Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(5): 681-693, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30783762

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to study mental health, coping, and support after work-related adverse events among pediatricians. Physicians are frequently exposed to adverse events. It makes them at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety disorders. Besides the personal impact, physicians could pose a threat towards patients, as mental health problems are associated with medical errors. A questionnaire was sent to all members of the Pediatric Association of The Netherlands in October 2016. The questionnaire focused on adverse events, coping, and support. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Trauma Screening Questionnaire were included for evaluation of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress. Four hundred ten questionnaires (18.9%) were eligible for analysis. Seventy-nine % (n = 325) of the respondents experienced adverse events, with "missing a diagnosis" having the most emotional impact and "aggressive behavior" as the most common adverse event. Nine (2.2%) pediatricians scored above the cut-off value on the Trauma Screening Questionnaire, indicative of PTSD. In total, 7.3% (n = 30) and 14.1% (n = 58) scored above the cut-off values in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, indicative of depression and anxiety. Only 26.3% reported to have a peer support protocol available for emotional support following adverse events.Conclusion: Pediatricians experience a considerable amount of adverse and potentially traumatizing events associated with significantly higher mental health problems compared to the general high-income population. Aggression towards pediatricians seems to be a common problem. Protocolled (peer) support should be implemented. What is known: • Physicians are frequently exposed to adverse events. It makes physicians at risk for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. • Physicians who are affected by these events pose a threat towards patients, as mental health problems are associated with medical errors. What is new: • Pediatricians experience a considerable amount of adverse and potentially traumatizing events associated with significantly higher mental health problems. • It is advised that (peer) support after adverse events is protocolled and education on coping strategies is implemented, to improve mental well-being of pediatricians.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Estresse Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Pediatras/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/etiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estresse Ocupacional/psicologia , Fatores de Risco , Apoio Social , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Violência no Trabalho/psicologia
2.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 26(1): 101-108, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31197893

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: We strive to maximize outcomes that are relevant to the women who deliver in our hospital. We demonstrate a practical method of using value-based health care (VBHC) concepts to analyse how care can be improved. METHOD: Using International Consortium of Health Outcome Measurements (ICHOM) set, a practical outcome set was constructed for women who go into spontaneous labour at term of a singleton in cephalic presentation and used for benchmarking. We included data on interventions that are major drivers of outcomes. Data from two hospitals in Amsterdam and for The Netherlands for 2011 to 2015 were collected. RESULTS: Benchmarking of readily available data helped identify a number of statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in obstetric outcomes. Caesarean section rate was significantly different at 13.7% in hospital 2 compared with 11.5% in hospital 1 with similar neonatal outcomes. Third and fourth degree tearing rates were significantly higher for hospital 1 at 5.5% compared with 3.6% for hospital 2 and the national average of 3.5%. On the basis of the guidelines, literature, and discussion, initiatives on how to improve these outcomes were then identified. These include caesarean section audit and guidelines regarding caesarean section decision making. In order to reduce the rate of third and fourth degree tearing, routine episiotomy on vaginal operative deliveries was introduced, and a training programme was set up to make care providers more aware of risk factors and potential preventive measures. CONCLUSION: Defining, measuring, and comparing relevant outcomes enable care providers to identify improvements. Collection and comparison of readily available data can provide insights in where care can be improved. Insights from literature and comparison of care practices and processes can lead to how care can be improved. Continuous monitoring of outcomes and expanding the set of outcomes that is readily available are key in the process towards value-based care provision.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Obstetrícia , Atenção à Saúde , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Países Baixos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa