Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 90
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 49(10): 713-718, 2022 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35921642

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized despite its efficacy and potential population impact. Achieving PrEP's full potential depends on providers who are knowledgeable and comfortable prescribing it to individuals at risk of acquiring HIV. Previous educational interventions targeting provider-related uptake barriers have had limited success. We designed and tested an electronic medical record (EMR) interpretative comment to improve the delivery of PrEP. METHODS: An EMR comment provided information on PrEP eligibility and referral resources to providers delivering positive chlamydia and gonorrhea results. Positive test results for bacterial sexually transmitted infections before intervention (January 1, 2019-August 23, 2019) and after intervention (August 24, 2019-December 31, 2019) were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted to ascertain provider documentation of PrEP discussions or provision, HIV prevention discussions, and HIV screening. Pretest-posttest analysis was performed to compare the provision of PrEP and HIV prevention services. RESULTS: We reviewed 856 preintervention encounters spanning 8 months and 461 postencounters spanning 4 months. Patient demographics were comparable. We observed an increase in provider documentation of safe sex and condom counseling (odds ratios [ORs], 1.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.07-1.18] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17], respectively), and the absence of any HIV prevention discussion decreased (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90), but not HIV screening or PrEP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that an EMR laboratory comment had a modest effect on increasing risk reduction counseling, although not HIV screening or PrEP prescriptions. Future strategies to encourage provider delivery of sexual health services may benefit from more targeted strategies that combine behavioral and information technology approaches.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Aconselhamento , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sexo Seguro , Aconselhamento Sexual
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(2): 380-384, 2021 01 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33202023

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 may be at increased risk for secondary bacterial infections with MDR pathogens, including carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). OBJECTIVES: We sought to rapidly investigate the clinical characteristics, population structure and mechanisms of resistance of CPE causing secondary infections in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively identified CPE clinical isolates collected from patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and April 2020 at our medical centre in New York City. Available isolates underwent nanopore sequencing for rapid genotyping, antibiotic resistance gene detection and phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 31 CPE isolates from 13 patients, including 27 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates. Most patients (11/13) had a positive respiratory culture and 7/13 developed bacteraemia; treatment failure was common. Twenty isolates were available for WGS. Most K. pneumoniae (16/17) belonged to ST258 and encoded KPC (15 KPC-2; 1 KPC-3); one ST70 isolate encoded KPC-2. E. cloacae isolates belonged to ST270 and encoded NDM-1. Nanopore sequencing enabled identification of at least four distinct ST258 lineages in COVID-19 patients, which were validated by Illumina sequencing data. CONCLUSIONS: While CPE prevalence has declined substantially in New York City in recent years, increased detection in patients with COVID-19 may signal a re-emergence of these highly resistant pathogens in the wake of the global pandemic. Increased surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship efforts, as well as identification of optimal treatment approaches for CPE, will be needed to mitigate their future impact.


Assuntos
COVID-19/microbiologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/enzimologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/complicações , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sequenciamento por Nanoporos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Filogenia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , beta-Lactamases/genética , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
4.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 38(3): 602-605, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724504

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship between the presence of enteroviral skin infection, defined as a positive skin polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and the nasopharyngeal (NP) respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) PCR test which includes enterovirus/rhinovirus as an analyte. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 543 subjects, age 18 years or younger, who had enterovirus (EV) skin swabs performed at an academic medical center in New York City between September 2014 and November 2019. Those patients with positive EV skin PCR were considered to have an enteroviral skin infection, and those with a negative EV skin PCR were considered not to have an enteroviral skin infection. Of those 543 children who had EV skin PCR, 170 also had an NP swab RPP performed. These NP swab RPP results were characterized as positive or negative, and if positive, it was noted if the patient was positive or negative for enterovirus/rhinovirus. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, and sensitivity of a NP swab RPP for enteroviral skin infection were then calculated. RESULTS: An enterovirus/rhinovirus NP swab RPP had a NPV of 95%, PPV of 43%, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 62% for cutaneous enterovirus infection. CONCLUSION: The enteroviral skin PCR test is an assay that was validated at this institution. In clinically suspicious cases of EV, a positive NP swab RPP for enterovirus/rhinovirus is a sensitive test. A negative test is highly predictive of not having EV on the skin. Although further data are needed, given that NP swab RPP is readily available, these data may suggest that an NP swab RPP, when appropriately utilized, can support or exclude a clinical diagnosis of cutaneous enterovirus in the pediatric population.


Assuntos
Infecções por Enterovirus , Enterovirus , Adolescente , Criança , Enterovirus/genética , Infecções por Enterovirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactente , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 38(1): 119-124, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33247481

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) require care of wounds that are colonized or infected with bacteria. A subset of EB patients are at risk for squamous cell carcinoma, and bacterial-host interactions have been considered in this risk. The EB Clinical Characterization and Outcomes Database serves as a repository of information from EB patients at multiple centers in the United States and Canada. Access to this resource enabled broad-scale analysis of wound cultures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 739 wound cultures from 158 patients from 13 centers between 2001 and 2018. RESULTS: Of 152 patients with a positive culture, Staphylococcus aureus (SA) was recovered from 131 patients (86%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) from 56 (37%), and Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS) from 34 (22%). Sixty-eight percent of patients had cultures positive for methicillin-sensitive SA, and 47%, methicillin-resistant SA (18 patients had cultures that grew both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant SA at different points in time). Of 15 patients with SA-positive cultures with recorded mupirocin susceptibility testing, 11 had mupirocin-susceptible SA and 6 patients mupirocin-resistant SA (2 patients grew both mupirocin-susceptible and mupirocin-resistant SA). SCC was reported in 23 patients in the entire database, of whom 10 had documented wound cultures positive for SA, PA, and Proteus species in 90%, 50%, and 20% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SA and PA were the most commonly isolated bacteria from wounds. Methicillin resistance and mupirocin resistance were reported in 47% and 40% of patients tested, respectively, highlighting the importance of ongoing antimicrobial strategies to limit antibiotic resistance.


Assuntos
Epidermólise Bolhosa , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Epidermólise Bolhosa/complicações , Epidermólise Bolhosa/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Mupirocina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(2)2020 01 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31748324

RESUMO

Despite the increasing reliance on polymyxin antibiotics (polymyxin B and colistin) for treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, many clinical laboratories are unable to perform susceptibility testing due to the lack of accurate and reliable methods. Although gradient agar diffusion is commonly performed for other antimicrobials, its use for polymyxins is discouraged due to poor performance characteristics. Performing gradient agar diffusion with calcium enhancement of susceptibility testing media has been shown to improve the identification of polymyxin-resistant isolates with plasmid-mediated resistance (mcr-1). We therefore sought to evaluate the broad clinical applicability of this approach for colistin susceptibility testing by assessing a large and diverse collection of resistant and susceptible patient isolates collected from multiple U.S. medical centers. Among 217 isolates, the overall categorical and essential agreement for calcium-enhanced gradient agar diffusion were 73.7% and 65.5%, respectively, compared to the results for reference broth microdilution. Performance varied significantly by organism group, with agreement being highest for Enterobacterales and lowest for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Nevertheless, even for Enterobacterales, there was a high rate of very major errors (9.2%). Performance was similarly poor for calcium-enhanced broth microdilution. While calcium enhancement did allow for more accurate categorization of mcr-1-resistant isolates, there were unacceptably high rates of errors for both susceptible and non-mcr-1-resistant isolates, raising serious doubts about the suitability of these calcium-enhanced methods for routine colistin susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Cálcio/farmacologia , Colistina/farmacologia , Meios de Cultura/química , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Ágar , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(8)2020 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513858

RESUMO

Molecular testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the clinical performance of these tests is still poorly understood, particularly with regard to disease course, patient-specific factors, and viral shedding. From 10 March to 1 May 2020, NewYork-Presbyterian laboratories performed 27,377 SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays from 22,338 patients. Repeat testing was performed for 3,432 patients, of which 2,413 had initial negative and 802 had initial positive results. Repeat-tested patients were more likely to have severe disease and low viral loads. The negative predictive value of the first-day result among repeat-tested patients was 81.3% The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays was estimated between 58% and 96%, depending on the unknown number of false-negative results in single-tested patients. Conversion to negative was unlikely to occur before 15 to 20 days after initial testing or 20 to 30 days after the onset of symptoms, with 50% conversion occurring at 28 days after initial testing. Conversion from first-day negative to positive results increased linearly with each day of testing, reaching 25% probability in 20 days. Sixty patients fluctuated between positive and negative results over several weeks, suggesting that caution is needed when single-test results are acted upon. In summary, our study provides estimates of the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays and suggests time frames for appropriate repeat testing, namely, 15 to 20 days after a positive test and the same day or next 2 days after a negative test for patients with high suspicion for COVID-19.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus/genética , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Coronavirus/patologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Carga Viral , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(8)2020 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32404482

RESUMO

A surge of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting to New York City hospitals in March 2020 led to a sharp increase in blood culture utilization, which overwhelmed the capacity of automated blood culture instruments. We sought to evaluate the utilization and diagnostic yield of blood cultures during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine prevalence and common etiologies of bacteremia and to inform a diagnostic approach to relieve blood culture overutilization. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 88,201 blood cultures from 28,011 patients at a multicenter network of hospitals within New York City to evaluate order volume, positivity rate, time to positivity, and etiologies of positive cultures in COVID-19. Ordering volume increased by 34.8% in the second half of March 2020 compared to the level in the first half of the month. The rate of bacteremia was significantly lower among COVID-19 patients (3.8%) than among COVID-19-negative patients (8.0%) and those not tested (7.1%) (P < 0.001). COVID-19 patients had a high proportion of organisms reflective of commensal skin microbiota, which, when excluded, reduced the bacteremia rate to 1.6%. More than 98% of all positive cultures were detected within 4 days of incubation. Bloodstream infections are very rare for COVID-19 patients, which supports the judicious use of blood cultures in the absence of compelling evidence for bacterial coinfection. Clear communication with ordering providers is necessary to prevent overutilization of blood cultures during patient surges, and laboratories should consider shortening the incubation period from 5 days to 4 days, if necessary, to free additional capacity.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Hemocultura/estatística & dados numéricos , Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19 , Hospitais , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(3)2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30651393

RESUMO

PCR-based multiplex gastrointestinal (GI) pathogen panels have started to replace stool culture and ova and parasite exam as a rapid and accurate means of diagnosing acute gastroenteritis. However, there are limited data on the impact of panel testing on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the management and health care utilization of patients following GI panel compared with conventional stool testing. We performed a retrospective comparative analysis of 9,402 patients who underwent testing with the FilmArray GI panel from March 2015 through May 2017 and 5,986 patients who underwent conventional stool testing from December 2012 through February 2015. GI panel was positive in 2,746 exams (29.2%) compared with 246 exams (4.1%) with conventional testing. Within 30 days following stool testing, compared with patients who received a conventional stool test, patients who received a GI panel were less likely to undergo any endoscopic procedure (8.4% GI panel versus 9.6% stool culture, P = 0.008) or any abdominal radiology (29.4% GI panel versus 31.7%, P = 0.002). Within 14 days following stool testing, patients who received a GI panel were less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic (36.2% GI panel versus 40.9%, P < 0.001). The implementation of multiplex PCR stool testing was associated with a reduction in the utilization of endoscopy, abdominal radiology, and antibiotic prescribing.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/parasitologia , Fezes/virologia , Feminino , Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Gastroenterite/parasitologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/parasitologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(7): 1125-1128, 2018 09 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635334

RESUMO

A review of 15 patients who tested positive for human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) on the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel revealed that the majority were unlikely to have HHV-6 encephalitis. Criteria to assist interpretation of HHV-6 positive results are presented.


Assuntos
Herpesvirus Humano 6/isolamento & purificação , Meningite/virologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Infecções por Roseolovirus/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Encefalite Viral/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Meningite/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Roseolovirus/diagnóstico
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(6): 905-912, 2018 08 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29718144

RESUMO

Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation. We aimed to characterize MDRO colonization dynamics and infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients through innovative use of active surveillance and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Methods: We prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients undergoing LT from March 2014 to March 2016. Fecal samples were collected at multiple timepoints from time of enrollment to 12 months posttransplant. Samples were screened for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (Ceph-RE), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. We performed WGS of CRE and selected Ceph-RE isolates. We also collected clinical data including demographics, transplant characteristics, and infection data. Results: We collected 998 stool samples and 119 rectal swabs from 128 patients. MDRO colonization was detected in 86 (67%) patients at least once and was significantly associated with subsequent MDRO infection (0 vs 19.8%, P = .002). Child-Turcotte-Pugh score at LT and duration of post-LT hospitalization were independent predictors of both MDRO colonization and infection. Temporal dynamics differed between MDROs with respect to onset of colonization, clearance, and infections. We detected an unexpected diversity of CRE colonizing isolates and previously unrecognized transmission that spanned Ceph-RE and CRE phenotypes, as well as a cluster of mcr-1-producing isolates. Conclusions: Active surveillance and WGS showed that MDRO colonization is a highly dynamic and complex process after LT. Understanding that complexity is crucial for informing decisions regarding MDRO infection control, use of therapeutic decolonization, and empiric treatment regimens.


Assuntos
Bactérias/genética , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Variação Genética , Transplante de Fígado , Idoso , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Infecção Hospitalar , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Genômica , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Transplantados , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/genética , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma
13.
Dig Dis Sci ; 63(7): 1900-1909, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29696481

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal infection is a major cause of morbidity. We sought to characterize the pathogenic etiologies of gastrointestinal infection to identify seasonal patterns and predictors of specific infections utilizing a multiplex PCR assay in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 9403 patients who underwent 13,231 stool tests with a FilmArray gastrointestinal pathogen PCR panel during an episode of diarrhea from March 2015 to May 2017. Our primary outcome was the presence of a positive panel. Logistic regression was used to test for associations between season and infections. RESULTS: A positive result was found in 3426 tests (25.9%) in 2988 patients (31.8%), yielding 4667 pathogens consisting of 1469 viruses (31.5%), 2925 bacteria (62.7%), and 273 parasites (5.8%). Age less than 50 years was associated with a higher prevalence of pathogens compared to age ≥ 50 (p < 0.0001). The overall prevalence of a positive result for bacteria peaked in the summer (635, 29.2%), and the prevalence of viruses peaked in the winter (446, 31.8%). Compared to the winter, testing in the summer yielded a higher prevalence of bacteria (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.33, 1.73, p < 0.0001) and lower odds of viruses (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58, 0.81, p < 0.0001), primarily driven by E. coli species and norovirus. CONCLUSIONS: Season was a major determinant in detecting specific pathogens. Our substantially lower positivity rate than previous reports in the literature on multiplex PCR assays may more accurately reflect true clinical practice. Recognizing the temporal distribution of enteric pathogens may help facilitate empiric treatment decisions in certain clinical situations.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Enterite/diagnóstico , Fezes , Enteropatias Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Intestinos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Viroses/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Enterite/microbiologia , Enterite/parasitologia , Enterite/virologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/parasitologia , Fezes/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Enteropatias Parasitárias/epidemiologia , Enteropatias Parasitárias/parasitologia , Intestinos/microbiologia , Intestinos/parasitologia , Intestinos/virologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Fatores de Tempo , Viroses/epidemiologia , Viroses/virologia , Adulto Jovem
14.
Dig Dis Sci ; 63(4): 996-1002, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29411208

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease, two immune-mediated luminal conditions, have higher rates of certain infections than healthy counterparts. The prevalence of many gastrointestinal infections in these patients, however, is unknown. AIMS: Using a novel clinical stool pathogen PCR test, we investigated the hypothesis that patients with celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease had different distributions of diarrheal pathogens than other patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of outpatients who underwent stool pathogen testing with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal PCR Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) at our institution from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Rates of pathogens were measured in patients with or without celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS: Of 955 patients, 337 had positive test for any pathogen, with 465 bacterial, parasitic, or viral pathogens identified. One hundred and twenty-seven patients (13.3%) had celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease, of which 29/127 (22.8%) had a positive test, compared to 308/828 other patients (37.2%) (p = 0.002). Patients with celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease had significantly fewer viruses (1.6 vs. 8.1% of patients; p = 0.008) and parasites (0 vs. 3.3%; p = 0.039), with nonsignificant trend toward fewer bacteria (21.3 vs. 29.2%; p = 0.063). Escherichia coli species were most common in both populations. CONCLUSIONS: Stool PCR identified numerous pathogens in patients with or without celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease. Patients with celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease were significantly less likely to have any pathogen identified, and had significantly fewer viruses and parasites. In this population, knowledge of common pathogens can guide diagnostic evaluation and offer opportunities for treatment.


