Epidemiology and potential risk factors of drug-related problems in Hong Kong paediatric wards.

AIMS: A drug-related problem (DRP) is 'an event or circumstance involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with the desired health outcome'. The extent and characteristics of DRPs in children in Hong Kong are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiology of and identify riskf actors for DRPs in hospitalized children in Hong Kong. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in children aged 0­18 years who were admitted to a medical ward, paediatric intensive care unit or neonatal intensive care unit of seven Hong Kong hospitals, during a 3 month period. Patients' charts, medical records and laboratory data were reviewed daily to identify DRPs; their preventability and severity were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyse potential risk factors associated with the incidence of DRPs. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-nine children (median age, 2 years; interquartile range, 0 months to 9 years) were included. In total, 82 DRPs were experienced by 69 patients. The overall incidence of DRPs was 21.0% (95% confidence interval, 16.7­25.8%). The incidence was higher in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units than medical wards. Dosing problems were the most frequently reported DRPs (n = 35; 42.7%), followed by drug choice problems (n = 19; 23.2%) and adverse drug reactions (n = 11; 13.4%). Sixty-seven (81.7%) DRP cases were assessed as preventable, 42 (51.2%) as minor and 40 (48.8%) as moderate. The number of prescribed drugs and 'certain infectious and parasitic diseases' were potential risk factors for occurrence of DRPs. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related problems were common in hospitalized children in this study in Hong Kong; the most frequent were dosing and drug choice problems, and the majority of them were preventable. Polypharmacy and 'certain infectious and parasitic diseases' were potential risk factors.

Management of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in UK primary care: a survey of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Compared to existing literature on childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), little published adult data are available, particularly outside of the United States. Using General Practitioner (GP) questionnaires from the United Kingdom, this study aimed to examine a number of issues related to ADHD in adults, across three cohorts of patients, adults who received ADHD drug treatment in childhood/adolescence but stopped prior to adulthood; adults who received ADHD drug treatment in childhood/adolescence and continued treatment into adulthood and adults who started ADHD drug treatment in adulthood. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of ADHD and prescribed methylphenidate, dexamfetamine or atomoxetine were identified using data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Dates when these drugs started and stopped were used to classify patients into the three cohorts. From each cohort, 50 patients were randomly selected and questionnaires were sent via THIN to their GPs.GPs returned completed questionnaires to THIN who forwarded anonymised copies to the researchers. Datasets were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 89% (133/150). GPs stated that in 19 cases, the patient did not meet the criteria of that group; the number of valid questionnaires returned was 114 (76%). The following broad trends were observed: 1) GPs were not aware of the reason for treatment cessation in 43% of cases, 2) patient choice was the most common reason for discontinuation (56%), 3) 7% of patients who stopped pharmacological treatment subsequently reported experiencing ADHD symptoms, 4) 58% of patients who started pharmacological treatment for ADHD in adulthood received pharmacological treatment for other mental health conditions prior to the ADHD being diagnosed. CONCLUSION: This study presents some key findings relating to ADHD; GPs were often not aware of the reason for patients stopping ADHD treatment in childhood or adolescence. Patient choice was identified as the most common reason for treatment cessation. For patients who started pharmacological treatment in adulthood, many patients received pharmacological treatment for comorbidities before a diagnosis of ADHD was made.

Epidemiology and potential associated risk factors of drug-related problems in hospitalised children in the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia.

AIM: Drug-related problems (DRP) are "an event or circumstance involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with the desired health outcome". The extent and characteristics of DRPs in children in the UK and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) are unknown. Our aim was to determine the epidemiology of and identify risk factors for DRPs in hospitalised children. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out in children aged 0-18 years, admitted to the medical ward, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during a 3-month period in two hospitals. Patients' charts, medical records and laboratory data were reviewed daily to identify DRPs; their preventability and severity were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyse the potential risk factors associated with DRP incidence. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty-seven children (median age 2.3 years, interquartile range 6 months to 8 years, 58.1% male) were included. Three hundred and thirty-three patients suffered from 478 DRPs. Overall DRP incidence was 45.2% (95% CI, 41.5-48.8); KSA (51.1%; 95% CI, 45.8-56.3), UK (39.4%; 95% CI, 34.4-44.6). Incidence was highest in the PICU (59.7%; 95% CI, 47.0-71.5). Dosing problems were the most frequently reported DRPs (n = 258, 54%). 80.3% of DRP (n = 384) cases were preventable; 72.2% (n = 345) of DRPs were assessed as minor; 27% (n = 129) as moderate. Number of prescriptions and type of admission (transferred) were potential risk factors for DRP occurrence in children. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related problems were common in the hospitalised children in this study; the most frequent were dosing problems and drug choice problems; the majority of them were preventable. Polypharmacy and transferred admission (another hospital or ward) were potential risk factors. To improve prescribing practices and minimise the risk of DRPs in hospitalised children, paediatric pharmacology and pharmacotherapy are important in medical education.

The use of medications with anticholinergic properties and risk factors for their use in hospitalised elderly patients.

PURPOSE: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the use of drugs with anticholinergic properties in elderly patients and to identify risk factors that increase the patient's chance of being given such medications. METHODS: The study was performed on a sample of 1636 patients aged ≥65 years hospitalised during the period between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2009 in three municipal hospitals. To evaluate the factors influencing the use of anticholinergic medications, we compared two groups-users and non-users of such drugs-in terms of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as comorbid conditions. The most important risk factors were identified using the binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: Hospitalisation led to a significant increase in the prevalence of anticholinergic medication users, when comparing their occurrence at the time of hospital admission and discharge (10.5% and 14.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). A significantly higher total number of prescribed drugs were found in the group of users compared with non-users, at both hospital admission (7.2 ± 3.5 vs 5.7 ± 3.1; p < 0.001) and discharge (8.7 ± 3.1 vs 7.5 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Immobilisation, urinary incontinence and retention, constipation, gastroduodenal ulcer disease as well as neurologic and psychiatric comorbidities (depression, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy) appeared as the most important risk factors of using anticholinergic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should be aware of the greater risk of adverse anticholinergic effects of drugs in certain therapeutic classes in the elderly. In patients with risk factors mentioned previously, special attention should be paid to active identification of anticholinergic effects of medications.

Persistence of pharmacological treatment into adulthood, in UK primary care, for ADHD patients who started treatment in childhood or adolescence.

BACKGROUND: ADHD guidelines in the UK suggest that children and adults who respond to pharmacological treatment should continue for as long as remains clinically effective, subject to regular review. To what extent patients persist with treatment from childhood and adolescence into adulthood is not clear. This study aims to describe, in UK primary care, the persistence of pharmacological treatment for patients with ADHD who started treatment aged 6-17 years and to estimate the percentage of patients who continued treatment from childhood and adolescence into adulthood. METHODS: The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database was used to identify patients with ADHD who received their first prescription for methylphenidate/ dexamfetamine/atomoxetine, aged 6-17 years. Patients were monitored until their 'censored date' (the earliest of the following dates: date the last prescription coded in the database ended, end of the study period (31st December 2008), date at which they transferred out of their practice, date of death, the last date the practice contributed data to the database). Persistence of treatment into adulthood was estimated using Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: 610 patients had follow-up data into adulthood. 213 patients (93.4% male) started treatment between 6-12 years; median treatment duration 5.9 years. 131 (61.5%) stopped before 18 years, 82 (38.5%) were still on treatment age ≥18 years. 397 patients (86.4% male) started treatment between 13-17 years; median treatment duration was 1.6 years. 227 (57.2%) stopped before 18 years, 170 (42.8%) were still on treatment age ≥18 years. The number of females in both age categories was too small to formally test for differences between genders in persistence of treatment. CONCLUSION: Persistence of treatment into adulthood is lower (~40%) compared with published rates of persistence of the condition (~65% when symptomatic definition of remission used). Due to the limited number of patients with data past 18 years, it is important that ongoing monitoring of prescribing into later adulthood is undertaken, particularly to observe the effects of recommendations in new guidelines.

The epidemiology of pharmacologically treated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults in UK primary care.

BACKGROUND: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by the symptoms of inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. ADHD was once perceived as a condition of childhood only; however increasing evidence has highlighted the existence of ADHD in older adolescents and adults. Estimates for the prevalence of ADHD in adults range from 2.5-4%. Few data exist on the prescribing trends of the stimulants methylphenidate and dexamfetamine, and the non-stimulant atomoxetine in the UK. The aim of this study was to investigate the annual prevalence and incidence of pharmacologically treated ADHD in children, adolescents and adults in UK primary care. METHODS: The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database was used to identify all patients aged over 6 years with a diagnosis of ADHD/hyperkinetic disorder and a prescription for methylphenidate, dexamfetamine or atomoxetine from 2003-2008. Annual prevalence and incidence of pharmacologically treated ADHD were calculated by age category and sex. RESULTS: The source population comprised 3,529,615 patients (48.9% male). A total of 118,929 prescriptions were recorded for the 4,530 patients in the pharmacologically treated ADHD cohort during the 6-year study. Prevalence (per 1000 persons in the mid-year THIN population) increased within each age category from 2003 to 2008 [6-12 years: from 4.8 (95% CI: 4.5-5.1) to 9.2 (95% CI: 8.8-9.6); 13-17 years: from 3.6 (95% CI: 3.3-3.9) to 7.4 (95% CI: 7.0-7.8); 18-24 years: from 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.3) to 1.1 (95% CI: 1.0-1.3); 25-45 years: from 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.03) to 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06-0.10); >45 years: from 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01) to 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.03). Whilst male patients aged 6-12 years had the highest prevalence; the relative increase in prescribing was higher amongst female patients of the same age - the increase in prevalence in females aged 6-12 years was 2.1 fold compared to an increase of 1.9 fold for their male counterparts. Prevalence of treated ADHD decreased with increasing age. Incidence (per 1000 persons at risk in the mid-year THIN population) was highest for children aged 6-12 years. CONCLUSIONS: A trend of increasing prescribing prevalence of ADHD drug treatment was observed over the period 2003-2008. Prevalence of prescribing to adult patients increased; however the numbers treated are much lower than published estimates of the prevalence of ADHD. This study has added to the limited knowledge on ADHD prescribing in primary care, particularly in the area of drug treatment in adulthood.

Paediatric post-marketing pharmacovigilance: comparison of the adverse event profile of vigabatrin prescribed to children and adults.

PURPOSE: Post-marketing pharmacovigilance is a cornerstone of monitoring and evaluating the safety of medicines in children and adults. However the methods may require modification to detect paediatric signals. The aim of this study was to compare the adverse event (AE) profile of children and adults taking vigabatrin, using modified signal detection methods (SDMs). METHODS: Data from the vigabatrin prescription-event monitoring study an observational cohort study (cohort 10,177 patients), stratified into one paediatric (0-17 years) and one adult (≥ 18 years) age group were examined using summary statistics for adverse drug reactions (ADRs), reasons for stopping and deaths. Incidence densities of AEs in children and adults in the first month of treatment were compared to months two to six to examine whether the AE rate was different in these two periods. AE rates in children were compared to those in adults (proportional reporting rates; PRRs and incidence rate ratios), to compare the AE profile between these age groups. RESULTS: Abnormal behaviour (PRR 5.3) and hyperactivity (PRR 4.5) were more frequently reported in children; confusion (PRR 25.0) and psychosis (PRR 12.5) more frequently in adults. In children 11.8% of ADRs were reported to the regulatory authority compared to 27.3% in adults. A higher proportion of children stopped treatment due to lack of effectiveness (57.7% vs. 47.5%). No deaths were attributed to vigabatrin. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that modified SDMs can be used to detect differences in the AE profiles between children and adults taking a medicinal product, and also to identify drug safety signals.

Examining the tolerability of the non-sedating antihistamine desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England.

BACKGROUND: Desloratadine is a non-sedating, long-acting histamine H(1) receptor antagonist indicated for the symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria in patients aged>12 years. OBJECTIVE: To monitor the safety of desloratadine as prescribed in England, using the observational cohort technique of prescription event monitoring (PEM). METHODS: Exposure data were derived from dispensed prescriptions written by primary care physicians (general practitioners [GPs]) for desloratadine (March-May 2001); patient demographics, indication, pattern of use and outcome (event) data were obtained via simple questionnaires returned by GPs. Incidence density observation rates (IDobs) were calculated to compare the difference in event rates between months 1 and 2 (m1/m2) and were compared for the whole cohort and by groups defined by indication and pattern of use. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 11 828 patients (median age 37 years [interquartile range 22, 54]; 59.9% were female). The most frequent indication was AR (n=8001; 67.6%). After 2 months, 36.8% (n=2464) of patients were still taking desloratadine. 'Condition improved' was the most common event and reason for stopping. Headache/migraine was uncommon but associated with starting treatment (IDobs(m1/m2) ratio 3.99 [95% CI 1.70, 10.83]). Cardiovascular events occurred rarely or very rarely, as did central and peripheral nervous system events. No serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported. Events related to effectiveness were more frequent in month 1 than month 2 for all patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This postmarketing surveillance study shows that desloratadine is well tolerated when used in general practice in England. No previously unrecognized ADRs were detected. This study highlights how modifications to PEM are contributing to the evaluation of drug utilization factors in relation to risks.

Use and risk management of carvedilol for the treatment of heart failure in the community in England: results from a modified prescription-event monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, the licence for carvedilol was extended in 1998 to include symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II and III heart failure) with the recommendation that initiation and up-titration should be under the supervision of a hospital physician. A post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to address the UK regulatory authority's request for monitoring the use and safety of carvedilol prescribed for heart failure in clinical practice. AIM: To investigate adherence to risk management recommendations for the use of carvedilol for heart failure, monitor how patients' subsequent care was managed and collect event data to evaluate the safety profile of carvedilol used for the treatment of heart failure. METHODS: An observational cohort study using a modified prescription-event monitoring technique identified patients from dispensed primary care prescriptions in England (August 1999 to June 2001). An eligibility questionnaire was used to identify patients who had been prescribed carvedilol for heart failure for the first time after 31 July 1999. Up to three follow-up questionnaires were sent to the prescribers of eligible patients, requesting demographic information, dosage, supervision of treatment, status of cardiac failure and event information. RESULTS: 2311 patients met the eligibility criteria. For 1666 patients, one or more valid follow-up questionnaires were returned: 68.5% were male; male median age 66 years; female median age 72 years; the observation period was up to 3 years. Hospital physicians supervised initiation of treatment and first up-titration in 85.6% and 61.4% of patients, respectively. 49.2% of patients were prescribed the recommended starting dosage of carvedilol (6.25 mg/day). Approximately 25% of patients started on a lower dose than recommended, and the same proportion were prescribed a higher dose. NYHA status of cardiac failure between starting treatment and the third questionnaire improved for 39.5% of patients, deteriorated for 10.9%, and 11.7% of those for whom NYHA status was given died. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported for 2.4% of patients; the most commonly reported ADR was malaise/lassitude. Overall, 27.1% of patients stopped taking carvedilol. None of the 163 deaths were attributed to carvedilol. CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory guidelines for the use and risk management of carvedilol in heart failure were mostly followed, and most patients appeared to benefit from treatment with carvedilol for heart failure. Malaise/lassitude was the main reason for discontinuing treatment. Further investigations may be warranted to examine the prescribing of carvedilol at lower than recommended doses.

Safety and drug utilization profile of varenicline as used in general practice in England: interim results from a prescription-event monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: Varenicline tartrate (Champix), a new smoking cessation medicine, was launched in the UK in December 2006. Varenicline is a highly selective partial agonist of the alpha(4)beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (alpha(4)beta(2) receptor). The partial agonistic binding leads to alleviation of symptoms of craving and withdrawal, and simultaneously prevents nicotine from binding to the alpha(4)beta(2) receptor thereby causing reduction in the rewarding and reinforcing effects of smoking. Regulatory concerns have arisen about psychiatric events associated with varenicline, including depression, suicidal ideation and changes in behaviour/emotion. AIM: To present the interim results of an ongoing study by the Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU) monitoring the safety of varenicline. METHODS: The observational cohort study is being conducted to study the postmarketing safety of varenicline, using modified prescription-event monitoring (PEM) methodology. Patients are identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) from December 2006. Demographic, clinical event (during the course and 1 month after stopping varenicline, reasons for discontinuing and suspected adverse drug reactions [ADRs] to varenicline) and drug utilization data are collected from detailed study-specific questionnaires posted to GPs at least 4 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Event incidence densities (IDs; number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure) are calculated. RESULTS: The interim cohort comprises 2,682 patients: median age 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-56), 60.7% females (n = 1627). Nausea/vomiting was the most frequent clinical reason for stopping varenicline (n = 91; 35.3% of clinical reasons) and the most frequently reported suspected ADR to varenicline (n = 60, 50.9% of patients for whom an ADR was reported). The most frequently reported psychiatric events (causality not implied) during treatment included (n; % of cohort): sleep disorder (43; 1.6%), anxiety (33; 1.2%), depression (29; 1.1%), abnormal dreams (26; 1.0%) and mood change (17; 0.6%). Two cases of attempted suicide were reported during treatment with varenicline (one patient took an overdose of a benzodiazepine with alcohol, the other slashed their wrist). Both these patients had previous history of psychiatric illness and precipitating factors for the event. CONCLUSION: This study reflects 'real life' use of varenicline. Nausea/vomiting - the event most frequently reported as an ADR and as reason for stopping treatment - is listed in the UK Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). The most frequently reported psychiatric events are listed in the UK SPC. All patients with suicidal events either had a past medical history of psychiatric illness prior to starting varenicline and/or a precipitating factor for the event. Clinicians should closely monitor patients with pre-existing psychiatric illness who are taking varenicline. Further evaluation of events of interest including psychiatric events is ongoing. Results presented are expected to change as the cohort size increases. Results of this study should be taken into account together with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies.

Hypoglycaemia with oral antidiabetic drugs: results from prescription-event monitoring cohorts of rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide.

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycaemia is an acute complication associated with intensive treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. This complication poses a major challenge in diabetes management. Furthermore, severe hypoglycaemia may be life threatening. Although hypoglycaemia is more often associated with insulin treatment, oral hypoglycaemic agents have the potential to trigger hypoglycaemia. AIM: The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of hypoglycaemic events and to describe the pattern of these incident events during the first 9 months of treatment with four oral antidiabetic drugs, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide, prescribed in general practice in England. METHODS: We used data collected for prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies of rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide. PEM is an observational, non-interventional, incept cohort study. Observation time for each patient and incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient-years of treatment for hypoglycaemia was calculated for each drug cohort. Smoothed hazard estimates were plotted over time. Case/non-case analysis was performed to describe and compare patients who had at least one hypoglycaemic event in the first 9 months of treatment with those who did not. RESULTS: The total number of patients included in the analysis was 14,373, 12,768, 4,549 and 5,727 in rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide cohorts, respectively. From these, 276 patients experienced at least one episode of hypoglycaemia. The IR was between 50% and 100% higher in patients receiving treatment with meglitinides compared with those treated with the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) [IR = 9.94, 9.64, 15.71 and 20.32 per 1,000 patient-years for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide, respectively]. The plot of the hazard function and the estimated shape parameter from the Weibull regression model showed that pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide had non-constant (decreasing) hazards over time, whereas the hazard for rosiglitazone-treated patients was approximately constant over time. Nateglinide and repaglinide had similar shape hazard function, indicating a significantly higher number of hypoglycaemic episodes shortly after starting treatment. For women treated with TZDs, hypoglycaemia was reported more frequently than for men. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows that the frequency of reported hypoglycaemia within the study cohorts was relatively low. The rates of hypoglycaemia were not equal between drug classes. Treatment with nateglinide or repaglinide was characterized by a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia at the beginning of treatment. Further investigation is necessary to assess whether women treated with TZDs are more prone to hypoglycaemia than men. Findings from this study should be taken into account with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies.

The safety profile of tadalafil as prescribed in general practice in England: results from a prescription-event monitoring study involving 16 129 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety of tadalafil as used in general practice in England, and to compare the mortality rate due to ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in tadalafil users with that in the male population in England. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in this observational cohort study were identified from dispensed prescriptions for tadalafil issued by general practitioners (GPs) from February 2003 to November 2004. Demographic and outcome data (clinical events) were requested from patients' GPs using a postal questionnaire. A standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated using indirect standardization for deaths from IHD in the cohort (where age was known) over a 1-year observation period compared to that in the English male population (2003). A sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the effects of missing data for age and cause of death. RESULTS: Clinical information was obtained for 16 129 patients (median age 60 years, interquartile range 52-67); the age was not specified for 3212 (19.9%) patients. At least a third of the patients had diabetes mellitus and 29% had hypertension. Comparison of the mortality rate due to IHD for the patients of known age with that in the English male population provided an SMR of 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.83) indicating fewer observed deaths in the cohort than expected. The results of the sensitivity analyses investigating the effect of missing data for age and cause of death produced similar SMR estimates. One confirmed case of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) was reported during tadalafil therapy in a patient with other risk factors for this condition. CONCLUSION: The results from this prescription-event monitoring study suggest that tadalafil is generally well tolerated when used in general practice in England. The most frequently reported adverse clinical events were in keeping with clinical trial data and include headache, dyspepsia and back pain. There was no evidence of a greater mortality rate due to IHD in the tadalafil cohort than in the general male population. However, these results are limited by the use of an external comparator group and might be explained by a 'healthy cohort effect'. One event of NAION was reported, and although a causal relationship was not established it indicates that NAION occurs rarely in patients prescribed tadalafil.

Safety profile of esomeprazole: results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 11 595 patients in England.

OBJECTIVE: Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, was launched in the UK in September 2000. The first proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, has been marketed in the UK for over 10 years. However, the adverse event database of newly marketed drugs is limited, and it is only after widespread clinical use that the adverse effect profile of a drug is ascertained more comprehensively. This study aims to monitor the safety of esomeprazole prescribed in the primary care setting in England using prescription-event monitoring (PEM). METHODS: A postmarketing surveillance study using the observational cohort technique of PEM. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions for esomeprazole issued by general practitioners between September 2000 and April 2001. Questionnaires ('green forms') requesting clinical event data on these patients were sent to prescribers approximately 6 months after the date of the first dispensed prescription for each individual patient. Incidence densities (IDs), expressed as the number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure (PME), were calculated. Significant differences between IDs for events reported in the first month (ID1) and the following 5 months (ID2-6) of exposure were regarded as potential signals. Other methods for signal detection such as medical evaluation of selected events and evaluation of reasons for stopping were also applied. RESULTS: Green forms containing clinically useful information for 11 595 patients (median age 56 years; 53.2% female) were received. Diarrhoea was the event with the highest ID1 in month 1 (8.0 per 1000 patient months of exposure). Adverse events that occurred significantly more often in the first month of treatment with esomeprazole compared with months 2-6 included diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, headache/migraine, intolerance, malaise/lassitude, pruritus, unspecified adverse effects and abnormal sensation. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of esomeprazole was consistent with the prescribing information and experience reported in the literature.

Monitoring the safety of pioglitazone : results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 12,772 patients in England.

BACKGROUND: Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that targets insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by stimulating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma. Pioglitazone belongs to a class of drugs called thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and was launched in the UK in November 2000. OBJECTIVE: To monitor, using prescription-event monitoring, the post-marketing safety of pioglitazone, which is prescribed in primary care in England. METHODS: An observational cohort study in which patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary-care physicians/general practitioners (GPs) between November 2000 and June 2001. Information on demographics, the use of pioglitazone, clinical event data, events suspected as adverse drug reactions, reasons for stopping the drug and cause of death (if appropriate) were collected using questionnaires posted to GPs at least 8 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Event incidence densities (IDs) [number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure] were calculated. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 12 772 patients (median age 62 years); 53.1% were males. The most frequent starting daily dose of pioglitazone was either 15 mg or 30 mg (n = 10 298). Pioglitazone/metformin was the most frequently used combination reported (n = 4029). Of the 3690 patients who stopped treatment, 1143 stopped due to reasons related to poor glycaemic control. 'Oedema/fluid retention' (n = 121) and 'weight gain' (n = 118) also appeared high on the list of reasons for discontinuing. 'Malaise/lassitude' and 'nausea/vomiting' were the most frequently reported suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with pioglitazone. Specific clinical events considered as early onset events with pioglitazone were: 'malaise/lassitude', 'nausea/vomiting', 'dizziness', 'headache/migraine', 'diarrhoea', 'weight gain' and 'abnormal liver function test'. CONCLUSION: Pioglitazone was considered to be a reasonably well tolerated drug, with the main reasons for discontinuing being related to the drug not being effective. The frequency of individual ADRs reported in this study did not exceed the frequency in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for pioglitazone. However, amongst the frequently reported suspected ADRs, 'nausea/vomiting' and 'diarrhoea' are not listed in the SPC. Further research is required to assess whether the risk of myocardial infarction and deaths due to cardiovascular causes is a class effect of the thiazolidinediones. Results from this study should be taken into account with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies.

A modified prescription-event monitoring study to assess the introduction of Seretide Evohaler in England: an example of studying risk monitoring in pharmacovigilance.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring was required for the introduction of non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in metered dose inhalers (MDIs) to ensure that there were no unexpected adverse events due to the new products. A postmarketing surveillance study has been conducted to evaluate the introduction of the MDI Seretide Evohaler (hydrofluoroalkane-134a inhaler containing salmeterol and fluticasone propionate). OBJECTIVES: To summarise the modified prescription-event monitoring (PEM) study conducted to evaluate the introduction of Seretide Evohaler and discuss the relevance of this type of study towards pharmacovigilance risk-management planning. METHODS: Modified PEM methodology was used to examine the introduction of Seretide Evohaler into general practice in England. Patients were identified from the first National Health Service prescriptions dispensed in England for Seretide Evohaler. One postal questionnaire was sent to the prescribing doctor, requesting demographic information, severity of the indication, concomitant medication for this condition, smoking history, event data 3 months prior to and 3 months after the first prescription for Seretide Evohaler and also reason for stopping if it had been stopped. Pregnancies, deaths and selected events were followed up. Incidence density ratios were calculated to compare event rates 3 months prior to and 3 months after the introduction of Seretide Evohaler. A matched cohort analysis examined oral corticosteroid use and hospital admissions between the pre- and post-exposure periods. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 13,464 patients prescribed Seretide Evohaler, with a response rate of 62%. There was no significant difference in the length of courses of oral corticosteroid use when the pre- and post-exposure periods were compared. A matched cohort analysis showed there was no increase in the use of oral corticosteroids (relative risk [RR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.90, 0.99) or hospital admissions in the post-exposure period (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.73, 1.04). When the number of patients with events were compared for the periods 3 months before and 3 months after exposure, fewer events were reported in the post-exposure period. There were 64 patients who experienced adverse events within an hour of using Seretide Evohaler, including one report of paradoxical bronchospasm and one of myocardial infarction with fatal outcome that were both assessed as possibly related to treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of the study suggest that the introduction of Seretide Evohaler was generally well tolerated. The modified methodology has allowed a comparison of the event rates before and after the introduction of this CFC-free inhaler into general practice.

Safety of zafirlukast: results of a postmarketing surveillance study on 7976 patients in England.

OBJECTIVES: A prescription event monitoring (PEM) postmarketing surveillance study was carried out to examine the safety of zafirlukast as used in general practice in England. METHODS: Exposure data were obtained from the first National Health Service (NHS) prescription dispensed for patients whose prescription details were processed by the Prescription Pricing Authority between August 1998 and December 2000. Outcome data were obtained from 'green form' questionnaires sent to general practitioners (GPs) at least 6 months following the first prescription issued. Incidence densities (IDs) were calculated for events reported per 1000 months of patient exposure and ID differences between the first month of treatment and months 2-6 combined were analysed. Events of medical interest were followed up by postal questionnaire sent to GPs. RESULTS: 21 557 green forms were sent to 8051 doctors, of which 9124 (42.3%) were returned. Useful clinical data was obtained for 7976 patients of which 4664 (58.5%) were female and 3265 (40.9%) were male. The patient's sex was not specified in 47 (0.6%) forms. The median age of the cohort was 53 years (interquartile range 38-66 years). The most frequently reported primary indication was the licensed indication of asthma, but for a small proportion of the cohort it was prescribed 'off label'.A total of 152 events in 120 (1.5%) patients were reported as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by GPs on the green forms. ADRs with the highest reported frequency were headache and nausea. There were 3514 reasons for stopping zafirlukast in 3148 (39.5%) patients, the most frequently reported of which was that the drug was 'ineffective' (2008 patients; 25.2%). The most frequently reported specified clinical reason for stopping was headache (82 patients; 1.0%). There were 28 pregnancies reported in this cohort, 20 of which were reported to have exposure to zafirlukast during the first trimester. Nine live births with no recorded congenital abnormalities were reported for pregnancies with exposure in the first trimester. There were 151 deaths reported during the study period (1.9%). The most frequently reported causes of death were related to the respiratory system (57; 37.7%), including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and bronchopneumonia. CONCLUSION: This study showed that zafirlukast, as used in general practice in England, is a generally well tolerated drug with few associated adverse events.

Safety profile of rosuvastatin: results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 11,680 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Rosuvastatin is a lipid-lowering drug, the newest of a class of drugs called HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, or 'statins', launched in the UK in March 2003. Our objective was to monitor the post-marketing safety of this drug, prescribed in primary care in England, using prescription-event monitoring. METHODS: An observational cohort study in which patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians/general practitioners (GPs) between August and December 2003. Demographic and clinical-event data were collected from questionnaires posted to GPs at least 6 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Stratified analysis of specific events by starting dose of rosuvastatin was conducted. Follow-up and causality assessment of medically significant events was undertaken. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 11,680 patients (median age 64 years); 50.3% were males (5880 of 11,680). The median period of treatment was 9.8 months. Of these patients, 72.7% (n = 8494) were started on rosuvastatin 10 mg/day. A total of 17.5% (n = 2047) of the patients were reported to have stopped treatment with rosuvastatin. Myalgia was the most frequent reason for stopping rosuvastatin and the most frequently reported clinical event. A 2.5-fold increase in the rate of abnormal liver-function tests (LFTs) was observed for patients started on rosuvastatin 40 mg/day compared with those started on 10 mg/day (2.71; 95% CI 1.53, 4.53). No case of rhabdomyolysis was reported in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin was considered to be a reasonably well tolerated drug. In the majority of patients, rosuvastatin was prescribed in line with recommendations. Abnormality of LFTs was found to be more frequent with the 40 mg/day dosage of rosuvastatin. Results from this study should be taken into account together with those of other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies of rosuvastatin.

The safety of quetiapine: results of a post-marketing surveillance study on 1728 patients in England.

The safety of the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine as used in general practice in England was examined by prescription-event monitoring (PEM). Patients were identified from dispensed National Health Service (NHS) prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) for quetiapine between October 1997 and July 1999. The outcome data were event reports obtained by sending questionnaires ('green forms') to the prescribing doctor at Least 6 months after the first prescription for an individual patient. Green forms with clinically useful information on 1728 patients (median age 39 years (IQR 30-56); 53% female) were received. The most frequently reported event during the first month of treatment was 'drowsiness/sedation' (47; 3% cohort). This was also the most frequently reported specified adverse drug reaction (ADR) to quetiapine (7; 11% of 65 reported ADRs) and the highest reported clinical reason for stopping quetiapine (51; 6% of the 734 reported reasons for stopping). There was a low incidence of extrapyramidal disease (21 during treatment, 1% of cohort) and hyperprolactinaemia (three during treatment, 0.2%) in this study. Three cases of diabetes mellitus in this cohort were reported to be a new diagnosis. Six pregnancies were reported during treatment with quetiapine, five of which were exposed during the first trimester only. There were four Live births with no reported congenital abnormaLities. Fifty-six deaths were reported during this study (3% cohort). The most frequently reported causes of death reLated to the cardiovascular (18) and respiratory (15) systems. The results of this post-marketing surveillance study demonstrated that quetiapine is generally well-tolerated when used in general practice.

Exposure to mirtazapine during pregnancy: a prospective, comparative study of birth outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Mirtazapine is a novel piperazinoazepine antidepressant, unrelated to any known class of antidepressants. Currently, apart from a few case reports and case series in the literature, there are no studies evaluating the safety of this drug during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mirtazapine increases the risk for major malformations in newborns when used by pregnant women. METHOD: The study design was prospective, with 2 comparison groups: disease-matched pregnant women diagnosed with depression taking other antidepressants and pregnant women exposed to nonteratogens. The primary outcome was major malformations in neonates; secondary endpoints included spontaneous abortions, therapeutic abortions, gestational age at birth, and mean birth weight. Women were recruited from 5 teratogen information services in Toronto, Canada; Farmington, Conn., U.S.A.; Jerusalem, Israel; Rome, Italy; Sydney, Australia; and from the Drug Safety Research Unit in Southampton, United Kingdom. Women were recruited into the study from June 2002 to August 2005. RESULTS: We were able to follow 104 pregnancy outcomes in each drug group. There were 77 live births, 1 stillbirth, 20 spontaneous abortions, 6 therapeutic abortions, and 2 major malformations in the mirtazapine group. The mean +/- SD birth weight was 3335 +/- 654 g and the mean +/- SD gestational age at delivery was 38.9 +/- 2.5 weeks. Most (95%) of the women took mirtazapine in the first trimester, but only 25% of the women took it throughout pregnancy. The differences among the 3 groups were in the rate of spontaneous abortions, which was higher in both antidepressant groups (19% in the mirtazapine group and 17% in the other antidepressant group) than in the nonteratogen group (11%), but none of the differences were statistically significant. The rate of preterm births (prior to 37 weeks' gestation) was also higher in the mirtazapine group (10%) and in the other antidepressant group (7%) than in the nonteratogen group (2%). The difference was statistically significant between the mirtazapine group and the nonteratogen group (p = .04). CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine does not appear to increase the baseline rate of major malformations of 1% to 3%. However, the higher number of spontaneous abortions in the antidepressant groups confirms the higher rates of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women taking antidepressant medications found in previous studies.

Ophthalmological events in patients receiving risedronate: summary of information gained through follow-up in a prescription-event monitoring study in England.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, the nitrogen bisphosphonate risedronate is licensed for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. It is also licensed for the treatment of Paget's disease. During a prescription-event monitoring (PEM) study on risedronate we noted a number of ophthalmological events. Recently, case reports of ophthalmological adverse drug reactions in patients taking bisphosphonates were published in the medical literature. The aim of this study was to further evaluate the association of ophthalmological events reported in relation to risedronate treatment during a PEM study on the drug. METHODS: An observational cohort study (PEM study) was conducted in England between September 2000 and June 2002. General practitioners (GPs) were asked for follow-up information on selected events. Events followed up were classified as either 'probably', 'possibly' or 'unlikely' to be related to risedronate, using a modified WHO classification. If insufficient information was obtained on the follow-up questionnaire, the cases were categorised as 'unassessable'. RESULTS: Of the total PEM study cohort of 13 643 patients, 11 156 (82%) were females and 2398 (18%) were males. We received 359 reports of ophthalmological events in 313 patients during the entire study period. Of these we followed up 178 events in 178 patients. Nineteen events in 19 patients were assessed as possibly or probably related to risedronate. The age range for these patients was 50-92 years and the time to onset ranged from 7 days to 5 months. Dry eye (six reports), sore eye (five reports) and conjunctivitis (three reports) were the most frequently reported ophthalmological events assessed as probably or possibly related to risedronate therapy. GPs also reported several other inflammatory conditions of the eye, amongst them two events each of iritis and episcleritis as well as one of keratitis. However, the information received on follow up of these events was insufficient to make causality assessments. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving risedronate can present with a variety of signs and symptoms affecting the eye with different degrees of severity. Patients may present after the first month of treatment. Doctors should have an increased awareness of possible ophthalmological adverse drug reactions in patients receiving this drug, which may affect the eyesight in a population at increased risk of fracture if they fall.