Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
3.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 28(1): e12914, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30238522

RESUMO

To understand Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) testing in primary care in relation to a national guideline, we conducted a retrospective observational study including CA125 data from a well-defined region in the UK, from 2003 to 2014. 51,033 CA125 tests from 30,737 women were stratified by month and year of testing, location of test request and patient age. Absolute numbers and rates of testing, rates and proportions of positive and negative tests, and frequencies of single and repeat tests were calculated. Negative binomial and logistic regression were used to test the effect of the guideline's introduction. Primary care testing spiked in the three months following the release of the guideline. However, there was no difference in the increase in testing observed across age groups. The proportion of positive tests decreased over time despite both the rates of positive and negative tests increasing. Retesting and repeat testing were associated with the initial CA125 value with no significant difference between women whose first test was 30-35 and >35 IU/L. Large studies using linked data are required to investigate the impact of increasing CA125 testing on onward intervention and patient outcomes. CA125 guidelines should be refined to avoid over-investigation in low risk age-groups.


Assuntos
Antígeno Ca-125/sangue , Proteínas de Membrana/sangue , Neoplasias Ovarianas/sangue , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(3): 1151-1159, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37987165

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Focusing on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this article uses data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database to highlight the burden of morbidity due to benign gynecological conditions (BGCs). METHODS: We analyzed 2019 morbidity data for all BGCs, measured as years lost to disability (YLDs). Disease burden was calculated for individual conditions, BGCs overall, and percentages of overall disease burden from all conditions. The same data extraction was performed for malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS for comparison. The data were subcategorized by age and World Bank income level. RESULTS: BGCs are major causes of disease morbidity worldwide. For women aged 15 years and over in high-income countries (HICs), 3 588 157 YLDs (3.94% of all YLDs) were due to BGC. In LMICs, 18 242 989 YLDs (5.35% of all YLDs) were due to BGCs. The highest burden of BGCs is seen during the reproductive years where conditions driven or exacerbated by reproductive hormones are the major causes of morbidity. In LMICs, for women aged 15-49, 14 574 100 YLDs (7.75% of all YLDs) were due to BGCs, declining to 3 152 313 YLDs (3.04%) in women aged 50-69 and 529 399 YLDs (1.06%) in women age 70+. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate a huge burden of morbidity due to BGCs. There is an urgent need for international stakeholders to prioritize the treatment and prevention of BGCs.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Carga Global da Doença , Humanos , Feminino , Prevalência , Morbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Saúde Global
5.
Stress Health ; 39(1): 103-114, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35650379

RESUMO

The unprecedented public health crisis of the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a significant challenge to the delivery of healthcare that has rarely been experienced before. The stress already faced by healthcare staff working in the National Health Service (NHS) has been further exacerbated during Covid-19, putting them at risk of adverse mental health outcomes. Through the lens of clinical psychologists who had provided support to frontline healthcare staff during the Covid-19 pandemic, this study aimed to better understand the stressors and uplifts healthcare staff experienced during Covid-19, the impact of these on the wellbeing of staff and patient care, and to examine the support needed to deal with the impact of a crisis. A qualitative study design using a combination of diaries followed by semi-structured interviews was utilised. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. The following five themes represented the stressors and uplifts experienced by NHS frontline healthcare staff during Covid-19, the impact on staff wellbeing and patient care: facing change; risks of working in the NHS environment; transcending the negatives; challenging professional values and haunted by patient deaths. The findings also highlight the importance of providing psychological support and suggest the need to continue to provide this support service to help NHS staff manage through subsequent waves of the pandemic. These findings can contribute towards both the management of the current Covid-19 pandemic and other similar crises in the future.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Medicina Estatal , Pandemias
7.
Women Birth ; 29(6): e99-e104, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27156021

RESUMO

PROBLEM AND BACKGROUND: Dysmelia is usually detected prenatally or postnatally in maternity services. The provision of family-centred care for parents at the time of initial diagnosis is crucial to facilitate decision making, access to appropriate services, and the provision of parental care-giving, but no research has investigated parent experiences or preferences in this population. AIMS: The current research aimed to address this by investigating satisfaction with service, occurrence of signposting and preferences in this group. METHODS: Two online surveys were conducted. In the first survey (n=417), parents reported whether they were offered signposting information and their level of satisfaction with the service they received when initially diagnosed. In the second survey (n=130), a subgroup of participants who completed the first survey reported their preferences for signposting and health service access after diagnosis. FINDINGS: On average, participants were less than satisfied with the service they received and only 27% were offered signposting information. Satisfaction was higher amongst parents who had been offered signposting information. 91% of parents said they would have wanted signposting information and 67% would have wanted access to a support group. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve the family-centeredness of care when dysmelia is identified. Offering signposting information to relevant third-sector organisations may increase parent satisfaction and address parent preferences. These findings could have implications for parents of children with other rare diseases identified in maternity services.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Pais/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Perinatal , Doenças Raras/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Deformidades Congênitas dos Membros/diagnóstico , Deformidades Congênitas dos Membros/psicologia , Masculino , Satisfação Pessoal , Doenças Raras/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa