Activating PI3Kδ mutations in a cohort of 669 patients with primary immunodeficiency.

The gene PIK3CD codes for the catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ), and is expressed solely in leucocytes. Activating mutations of PIK3CD have been described to cause an autosomal dominant immunodeficiency that shares clinical features with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). We screened a cohort of 669 molecularly undefined primary immunodeficiency patients for five reported mutations (four gain-of-function mutations in PIK3CD and a loss of function mutation in PIK3R1) using pyrosequencing. PIK3CD mutations were identified in three siblings diagnosed with CVID and two sporadic cases with a combined immunodeficiency (CID). The PIK3R1 mutation was not identified in the cohort. Our patients with activated PI3Kδ syndrome (APDS) showed a range of clinical and immunological findings, even within a single family, but shared a reduction in naive T cells. PIK3CD gain of function mutations are more likely to occur in patients with defective B and T cell responses and should be screened for in CVID and CID, but are less likely in patients with a pure B cell/hypogammaglobulinaemia phenotype.

Eribulin mesylate pharmacokinetics in patients with solid tumors receiving repeated oral ketoconazole.

Purpose To study the influence of repeated oral administration of ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the plasma pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate administered by single-dose intravenous infusion. Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor that is currently under development in phase I-III trials for the treatment of solid tumors. Experimental design A randomized, open-label, two treatments, two sequences, crossover phase I study was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors. Treatments were given on day 1 and day 15 and consisted of 1.4 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate alone or 0.7 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate plus 200 mg ketoconazole on the day of eribulin mesylate administration and the following day. Pharmacokinetic sampling for determination of eribulin plasma concentration was performed up to 144 h following administration of eribulin mesylate. Also safety and anti-tumor activity were determined. Results Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis was completed in ten patients. Statistical analysis of dose-normalized log-transformed AUC0-∞ and Cmax indicated that single-dose exposure of eribulin was not statistically different when co-administered with ketoconazole (ratio of geometric least square means: 0.95 (90%CI: 0.80-1.12) and 0.97 (90%CI: 0.83-1.12), respectively) in patients with solid tumors. Ketoconazole had no effect on eribulin clearance and elimination half-life. The most frequently reported treatment related adverse events were fatigue and nausea, each reported in 8/12 patients. Seven patients (58.3 %) achieved stable disease as best overall response. Conclusions The results indicate that eribulin mesylate can be safely co-administered with ketoconazole. Drug-drug interactions are not expected with other CYP3A4 inhibitors.

A phase I study of E7080, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this phase I study were to assess the safety and tolerability of E7080 in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics profile of E7080; and to explore preliminary evidence of its anti-tumour efficacy. METHODS: E7080 was administered orally in escalating doses on a once-daily continuous schedule in 28-day cycles to eligible patients. Samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycle 2. Anti-tumour efficacy was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients received E7080 in dose cohorts from 0.2 to 32 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 proteinuria (two patients) at 32 mg, and the MTD was defined as 25 mg. The most frequently observed cumulative toxicities (all grades) were hypertension (40% of patients), diarrhoea (45%), nausea (37%), stomatitis (32%) and vomiting (23%). Seven patients (9%) had a partial response and 38 patients (46%) had stable disease as best response. E7080 has dose-linear kinetics with no drug accumulation after 4 weeks' administration. CONCLUSION: E7080 is well tolerated at doses up to 25 mg per day. Encouraging anti-tumour efficacy was observed in patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

Phase II study of eribulin mesylate (E7389) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer stratified by prior taxane therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options remain limited for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We evaluated eribulin mesylate (E7389), a nontaxane halichondrin B analog microtubule inhibitor, in patients with metastatic CRPC with or without previous taxane exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with histologically proven CRPC, with or without prior taxane exposure, were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm phase II trial. Patients received eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m(2) as a 2- to 5-min i.v. bolus infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary efficacy end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were assessable for safety (50 were taxane-pretreated) and 105 for efficacy in the per-protocol population. The median age of patients was 71 years and median number of cycles was 4. PSA decreases of ≥ 50% were achieved in 22.4% and 8.5% of taxane-naive and taxane-pretreated patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia, seen in 22.4% of chemo-naive and 40% of taxane-pretreated men. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in none of the taxane-naive patients and 6.0% of taxane-pretreated patients. CONCLUSION: Eribulin mesylate demonstrated activity and a relatively favorable toxicity profile in metastatic CRPC.

A dose-escalation study of indisulam in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with solid tumours.

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the recommended dose of the multi-targeted cell cycle inhibitor indisulam in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumours and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Thirty-five patients were treated with indisulam on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Capecitabine was administered two times daily (BID) on days 1-14. Plasma concentrations of indisulam, capecitabine and its three metabolites were determined for pharmacokinetic analysis. The main dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Hand/foot syndrome and stomatitis were the major non-haematological toxicities. The recommended dose was initially established at indisulam 700 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID. However, during cycle 2 the recommended dose was poorly tolerated in three patients. A dose of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID proved to be safe at cycle 1 and 2 in nine additional patients. Indisulam pharmacokinetics during cycle 1 were consistent with pharmacokinetic data from phase I mono-therapy studies. However, exposure to indisulam was remarkably increased at cycle 2 due to a drug-drug interaction between capecitabine and indisulam. Partial response was confirmed in two patients, one with colon carcinoma and the other with pancreatic carcinoma. Seventeen patients had stable disease. Indisulam (700 mg m(-2)) in combination with capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) BID) was well tolerated during the first cycle. A dose of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID was considered safe in multiple treatment cycles. The higher incidence of toxicities observed during cycle 2 can be explained by a time-dependent pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction.

Docetaxel: an active new drug for treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Because of the relative scarcity of natural paclitaxel (Taxol), which has been recently recognized as a highly cytotoxic agent for use in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, synthetic and semisynthetic substitutes have been actively pursued. Docetaxel (Taxotere), a new semisynthetic taxoid, has been selected for clinical development because it is twice as potent as paclitaxel in promoting assembly of tubulin and in inhibiting microtubule depolymerization. Docetaxel also shows equal or greater cytotoxicity in relevant preclinical models. PURPOSE: Because docetaxel has produced consistent antitumor responses in ovarian cancer patients in phase I trials, we planned and conducted a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the drug's effectiveness and its toxic effects. METHODS: The present trial, which started in May 1992 and ended in December 1992, involved 97 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The target study population had disease relapse or disease progression within 12 months of the last administration of a first-line or second-line platinum-based regimen with at least one bidimensionally measurable target lesion. The patients received docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks without premedication for minimizing potential hypersensitivity. Docetaxel-induced side effects were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 23.6% in 76 assessable patients versus 20% if all 90 eligible patients were included in the comparison (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11%-29%). Among 34 eligible patients whose tumor progressed on the most recent platinum treatment, the response rate was 23.5% (95% CI = 8%-39%). The median progression-free survival for all eligible patients was 3.9 months, and the median overall survival was 8.4 months. Docetaxel-associated toxicity in 90 assessable patients consisted of short-lived neutropenia in 81 (90%) patients, which was complicated by fever and hospitalization in seven (8%); hypersensitivity reactions were seen in 29 (31%) patients, with significant reactions seen in seven (8%); and neurotoxicity in 43 (48%) patients, with grade 3 or above toxicity seen in only three (3%). The treatment also produced skin reactions in 58 (64%) patients, of whom only four (4%) showed the intensity of grade 3. Eleven (12%) patients experienced pleural effusions, which were the effects of the drug considered to be of greatest concern. Peripheral edema and weight gain due to fluid retention were reported in 40 (44%) and 17 (19%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel appears to be effective in the treatment of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer patients.

New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Anticancer cytotoxic agents go through a process by which their antitumor activity-on the basis of the amount of tumor shrinkage they could generate-has been investigated. In the late 1970s, the International Union Against Cancer and the World Health Organization introduced specific criteria for the codification of tumor response evaluation. In 1994, several organizations involved in clinical research combined forces to tackle the review of these criteria on the basis of the experience and knowledge acquired since then. After several years of intensive discussions, a new set of guidelines is ready that will supersede the former criteria. In parallel to this initiative, one of the participating groups developed a model by which response rates could be derived from unidimensional measurement of tumor lesions instead of the usual bidimensional approach. This new concept has been largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines. This special article also provides some philosophic background to clarify the various purposes of response evaluation. It proposes a model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions (to be measured) and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment. Methods of assessing tumor lesions are better codified, briefly within the guidelines and in more detail in Appendix I. All other aspects of response evaluation have been discussed, reviewed, and amended whenever appropriate.