Assuntos
Doença Celíaca/epidemiologia , Doença Celíaca/microbiologia , Diarreia/microbiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença Celíaca/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Adulto Jovem
15.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 35(1): 92-96, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29105824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Many patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) require intensive daily wound care and individualized treatment plans. Understanding patient's home skin care routines and emerging antibiotic resistance patterns in EB wounds is necessary to optimize treatment recommendations. The objective was to identify patterns of antimicrobial resistance in EB wounds and characterize patient's home practices of skin care and bathing. METHODS: This was an observational study of 23 children with EB at an outpatient pediatric dermatology practice in New York City from 2012 to 2014. Information on individual bathing and skin care practices and wound cultures was collected as part of routine examinations and an institutional review board-approved antibiogram protocol. RESULTS: Sixty wound cultures were collected from 23 patients. Eleven organisms were isolated, most commonly methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Streptococcus species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Six patients (26%) were colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Over the course of the study, 13 patients (56%) were found to have mupirocin-resistant S. aureus. More than half of participants reported mupirocin or bacitracin use. Fewer than half indicated that they regularly used dilute bleach or dilute vinegar as part of their bathing routine. CONCLUSION: Numerous organisms, including resistant bacteria, are known to colonize the wounds of individuals with EB. Mupirocin resistance was prevalent and more than half of the participants reported its use. Testing for mupirocin resistance may be considered for certain patients. These observations may help guide questions for future longitudinal multicenter studies with the goal of optimizing EB wound care recommendations.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Epidermólise Bolhosa/microbiologia , Higiene da Pele/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção dos Ferimentos/microbiologia , Banhos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidadores , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Epidermólise Bolhosa/complicações , Epidermólise Bolhosa/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Infecção dos Ferimentos/terapia
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28507105

RESUMO

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) often lead to severe complications despite the availability of effective antibiotics. It remains unclear whether elevated vancomycin MICs are associated with worse outcomes. We conducted a 2-year retrospective cohort study (n = 252) of patients with MSSA BSIs at a tertiary care hospital. We defined reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) as a Microscan MIC of 2 mg/liter. All strains were genotyped (spa) and assessed for agr functionality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the impact of RVS phenotype and strain genotype on 30-day all-cause mortality and complicated bacteremia (metastatic spread, endovascular infection, or duration ≥3 days). One-third of patients (84/252) were infected with RVS isolates. RVS Infections were more frequently associated with metastatic or embolic sites of infection (36% versus 17%, P < 0.001), and endovascular infection (26% versus 12%, P = 0.004). These infections occurred more often in patients with fewer underlying comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index of ≥3 [73% versus 88%, P = 0.002]). Genotyping identified 127 spa-types and 14 Spa-clonal complexes (Spa-CCs). Spa-CC002 and Spa-CC008 were more likely to exhibit the RVS phenotype versus other Spa-CCs (OR = 2.2, P < 0.01). The RVS phenotype was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality; however, it was associated with complicated bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio of 2.35 [range, 1.26 to 4.37]; P = 0.007) in adjusted analyses. The association of RVS strains with complicated infection and fewer underlying comorbidities suggests the phenotype as a potential marker of strain virulence in MSSA BSIs. The RVS phenotype itself was not a significant predictor of mortality in this patient cohort. Further studies are necessary to explore this host-pathogen relationship.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Idoso , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico
17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28320724

RESUMO

In vivo induction of AmpC beta-lactamases produces high-level resistance to many beta-lactam antibiotics in Enterobacteriaceae, often resulting in the need to use carbapenems or cefepime (FEP). The clinical effectiveness of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), a weak inducer of AmpC beta-lactamases, is poorly understood. Here, we conducted a case-control study of adult inpatients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species from 2009 to 2015 to assess outcomes following treatment with TZP compared to FEP or meropenem (MEM). We collected clinical data and screened all isolates for the presence of ampC alleles by PCR. Primary study outcomes were 30-day mortality and persistent bacteremia at ≥72 h from the time of treatment initiation. Of 493 patients with bacteremia, 165 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 88 were treated with TZP and 77 with FEP or MEM. To minimize differences between covariates, we carried out propensity score matching, which yielded 41 matched pairs. Groups only differed by age, with patients in the TZP group significantly older (P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, persistent bacteremia, 7-day mortality, or treatment escalation between the two treatment groups, including in the propensity score-matched cohort. PCR amplification and sequencing of ampC genes revealed the presence of ampC in isolates with cefoxitin MICs below 16 µg/ml, in particular in Serratia spp., and demonstrated that these alleles were highly genetically diverse. Taken together, TZP may be a valuable treatment option for BSIs due to AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, diminishing the need for broader-spectrum agents. Future studies are needed to validate these findings.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Idoso , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Fenótipo , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Serratia marcescens/efeitos dos fármacos , Serratia marcescens/genética , beta-Lactamases/genética
18.
Ann Plast Surg ; 78(1): 17-21, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26835824

RESUMO

Rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (RG-NTM), which can contaminate inadequately sterilized medical instruments, have been known to cause serious postsurgical skin and soft tissue infections that often are characterized by a prolonged incubation period and a disfiguring clinical course. Historically, these infections have been associated with surgical procedures performed outside the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reported an outbreak of RG-NTM infections among women who underwent cosmetic surgery in the Dominican Republic. Because of the large Dominican American community in upper Manhattan, we have recently observed a number of these cases at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center. We highlight the case of a 55-year-old woman who developed a postsurgical RG-NTM infection after bilateral breast reduction in the Dominican Republic; she experienced progressive deformity of her left breast until the causative pathogen was identified 20 months after her initial surgery. To assist in the timely diagnosis and treatment of these infections, we aim to promote greater awareness among physicians who are likely to encounter such patients. We present the pathologic findings of a review of 7 cases of RG-NTM infections seen at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with these infections, such as prolonged incubation periods, the need for acid-fast stains and mycobacterial cultures, and the combination of surgical therapy and lengthy antibiotic courses that are often required for treatment.


Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Surtos de Doenças , Turismo Médico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/epidemiologia , Micobactérias não Tuberculosas/isolamento & purificação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , República Dominicana , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/etiologia , New York/epidemiologia , Micobactérias não Tuberculosas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico
19.
Gastroenterology ; 149(4): 883-5.e9, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26164495

RESUMO

We conducted an open-label crossover trial to test whether proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) affect the gastrointestinal microbiome to facilitate Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Twelve healthy volunteers each donated 2 baseline fecal samples, 4 weeks apart (at weeks 0 and 4). They then took PPIs for 4 weeks (40 mg omeprazole, twice daily) and fecal samples were collected at week 8. Six individuals took the PPIs for an additional 4 weeks (from week 8 to 12) and fecal samples were collected from all subjects at week 12. Samples were analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We found no significant within-individual difference in microbiome diversity when we compared changes during baseline vs changes on PPIs. There were, however, significant changes during PPI use in taxa associated with CDI (increased Enterococcaceae and Streptococcaceae, decreased Clostridiales) and taxa associated with gastrointestinal bacterial overgrowth (increased Micrococcaceae and Staphylococcaceae). In a functional analysis, there were no changes in bile acids on PPIs, but there was an increase in genes involved in bacterial invasion. These alterations could provide a mechanism by which PPIs predispose to CDI. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01901276.


Assuntos
Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Intestinos/efeitos dos fármacos , Microbiota , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Cross-Over , Esquema de Medicação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/induzido quimicamente , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Intestinos/microbiologia , Omeprazol/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Ribotipagem , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
20.
J Pediatr ; 173: 196-201.e2, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27039227

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) vs non-mPCR testing impacts the use of antibiotics, chest radiographs, and isolation precautions. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively compared use of antibiotics, chest radiographs, and isolation precautions for patients <18 years old (excluding neonates) hospitalized at a tertiary referral center tested for respiratory pathogens in the emergency department or during the first 2 hospital days, during 2 periods: June 2010-June 2012 (non-mPCR group) vs October 2012-May 2014 (mPCR group). RESULTS: Subjects (n = 2430) in the mPCR group were older, had more complex chronic conditions, and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit more often compared with the non-mPCR (n = 2349) group. Subjects in the mPCR group had more positive tests (42.4% vs 14.4%, P < .01), received fewer days of antibiotics (4 vs 5 median antibiotic days, P < .01), fewer chest radiographs performed, (59% vs 78%, P < .01), and were placed in isolation longer (20 vs 0 median isolation-hours, P < .01) compared with the non-mPCR group. In multivariable regression, patients tested with mPCR were less likely to receive antibiotics for ≥2 days (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.5-0.6), chest radiographs at admission (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.4), and more likely to be in isolation for ≥2 days (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.1-2.8) compared with the non-mPCR group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of mPCR testing for respiratory viruses among hospitalized patients was significantly associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization, including decreased use of antibiotics and chest radiographs, and increased use of isolation precautions.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/etiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Isolamento de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa