Mandibular molar protraction: A comparison between fixed functional appliances and temporary anchorage devices.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the efficiency of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) and fixed functional appliances (FFAs) for mandibular molar protraction. METHODS: Orthodontic records of 1050 consecutively treated patients with molar protraction were screened. Thirty-six records (22 females and 14 males; mean age, 17.4 years) were divided into two groups: TAD (21 subjects with 25 edentulous spaces) and FFA (15 subjects with 24 edentulous spaces). The primary outcome measure was the efficiency of protraction [magnitude and time required for protraction (rate) and anchor loss (AL)]. The secondary outcomes involved measuring the type of tooth movement (TOTM), external apical root resorption (EARR), alveolar bone height change (ABHC), alveolar bone width change (ABWC) and appliance failure. RESULTS: The rate of tooth movement was significantly higher for FFAs (0.83 ± 0.35 mm/month) versus TADs (0.49 ± 0.2 mm/month) (P = .005). Total treatment duration was less for FFAs (34.78 ± 8.1 months) versus TADs (47.72 ± 13.94 months) (P = .002). TOTM was similar for both (P = .909). EARR was 1.42 ± 1.38 mm for TAD and 1.25 ± 0.88 mm for FFA (P = .81). ABHC increased in the FFA group (1.01 ± 3.62 mm) and decreased for the TAD group (0.68 ± 1.66 mm). ABWC increased for both TAD (1.81 ± 1.73 mm) and FFA (1.75 ± 1.35 mm). The failure rate was 50% for FFAs and 33% for TADs. CONCLUSIONS: Both systems provided translation of lower molars with comparable anchorage control. However, FFAs were more efficient than TADs for lower molar protraction.

Estimating the 3-D location of impacted maxillary canines: A CBCT-based analysis of severity of impaction.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to quantify the 3-D location of impacted canines by measuring their linear and angular deviations in relation to adjacent structures and further evaluate impaction severity. METHODS: CBCT images of 314 impacted canines were analysed in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. Linear and angular measurements were recorded. Canine inclination was identified in coronal and sagittal planes. An evaluation system was constructed for analysis. Upright canine was considered as the appropriate position for fully erupted maxillary canine. Outcomes were compared between right and left sides and by gender. For categorical variables, chi-square tests were used while Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables. Regression models were used to measure severity. RESULTS: Impactions were greater in females (119/207; 57.5%). No significant differences between unilateral (100/207; 49.3%) and bilateral (107/207; 51.7%) (P > 0.05). Out of 314 impactions, 105 (33.4%) were mild, 118 (37.58%) moderate and 91 (28.98%) severe. Severe impactions were primarily buccal (44/ 91; 48.3%), in the occlusal ½ of the adjacent incisor root (38/ 91, 41.7%), mesial to the distal border of central incisor (47/91, 51.6%), with sagittal angle value + >45 ̊ (46/ 91, 50.5%) and mesial tip + >30 ̊ (86/ 91, 94.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Severely impacted canines had their crowns buccal, closer to occlusal plane and mesial to the distal border of the central incisor with greater than 45-degree buccal inclination and greater than 30-degree mesial tip. The sagittal angle can have a significant impact on the severity of impaction. A new classification system was proposed to quantify severity.

Survival and failure rate of lower lingual bonded retainers: A retrospective cohort evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the survival rates for lower lingual retainers (LLRs) and to establish a correlation between patients' treatment-related factors (age, sex, malocclusion, appliance used for treatment, teeth bonded, retention protocols) to the survival of LLRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 765 subjects [474 females and 291 males: mean age = 24.29 ± 10.67 years] between 2013 and 2022 were included. A customized data collection form was utilized to gather the data from the electronic health record (EHR) of subjects. Patient-related factors, crowding or spacing, deep bite or open bite and duration of treatment were extracted from patients' files. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for the survival function, whereas Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to associate risk factors with retainer survival. RESULTS: 328 (42.9%) subjects had their LLRs failed, and the survival period was on average 17.37 ± 22.85 months. On the other hand, the follow-up period for the retainers that did not fail was on average 47.19 ± 23.66 months. 192 (28.3%) subjects had segment failure (retainer detached from 3 teeth or less), while 51 (7.5%) subjects had failures in more than 3 teeth (complete). None of the evaluated clinical variables were significantly associated with LLRs failure except for the bite category (P = .013) and the appliance used for treatment (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Success rate for LLRs was 57.1% over 47.19 months, failure rate was 42.9% over 17.37 months. The presence of deep bite and treatment with aligners were significantly associated with increased failure rate.

