Medication errors at hospital admission and discharge in Type 1 and 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of medication errors at hospital admission and discharge in people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and identify potential risk factors for these errors. METHODS: This prospective observational study included all people with Type 1 (n = 163) and Type 2 diabetes (n = 508) admitted to the Diabetology-Department of the University Hospital of Montpellier, France, between 2013 and 2015. Pharmacists conducted medication reconciliation within 24 h of admission and at hospital discharge. Medication history collected from different sources (patient/family interviews, prescriptions/medical records, contact with community pharmacies/general practitioners/nurses) was compared with admission and discharge prescriptions to detect unintentional discrepancies in medication indicating involuntary medication changes. Medication errors were defined as unintentional medication discrepancies corrected by physicians. Risk factors for medication errors and serious errors (i.e. errors that may cause harm) were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 322 medication errors were identified and were mainly omissions. Prevalence of medication errors in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes was 21.5% and 22.2% respectively at admission, and 9.0% and 12.2% at discharge. After adjusting for age and number of treatments, people with Type 1 diabetes had nearly a twofold higher odds of having medication errors (odds ratio (OR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.94) and serious errors (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.02-4.76) at admission compared with those with Type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Medication reconciliation identified medication errors in one third of individuals. Clinical pharmacists should focus on poly-medicated individuals, but also on other high-risk people, for example, those with Type 1 diabetes.

Pharmacist intervention to detect drug adverse events on admission to the emergency department: Two case reports of neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but severe adverse effect of antipsychotic drugs. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report two cases of NMS highlighted by clinical pharmacists in an emergency unit during summer. One of them was fatal. Medication reconciliation processes performed at admission identified treatment with loxapine for one of them and with loxapine and clozapine for the other. Interview of the patients highlighted clinical symptoms suggesting NMS, allowing the pharmacists to alert the medical team. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Adverse drug events may be severe and clinical pharmacists in emergency departments can help to detect them.

Impact of a medico-pharmaceutical follow-up and an optimized communication between hospital and community on the readmission to the emergency department for an adverse drug event: URGEIM, study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADE) represent one of the main causes of admission to emergency department (ED). Their detection, documentation, and reporting are essential to avoid readmission. We hypothesize that a pharmacist-initiated multidisciplinary transition of care program combining ED pharmacist contribution and medications' data transfer between inpatient and outpatient caregivers will reduce emergency visits related to ADE METHOD/DESIGN: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The primary aim of the study is 6-month ED readmission related to the same ADE. Three hundred forty-six adult patients with an ADE detected by a binomial pharmacist-physician will be recruited from the ED of an University Hospital and will be randomized in two groups: [1] experimental group (multidisciplinary transition of care program and medications' data transfer between inpatient and outpatient caregivers) and [2] control group (usual care). Patients will be followed up over a period of 6 months. Endpoints will be carried out blindly of the randomization arm. The primary endpoint is the rate of patients who had at least one readmission in the ED for the same reason at 6 months (data collected during a phone call with the patient and the general practitioner). Trials registered NCT03725046. DISCUSSION: The trial results will have implications for the role of the clinical pharmacist in an emergency department. If successful, the intervention could be considered for implementation across other hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03725046 . Registered on 30 October 2018.

[Prophylaxis use of posaconazole (P) in an hemato-oncology unit: a retrospective study]. / Le posaconazole (P) utilisé en prophylaxie dans un service d'hémato-oncologie : une étude rétrospective.

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY: The mortality level of leucemic patient's fungal infections can reach 70%. Antifungal prophylaxis posaconazole (P) is used during severe and prolonged neutropenia resulting from chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome and after autologous transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We realized a retrospective study in order to assess the efficiency of P. Oral prophylaxy dosage is 200mg every eight hours to beginning before presumed neutropenia. Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of proven/probable invasive fungal infections (IFI), receipt of any other systemic antifungal agent for suspected IFI or for impossible swallowing and the occurrence of adverse event. The objective is to note down the incidence of proven/probable IFI prevented by P. RESULTS: We included 22 patients of whom 86% suffered from AML. P was prescribed in IFI prophylaxies during prolonged and severe neutropenia postchemotherapy (72%) or postautologous transplant (28%) and initiated 7 days before neutropenia (50% of cases). The mean treatment period was 18 days. Colonization occurred in one third of patients (43% of Candida albicans). Esomeprazole (E) 40 mg was associated in 64% of cases. P prophylaxis failed in 50% of cases. Proven/probable IFI occurred in one case. Different failure causes were: suspected or possible IFI (n=5) and impossible swallowing (n=5). CONCLUSION: P prophylaxis seems to be efficient among these high-risk patients. However, a P tardive initiation, an E association, P administration and resorption difficulties seem to have a importance in successful treatment. It would be interesting to optimize P treatment with plasmatic dosages to ensure efficiency and safety for patients.

[Appropriate medication prescribing in older people]. / Bon usage des médicaments chez le sujet âgé.

Drug-induced adverse effects are one of the main avoidable causes of hospitalization in older people. Numerous lists of potentially inappropriate medications for older people have been published, as national and international guidelines for appropriate prescribing in numerous diseases and for different age categories. The present review describes the general rules for an appropriate prescribing in older people and summarizes, for the main conditions encountered in older people, medications that are too often under-prescribed, the precautions of use of the main drugs that induce adverse effects, and drugs for which the benefit to risk ratio is unfavourable in older people. All these data are assembled in educational tables designed to be printed in a practical pocket format and used in daily practice by prescribers, whether physicians, surgeons or pharmacists.

[Antifungal treatment for suspected or proved candidiasis in the critically ill]. / Traitements antifongiques en réanimation au cours des infections fongiques invasives documentées ou suspectées.

OBJECTIVE: Describe systemic antifungal therapy in non-neutropenic adult patients in intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective, observational study was conducted during the first half of 2010 in the 7 ICU in a hospital with medical consultant on antimicrobial therapy. All non-neutropenic consecutive adult patients receiving systemic antifungal therapy for documented or suspected invasive fungal infection (IFI) apart from aspergillosis were included. RESULTS: Out of 1502 patients admitted in ICU, 104 (7 %) underwent systemic antifungal therapy, including 30 (29 %) for a documented IFI and 74 (71 %) for a suspected IFI. Candida albicans was identified in 23 (77 %) of the IFI and 45/52 (86 %) of the broncho-pulmonary and/or urinary colonizations in suspected IFI. Echinocandin was significantly more prescribed in patients with a documented infection (19/30 patients) and fluconazole in patients with a suspected infection (48/74 patients). The first line therapy was primarily stopped after recovery (11/30 patients) or de-escalation (9/30 patients) in documented infections, and for lack of indication (34/74 patients) or due to recovery (21/74 patients) in suspected infections after on average of 7 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: For ICU non-neutropenic adult patients in our center, antifungal therapy is prescribed two times out of three for suspected, unproved infections, in most cases with fluconazole. Documented infections were more often treated by echinocandin with secondary de-escalation. An interventional prospective study to assess the role of antifungal pre-emptive or empirical therapy is necessary.