Quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling construction and demolition waste in the Greater Bay Area, China: Status quo and future scenarios.

Comparing with the enduring efforts to reduce carbon emissions in design, construction, and operation stages of a construction project, less attention has been paid to emission abatement potential in the end-of-life stage, particularly by recycling waste generated by construction and demolition (C&D) activities. This research aims to cover this knowledge void by quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling C&D waste. It does so by adopting a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and choosing the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) in South China for a case study. The carbon emission is treated as embodied in construction materials, by recycling which the equivalent amount of carbon generated from the virgin materials can be saved. It is estimated that the GBA produced 128.49 Mt. of C&D waste in 2018, which implies an embodied carbon saving potential of 92.26 Mt. carbon emissions. The research goes further to understand the future C&D waste generation and their corresponding embodied carbon saving potential. A first-of-its-kind dynamic approach is developed to simulate the future 42-year saving potential under four construction development scenarios. Depending on different construction growth rates, the embodied carbon saving potential in 2060 can be up to 894.80 Mt. and down to 166.34 Mt. This research can help achieve China's 2060 carbon neutral goal by focusing on a non-negligible sector in an economically important region. Methods proposed in this paper are also applicable to other regions worldwide, especially where C&D waste data is insufficient.

Comparability of Biologics: Global Principles, Evidentiary Consistency and Unrealized Reliance.

The principles of comparability assessments have been accepted globally as offering sensitive and reliable tools with which to evaluate potential changes to biologics that may arise either through processing changes or through the creation of a copy (biosimilar) by a different sponsor. The comparability approach has evolved through systematic advances in four areas: clear and convergent guidelines for evaluation of potential changes to biologics; risk-based systems of weighting analytical data; progressive improvements in analytical methods; and advanced understanding of post-translational modifications. Routine regulatory expectations for clinical equivalence data are being reevaluated, as they seldom contribute to the assessment of similarity. Similarly, we show that requirements to compare biosimilars and locally sourced versions of their reference products are of questionable scientific value and represent a double standard by comparison with the invariable acceptance of the clinical profiles of novel biologics without reference to their sources. The consistent application of evidentiary standards for comparability to all biologics offers an opportunity for regulators to curtail their own assessments of new biosimilars and instead to recognize comparability assessments made in another jurisdiction (reliance), thereby gaining important efficiencies in the regulatory review of biosimilars and improving the competitiveness of the biosimilars market. Such consistency can also enhance the confidence of all stakeholders, especially patients and their providers, in all biologics.

A cost-effectiveness approach to the qualification and acceptance of biomarkers.

The flow of new medicines to patients depends on the development of new biomarkers and their correct interpretation, yet there are no widely accepted and practically applicable criteria that facilitate adequate biomarker qualification. As a result, case-by-case qualifications are based on subjective assessments that do not lead to optimal decisions for patients, which have contributed to the 'stagnation' in drug productivity identified by the FDA. An alternative is to qualify biomarkers in terms of cost effectiveness using a set of principles that enable the evaluation of biomarkers even with incomplete knowledge. This approach could minimize harm to patients, improve access to medicines and reduce healthcare costs.

An Efficient Development Paradigm for Biosimilars.

The current development paradigm for biosimilars required by regulators in highly regulated jurisdictions is derived from the development of novel drugs and is unnecessarily burdensome and inefficient. It requires the accumulation of data from analytical, nonclinical (including in vivo studies in some jurisdictions), and clinical studies (including powered efficacy studies in most cases); this paradigm is known as 'totality of evidence' (ToE) and does not admit a conclusion of biosimilarity from analytical data alone. The record of biosimilar approvals in these jurisdictions shows that no biosimilar candidate that has been found highly similar to its reference in analytical and pharmacokinetic studies has failed to be approved. We propose a new paradigm ('confirmation of sufficient likeness', CSL) that emphasizes the demonstration of analytical resemblance between the biosimilar candidate and its reference, and permits the conclusion of biosimilarity upon this basis. CSL does not entail bridging studies between reference products, in vivo nonclinical studies, or powered efficacy studies and is, therefore, substantially more efficient than ToE while maintaining equivalent scientific rigor. Such efficiency will contribute to the attractiveness as well as the sustainability of biosimilars as a therapeutic modality.

Efficacy of sumatriptan tablets in migraineurs self-described or physician-diagnosed as having sinus headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients and physicians interpret episodic headache in the presence or absence of nasal symptoms as "sinus' headache, while ignoring the possible diagnosis of migraine. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan succinate 50-mg tablets in patients with migraine presenting with "sinus" headache. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in adult (aged 18-65 years) migraine patients presenting with self-described or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. From November 2001 to March 2002, patients meeting International Headache Society criteria for migraine (with > or =2 of the following: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe intensity, aggravation by moderate physical activity; and > or =1 of: phonophobia and phonophobia, nausea and/or vomiting) and with no evidence of bacterial rhinosinusitis were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio via computer-generated randomization schedule to receive either 1 sumatriptan 50-mg tablet or matching placebo tablet. The primary efficacy end point was headache response (moderate or severe headache pain reduced to mild or no headache pain) at 2 hours after administration. The presence or absence of migraine-associated symptoms and sinus and nasal symptoms was also measured. Tolerability was assessed through patient-reported adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen patients with self-described or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache received a migraine diagnosis and treated 1 migraine attack with sumatriptan 50 mg. The efficacy (intent-to-treat) analysis included 215 patients treated with sumatriptan 50 mg (n = 108; mean [SD] age, 39.6 [12.3] years; mean [SD] weight, 77.7 [17.7] kg; sex, 71% female; race, 69% white) or placebo (n = 107; mean [SD] age, 41.0 [11.3] years; mean [SD] weight 80.7 [20.9] kg; sex, 69% female; race, 64% white). Significantly more patients treated with sumatriptan 50 mg achieved a positive headache response at 2 and 4 hours after administration compared with those treated with placebo (69% vs 43% at 2 hours and 76% vs 49% at 4 hours, respectively; both, P < 0.001). Significantly more sumatriptan-treated patients were free from sinus pain compared with placebo recipients at 2 hours (63% vs 49% placebo, P = 0.049) and 4 hours (77% vs 55%, P = 0.001). All treatments were generally well tolerated. The most common drug-related AEs reported in the sumatriptan and placebo groups, respectively, were dizziness (5% vs < 1%), nausea (3% vs 2%), other pressure/tightness (defined as sense of heaviness; heaviness of upper body, upper extremities; jaw tension; neck tension) (4% vs 0%), and temperature sensations (defined as warm feeling of back of neck, or flushing) (2% vs 0%). No patients experienced any serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan 50-mg tablets were effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of these patients presenting with migraine headaches that were self-described or physician-diagnosed as sinus headaches.

A 'Global Reference' Comparator for Biosimilar Development.

Major drug regulators have indicated in guidance their flexibility to accept some development data for biosimilars generated with reference product versions licensed outside their own jurisdictions, but most authorities require new bridging studies between these versions and the versions of them licensed locally. The costs of these studies are not trivial in absolute terms and, due to the multiplier effect of required repetition by each biosimilar sponsor, their collective costs are substantial. Yet versions of biologics licensed in different jurisdictions usually share the same development data, and any manufacturing changes between versions have been justified by a rigorous comparability process. The fact that a biosimilar is usually expected to be licensed in multiple jurisdictions, in each case as similar to the local reference product, confirms that minor analytical differences between versions of reference biologics are typically inconsequential for clinical outcomes and licensing. A greatly simplified basis for selecting a reference comparator, that does not require conducting new bridging studies, is proposed and justified based on the shared data of the reference product versions as well as the proof offered where biosimilars have already been approved. The relevance of this proposal to the interchangeability designation available in the US is discussed.

Toward a Metagenomic Understanding on the Bacterial Composition and Resistome in Hong Kong Banknotes.

Currency is possibly one of the main media transmitting pathogens and drug resistance due to its wide circulation in daily life. In this study, we made a comprehensive characterization of the bacterial community present on banknotes collected from different geographical regions of Hong Kong (HK) by performing in vitro characterization of the bacterial presence and resistome profile, as well as metagenomic analysis including microbial diversity, the prevalence of potential pathogens, the dissemination potential of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), among others. When comparing the bacterial community of HK banknotes with other HK environmental samples, including water and marine sediment, we revealed that HK banknotes cover nearly 50% of total genera found in all the environmental samples, implying that banknotes harbor diverse bacteria originated from a variety of environments. Furthermore, the banknotes have higher abundance of potential pathogenic species (~5 times more) and ARGs (~5 times more) with higher dissemination potential (~48 times more) compared with other environmental samples. These findings unveiled the capabilities of this common medium of exchange to accommodate various bacteria, and transmit pathogens and antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the observed independence of microbiome profile from the city's topological indices led us to formulate a hypothesis that due to their high circulation banknotes may harbor a homogenized microbiome.

Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self-reported or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms referable to the sinus area are frequently reported during migraine attacks, but are not recognized in diagnostic criteria. Underrecognition of migraine may be partly attributed to a variable clinical presentation, and migraines with "sinus" symptoms contribute to this problem. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of migraine-type headache (International Headache Society [IHS]-defined migraine without aura [IHS 1.1], migraine with aura [IHS 1.2], or migrainous disorder [IHS 1.7]) in patients with a history of self-described or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. METHODS: During a clinic visit, patients with a history of "sinus" headache, no previous diagnosis of migraine, and no evidence of infection were assigned an IHS headache diagnosis on the basis of headache histories and reported symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 2991 patients were screened. The majority (88%) of these patients with a history of self-described or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache were diagnosed at the screening visit as fulfilling IHS migraine criteria (80% of patients) or migrainous criteria (8% of patients). The most common symptoms referable to the sinus area reported by patients at screening were sinus pressure (84%), sinus pain (82%), and nasal congestion (63%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 88% of patients with a history of "sinus" headache were determined to have migraine-type headache. In patients with recurrent headaches without fever or purulent discharge, the presence of sinus-area symptoms may be part of the migraine process. Migraine should be included in the differential diagnosis of these patients.

GW320659 for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GW320659, a chemically novel inhibitor of norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake, in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This was a multicenter, open-label, dose-titration study of seven daily dose levels of GW320659: 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5,10,12.5, and 15 mg. Treatment began with the lowest dose of GW320659 and increased weekly until subjects (mean age 9.1 years) achieved a maximum acceptable dose. Subjects remained at their maximum acceptable dose for a 4-week treatment period. The key efficacy end-point was clinical response (Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement score of 1 or 2 and an improvement of 5 or more points on at least one of the Conners Parent or Teacher Rating Scales Tscore). Other end-points included assessments of safety and of quality of life using the Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form 28 (CHQ-PF28). RESULTS: Fifty-one subjects entered the titration phase and 46 subjects completed the study. During the treatment phase, these 46 subjects received a mean dose of 14.2 mg/day and the maximum exposure to GW320659 was 11 weeks. At the end of the treatment period, 76% of subjects showed improvement with GW320659 and there were significant improvements in 7 of the 12 subscales of the CHQ-PF28 compared with baseline (p < .05). Adverse events were generally mild; only five subjects required downward titration because of adverse events (three psychiatric, one neurological and urological, one cardiovascular), and no subject withdrew because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GW320659 may have clinically relevant efficacy in pediatric ADHD and was well tolerated in this short-term initial study in children.

Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider.

This paper is intended to stimulate debate amongst stakeholders in the international research community on the topic of returning individual genetic research results to study participants. Pharmacogenetics and disease genetics studies are becoming increasingly prevalent, leading to a growing body of information on genetic associations for drug responsiveness and disease susceptibility with the potential to improve health care. Much of these data are presently characterized as exploratory (non-validated or hypothesis-generating). There is, however, a trend for research participants to be permitted access to their personal data if they so choose. Researchers, sponsors, patient advocacy groups, ethics committees and regulatory authorities are consequently confronting the issue of whether, and how, study participants might receive their individual results. Noted international ethico-legal guidelines and public policy positions in Europe and the United States are reviewed for background. The authors offer 'Points-to-Consider' regarding returning results in the context of drug development trials based on their knowledge and experience. Theses considerations include: the clinical relevance of data, laboratory qualifications, informed consent procedures, confidentiality of medical information and the competency of persons providing results to participants. The discussion is framed as a benefit-to-risk assessment to balance the potential positive versus negative consequences to participants, while maintaining the integrity and feasibility of conducting genetic research studies.

Genetic patent protection in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries.

Without patent protection, biomedical progress would be severely diminished. Conditions under the current patent regime are characterized by rapid advancement made possible by cooperative licensing, collaboration and partnerships between and among various entities, and the drive to bring successful products to market both in order to make profits and to further the cause of humanity. The financial advantages associated with patent-driven corporate participation are the lifeline of innovation. While granting limited periods of exclusivity under the patent system necessary to entice innovation is a calculated sacrifice, the enormous benefits of fully-disclosed pharmaceutical and genetic discoveries result in a handsome net benefit over the alternative of resource-limited research clouded by a shroud of secrecy as a substitute for patent protection. By examining characteristics of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries and the critical role the patent regime plays in driving investment in these areas, a clearer picture of the necessity of strong intellectual property rights in the context of genetics will emerge.

Long-term tolerability of sumatriptan nasal spray in adolescent patients with migraine.

OBJECTIVE: This 1-year, open-label, multicenter study was designed to assess the long-term tolerability and efficacy of sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg in adolescent patients with migraine. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in patients aged 12 to 17 years who were allowed to treat an unlimited number of migraines at severe, moderate, or mild pain intensity with sumatriptan nasal spray for up to 1 year. All patients started the study at the 20-mg dose of sumatriptan nasal spray. Dose could be adjusted downward to 5 mg at the discretion of the investigator to optimize therapy. RESULTS: A total of 484 adolescent migraineurs treated 4676 migraines with sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg (3593 during the first 6 months and 1083 during the second 6 months). A total of 3940 migraines and 699 migraines were treated with one and two 20-mg doses of sumatriptan nasal spray, respectively. Only 10 patients (treating 42 migraines) took the 5-mg dose of sumatriptan nasal spray. The overall percentage of migraines treated with either one 20-mg dose or one, two, or three 20-mg doses with at least 1 drug-related adverse event was 19%. The most common specific drug-related adverse event was unpleasant taste, reported in 17% of migraines. No other single drug-related adverse event was reported in more than 1% of migraines over the 1-year treatment period. When unpleasant taste was excluded from the adverse-event tabulations, the percentages of migraines with at least 1 drug-related adverse event after one or one, two, or three 20-mg doses declined to 4% and 3%, respectively. No patient experienced any drug-related changes in 12-lead ECGs, vital signs, or nasal assessments; and no clinically meaningful changes in clinical laboratory values were observed. Across all migraines with evaluable efficacy data (n=4334), headache relief was reported in 43% of migraines at 1 hour and in 59% at 2 hours after dosing with sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg. Of the 2561 migraines with headache relief 2 hours postdose, headache recurrence was reported within 24 hours of initial dosing in 7% of migraines. None of the efficacy or tolerability results varied as a function of time in the study (ie, first 6 months vs. second 6 months). CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg is generally well tolerated and may be beneficial during long-term use by adolescent migraineurs ages 12 to 17 years.