Geriatric All-Terrain Vehicle Trauma: An Unhelmeted and Severely Injured Population.

BACKGROUND: All-terrain vehicle (ATV) use is widespread, however, little is known about injury patterns and outcomes in geriatric patients. We hypothesized that geriatric patients would have distinct and more severe injuries than non-geriatric adults after ATV trauma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Trauma Databank comparing non-geriatric (18-64) and geriatric adults (≥65) presenting after ATV trauma at Level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, admission, and outcomes data were collected, including injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score, discharge disposition, and mortality. We performed univariate statistical tests between cohorts and multiple logistic regression models to assess for risk factors associated with severe injury (ISS>15) and mortality. RESULTS: 23,568 ATV trauma patients were identified, of whom 1,954 (8.3%) were geriatric. Geriatric patients had higher rates of severe injury(29.2 v 22.5%,p<0.0001), and thoracic (55.2 v 37.8%,p<0.0001) and spine (31.5 v 26.0%,p<0.0001) injuries, but lower rates of abdominal injuries (14.6 v 17.9%,p<0.001) as compared to non-geriatric adults. Geriatric patients had overall lower head injury rates (39.2 v 42.1%,p=0.01), but more severe head injuries (AIS>3) (36.2 vs 30.2%,p<0.001). Helmet use was significantly lower in geriatric patients (12.0 v 22.8%,p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis age increased the odds for both severe injury (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.72, p<0.0001) and mortality (OR 5.07, 95% CI 3.42-7.50, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While severe injury and mortality after ATV trauma occurred in all adults, geriatric adults suffered distinct injury patterns and were at greater risk for severe injury and mortality.

Geriatric Snowmobile Trauma: Longer Courses After Similar Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Snowmobiling is a popular activity that leads to geriatric trauma admissions; however, this unique trauma population is not well characterized. We aimed to compare the injury burden and outcomes for geriatric versus nongeriatric adults injured riding snowmobiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Trauma Databank comparing nongeriatric (18-64) and geriatric adults (≥65) presenting after snowmobile-related trauma at level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, admission, injury, and outcome data were collected and compared. A multivariate logistic regression model assessed for risk factors associated with severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15). Analysis was also performed using chi square, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis testing. RESULTS: A total of 2471 adult patients with snowmobile trauma were identified; 122 (4.9%) were geriatric. Rates of severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15) were similar between groups, 27.5% in geriatric patients and 22.5% in nongeriatric adults (P = 0.2). Geriatric patients experienced higher rates of lower extremity injury (50.4 versus 40.3%, P = 0.03), neck injury (4.1 versus 1.4%, P = 0.02), and severe spine injury (20.6 versus 7.0%, P = 0.004). Geriatric patients had longer hospitalizations (5 versus 3 d, P < 0.0001), rates of discharge to a facility (36.8% versus 12%, P < 0.0001), and higher mortality (4.1 versus 0.6%, P < 0.0001). Geriatric age did not independently increase the risk for severe injury. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric age was not a significant predictor of severe injury after snowmobile trauma; however, geriatric patients suffered unique injuries, had longer hospitalizations, had higher rates of discharge to a facility, and had higher mortality. Tailored geriatric care may improve outcomes in this unique sport-related trauma population.

Geriatric Skiers: Active But Still at Risk, a National Trauma Data Bank Study.

BACKGROUND: Downhill skiing accounts for a large portion of geriatric sport-related trauma. We assessed the national burden of geriatric versus nongeriatric ski trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults presenting to level 1/2 trauma centers after ski-associated injuries from 2011 to 2015 were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank by ICD-9 code. We compared demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes between geriatric (age ≥65 y) and nongeriatric adult skiers (age 18-64 y). A multiple regression analysis assessed for risk factors associated with severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15). RESULTS: We identified 3255 adult ski trauma patients, and 16.7% (543) were geriatric. Mean ages for nongeriatric versus geriatric skiers were 40.8 and 72.1 y, respectively. Geriatric skiers more often suffered head (36.7 versus 24.3%, P < 0.0001), severe head (abbreviated injury scale score >3, 49.0 versus 31.5%, P < 0.0001) and thorax injuries (22.2 versus 18.1%, P = 0.03) as compared with nongeriatric skiers. Geriatric skiers were also more often admitted to the ICU (26.5 versus 14.9%, P < 0.0001), discharged to a facility (26.7 versus 11.6%, P < 0.0001), and suffered higher mortality rates (1.3 versus 0.4%, P = 0.004). Independent risk factors for severe injury included being male (OR: 1.68, CI: 1.22-2.31), helmeted (OR: 1.41, CI: 1.07-1.85), and having comorbidities (OR: 1.37, CI: 1.05-1.80). Geriatric age was not independently associated with severe injury. CONCLUSIONS: At level 1/2 trauma centers, geriatric age in ski trauma victims was associated with unique injury patterns, higher acuity, increased rates of facility care at discharge, and higher mortality as compared with nongeriatric skiers. Our findings indicate the need for specialized care after high impact geriatric ski trauma.

Gender Representation by Specialty Track at Surgical Meetings: The American and Australasian Experiences.

BACKGROUND: We compared the representation of women panelists at two large, general interest surgical meetings: the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinical Congress and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Scientific Congress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed comprehensive analyses of panels and panelists at ACS and RACS meetings (2013-2018). Manual review was conducted to determine counts and proportions of invited panelists by gender. We made within- and between-meeting comparisons regarding gender representation by specialty track. Tracks were characterized after our review of meeting programs. RESULTS: There were 4542 panelists and 1390 panels at RACS from 2013 to 2018. At ACS, there were 3363 panelists over 693 panels. The specialty tracks with the highest proportion of men-only panels were transplant (75%) and cardiothoracic (63%) at ACS and cardiothoracic (83%) and multidisciplinary (81%) at RACS. The lowest proportions of men-only panels were in breast and pediatric surgery at ACS (5% and 11%, respectively) and breast and rural surgery at RACS (24% and 36%, respectively). At ACS, the highest proportions of women panelists were on panels in breast (63%) and endocrine surgery (48%) and in breast (44%) and rural surgery (33%) at RACS, while the lowest proportion of women panelists were in transplant (10%) and cardiothoracic (14%) at ACS and multidisciplinary (8%) and cardiothoracic (7%) at RACS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a persistent difference in gender representation at surgical meetings, particularly within certain subspecialties. Program chairs and committees could increase the proportion of women by focusing on who serves as panelists overall and within specialty tracks.

Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly reported in the literature and are subsequently relied on for clinical decision-making. In 2013, CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) added 5 guidelines for reporting PROs in randomized controlled trials, the PRO extensions. Adherence to the extensions among inguinal hernia trials is unknown. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to find RCTs evaluating inguinal hernia repair. Inclusion criteria were RCTs evaluating surgical management of inguinal hernia that included PROs as primary or secondary outcomes, published from January, 2014 through July, 2018. Exclusion criteria were nonelective repairs, age <18 y, or articles unavailable in English. Two researchers graded the articles for compliance with the extensions. RESULTS: We identified 1548 articles, 78 of which met inclusion criteria. Four articles (5%) met all 5 extensions, whereas five (6%) did not meet any of the extensions. The extension requiring "identification of the PROs in the abstract as a primary or secondary outcome" was most commonly satisfied (83%), whereas that requiring the article "reference PRO instrument validity" was least satisfied (23%). Pain was the most frequently studied PRO and a visual analog scale was the most frequently used instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal hernia trials demonstrate poor adherence to the PRO extensions. PRO data from these trials have been published widely; however, the lack of standardization in reporting calls into question the generalizability of these findings. Further education about these guidelines is necessary to improve PRO reporting and ensure optimal patient-centered care based on high quality evidence.

A senior scholars forum can enhance the scholarship process.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the educational value of an annual Senior Scholars Forum (SSF) of graduating Emergency Medicine resident participants and attendees. DESCRIPTION: This study was conducted at an urban academic medical center with a PGY1-4 year residency program. After completion of the 2nd annual SSF, a web-based survey instrument was sent to all resident and faculty attendees. The instrument was a 3-part tool adapted from previous studies on postgraduate scholarship. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. EVALUATION: Forty-two of the 44 (95%) attendees completed the survey, including 100% of the PGY4 resident presenters. Prior to the SSF, 52% of respondents did not have a full understanding of senior scholarly activities. After the SSF, 67% reported an improved understanding and 88% had a better understanding of the scope of potential scholarly projects. Sixty-four percent reported the SSF introduced them to departmental resources available for completion of their own scholarly projects, and 69% would have liked to have heard the lessons communicated earlier in residency. Most (79%) agreed the SSF demonstrated the value of communal scholarly activities. Most senior residents (67%) felt most of the department would not know about their scholarship if they had not participated in the SSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative SSF enhanced the scholarship process by allowing graduating senior residents an opportunity to share their scholarly productivity with a larger audience, provided attendees critical insights into the process of scholarship, and encouraged communal learning. Because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and Residency Review Committee require all residents to participate in scholarly activity, other training programs may benefit from a similar educational experience.

The Effect of Implicit Bias and Role Misidentification in the Learning Environment.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of implicit bias our trainees experience in the form of role misidentification in the clinical learning environment. ACTIVITY: We surveyed 540 residents and clinical medical students to determine the frequency and impact of role misidentification. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Most respondents (85%, n = 162) experienced role misidentification, directly resulting in heightened emotions that led to guarded behavior. An additional indirect impact for trainees is transmitted through frequent non-promotional role misidentification and personalizing the incidents. Women and trainees with marginalized identities had significant impacts. These findings present an opportunity to improve our understanding of the trainee experience. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01475-9.

Geriatric ATV and snowmobile trauma at a rural level 1 trauma center: A blow to the chest.

INTRODUCTION: As the population ages, trauma centers are seeing a significant volume of injured geriatric patients. However, there is limited data on geriatric off-roading incidents. We investigated the injury patterns, severity and outcomes of geriatric versus younger adult all-terrain vehicle (ATV) and snowmobile related trauma with the hypothesis that geriatric patients will have higher mortality and worsened outcomes. METHODS: The trauma registry at a New England Level 1 trauma center was queried by ICD 9/10 code for adult ATV and/or snowmobile-related trauma from 2011-2019. Data reviewed included demographic, admission, injury, and outcomes data including injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score, hospital disposition, and mortality. Patients were stratified by age into younger adults (18-64 years old) versus geriatric (65 years and older). Univariate analysis was performed to compare groups. RESULTS: Over the study period, we identified 390 adult ATV or snowmobile-related trauma patients, of whom 38 were geriatric. The mean ages for the younger adult vs. geriatric cohorts were 41(SD 13) and 73(SD 5), respectively. The majority of patients were male (77%). Compared to younger adults, geriatric patients were more often unhelmeted (66 v 38%, p=0.004) and more likely to present after ATV as opposed to snowmobile trauma (71 v 51%, p=0.028). Geriatric patients more often sustained both any chest trauma (68 v 41%, p=0.003) and severe chest trauma (AIS≥3, 55 v 31%, p=0.022), and more often required tube thoracostomy (26 v 12%, p=0.042). Geriatric patients were also more often discharged to a facility (39 v 14%, p<0.001) compared to younger patients. There were no differences between age cohorts regarding arrival Glasgow coma scale scores, ISS>15, length of stay, ventilator days, complications, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Following ATV or snowmobile-related trauma, geriatric patients were more likely to sustain severe chest trauma and to require additional care upon hospital discharge as compared to younger adults. Primary prevention should focus on encouraging helmet and chest protective clothing use in this geriatric population.

Quality assessment of the literature on surgical quality improvement.

BACKGROUND: A proliferation of work on surgical quality improvement has brought about an increase in quality improvement publications. We assessed the quality of surgical quality improvement publications using the Standards of Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the surgical quality improvement literature from 2008 to 2018. Articles were reviewed for concordance with 18 SQUIRE statements and 40 subheadings using a dichotomous (yes or no) scale. RESULTS: Fifty-five articles were included. No publication adhered to all 18 SQUIRE statements. On average, quality improvement publications met 11 out of 18 (61%) of the main statements and 26 out of 40 (65%) of the subheadings. Articles were concordant with introductory components, such as problem description (n = 55, 100%) and rationale (n = 52, 95%), but were less adherent to statements describing methodology, results, and discussion sections including measures (n = 7, 13%), results (n = 3, 5.5%), interpretation (n = 2, 3.6%), and conclusions (n = 2, 3.6%). Only 4 articles cited the SQUIRE guidelines (7.3%). Articles that cited SQUIRE were not more concordant to the statements than those that did not cite SQUIRE. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that SQUIRE guidelines have not been adopted widely as a framework for the reporting of surgical quality improvement studies. Increased adherence to SQUIRE guidelines has the potential to improve the development and dissemination of surgical quality improvement projects.

Trends in Gender Representation at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress and the Academic Surgical Congress: A Mixed Picture of Progress.

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing attention to gender inequity in speakers at professional meetings. The aim of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in representation of women at the Academic Surgical Congress (ASC) and American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress (CC), 2 prominent general interest, national surgical meetings. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed ASC (2014-2019) and CC (2013-2018) meeting programs to determine counts and proportions of invited panelists and moderators by gender, including the frequency of men-only panels. We conducted trend analyses to assess for temporal change in gender representation and univariate tests of association between different measures of gender representation. RESULTS: The overall proportions of women panelists were 35% (ASC) and 28% (CC). There was a significant increase in the proportion of women panelists over the study period at the CC (23% to 34%, p = 0.007) but not at the ASC (37% to 36%, p = 0.79). The proportion of men-only panels decreased significantly over time at the CC (38% to 23%, p = 0.04), but not at the ASC (23% to 17%, p = 0.50), while the proportion of moderators at the ASC increased significantly (31% to 43%, p = 0.01), but not at the CC (29% to 37%, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Women remain in the minority of panelists and moderators at the ASC and CC meetings, and approximately 1 in 5 panels are composed entirely of men. Although progress has been made at both meetings, ongoing and deliberate attention is needed to ensure continued progress toward the goal of equitable gender representation in academic surgery.

A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words. The Use of Clinical Images in Electronic Medical Records.

OBJECTIVE: To understand how clinicians utilize image uploading tools in a home grown electronic health records (EHR) system. METHODS: A content analysis of patient notes containing non-radiological images from the EHR was conducted. Images from 4,000 random notes from July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010 were reviewed and manually coded. Codes were assigned to four properties of the image: (1) image type, (2) role of image uploader (e.g. MD, NP, PA, RN), (3) practice type (e.g. internal medicine, dermatology, ophthalmology), and (4) image subject. RESULTS: 3,815 images from image-containing notes stored in the EHR were reviewed and manually coded. Of those images, 32.8% were clinical and 66.2% were non-clinical. The most common types of the clinical images were photographs (38.0%), diagrams (19.1%), and scanned documents (14.4%). MDs uploaded 67.9% of clinical images, followed by RNs with 10.2%, and genetic counselors with 6.8%. Dermatology (34.9%), ophthalmology (16.1%), and general surgery (10.8%) uploaded the most clinical images. The content of clinical images referencing body parts varied, with 49.8% of those images focusing on the head and neck region, 15.3% focusing on the thorax, and 13.8% focusing on the lower extremities. CONCLUSION: The diversity of image types, content, and uploaders within a home grown EHR system reflected the versatility and importance of the image uploading tool. Understanding how users utilize image uploading tools in a clinical setting highlights important considerations for designing better EHR tools and the importance of interoperability between EHR systems and other health technology.

A novel clinician interface to improve clinician access to up-to-date genetic results.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the impact of GeneInsight Clinic (GIC), a web-based tool designed to manage genetic information and facilitate communication of test results and variant updates from the laboratory to the clinics, we measured the use of GIC and the time it took for new genetic knowledge to be available to clinicians. METHODS: Usage data were collected across four study sites for the GIC launch and post-GIC implementation time periods. The primary outcome measures were the time (average number of days) between variant change approval and notification of clinic staff, and the time between notification and viewing the patient record. RESULTS: Post-GIC, time between a variant change approval and provider notification was shorter than at launch (average days at launch 503.8, compared to 4.1 days post-GIC). After e-mail alerts were sent at launch, providers clicked into the patient record associated with 91% of these alerts. In the post period, clinic providers clicked into the patient record associated with 95% of the alerts, on average 12 days after the e-mail was sent. DISCUSSION: We found that GIC greatly increased the likelihood that a provider would receive updated variant information as well as reduced the time associated with distributing that variant information, thus providing a more efficient process for incorporating new genetic knowledge into clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrate that health information technology systems have the potential effectively to assist providers in utilizing genetic information in patient care.

How physicians document outpatient visit notes in an electronic health record.

BACKGROUND: Clinical documentation, an essential process within electronic health records (EHRs), takes a significant amount of clinician time. How best to optimize documentation methods to deliver effective care remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether EHR visit note documentation method was influenced by physician or practice characteristics, and the association of physician satisfaction with an EHR notes module. MEASUREMENTS: We surveyed primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists, and used EHR and provider data to perform a multinomial logistic regression of visit notes from 2008. We measured physician documentation method use and satisfaction with an EHR notes module and determined the relationship between method and physician and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1088 physicians, 85% used a single method to document the majority of their visits. PCPs predominantly documented using templates (60%) compared to 34% of specialists, while 38% of specialists predominantly dictated. Physicians affiliated with academic medical centers (OR 1.96, CI (1.23, 3.12)), based at a hospital (OR 1.57, 95% CI (1.04, 2.36)) and using the EHR for longer (OR 1.13, 95% CI (1.03, 1.25)) were more likely to dictate than use templates. Most physicians of 383 survey responders were satisfied with the EHR notes module, regardless of their preferred documentation method. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians predominantly utilized a single method of visit note documentation and were satisfied with their approach, but the approaches they chose varied. Demographic characteristics were associated with preferred documentation method. Further research should focus on why variation exists, and the quality of the documentation resulting from different methods used.

Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Accurate clinical problem lists are critical for patient care, clinical decision support, population reporting, quality improvement, and research. However, problem lists are often incomplete or out of date. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a clinical alerting system, which uses inference rules to notify providers of undocumented problems, improves problem list documentation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Inference rules for 17 conditions were constructed and an electronic health record-based intervention was evaluated to improve problem documentation. A cluster randomized trial was conducted of 11 participating clinics affiliated with a large academic medical center, totaling 28 primary care clinical areas, with 14 receiving the intervention and 14 as controls. The intervention was a clinical alert directed to the provider that suggested adding a problem to the electronic problem list based on inference rules. The primary outcome measure was acceptance of the alert. The number of study problems added in each arm as a pre-specified secondary outcome was also assessed. Data were collected during 6-month pre-intervention (11/2009-5/2010) and intervention (5/2010-11/2010) periods. RESULTS: 17,043 alerts were presented, of which 41.1% were accepted. In the intervention arm, providers documented significantly more study problems (adjusted OR=3.4, p<0.001), with an absolute difference of 6277 additional problems. In the intervention group, 70.4% of all study problems were added via the problem list alerts. Significant increases in problem notation were observed for 13 of 17 conditions. CONCLUSION: Problem inference alerts significantly increase notation of important patient problems in primary care, which in turn has the potential to facilitate quality improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01105923.

A method and knowledge base for automated inference of patient problems from structured data in an electronic medical record.

BACKGROUND: Accurate knowledge of a patient's medical problems is critical for clinical decision making, quality measurement, research, billing and clinical decision support. Common structured sources of problem information include the patient problem list and billing data; however, these sources are often inaccurate or incomplete. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate methods of automatically inferring patient problems from clinical and billing data, and to provide a knowledge base for inferring problems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 17 target conditions and designed and validated a set of rules for identifying patient problems based on medications, laboratory results, billing codes, and vital signs. A panel of physicians provided input on a preliminary set of rules. Based on this input, we tested candidate rules on a sample of 100,000 patient records to assess their performance compared to gold standard manual chart review. The physician panel selected a final rule for each condition, which was validated on an independent sample of 100,000 records to assess its accuracy. RESULTS: Seventeen rules were developed for inferring patient problems. Analysis using a validation set of 100,000 randomly selected patients showed high sensitivity (range: 62.8-100.0%) and positive predictive value (range: 79.8-99.6%) for most rules. Overall, the inference rules performed better than using either the problem list or billing data alone. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a set of rules for inferring patient problems. These rules have a variety of applications, including clinical decision support, care improvement, augmentation of the problem list, and identification of patients for research cohorts.

An automated procedure logging system improves resident documentation compliance.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an automated procedure logging (APL) system on the number of procedures logged by emergency medicine (EM) residents. Secondary objectives were to assess the APL's effect on completeness and accuracy of procedure logging and to measure resident compliance with the system. METHODS: This was a before-and-after study conducted at a university-affiliated, urban medical center, with an annual emergency department census of >130,000. The EM residency is a 4-year, Residency Review Committee (RRC)-accredited program with 12 residents per year. We developed software to electronically search and abstract resident procedures documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) and automatically export them into a Web-based residency management system. We compared the mean daily number of procedures logged for two 6-month periods: October 1, 2009, to March 31, 2010 (pre-APL), and October 1, 2010, to March 31, 2011 (post-APL), using a two-sample t-test. We also generated a random sample of 231 logged procedures from both the pre- and post-APL time periods to assess for completeness and accuracy of data transfer. Completeness and accuracy in the pre- and post-APL periods were compared using Fisher's exact test. Aggregate resident compliance with the system was also measured. RESULTS: The mean daily number of procedures logged increased by 168% (10.0 vs. 26.8, mean difference = 16.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.4 to 18.2, p < 0.001) after the implementation of APL. Procedures logged with the APL system were more complete (76% vs. 100%, p < 0.001) and more accurate (87% vs. 99%, p < 0.001). Most residents (42/48, 88%) used APL to log at least 90% of procedures. Only 4% of procedures eligible for automation were logged manually in the post-APL period. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in the daily mean number of procedures logged after the implementation of APL. Recorded data were more complete and more accurate during this time frame. This innovative system improved resident logging of required procedures and helped our assessment of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Patient Care and Practice-Based Learning Competencies for individual residents.

Analysis of user behavior in accessing electronic medical record systems in emergency departments.

Electronic patient tracking and records systems in emergency departments often connect to hospital information systems, ambulatory patient records and ancillary systems. The networked systems may not be fully interoperable and clinicians need to access data through different interfaces. This study was conducted to describe the interactive behavior of clinicians working with partially interoperable clinical information systems. We performed 78 hours of observation at two emergency departments, shadowing five physicians, ten nurses and four administrative staff. Actions related to viewing or recording data in any system or on paper were recorded. Collected data were compared along clinical roles and contrasted with findings across the two hospital sites. The findings suggest that differences in the levels of interoperability may affect the ways physicians and nurses interact with the systems. When tradeoffs in functionality are necessary for connecting ancillary systems, the effects on clinicians and staff need to be considered.

A new tool to measure the burden of Crohn's disease and its treatment: do patient and physician perceptions match?

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is difficult to efficiently measure in the clinic setting. Our aim was to develop and test a simple tool to measure the burden of Crohn's disease (CD) and its treatment and to compare how patients and their physicians perceive the impact of CD on HRQOL. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to patients with CD. The questionnaire included a feeling thermometer to measure disease and treatment burden, which was compared to the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). At that visit, the patient's physician completed a questionnaire containing the feeling thermometer and the Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI). Nonparametric tests were use to report results. RESULTS: In all, 113 surveys were completed. The median age of respondents was 40 years and 68% were female. Using the feeling thermometer (scale 0-100), patients reported their current health as a median of 70 (interquartile range [IQR] 50-80) and their disease specific burden as 20 (IQR 10-40). Treatment-specific burden was 6.9 (IQR 1.3-20). Physicians perceived their patients' current health as a median of 71.3 (IQR 57.5-90) with a disease burden of 12.5 (IQR 5-30). Spearman's rho between the burden of symptoms measured by the feeling thermometer and the SIBDQ was -0.71. The correlation between patient and physician perception of current health was 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: Two questions using the feeling thermometer provide a quick and accurate assessment of the burden of CD on patients. Physicians' perception of the burden of disease was similar to their patients.