Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Endocr Pract ; 22(9): 1040-7, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27124695

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Inpatient hypoglycemia (glucose ≤70 mg/dL) is a limitation of intensive control with insulin. Causes of hypoglycemia were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial examining intensive glycemic control (IG, target 140 mg/dL) versus moderate glycemic control (MG, target 180 mg/dL) on post-liver transplant outcomes. METHODS: Hypoglycemic episodes were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team to calculate and identify contributing pathophysiologic and operational factors. A subsequent subgroup case control (1:1) analysis (with/without) hypoglycemia was completed to further delineate factors. A total of 164 participants were enrolled, and 155 patients were examined in depth. RESULTS: Overall, insulin-related hypoglycemia was experienced in 24 of 82 patients in IG (episodes: 20 drip, 36 subcutaneous [SQ]) and 4 of 82 in MG (episodes: 2 drip, 2 SQ). Most episodes occurred at night (41 of 60), with high insulin amounts (44 of 60), and during a protocol deviation (51 of 60). Compared to those without hypoglycemia (n = 127 vs. n = 28), hypoglycemic patients had significantly longer hospital stays (13.6 ± 12.6 days vs. 7.4 ± 6.1 days; P = .002), higher peak insulin drip rates (17.4 ± 10.3 U/h vs. 13.1 ± 9.9 U/h; P = .044), and higher peak insulin glargine doses (36.8 ± 21.4 U vs. 26.2 ± 24.3 U; P = .035). In the case-matched analysis (24 cases, 24 controls), those with insulin-related hypoglycemia had higher median peak insulin drip rates (17 U/h vs. 11 U/h; P = .04) and protocol deviations (92% vs. 50%; P = .004). CONCLUSION: Peak insulin requirements and protocol deviations were correlated with hypoglycemia. ABBREVIATIONS: DM = diabetes mellitus ICU = intensive care unit IG = intensive glycemic control MELD = Model for End-stage Liver Disease MG = moderate glycemic control SQ = subcutaneous.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Glicemia/metabolismo , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hiperglicemia/complicações , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemia/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Internados , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Falência Hepática/sangue , Falência Hepática/complicações , Falência Hepática/epidemiologia , Falência Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 102(2): 451-459, 2017 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27875061

RESUMO

Context: Previous studies have shown a relationship between glycemic control and posttransplant morbidity. Objective: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in postliver transplant patients to evaluate intensive inpatient glycemic control and effects on outcomes to 1 year. Research Design and Intervention: A total of 164 patients [blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL] were randomized into 2 target groups: 82 with a BG of 140 mg/dL and 82 with a BG of 180 mg/dL. Continuous insulin infusions were initiated and then converted to subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy by our glucose management service. Results: The inpatient mean BG level was significantly different (140 group, 151.4 ± 19.5 mg/dL vs 180 group, 172.6 ± 27.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Any infection within 1 year occurred in 35 of the 82 patients (42.7%) in the 140 group and 54 of 82 (65.9%) in the 180 group (P = 0.0046). In a time-to-first infection analysis, being in the 140 group resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.83; P = 0.004); the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant at 1 month (P = 0.008). The number with adjudicated transplant rejection was similar between the 2 groups [17 of 82 (20.7%) and 20 of 82 (24.3%) in the 140 and 180 groups, respectively; P = not significant]. Severe hypoglycemia (BG ≤40 mg/dL) occurred in 3 patients (2 in the 140 group and 1 in the 180 group). However, more patients had moderate hypoglycemia (BG, 41 to 70 mg/dL) in the 140 group [27 of 82 (32.9%) vs 10 of 82 (12.2%) in the 180 group; P = 0.003]. Insulin-related hypoglycemia was not associated with the incidence of severe adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Glycemic control of 140 mg/dL safely resulted in a reduced incidence of infection after transplantation compared with 180 mg/dL, but with an increase in moderate hypoglycemia.


Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Infecções Oportunistas/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa