Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 139-147, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490854

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Federally funded Community, Migrant, and Homeless Health Centers provide health services to the most vulnerable communities in the United States. However, little is known about their capabilities and processes for providing vaccinations to adults. PROGRAM: We conducted the first national survey of health centers assessing their inventory, workflow, capacity for, and barriers to provision of routinely recommended adult vaccines. In addition, we asked health center leaders' perceptions regarding best practices and policy recommendations for adult vaccinations. IMPLEMENTATION: A survey was developed on the basis of domains elicited from advisory panels and focus groups and was sent electronically to leaders of 762 health centers throughout the United States and its territories; data were collected and analyzed in 2018. EVALUATION: A total of 319 survey responses (42%) were obtained. Health centers reported stocking most routinely recommended vaccines for adults; zoster vaccines were not stocked regularly due to supply and storage issues. Respondents most commonly reported adequate reimbursement for vaccination services from private insurance and Medicaid. Most vaccinations were provided during primary care encounters; less than half of health centers reported providing vaccines during specialist visits. Vaccines administered at the health center were most commonly documented in an open field of the electronic health record (96%) or in an immunization information system (72%). Recommendations for best practices related to better documentation of vaccinations and communication with immunization information systems were provided. DISCUSSION: Health centers provide most adult vaccines to their patients despite financial and technological barriers to optimal provisioning. Further studies at point of care could help identify mechanisms for system improvements.


Assuntos
Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Pública/normas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 9: 407-414, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29910640

RESUMO

Health systems science (HSS) is an emerging discipline addressing multiple, complex, interdependent variables that affect providers' abilities to deliver patient care and influence population health. New perspectives and innovations are required as physician leaders and medical educators strive to accelerate changes in medical education and practice to meet the needs of evolving populations and systems. The purpose of this paper is to introduce gaming science as a lens to magnify HSS integration opportunities in the scope of medical education and practice. Evidence supports gaming science innovations as effective teaching and learning tools to promote learner engagement in scientific and systems thinking for decision making in complex scenarios. Valuable insights and lessons gained through the history of war games have resulted in strategic thinking to minimize risk and save lives. In health care, where decisions can affect patient and population outcomes, gaming science innovations have the potential to provide safe learning environments to practice crucial decision-making skills. Research of gaming science limitations, gaps, and strategies to maximize innovations to further advance HSS in medical education and practice is required. Gaming science holds promise to equip health care teams with HSS knowledge and skills required for transformative practice. The ultimate goals are to empower providers to work in complex systems to improve patient and population health outcomes and experiences, and to reduce costs and improve care team well-being.

3.
US Army Med Dep J ; (2-18): 54-58, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623399

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to assist military communities of interest to more accurately identify service members who may have emotional and behavior disorders. Specifically, this study identifies service members' perceptions of the Department of Defense Post-Deployment Health Reassessment (PDHRA) screening instrument for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Findings were that responses to the PDHRA were related to how it was administered and the respondents' perceptions of how the PTSD diagnosis could affect the ability to obtain jobs and obtain promotions. Recommendations include implementing a screening environment free of distractions, involving family members, and assuring a confidential PTSD diagnosis.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Militares/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Estigma Social , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa