Fatigue and health-related quality of life in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria: A post hoc analysis of the pegcetacoplan PEGASUS trial data.

OBJECTIVES: Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, non-malignant haematological disorder associated with disabling fatigue and reduced health-related quality of life. Post hoc analysis of PEGASUS phase 3 trial (NCT03500549) characterised improvements in patient-reported fatigue measured by functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-fatigue) instrument item-level ratings for pegcetacoplan and eculizumab for the treatment of PNH. METHODS: Item-level responder analysis was conducted on a ≥2-level change from baseline (CFB) clinically important response (CIR) for the FACIT-fatigue 13 individual items rated on a 5-level Likert scale. We evaluated ≥2-level change against the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the FACIT-fatigue total score (≥5 points) and clinical parameters, haemoglobin (Hb; ≥1 g/dL) and normalised absolute reticulocyte count (ARC; 30-100 pg/cells). Logistic regressions estimated baseline-to-Week-16 FACIT-fatigue item-level transitional probabilities; Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated time to FACIT-fatigue item CIR. RESULTS: Pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab was associated with significantly greater odds of Week 16 CIR across 8/13 items and on total score MCID (OR [CI] = 11.19 [3.73, 33.57]) and faster times to responses. The item-level CIR threshold also showed clinical relevance on Hb level and ARC normalization. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with eculizumab, pegcetacoplan was associated with clinically meaningful greater improvements on a majority of FACIT-fatigue items.

Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L index for patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in France.

Aim: To map patient-level data collected on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC) QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-5L data for estimating health-state utilities in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Materials & methods: European cross-sectional PNH patient survey data populated regression models mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (covariates: sex and baseline age) to utilities calculated with the EQ-5D-5L French value set. A genetic algorithm allowed selection of the best-fitting between a set of models with and without interaction terms. We validated the selected algorithm using EQ-5D-5L utilities converted from EORTC QLQ-C30 data collected in the PEGASUS phase III, randomized controlled trial of pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab in adults with PNH. Results: Selected through the genetic algorithm, the ordinary least squares model without interactions provided highly stable results across study visits (mean [±SD] utilities 0.58 [±0.42] to 0.89 [±0.10]), and showed the best predictive validity. Conclusion: The new PNH EQ-5D-5L direct mapping developed using a genetic algorithm enabled calculation of reliable health-state utility data required for cost-utility analysis in health technology assessments supporting treatments of PNH.

Efficacy of rFIXFc versus N9-GP Prophylaxis in Patients with Hemophilia B: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of B-LONG and PARADIGM 2 Trials.

Purpose: For patients with hemophilia B, extended half-life factor IX (FIX) products are available for prophylaxis and for treating bleeds. Different methods are used to extend the half-lives of recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP). This affects their biodistribution and plasma FIX levels, although differences do not always correlate with clinical outcomes. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP was performed, based on licensed dosing in the European Union. Patients and Methods: Combined rFIXFc data from the weekly and individualized interval prophylaxis arms of the B-LONG clinical trial, and N9-GP data from the 40 IU/kg once-weekly prophylaxis arm of PARADIGM 2 were used in a MAIC. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (n=87) were matched to aggregated data for N9-GP (n=29). Estimated annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for rFIXFc were recalculated using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over-dispersion, and compared with ABRs reported for N9-GP, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: There was no evidence of significant differences in estimated ABRs between prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP. Analysis of pooled rFIXFc weekly and interval-adjusted dosing compared with N9-GP 40 IU/kg once weekly produced estimated ABRs of 2.59 versus 2.51 (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56-1.89), as well as 1.34 versus 1.22 (IRR 1.10; 95% CI 0.42-2.91) and 1.13 versus 1.29 (IRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47-1.63) for overall, spontaneous, and traumatic bleeding events, respectively. Conclusion: The study did not reveal any significant differences in the efficacy of rFIXFc and N9-GP prophylaxis. Given differences in trough levels (rFIXFc dosing was targeted to achieve a trough 1-3 IU/dL above baseline versus a reported estimated N9-GP mean trough of 27.3 IU/dL), interpreting plasma FIX levels as potential surrogate efficacy markers requires consideration of compound-specific pharmacokinetic profiles.