover, ABCC2 1249G>A was reported to alter transmembranal carbamazepine transport. Therefore, we aimed to confirm the association of ABCC2 variants with pharmacotherapy-resistance in Caucasians mainly affected by partial epilepsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 208 patients (114 male; age: 11.3±5.9 years) were genotyped for three putatively functionally relevant polymorphisms of ABCC2 (-24C>T, 1249G>A, 3972C>T). Genotype and haplotype frequencies were compared between responders and nonresponders to first-line antiepileptic treatment. RESULTS: Carriers of the ABCC2 1249G>A variant (417V>I) were more frequent among responders [odds ratio (OR)=2.68 (1.25-5.78); P=0.010]. This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex and seizure type, [OR=2.88 (1.23-6.73); P=0.015]. The impact of 1249G>A was more pronounced among 64 patients receiving carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (P=0.005), but nonsignificant in patients receiving other anticonvulsants. ABCC2 -24C>T and 3972C>T showed lack of association to therapy response. Haplotype analyses revealed that haplotype H2 containing solely the 1249A variant allele was more frequent in the responder group [OR=2.98 (1.38-6.44); P=0.004]. DISCUSSION: These data argue for a greater probability of antiepileptic drug response among carriers of the ABCC2 1249A variant that is associated with reduced carbamazepine transport. Although we could not confirm an impact of ABCC2 -24C>T, these results suggest that ABCC2 genotype may also modulate the response to anticonvulsants besides the extensively studied ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein).

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cenerimod, A Selective S1P1 R Modulator, Are Not Affected by Ethnicity in Healthy Asian and White Subjects.

Cenerimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor (S1P1 R) modulator in phase II development for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Its pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), as well as safety and tolerability were investigated in white and Asian subjects to allow for recruitment of Asian patients in future studies. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study was performed in 20 healthy male subjects (n = 10 per ethnicity). A single, oral dose of 4 mg cenerimod or placebo (ratio 8:2) was administered under fasted conditions. The PKs of cenerimod were similar in white and Asian subjects indicated by geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of 0.99 (0.80-1.21) for maximum plasma concentration, 0.96 (0.75-1.24) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, and 1.04 (0.86-1.25) for terminal half-life. Accordingly, the extent and time course of reduction in lymphocyte count (as PD biomarker) were also similar in white and Asian subjects as compared with placebo. As observed for other S1PR modulators, a transient mean (SD) heart rate reduction in white (15.1 (14.8) bpm) and Asian (11.8 (6.16) bpm) subjects was observed following administration of cenerimod. The drug was safe and well-tolerated indicated by occurrence of a single adverse event of chemical conjunctivitis in a white subject that was not suspected as study drug related. In conclusion, the determined absence of any relevant PK or PD differences supports using the same doses of cenerimod in white and Asian patients in upcoming late-phase studies.

Effect of the new dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on nighttime respiratory function and sleep in patients with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study, the effect of the dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant was evaluated on nighttime respiratory function and sleep in 28 patients with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In each period, 50 mg daridorexant or placebo was administered every evening for 5 days. The primary endpoint was apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) during total sleep time (TST) after the last dosing. Other endpoints included peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), sleep duration, latency to persistent sleep (LPS), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency index (SEI). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also assessed. The mean treatment difference for AHI during TST (i.e. daridorexant - placebo) after the last dosing was 0.74 events/hour (90% confidence interval [CI]: -1.43, 2.92). The corresponding treatment difference for SpO2 during TST was 0.16% [90% CI: -0.21, 0.53]. Overall, there was no clinically relevant effect of daridorexant on AHI or SpO2-related data after single and repeated dosing irrespective of sleep phase (i.e. rapid eye movement [REM] vs non-REM). Moreover, after single and repeated dosing, daridorexant prolonged TST by 39.6 minutes (90% CI: 16.9, 62.3) and 38.8 minutes (19.7, 57.9), respectively, compared with placebo and favorably modulated other sleep-related endpoints (i.e. increased SEI, decreased WASO, and shortened LPS). It attained expected plasma concentrations and was well tolerated in patients with mild and moderate OSA. These results indicate that single and repeated doses of 50 mg daridorexant do not impair nighttime respiratory function and improve sleep in patients with mild and moderate OSA. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03765294. A study to investigate the effects of ACT-541468 on nighttime respiratory function in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT03765294.

Impact of Daridorexant, a Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist, on Cardiac Repolarization Following Bedtime Dosing: Results from a Thorough QT Study Using Concentration-QT Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Daridorexant is a new dual orexin receptor antagonist currently in late-stage clinical development for the treatment of insomnia. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study investigated the effect of daridorexant at a therapeutic and supratherapeutic dose on QT interval duration. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy subjects received single oral doses of daridorexant (50 mg; 200 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg; open label), and placebo. All treatments were administered at bedtime to mimic therapeutic practice. The primary analysis was based on linear mixed-effects concentration-QT modelling. Triplicate ECG data were extracted from Holter recordings at baseline and until 24 h post dosing at time points matching those for pharmacokinetic sampling. Plasma concentrations of daridorexant were determined over 24 h. RESULTS: Assay sensitivity was demonstrated based on mean baseline- and placebo-corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF) > 5 ms following moxifloxacin administration (p < 0.01). Following daridorexant administration, mean (90% confidence interval, CI) ΔΔQTcF was 1.40 ms (0.48; 2.32 ms) and 1.84 ms (-0.12; 3.79 ms) at the Cmax of 747 ng/mL (50 mg dose) and 1809 ng/mL (200 mg dose), respectively, i.e., the upper bounds of the CIs were < 10 ms defined as threshold of regulatory concern. Lack of relevant QT prolongation was confirmed by secondary by-time point analysis and absence of relevant findings in the categorical outlier analysis. Daridorexant was safe and well tolerated and its pharmacokinetics were consistent with previous data. CONCLUSION: Daridorexant does not impair cardiac repolarization evidenced by absence of relevant QT prolongation at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses. Clinical Trials Registration ID: NCT04250506.

Insights from In Vitro and Clinical Data to Guide Transition from the Novel P2Y12 Antagonist Selatogrel to Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, and Ticagrelor.

Reduced pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of irreversible oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists have been reported when administered during cangrelor infusion. Therefore, the PD interaction liability of the novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel with irreversible (i.e., clopidogrel, prasugrel) and reversible (i.e., ticagrelor) oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists was investigated in vitro and in healthy subjects. In vitro, selatogrel reduced the effects of clopidogrel and prasugrel in a concentration-dependent manner, while additive effects were observed for the combination of selatogrel and ticagrelor. Accordingly, a single-center, randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover study was conducted consisting of six groups. In each group (N = 12), an open-label loading dose of 300 or 600 mg clopidogrel, 60 mg prasugrel, or 180 mg ticagrelor was administered 30 minutes (i.e., at t max of selatogrel) or 12 hours after a single subcutaneous dose of 16 mg selatogrel or placebo. Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) was assessed at various time points up to 48 hours. Reduced IPA was determined when clopidogrel or prasugrel was administered 30 minutes after selatogrel (∼40 and 70% lower IPA, respectively, at 24 hours postdosing). However, when administering prasugrel 12 hours after selatogrel, IPA was not impacted (>90% IPA) and in the case of clopidogrel reduced effects were partially mitigated. Similar IPA was determined for ticagrelor when administered 30 minutes after selatogrel or placebo. In conclusion, reduced IPA was observed for clopidogrel and prasugrel when administered after selatogrel, which can be mitigated by applying an appropriate time interval. No PD interaction with ticagrelor was observed.