Application of a new multinomial phase II stopping rule using response and early progression.

PURPOSE: A multinomial stopping rule had previously been developed that incorporated both objective response and early progression into decisions to stop or continue phase II trials of anticancer agents. The purpose of this study was to apply the multinomial rule to two independent sets of phase II data to assess its utility in appropriately recommending early trial closure as compared with other stopping rules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from completed phase II trials of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG) formed the basis of the study. Based on observed results for each trial, the recommendation of the multinomial stopping rule was applied, as was the recommendation of the actual stopping rule used (Fleming or Gehan). The appropriateness of the recommendations was evaluated based on interpretation of final study results. RESULTS: The standard and multinomial rules disagreed on early stopping in one of 16 NCIC CTG trials and in seven of 23 ECSG trials. In all cases, the standard rule advised continuing to the second stage whereas the multinomial rule advised stopping early because of excessive numbers of patients experiencing early disease progression. Final trial results indicated that the multinomial recommendation was appropriate, because in no study did final results lead to conclusions of activity. CONCLUSION: In this series of trials, the multinomial stopping rule performed more efficiently than the Fleming or Gehan rules in advising early stopping of trials. These results encourage continued exploration of this approach for phase II trials of cytotoxic and noncytotoxic anticancer agents.

Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To assess activity and toxicity of topotecan in previously treated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable SCLC, progressive after one first-line regimen, were eligible for the study. Two groups of patients were selected: (1) patients who failed first-line treatment < or = 3 months from chemotherapy discontinuation (refractory group); and (2) patients who responded to first-line treatment and progressed greater than 3 months after chemotherapy discontinuation (sensitive group). Topotecan was administered as a 30-minute daily infusion at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred one patients were entered onto the study and 403 courses were administered. Ninety-two patients (47 refractory and 45 sensitive) were eligible and assessable for response. Among refractory patients, there were two partial responses (PRs) and one complete response (CR), for an overall response rate of 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3% to 17.6%), whereas in the sensitive group, there were 11 PRs and six CRs, for an overall response rate of 37.8% (95% CI, 23.8% to 53.5%). Overall median duration of response was 7.6 months. Median survival was 5.4 months; median survival of refractory patients was 4.7 months, whereas that of sensitive patients was 6.9 months (P = .002). Median survival of responding patients was 12.5 months. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. Leukopenia, although short-lived, was universal, with grade III and IV neutropenia occurring in 28% and 46.8% of cycles, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was mild. Fatigue/malaise was reported in 39.3% of cycles and transient elevation of liver enzymes in 17%. CONCLUSION: Topotecan has significant activity in SCLC, particularly in patients sensitive to prior chemotherapy, with predictable and manageable toxicity. The incorporation of topotecan in combination chemotherapy regimens for future treatment of SCLC is warranted.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of E7070, a novel chloroindolyl sulfonamide cell-cycle inhibitor, administered as a one-hour infusion every three weeks in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: The objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, the recommended dose, the dose-limiting toxicity, the pharmacokinetics, and the activity of E7070, a novel cell-cycle inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: E7070 was given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in two groups of patients with advanced solid tumors who met prespecified eligibility criteria (group A) or who met the same eligibility criteria but in addition were less heavily pretreated and had more favorable liver functions (group B). RESULTS: Forty patients (31 patients in group A and nine patients in group B) were entered. Dose escalation proceeded through eight levels (range, 50 to 1,000 mg/m(2)). In group A, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first cycle in two of seven patients treated at the doses of 700 mg/m(2) and two of four patients treated at 800 mg/m(2). Identical dose-limiting toxicities were observed in zero of six and two of three patients from group B at doses of 800 and 1,000 mg/m(2), respectively. Other toxicities included acne-like skin eruption, mucositis, conjunctivitis, nausea, fatigue, and alopecia. At doses greater than 400 mg/m(2), the area under the concentration-time curve increased disproportionately to the administered dose. Tumor stabilization lasting > or = 6 months was observed in six assessable patients. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses of E7070 in this schedule were 700 mg/m(2) (group A) and 800 mg/m(2) in patients who were less heavily pretreated (group B) with a moderate tumor burden. Prolonged disease stabilization observed in this study might warrant further investigation of E7070 in selected tumor types.

Phase I trial of 6-hour infusion of glufosfamide, a new alkylating agent with potentially enhanced selectivity for tumors that overexpress transmembrane glucose transporters: a study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the principal toxicities, and the pharmacokinetics of 6-hour infusion of glufosfamide (beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard; D-19575), a novel alkylating agent with the potential to target the glucose transporter system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (10 women and 11 men; median age, 56 years) with refractory solid tumors were treated with doses ranging from 800 to 6,000 mg/m(2). Glufosfamide was administered every 3 weeks as a two-step (fast/slow) intravenous infusion over a 6-hour period. All patients underwent pharmacokinetic sampling at the first course. RESULTS: The MTD was 6,000 mg/m(2). At this dose, two of six patients developed a reversible, dose-limiting renal tubular acidosis and a slight increase in serum creatinine the week after the second and third courses of treatment, respectively, whereas three of six patients experienced short-lived grade 4 neutropenia/leukopenia. Other side effects were generally mild. Pharmacokinetics indicated linearity of area under the time-versus-concentration curve against dose over the dose range studied and a short elimination half-life. There was clear evidence of antitumor activity, with a long-lasting complete response of an advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and minor tumor shrinkage of two refractory colon carcinomas and one heavily pretreated breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The principal toxicity of 6-hour infusion of glufosfamide is reversible renal tubular acidosis, the MTD is 6,000 mg/m(2), and the recommended phase II dose is 4, 500 mg/m(2). Close monitoring of serum potassium and creatinine levels is suggested for patients receiving glufosfamide for early detection of possible renal toxicity. Evidence of antitumor activity in resistant carcinomas warrants further clinical exploration of glufosfamide in phase II studies.

Population pharmacokinetics of the novel anticancer agent E7070 during four phase I studies: model building and validation.

PURPOSE: N-(3-Chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulfonamide (E7070) is a novel sulfonamide anticancer agent currently in phase II clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. Four phase I studies have been finalized, with E7070 administered at four different treatment schedules to identify the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities. Pharmacokinetic analyses of all studies revealed E7070 to have nonlinear pharmacokinetics. A population pharmacokinetic model was designed and validated to describe the pharmacokinetics of E7070 at all four treatment schedules and to identify the possible influences of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma concentration-time data of all patients (n = 143) were fitted to several pharmacokinetic models using NONMEM. Seventeen covariables were investigated for their relation with individual pharmacokinetic parameters. A bootstrap procedure was performed to check the validity of the model. RESULTS: The data were best described using a three-compartment model with nonlinear distribution to a peripheral compartment and two parallel pathways of elimination from the central compartment: a linear and a saturable pathway. Body-surface area (BSA) was significantly correlated to both the volume of distribution of the central compartment and to the maximal elimination capacity. The fits of 500 bootstrap replicates of the data set demonstrated the robustness of the developed population pharmacokinetic model. CONCLUSION: A population pharmacokinetic model has been designed and validated that accurately describes the data of four phase I studies with E7070. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that BSA-guided dosing for E7070 is important.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of carzelesin (U-80244) given daily for five consecutive days.

Carzelesin (U-80244), one of the synthetic DNA minor groove binding cyclopropylpyrroloindole analogues, was selected for clinical development because of its high potency, promising antitumor activity in murine solid tumors and leukemia, and significant therapeutic efficacy against colon and rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. In this Phase I study, carzelesin was given daily for 5 consecutive days to (a) determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and the pattern of toxicity of this schedule; (b) define the pharmacokinetic profile of the parent, as was done for the intermediate compound U-76073 and the DNA-reactive agent U-76074; and (c) document any antitumor activity observed. Carzelesin was given as a 10-min infusion with a constant-rate infusion pump. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks or when blood counts had recovered to normal values. The starting dose of 12 microgram/m2/day was escalated by 20-30% increments until the MTD (defined as the dose leading to grade 4 hematological or grade 3 nonhematological toxicity in at least two of six patients) was reached. Pharmacokinetic studies were planned on days 1 and 5 of the first cycle in at least two patients per dose level. Plasma levels of carzelesin, U-76073, and U-76074 were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection and a detection limit of 0.5 ng/ml. Twenty-five patients were entered in the study, and 56 cycles were evaluable for hematological toxicity. Subsequent dose levels evaluated were 24, 30, 35, and 40 microgram/m2. Both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting and cumulative, with a high interpatient variability. Neutropenia occurred earlier (median time to neutrophil nadir and recovery, 15 and 29 days, respectively) than thrombocytopenia (median time to platelet nadir and recovery, 25 and >/=26 days, respectively); there were delays of treatment because of persisting thrombocytopenia in all patients treated at the MTD. At the MTD, the peak plasma concentrations of carzelesin were achieved at the end of the infusion and were higher than those found cytotoxic in vitro against tumor cell lines. Carzelesin was detectable up to a maximum of 1 h after the infusion. Smaller amounts of U-76073 were detectable for a maximum of 30 min only at the MTD, whereas U-76074 was never found. An 8-month partial remission was reported in one previously untreated patient with hepatocellular carcinoma at 40 microgram/m2. The MTD was fixed at 40 microgram/m2 daily; 35 and 30 microgram/m2 are the daily doses recommended for Phase II studies in good- and poor-risk patients. The daily regimen for 5 days seems to offer no advantage over the single intermittent schedule that has been selected for the Phase II program in Europe.

Phase I and pharmacological study of weekly administration of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM 486A (CGP 48 664) in patients with solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group.

A single-agent dose-escalating Phase I and pharmacological study of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM 486A was performed. A dosing regimen of four weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks off therapy was studied. Fifty patients were entered into the study. Dose levels studied were 1.25, 2.5, 5, 8, 16, 32, 48, 70, 110, 170, 270, and 325 mg/m2/week. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done on day 1, and trough samples were taken weekly during the first treatment cycle. Pharmacodynamic sampling was done on days 1 and 22. At 325 mg/m2/week, dose-limiting toxicity was seen (one patient each with grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 neurotoxicity, and grade 3 hypotension with syncope and T-wave inversions on electrocardiogram). The recommended dose for further testing was set at 270 mg/m2/week. Infusion time was increased from 10 to 180 min due to facial paresthesias and flushing and somnolence. Drug exposure increased linearly with dose. Mean +/- SD t1,2 at 70-325 mg/m2 doses was 61.4+/-26.2 h, with a large volume of distribution at steady state. In peripheral blood leukocytes, a clear relationship between dose and inhibitory effect on S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase or changes in intracellular polyamine pools was not recorded. SAM 486A can be administered safely using a dosing regimen of four weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks off therapy. The recommended dose for Phase II studies using this regimen is 270 mg/m2/week.

Phase II study of LU 103793 (dolastatin analogue) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

LU 103793 is a synthetic analogue of Dolastatin 15 that inhibits tubulin polymerisation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of LU 103793 in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with two lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients received LU 103793 at a dose of 2.5 mg/m(2)/day over 5 min for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Thirty-four patients were enrolled and 23 patients were eligible for the evaluation of efficacy. Eleven patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. Other related grade 3/4 adverse events included asthenia (three patients), stomatitis (1), myalgia (1) and increase of serum bilirubin (2). The main toxicity was hypertension occurring in seven out of 34 patients. There were no objective responses, 7 patients had stable disease. These results do not support the further evaluation of LU 103793 in metastatic breast cancer patients using this dose and schedule.

Activity of docetaxel (Taxotere) in small cell lung cancer. The Early Clinical Trials Group of the EORTC.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a new cytotoxic compound with a broad spectrum of activity in preclinical studies. This paper reports a phase II trial in patients with previously-treated small cell carcinoma of the lung. 34 patients received 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel in an intravenous infusion given over 1 h every 21 days. Seven partial responses were reported (25% of 28 evaluable patients). Duration of response was 3.5-12.6 months. Toxicities were predominantly neutropenia, alopecia and asthenia. Docetaxel is a new compound with activity in previously-treated patients with small cell lung cancer, and is suitable for evaluation in combination with other cytotoxic drugs active in this disease.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) in advanced malignant melanoma: a phase II study of the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

The antitumour activity of docetaxel was investigated in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, intravenous, over 60 min, was administered every 3 weeks. Response evaluation was performed after two cycles. No prophylactic treatment with steroids or antihistamines was given. 38 patients were included, 36 were eligible and evaluable for toxicity and 30 patients were evaluable for response. The main haematological toxicity was neutropenia [17 patients with common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 4 and 11 CTC grade 3] with nadir after 5-8 days and rapid recovery. The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was generalised alopecia (83% of the patients). Asthenia, malaise and fatigue were also seen in 58%. Skin toxicity was also frequent. Hypersensitivity reactions (erythematous rash, urticaria, blood pressure changes and tachycardia), seen in 42% of the patients, were mild to moderate. Oedema was registered in one fifth of the patients and developed after four or more treatment cycles. The overall response rate in the evaluable patients was 17% (five partial responders). We conclude that docetaxel has activity in advanced malignant melanoma.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) in advanced renal cell cancer. A phase II trial of the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

Docetaxel (Taxotere), an analogue of paclitaxel, was tested in a phase II study in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Consenting patients with measurable lesions, adequate organ functions and no prior chemotherapy received 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. No premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions or nausea and emesis was given. 32 eligible patients received 100 treatment cycles. Short-lasting neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Acute hypersensitivity reactions (HSR), oedema and skin changes were other important side-effects. HSRs regressed spontaneously or were treated with antihistamines with or without corticosteroids. One partial remission was documented. At the dose and schedule used, docetaxel has only low activity against renal cell carcinoma.

Phase II trial with S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with gastric cancer. A trial performed by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG).

S-1 is a new oral fluorinated pyrimidine derivate, in which the oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, tegafur, was combined with two 5-FU-modulating substances, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (gimeracil), and potassium oxonate (oteracil), at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. The final mechanism of action is exerted by 5-FU. The present study is the first European phase II trial of S-1 in gastric cancer. The primary study objectives were the safety, toxicity and activity of S-1 in non-pretreated patients with gastric cancer. The secondary objective was the duration of response. Patients had to have histologically- or cytologically-verified metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer; S-1 was administered orally twice daily at 40, then 35 mg/m(2) for 28 days every 5 weeks. The starting dose of 40 mg/m(2) was found to be intolerable due to significant non-haematological toxicity, and this dose was rapidly reduced to 35 mg/m(2) twice daily. Of the 7 patients enrolled at the 40 mg/m(2) level, only 3 were evaluable. At 35 mg/m(2), a response rate of 26.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.0-45.1%) in 23 enrolled patients, and 31.6% (C.I. 14.7-53.0%) in 19 evaluable patients according to an independent radiology review, was found. The median duration of response at 35 mg/m(2) (6 patients) was 223 days (range, 108-828 days), and of stable disease was 111 days (range 68-411 days). S-1 can be administered with an acceptable safety and toxicity in European patients at a dose of 35 mg/m(2) days 1 - 28 every 5 weeks and is associated with a moderate response rate similar to the results achieved with other fluoropyrimidines.

An EORTC-ECSG phase I study of LU 79553 administered every 21 or 42 days in patients with solid tumours.

A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the naphthalamide agent, LU 79553, was performed to determine its safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for phase II studies. LU 79553 was given intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid cancers (an extended cohort of patients also received the drug every 6 weeks). 59 patients were enrolled into the study (50 patients in the 3-weekly schedule and 9 patients in the 6-weekly schedule). Dose levels studied ranged from 10 mg/m(2) to 160 mg/m(2). Neuro-muscular toxicity was identified as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). This muscular toxicity was observed after administrating total doses of 160-450 mg/m(2) (median 330 mg/m(2)). Non-DLTs consisted of diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, fatigue and local venous phlebitis. The major haematological toxicities observed were anaemia and neutropenia (and were mainly observed at the two highest dose levels). The proposed dose for phase II studies using the 3-weekly regimen is 100 mg/m(2)/course (60 min infusion in 500 ml normal saline), but a close clinical follow-up of the patients for neuromuscular toxicity is mandatory. Prolongation of the treatment interval to 6 weeks, based upon the long half-life of the drug in the plasma and tissue, observed during this study, seemed not to be feasible in this heavily pretreated group of patients.