RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) affects 3% to 15% of all cancer patients. In patients with advanced cancer and inoperable MBO, the average survival varies between four to nine weeks. Parenteral nutrition (PN) may improve survival in specific patient populations with malignant bowel obstruction. AIMS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study aimed to review individual patient outcomes on PN in the setting of advanced cancer with a diagnosis of MBO and identify clinical and laboratory markers predictive of short- and long-term survival to further highlight patients that would benefit from PN in the setting of an inoperable MBO. RESULTS: In a retrospective analysis of 68 patients receiving PN for inoperable MBO, the median survival was 142 (IQR: 63.3-239.5) days. Patients experienced a median number of two hospital readmissions (range: 0-10) and spent a median of 29 days (range: 0-105) in the hospital after starting PN. Eighteen (26.5%) patients developed a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). A diagnosis of appendiceal cancer was identified as a predictive marker of improved survival (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.92, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PN in the context of end-of-life cancer care is a practice that necessitates improvement. Recognizing the outcomes and patient experiences of PN utilization is essential to physicians and patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Hospitais , Nutrição ParenteralRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This narrative review aims to outline the current available evidence, challenges, and future perspectives of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and management of priapism, a condition marked by prolonged and often painful erections that presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advancements in AI offer promising solutions to face the challenges in diagnosing and treating priapism. AI models have demonstrated the potential to predict the need for surgical intervention and improve diagnostic accuracy. The integration of AI models into medical decision-making for priapism can also predict long-term consequences. AI is currently being implemented in urology to enhance diagnostics and treatment work-up for various conditions, including priapism. Traditional diagnostic approaches rely heavily on assessments based on history, leading to potential delays in treatment with possible long-term sequelae. To date, the role of AI in the management of priapism is understudied, yet to achieve dependable and effective models that can reliably assist physicians in making decisions regarding both diagnostic and treatment strategies.
RESUMO
Background: Priapism is a rare condition characterized by persistent erection of the penis that lasts more than 4 hours in the absence of sexual stimulation and is associated with significant morbidity and complications, including erectile dysfunction and penile fibrosis. Surgical management of priapism can be extremely challenging. We herein provide a comprehensive review that aims to evaluate the role of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation in the management of priapism. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of PP implantation in treating priapism and the long-term complications, outcomes, and patients' satisfaction rate. Results: Out of 717 English-language studies published between 2002 and 2022, 17 were chosen for this review. Majority of patients had a malleable PP (MPP) implant, either early or delayed after the priapism episode. Early placement (EP) of PP is widely defined between studies ranging from less than 72 hours, within 1 week, and within 3 weeks. Most common causes of priapism were sickle cell anemia (SCA), medication-induced, and idiopathic. Studies show a higher satisfaction rate ranging between 80% and 100%, with sexual intercourse achievement ranging between 64.2% and 100%. Based on the GRADE system, included studies rated as very low quality of evidence. Commonly reported complications that arise after PP procedures, include device infection, erosion, curvature, and mechanical malfunction, such as auto-inflation. Conclusions: PP can be an effective treatment option for priapism, particularly in cases of ischemic priapism lasting more than 36 hours or recurrent priapism that is medically refractory. However, due to the very low quality of evidence, larger, well-designed studies are warranted where long-term outcomes, patients' satisfaction, and complications following priapism-related PP implantation are measured as endpoints.
RESUMO
Peyronie's Disease (PD) is characterized by fibrotic plaques in the penile tunica albuginea, causing curvature and painful erections. Current treatments have limited established efficacy. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), known for modulating inflammation, offers a potential alternative. This randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study at the University of Miami assesses PRP's safety and efficacy for PD. Forty-one PD patients were randomized into PRP-placebo (Group A) and placebo-PRP (Group B) sequences, receiving two injections of each treatment over three months, with a crossover to receive two injections of alternate treatment over the next three months. Assessments include pain scale, goniometry, questionnaires, and curvature evaluations. Preliminary analysis of 28 patients shows that PRP is safe. There were no adverse events, including penile complications, during follow-up. Pain scores during treatments showed no significant difference between PRP and placebo (p = 0.52). Over six months, the PRP-Placebo group's median PDQ score decreased from 1.9 (IQR: 1.7-2.9) to 1.4 (IQR: 0.7-2.1). This change was not statistically significant (p = 0.098). In contrast, the Placebo-PRP group showed a significant reduction from 1.8 (IQR: 1.4-2.6) to 1.2 (IQR: 1.0-2.0) (p = 0.020). No significant changes in IIEF scores were observed. Both groups initially had a median penile curvature of 40 degrees. At 3 months, the PRP-Placebo group's curvature decreased to 38 degrees (IQR: 35-47.5), while the Placebo-PRP group decreased to 35 degrees (IQR: 30-60). At 6 months, the PRP-Placebo group showed a significant reduction to 25 degrees (IQR: 20-40, p = 0.047), while the Placebo-PRP group's reduction to 32.5 degrees (IQR: 20-50) was not significant (p = 0.490). These early results indicate a delayed PRP effect, prompting further investigation into its long-term impacts. Although limited by sample size, this study suggests PRP injections as a safe treatment for PD, with ongoing research aiming to clarify its therapeutic value.
RESUMO
When feasible from an oncologic standpoint, partial penectomy (PP) is often preferred to total penectomy (TP) for penile cancer treatment, for the preservation of functional urinary outcomes. However, to date, there has not been a direct comparison of perioperative outcomes between PP and TP. Comparing treatments for penile cancer has proven difficult due to the rarity of penile cancer in the United States. We aimed to report differences in pre-operative risk factors, intra-operative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes between TP and PP for penile cancer. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we conducted a retrospective cohort review of penile cancer patients enlisted in the database between the years 2006-2016 using the International Classification of Diseases clinical modification 9th revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. PP patients were less likely to be transferred patients (p = 0.002), diabetic (p = 0.026), and were more likely to have preoperative laboratory values within normal limits. PP patients also had shorter lengths of stay in the hospital (p < 0.001) and operating time (p < 0.001). Significant differences were also found for inpatient stay (p < 0.001), 30-day post-surgery complications (p < 0.001), deep incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.017), wound disruption (p = 0.017), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (p = 0.029), and sepsis (p < 0.005). Finally, PP patients required fewer concurrent surgical procedures (p < 0.001). Demographic differences between PP and TP patients may reflect patients presenting with more advanced oncologic disease. PP is associated with fewer postoperative complications, shorter surgeries, shorter hospital stays, fewer concurrent surgical procedures, and comorbid conditions compared to TP. A gap remains in the reported data pertaining to postoperative sexual function and erectile outcomes for PP at a national level.
RESUMO
Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) affects 3-15% of all cancer patients. In patients with advanced cancer and inoperable MBO, the average survival varies between four to nine weeks. Parenteral nutrition (PN) may improve survival in specific patient populations with malignant bowel obstruction. Aims: This retrospective, single-center cohort study aimed to review individual patient outcomes on PN in the setting of advanced cancer with a diagnosis of MBO and identify clinical and laboratory markers predictive of short- and long-term survival to further highlight patients that would benefit from PN in the setting of an inoperable MBO. Results: In a retrospective analysis of 68 patients receiving PN for inoperable MBO, the median survival was 142 (IQR: 63.3-239.5) days. Patients experienced a median number of two hospital readmissions (range: 0-10) and spent a median of 29 days (range: 0-105) in the hospital after starting PN. Eighteen (26.5%) patients developed a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). A diagnosis of appendiceal cancer was identified as a predictive marker of improved survival (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.92, p = 0.023). Conclusions: The use of PN in the context of end-of-life cancer care is a practice that necessitates improvement. Recognizing the outcomes and patient experiences of PN utilization is essential to physicians and patients.