Barriers to Implementing the ICU Liberation Bundle in a Single-center Pediatric and Cardiac ICUs.

Objectives: The intensive care unit (ICU) Liberation "ABCDEF" Bundle improves outcomes in critically ill adults. We aimed to identify common barriers to Pediatric ICU Liberation Bundle element implementation, to describe differences in barrier perception by ICU staff role, and to describe changes in reported barriers over time. Study Design: A 91-item survey was developed based on existing literature, iteratively revised, and tested by the PICU Liberation Committee at Seattle Children's Hospital, a tertiary free-standing academic children's hospital. Voluntary surveys were administered electronically to all ICU staff twice over 4-week periods in 2017 and 2020. Survey Respondents: 119 (2017) and 163 (2020) pediatric and cardiac ICU staff, including nurses (n = 142, 50%), respiratory therapists (RTs) (n = 46, 16%), attending and fellow physicians, hospitalists, and advanced practice providers (APPs) (n = 62, 22%), physical, occupational, and speech-language pathology therapists (n = 25, 9%), and pharmacists (n = 7, 2%). Measurements and Main Results: Respondents widely agreed that increased workload (78%-100% across roles), communication (53%-84%), and lack of RT-directed ventilator weaning (68%-88%) are barriers to implementation. Other barriers differed by role. In 2020, nurses reported liability (59%) and personal injury (68%) concerns, patient severity of illness (24%), and family discomfort with ICU liberation practices (41%) more frequently than physicians and APPs (16%, 6%, 8%, and 19%, respectively; P < .01 for all). Between 2017 and 2020, some barriers changed: RTs endorsed discomfort with early mobilization less frequently (50% vs 11%, P = .028) and nurses reported concern for patient harm less frequently (51% vs 24%, P = .004). Conclusions: Implementation efforts aimed at addressing known barriers, including educating staff on the safety of early mobility, considering respiratory therapist-directed ventilator weaning, and standardizing interdisciplinary discussion of Pediatric ICU Liberation Bundle elements, will be needed to overcome barriers and improve ICU Liberation Bundle implementation.

Determining Interrater Reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Screening Tool Among PICU Nurses.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the interrater reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Screening Tool amount PICU nurses. DESIGN: The design was setup as a cross-sectional study and conducted over the course of a year. SETTING: This study setting was a PICU and a pediatric cardiac ICU at Seattle Children's Hospital, a tertiary freestanding university-affiliated hospital in Seattle, Washington. PATIENTS: A total sample of 108 patients were included in this study. Patients were selected using a convenience sample. Inclusion in this study involved all patients eligible for a Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium assessment, reflecting practice standards. Exclusion criteria included patients who had a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score of (-4) or (-5), based on the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium procedure. There were 113 patients screened, but five were excluded from the final sample size due to missing information. INTERVENTIONS: The research nurse would screen the patient using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium during the 12:00 noon hour, which coincided with the clinical nurse Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium assessment. The clinical and research nurse were kept blind to each other's assessment. Scores were then analyzed to determine the kappa coefficient. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The kappa coefficient between nurses was found to be 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.76), indicating moderate agreement. Age was found to have a higher association with agreement. In children 2 years old or greater, the kappa coefficient was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.00). Children whose raters did not agree on scoring were more likely to be younger than those who had raters that agreed (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the interrater reliability of clinical tool, such as the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, may be important to more accurately identify patients at high risk of delirium in a PICU or pediatric cardiac ICU. The evaluation of the tool's performance in practice may also be helpful to ensure ongoing consistency among the clinical nurses that complete these assessments on a daily basis.