Companion Animal Fostering as Health Promotion: A Literature Review.

There is growing interest in the health-promoting potential of human-companion animal relationships from a broad public health perspective while acknowledging barriers to ownership, particularly for older adults. Companion animal fostering is an alternative to pet ownership that aligns with the Ottawa Charter health promotion principle that caring for others in everyday settings promotes health. This narrative review of the literature on companion animal fostering draws on Te Whare Tapa Wha (the four-sided house), an indigenous model of health that is influential in Aotearoa/New Zealand, and the Ottawa Charter. We found that companion animal fostering can be considered health-promoting for human and non-human animals, using a broad and multidimensional understanding of health. As well as improving the long-term outcomes for homeless animals, companion animal fostering has the potential to promote the health of the individuals, families, and communities who provide foster homes. Our review highlights the importance of health promoters considering the reciprocal relationship between human and animal health. Future research should explore different aspects of human and non-human health, perspectives of different types of fosterers in different settings and communities, barriers to fostering, and methods that explore the role of caring for a wider range of companion animals in creating and sustaining wellbeing.

Home modifications to prevent home fall injuries in houses with Maori occupants (MHIPI): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: As with many Indigenous populations internationally, Maori in New Zealand suffer health inequity. We aimed to assess the rate of fall injuries at home with and without home modifications in houses with Maori occupants. METHODS: We did a single-blind randomised controlled trial in the Wellington and Taranaki regions of New Zealand and enrolled owner-occupied households with at least one Maori occupant. Only households who stated they intended to live at that address for the subsequent 3 years were eligible for participation. We randomly assigned (1:1) households to either the intervention group, who received home modifications (handrails for outside steps and internal stairs, grab rails for bathrooms, outside lighting, repairs to window catches, high-visibility and slip-resistant edging for outside steps, fixing of lifted edges of carpets and mats, non-slip bath mats, and slip-resistant surfacing for outside areas such as decks) immediately, or the control group, who received the modifications 3 years later. Data on home injuries were obtained from the Accident Compensation Corporation and coded by study team members, who were masked to study group allocation. The primary outcome was the rate of medically treated fall injuries at home per household per year, analysed according to intention to treat. This Maori Home Injury Prevention Intervention (MHIPI) trial is now completed, and is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000148774. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2013, and Oct 1, 2014, 824 households were assessed for eligibility and 254 were enrolled, of which 126 (50%) were assigned to the intervention group and 128 (50%) were assigned to the control group. After adjustment for previous falls and geographical region, there was an estimated 31% reduction in the rate of fall injuries at home per year exposed to the intervention compared with households in the control group (adjusted relative rate 0·69 [95% CI 0·47-1·00]). INTERPRETATION: Low-cost home modifications and repairs can be an effective means to reduce injury disparities. The high prevalence of modifiable safety issues in Maori homes merits considerable policy and community effort. FUNDING: Health Research Council of New Zealand.

Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Modification to Prevent Home Fall Injuries in Houses with Maori Occupants.

Worldwide, injuries due to falls in the home impose a substantial burden and merit considerable effort to find effective prevention measures. The current study is one of very few randomized controlled trials that assess the effectiveness of home modification for preventing falls. It is the first carried out with a minority or indigenous community and focused on reducing inequities. Just over 250 households in Aotearoa, New Zealand, with Maori occupants were recruited in two strata, 150 from the Wellington region and 100 from the Taranaki region. These were randomly allocated to equally sized treatment and control groups within the respective regions, the treatment group receiving a package of home modifications designed to prevent falls at the start of the study, and the control group receiving the package at the end of the study. Injury data came from the Accident Compensation Corporation, a state-owned no-fault injury insurer. This provided coverage of virtually all unintentional injuries requiring medical treatment. Matched injury claims were made available for analysis once all identifying fields had been removed. These data will be pooled with data for Maori households from the already-conducted Home Injury Prevention Intervention (HIPI) study, which tested an identical intervention on the general population. In the analysis, the primary outcome measure will be fall injury rates over time, comparing treatment and control households, adjusting for the stratum and prior falls in the household. A secondary measure will be the rates of specific injuries, which are most likely to be prevented by the package of modifications tested. We anticipate that the findings will provide robust evidence for effective injury prevention measures that can reduce an important contributor to health inequities for indigenous populations such as the Maori.