Assessment of clear aligner accuracy of 2 clear aligners systems.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared treatment efficacy for specific tooth movements between 2 clear aligner systems (Clarity [3M Oral Care Solutions, St Paul, Minn] and Invisalign [Align Technology, San Jose, Calif]). METHODS: The study sample included 47 patients (7 males, 40 females; mean age, 36.57 ± 15.97 years) treated with Invisalign and 37 (4 males, 33 females; mean age, 34.30 ± 16.35 years) treated with Clarity aligners who completed their first set of aligners and had an initial refinement scan. Initial and predicted models were obtained from the initial simulated treatment plan. The first model of the refinement scan was labeled as achieved. SlicerCMF software (version 3.1; http://www.slicer.org) was used to superimpose the achieved and predicted digital models over the initial ones with regional superimposition on the relatively stable first molars. Nine hundred forty teeth in the Invisalign system were measured for horizontal, vertical, and angular movements and transverse width and compared with similar measurements of 740 teeth for the Clarity aligners. The deviation from the predicted was calculated and compared between both systems. RESULTS: The deviation achieved from the predicted was significant between the groups for the mandibular interpremolar and intercanine widths (P <0.05). Clarity aligners significantly undercorrected rotations compared with Invisalign for the mandibular first premolars, mandibular canines, maxillary canines, and maxillary central incisors. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the achieved vs predicted movements in the horizontal and vertical planes (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of clear aligner therapy systems (Clarity and Invisalign) in treating mild and moderate malocclusions was comparable. Deviation of the achieved movements from the predicted was greatest for rotational and vertical movements.

Long-term effects on alveolar bone with bone-anchored and tooth-anchored rapid palatal expansion.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of bone-anchored and tooth-anchored expansion appliances on alveolar bone in vertical and horizontal dimensions, compared with controls, using cone-beam computed tomography. METHODS: We evaluated 180 cone-beam computed tomography scans for 60 patients at 3-time points: T1 (pretreatment), T2 (postexpansion), and T3 (posttreatment), for 3 groups: bone-anchored expansion appliance (BA), tooth-anchored expansion appliance (TA), and controls (T1-T3: BA, 2 years 8 months; TA, 2 years 9 months; control: 2 years 7 months). The intermolar width, molar angulation, palatal width, vertical buccal bone height, buccal bone thickness at the alveolar crest, and root apex were measured in the 3 groups at different time points. RESULTS: In the short term, both BA and TA led to a statistically significant increase in the intermolar width and vertical buccal bone loss after expansion compared with controls. Vertical buccal bone loss was significantly greater in TA than in BA. In addition, TA led to significantly increased molar angulation (buccal tipping) compared with controls at T2. There were no significant differences in the 3 groups in the long term except vertical buccal bone loss, which was significantly greater in TA than controls. A substantial correlation was found between molar angulation and vertical buccal bone loss, and a moderate negative correlation was found between intermolar width and buccal bone thickness at the alveolar crest at T3. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the treatment outcomes between the 3 groups in the long term except vertical buccal bone loss, which was significantly increased in the TA group compared with controls.

Variability associated with mandibular ramus area thickness and depth in subjects with different growth patterns, gender, and growth status.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the ramus bone parameters (ramus thickness and ramus depth) for miniscrew placement. An additional aim was to compare and contrast the ramus bone parameters in growing and nongrowing male and female subjects with hyperdivergent, normodivergent, hypodivergent facial types. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 690 subjects were evaluated. They were classified in terms of growth status, gender, and facial type. Ramus thickness was measured as the distance from the outer (buccal) to the inner (lingual) aspects of the mandibular ramus. Ramus depth was measured as the distance from the anterior border of the ramus to the inferior alveolar nerve canal. The measurements for ramus thickness and ramus depth were performed at 3 different levels bilaterally: (1) occlusal plane (OP), (2) 5 mm above the occlusal plane (5OP), and (3) 10 mm above the occlusal plane (10OP). RESULTS: Males showed a significantly higher ramus thickness than females (P <0.05). Ramus thickness decreased significantly (P <0.05) as we moved superior from the level of OP to 5OP and 10OP in all 3 facial types in both females (growing and nongrowing) and males (growing and nongrowing). Growing females and growing males had significantly higher ramus thickness than nongrowing females and nongrowing males, respectively. Ramus depth increased as we moved higher from the OP to 10OP. Hyperdivergent facial type showed a significantly reduced ramus depth compared with hypodivergent and normodivergent facial type in growing and nongrowing males and females at all 3 locations, namely OP, 5OP, and 10OP (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Because of adequate ramus depth and ramus thickness, 5OP was considered the optimal insertion site for the placement of miniscrews. Patients with a hyperdivergent facial type showed significantly reduced ramus depth than hypodivergent and normodivergent facial types. Ramus thickness in males was significantly higher than in females in all facial types.

Long-term effects of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion on root resorption.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to use cone-beam computed tomography to compare immediate and long-term effects of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) appliances on root resorption in 2 treatment groups and a control group. METHODS: One hundred eighty cone-beam computed tomography images of 60 patients at 3 time points were assessed: initial, postexpansion, and debond. The patients were divided into 3 groups: control (n = 19), rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance (n = 21), and MARPE (n = 20). The period of initial to debond varied for the 3 groups: 2 years, 7 months for controls; 2 years, 9 months for RPE; and 2 years, 8 months for MARPE. The length of mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal root of the maxillary first molar (1M); the buccal root of maxillary first premolar; and second premolar were measured. The inclination of the 1M, intercuspal width (ICW), interroot width (IRW), ICW/IRW ratio, maxillary skeletal width were measured in all 3 groups at different time points. RESULTS: Immediately after expansion, RPE and MARPE groups showed a significant increase in the molar inclination, ICW, ICW/IRW ratio, and maxillary skeletal width compared with controls at postexpansion. However, the long-term comparison did not show any significant difference for root resorption and expansion parameters between the 3 groups, except the ICW/IRW ratio, which was higher in MARPE than controls at debond. A significant negative association was observed between the length of the mesiobuccal root of 1M and molar inclination (ß = -0.025; 95% confidence interval, -0.050 to 0.0008; P <0.05). The expansion of ICW and IRW did not show a significant association with root resorption. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcomes showed no difference in the amount of root resorption between the RPE, MARPE, and control groups. Molar inclination showed a significant negative association with the length of the mesiobuccal root of the 1M.

Variability of the maxillary suture maturation and density in the subjects with different sex and growth status.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to classify median palatine suture (MPS) maturation type in young and adult patients. Additionally, we compared MPS maturity type and density based on sex and growth status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cone beam computed tomography study, we included a total of 221 subjects, grouped based on sex and growth status. Once scans were aligned and oriented in the sagittal view, we conducted our evaluations on the axial sections. Based on interdigitation and shape, the MPS were categorized into Maturation Types A through E. Additionally, MPS density was measured as Hounsfield unit equivalent pixel intensity value scale for anterior and posterior sutural regions. RESULTS: The majority of male (39%) and female (42%) subjects had MPS Maturation Type C. A maximum number of growing (42%) patients had Type C and nongrowing subjects (39%) had Type E sutures. The sex comparison showed significantly lower (p < .001) MPS density for both anterior and posterior regions in males when compared to females. Additionally, for the posterior region, nongrowing males had significantly lower (p < .001) MPS density when compared to nongrowing females. Subgroup comparisons of the MPS densities between growing and nongrowing males and growing and nongrowing females showed a significant difference (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Classification of the MPS based on the maturation types provides a reliable predictor for orthodontic treatment planning. MPS density is significantly higher in females as compared to males. Similarly, nongrowing individuals have significantly higher MPS density compared to growing individuals for both anterior and posterior locations.

Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of the study was to quantitatively analyze the width and height of the mandibular buccal shelf area (MBS) at 3 different potential locations for mini-implant placement. In addition, we aimed to compare and contrast the bone parameters of the MBS to study the correlation between different growth status (growing or nongrowing), facial types (hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent), and sex differences (male or female). METHODS: In this retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study, 678 subjects were included. They were divided into groups according to growth status, facial type, and sex. Scans were imported into the reconstruction program and were aligned in 3 different steps. Measurements were made at 6 different coronal sections: mandibular first molar distal root, second molar mesial root, and second molar distal root (bilaterally). The roots of mandibular molars were used as a reference to measure the width and the roof of the inferior alveolar canal to measure the height of the buccal shelf area. Intraobserver reliability was assessed by measuring the width and height of MBS in 20 randomly selected subjects. RESULTS: No significant difference (P > 0.05) was found in the width of MBS between males and females. MBS width increased, and height decreased (P < 0.0001) as moved distally from the first molar distal root to the second molar distal root in all 3 facial types irrespective of age or sex. The hypodivergent facial type had significantly greater bone width than the hyperdivergent facial type at all the 3 locations in both males and females. The hypodivergent facial type had significantly less (P < 0.0001) bone height than the hyperdivergent group at all the 3 locations irrespective of age or sex. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal site for MBS mini-implant is the buccal region of the distal root of mandibular second molars. Hypodivergent patients have more width and less height of MBS compared with hyperdivergent patients. MBS mini-implants are not advised for growing patients because of proximity to developing roots.

Where is the center of resistance of a maxillary first molar? A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The center of resistance (CRes) is regarded as the fundamental reference point for predictable tooth movement. Accurate estimation can greatly enhance the efficiency of orthodontic tooth movement. Only a handful of studies have evaluated the CRes of a maxillary first molar; however, most had a low sample size (in single digits), used idealized models, or involved 2-dimensional analysis. The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine the 3-dimensional (3D) location of the CRes of maxillary first molars, (2) evaluate its variability in a large sample, and (3) investigate the effects of applying orthodontic load from 2 directions on the location of the CRes. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 50 maxillary molars from 25 patients (mean age, 20.8 ± 8.7 years) were used. The cone-beam computed tomography volume images were manipulated to extract 3D biological structures via segmentation. The segmented structures were cleaned and converted into virtual mesh models made of tetrahedral triangles having a maximum edge length of 1 mm. The block, which included the molars and periodontal ligament, consisted of a mean of 7753 ± 2748 nodes and 38,355 ± 14,910 tetrahedral elements. Specialized software was used to preprocess the models to create an assembly and assign material properties, interaction conditions, boundary conditions, and load applications. Specific loads were applied, and custom-designed algorithms were used to analyze the stress and strain to locate the CRes. The CRes was measured in relation to the geometric center of the buccal surface of the molar and the trifurcation of the molar roots. RESULTS: The average location of the CRes for the maxillary first molar was 4.94 ± 1.39 mm lingual, 2.54 ± 2.7 mm distal, and 7.86 ± 1.66 mm gingival relative to the geometric center of the buccal surface of the molar and 0.136 ± 1.51 mm lingual (P <0.01), 1.48 ± 2.26 mm distal (P <0.01), and 0.188 ± 1.75 mm gingival (P >0.01) relative to the trifurcation of the molar roots. In the anteroposterior (y-axis) and the vertical (z-axis) planes, the CRes showed significant association with root divergence (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The CRes of the maxillary first molar was located apical and distal to the trifurcation area. It showed significant variation in its location. The 3D location of and also varied with the force direction. In some samples, this deviation was large. For accurate and predictable movement, tooth-specific CRes need to be calculated.

Orthodontic management of a patient with short root anomaly and impacted teeth.

Short root anomaly (SRA) is a rare familial dental condition that is often misdiagnosed. Orthodontic treatment of patients with SRA is challenging because it is difficult to diagnose, it may be accompanied by other dental anomalies, and it has been reported to contribute to additional susceptibility to root resorption during orthodontic treatment. In this article, we describe a methodical and evidence-based means of diagnosing and orthodontically managing a patient with SRA. The patient had additional challenges, including impacted and ectopic teeth. An individualized treatment plan that incorporated efficient and effective mechanics led to a well seated occlusion and an esthetic smile.

Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Clear aligners and to a lesser extent self-ligated brackets are considered to facilitate better oral hygiene than traditional fixed orthodontic appliances. This 3-arm parallel-group prospective randomized clinical trial compared the long-term and short-term effects of clear aligners, self-ligated brackets, and conventional (elastomeric-ligated) brackets on patients' oral hygiene during active orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Seventy-one participants (41 boys, 30 girls; mean age, 15.6 years) undergoing orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated through a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of the groups based on the choice of intervention: Clear Aligners (CLA) (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) (n = 27), preadjusted edgewise fixed appliance with self-ligated brackets (SLB) (Carriere, Carlsbad, Calif (n = 22), or preadjusted edgewise fixed appliance with elastomeric ligated brackets (ELB) (Ortho Organizers Inc., Carlsbad, CA) (n = 22). For each participant, the primary outcome, plaque index (PI), and secondary outcomes, gingival Index (GI) and periodontal bleeding index (PBI), were measured at baseline (T0), after 9 months of treatment (T1), and after 18 months of treatment (T2). Blinding of the clinicians and the patients to the intervention was impossible. It was only done for outcome assessment and for the statistician. Ten participants did not receive the allocated intervention for various reasons. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of PI at T0 (CLA, 0.50 ± 0.51; SLB, 0.65 ± 0.49; ELB, 0.70 ± 0.73), T1 (CLA, 0.83 ± 0.48; SLB, 1.38 ± 0.72; ELB, 1.32 ± 0.67), and T2 (CLA, 0.92 ± 0.58; SLB, 1.07 ± 0.59; ELB, 1.32 ± 0.67) were similar. The odds ratio (OR) for plaque index (0 or ≥1) comparing SLB or CLA to ELB was not significant. OR for SLB vs ELB = 1.54 at T0 (95% CI, 0.39-6.27), 0.88 at T1 (95% CI, 0.03-24.69), and 0.83 at T2 (95% CI, 0.02-27.70); OR for CLA vs ELB = 1.07 at T0 (95% CI, 0.30-3.88), 0.24 at T1 (95% CI, 0.01-1.98), and 0.17 at T2 (95% CI, 0.01-1.71). However, the odds ratios comparing CLA with ELB for GI (OR = 0.14; P = 0.015) and PBI (OR = 0.10; P = 0.012) were statistically significant at T1. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, we found no evidence of differences in oral hygiene levels among clear aligners, self-ligated brackets, and conventional elastomeric ligated brackets after 18 months of active orthodontic treatment. REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02745626). PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Force system generated by elastic archwires with vertical V bends: a three-dimensional analysis.

Background: Our previous understanding of V-bend mechanics is primarily from two-dimensional (2D) analysis of archwire bracket interactions in the second order. These analyses do not take into consideration the three-dimensional (3D) nature of orthodontic appliances involving the third order. Objective: To quantify the force system generated in a 3D two bracket set up involving the molar and incisors with vertical V-bends. Materials and methods: Maxillary molar and incisor brackets were arranged in a dental arch form and attached to load cells capable of measuring forces and moments in all three planes (x, y, and z) of space. Symmetrical V-bends (right and left sides) were placed at 11 different locations along rectangular beta-titanium archwires of various sizes at an angle of 150degrees. Each wire was evaluated for the 11 bend positions. Specifically, the vertical forces (Fz) and anterio-posterior moments (Mx) were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to interpret the results. Results: With increasing archwire size, Fz and Mx increased at the two brackets (P < 0.05). The vertical forces were linear and symmetric in nature, increasing in magnitude as the bends moved closer to either bracket. The Mx curves were asymmetric and non-linear displaying higher magnitudes for molar bracket. As the bends were moved closer to either bracket a distinct flattening of the incisor Mx curve was noted, implying no change in its magnitude. Conclusions: This article provides critical information on V-bend mechanics involving second order and third order archwire-bracket interactions. A model for determining this force system is described that might allow for easier translation to actual clinical practice.

En-masse protraction of mandibular posterior teeth into missing mandibular lateral incisor spaces using a fixed functional appliance.

Protraction of mandibular posterior teeth requiring absolute anchorage has always been a challenge, especially when the space is located in the anterior region, since more teeth must be protracted. Traditionally, skeletal anchorage devices have been used for anchorage reinforcement during protraction. However, drawbacks such as requirement of a surgical step, inability to tolerate heavy forces, and patient willingness to undergo such surgical procedures can be limiting factors. Additionally, the mechanics involved can sometimes create undesirable side effects, thereby limiting their application in such situations. This report describes the use of a fixed functional appliance as an anchorage-reinforcement device for en-masse protraction of mandibular posterior teeth into a missing lateral incisor space.

Anchorage reinforcement with a fixed functional appliance during protraction of the mandibular second molars into the first molar extraction sites.

Protraction of posterior teeth into edentulous spaces is a challenge. This report describes the treatment of a 19-year-old woman with missing mandibular first molars owing to caries. A fixed functional appliance was used for anchorage reinforcement during mandibular second molar protraction. Eight millimeters of bilateral protraction was done with bodily mesial movement of the molars and no lingual tipping of the incisors.

Diagnostic accuracy of 2 cone-beam computed tomography protocols for detecting arthritic changes in temporomandibular joints.

INTRODUCTION: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex joint that often develops degenerative joint disease. Clinical examination alone cannot usually diagnose this accurately, and a radiographic examination complements and aids in diagnosis and treatment. The osseous components of the TMJ complex are best imaged using computed tomography. The evolution of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers a low radiation dose and a high spatial resolution alternative and is becoming the imaging modality of choice for the TMJ. To further reduce the dose and yet not compromise the diagnostic task at hand, some alternative rotation acquisition protocols are available but have not been adequately evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of 2 CBCT acquisition protocols to detect degenerative changes associated with the TMJ complex. METHODS: Thirty-four TMJs, from 17 dry human skulls, were obtained from the anatomy department at the School of Dental Medicine of the University of Connecticut. The sample consisted of complete dentate and partially dentate skulls with no identifiable markers such as age, sex, or ethnicity. Small and large lesions simulating early and established arthritic changes were created on the mandibular condyle. Each defect was randomly created on the medial pole, articulating surface, or lateral pole. After simulating the articular disc with rubber dam material, the condyle and the glenoid fossa were articulated and positioned in place by a rubber band. The skulls were scanned by using an Accuitomo CBCT scanner (J. Morita Corp, Kyoto, Japan) with 180° and 360° rotation protocols. Two operators scored the lesions and compared the results to the gold standard, which was the master list of where the lesions were made on the condyles. RESULTS: On the 102 randomly selected sites, 39 large and 33 small lesions were made, and the rest of the sites had no lesions. The detection rates for areas with large lesions and areas with no lesions were 100% between the examiners. However, of the 33 small lesions, each examiner was able to identify 32 of them with the 360° scans: a 97.4% detection rate when compared with the gold standard. With the 180° scan, 94.9% of the small lesions were detected when compared with the gold standard, and 96.9% were detected with the 360° scan. The overall interexaminer reliability was over 90% for both imaging protocols (Cronbach's alpha, 92.4% for 180° and 97% for 360°). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, the 180° CBCT acquisition protocol can detect small and large arthritic lesions with high reliability and is comparable with the 360° spin acquisition.

Biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of four different mini-implant surfaces.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of surface roughness on the removal torque and bone-to-implant contact of four different orthodontic mini-implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mini-implants and circular discs were made from alloy Ti6Al4V grade 5. On the basis of surface treatment, the study was divided into four groups-group 1: machined (n = 32), no surface treatment; group 2: acid etched (n = 32), with hydrochloric acid; group 3 (n = 32), grit blasted with alumina; and group 4, grit blasted + acid etched (n = 32). Mean surface roughness (Ra) and quadratic average roughness (Rq) from each group were measured two dimensionally in non-contact mode by the optical profilometer. Contact angle measurement of discs from each group was done with a contact angle goniometer. Contact angle of liquids with different hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity was measured: 1. highly hydrophilic liquid sodium chloride (NaCl), 2. lightly hydrophobic liquid dimethylsulfoxide, 3. distilled water, and 4. human blood. One hundred and twenty-eight miniscrews, differing in surface treatment, were placed into the tibias and femurs of adult male New Zealand white rabbits. Rabbits were euthanized after 8 weeks and removal torque and bone-to-implant contact were measured. RESULTS: Surface roughness of group 3 was significantly greater than other groups (P < 0.05). Group 4 had significantly lower contact angle measurements, both for blood and sodium chloride (NaCl; 40.26 degrees, 27.20 degrees) when compared to other three groups (P ≤ 0.01). Group 4 had significantly higher torque and bone-to-implant contact than group 3 (P = 0.007), group 2 (P = 0.003), and group 1 (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Surface roughness and wettability of mini-implants influence their biological response.

Evaluation of alveolar bone dimensions in unilateral palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomographic analyses.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the alveolar bone dimensions and arch perimeter discrepancy in unilateral palatally impacted canines. METHODS: This retrospective split-mouth study reviewed 207 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with unilateral or bilateral impacted canines referred for orthodontic treatment. Out of 207 CBCT scans, only 39 scans in which canines were unilaterally palatally impacted were approved for the study based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two fiducial lines were used to orient the examiners and standardize the measurements. Arch perimeter, buccopalatal (BP) width, and alveolar height were measured both on the impacted and non-impacted side. Two different examiners measured all the parameters. A one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine normality of distribution of outcomes. Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests were used for comparing arch width and alveolar bone height between the impacted and non-impacted sides. For arch perimeter, the paired-sample t-test was used. RESULTS: The arch perimeter, BP width, and alveolar bone height was significantly decreased on the impacted side (P < 0.05). The mean arch perimeter on the impacted side was 41.7 ± 2.5mm compared to 43.5 ± 2.37 on the non-impacted side. Similarly, BP width and alveolar bone height on the impacted side was 6.87 ± 1.08 mm and 18.12 ± 2.28 mm, respectively, whereas on the non-impacted side was 8.70 ± 1.13 mm and 19.49 ± 2.09 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the arch perimeter and alveolar bone dimensions (BP width and alveolar bone height) on the impacted side.