Impact of pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis in Italy: a patient-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Itching is an annoying symptom which afflicts patients with chronic renal failure. We aimed to assess the impact and patient's perception and experience of itching in the dialysis population in Italy. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed by the National Hemodialysis and Dialysis Association of Italy (ANED) and administered to 996 hemodialysis recipients across 153 Italian dialysis centers. The main outcomes investigated by the questionnaire were patients' satisfaction on answers regarding the nature of itching; continuing to talk about itching with the nephrologist; beliefs about resolution of itching. RESULTS: A total of 1903 patients from 153 centers responded to the questionnaire. Patients who responded had a mean age of 67.9 ± 13.8 years (63.9% male) and were stratified by itch discomfort graded as mild (35.9%), moderate (29.6%), and severe (34.4%). Severe itching disrupted patients' daily lives, strained their relationships, caused anxiety, and diminished their quality of life. Patients with severe itch were more likely to talk about it with dialysis staff and to undertake dermatological visits. However, only 18.0% of patients reporting severe itching found the clinicians' responses satisfactory, compared to 49.1% of mild itch patients. Those who continued talking to nephrologists about itching received more satisfactory response. However, 40.8% believed itching could not be alleviated and were less likely to discuss it with nephrologists. CONCLUSIONS: There is an intricate relationship between the severity of itching, patient perceptions, and healthcare communication among hemodialysis patients. A substantial proportion of patients experiencing severe itching expressed feelings of resignation, highlighting the pressing need for enhanced clinician-patient communication.

[Itching in dialysis, from the patient's point of view].

Itching is an annoying symptom, which afflicts patients with chronic renal failure. To assess the diffusion of itching in the dialysis population in Italy, we carried out a questionnaire, which was distributed to patients of various Italian dialysis centers. The purpose of this investigation was to bring out all those aspects, which make itching a state of chronic suffering, which daily undermines the quality of life of patients. The questionnaire had 16 questions on the intensity of itching, the timing of appearance, the report to doctors and nurses, and any suggested remedies, in addition to some other concerning age, sex, and dialysis age. The questionnaires were distributed to 153 Dialysis Centers and received 1905 responses. In 46.7% of the answered questionnaires, the patients declared the absence of itching. Instead, 53.3% of the patients interviewed reported having itching with varying degrees of intensity. We used for quantifying the intensity of itching the numerical rating scale (NRS). Among the interviewees, those (20.4%) who reported a greater intensity and severity of the symptom described it as often present always, even at night, so as to heavily condition sleep. Only 32.5% of patients solved the problem by contacting their nephrologist or dialysis nurse, and a lower percentage by contacting the dermatologist or general practitioner.

The 3-T Model of Informed Consent for Nonstandard Risk Donors: A Proposal for Transplant Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: The risk of disease transmission from nonstandard risk donors (NSRDs) is low, and outcomes are similar or better relative to transplants performed with standard criteria donors. However, NSRDs have posed new ethical challenges to the informed consent (IC) process. Based on the shared decision-making model, coinciding with the 3 main timings of the IC process ([1] pretransplant assessments and waiting list registration, [2] time on the waiting list, and [3] time of the organ offer), we put forward a model (3-T Model) to summarize the knowledge on IC for NSRDs and to deliver conceptual and practical support to transplant providers on this emergent issue. METHODS: We searched PubMed and analyzed data from our area to provide evidence and ethical arguments to promote standardization of the timing of patient information, degree of patient participation, and disclosure of donor risk factors throughout the 3 stages of the time continuum leading to the potential acceptance of NSRDs. RESULTS: Each of the 3 timings carries special ethical significance and entails well-defined duties for transplant providers relative to patient involvement and information of the benefits and risks associated with NSRDs. Based on our framework, experience, and interpretation of the literature, we put forward a list of recommendations to combine standardization (ie, timing, content, and degree of patient participation) and individualization of IC. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-T Model may enable the prevention of physicians' arbitrariness and the promotion of patient-centered care. Future studies will assess the effectiveness of the 3-T Model in transplant clinical practice.