Interleukin 22 serum levels are associated with radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To study the role of interleukin 22 (IL-22) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: IL-22 serum levels were measured in patients with early, treatment-naive RA (n=49) and in 45 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals as controls. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at baseline and followed up for 2 years. Correlations of IL-22 serum levels were sought with parameters of disease activity, serological markers, demographic factors and the incidence of erosions. IL-22 production by peripheral blood T cells was investigated by intracellular flow cytometry. RESULTS: 24 of 49 patients with RA demonstrated elevated IL-22 levels compared with the range of healthy controls. At baseline, a high percentage of these patients (8/24, 33%) demonstrated bone erosions, whereas only one patient (4%) from the group with normal IL-22 had erosions. During the 2 years of follow-up, six additional patients with increased IL-22 at baseline developed erosions. In contrast, none of the patients in whom IL-22 levels were normal developed erosions despite similar treatment regimens. Multivariate regression analysis accounting for other parameters predictive for erosions, such as the presence of rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and disease activity, showed that elevated IL-22 baseline levels were independently and significantly associated with erosive RA. Cellular analysis demonstrated enhanced expression of IL-22 from CD4 T cells in RA. CONCLUSION: IL-22 is elevated in the serum of half of the patients with RA. Elevated serum IL-22 allows discrimination between patients with different radiographic progression and indicates a possible involvement of IL-22 in the pathophysiology of RA.

Occurrence of HSV-1-induced pneumonitis in patients under standard immunosuppressive therapy for rheumatic, vasculitic, and connective tissue disease.

BACKGROUND: Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) has been described to cause respiratory tract infections in critically ill patients or in individuals that are immunocompromised. It is a continuing matter of debate under which circumstances HSV-1 is a relevant pathogen for pneumonitis. While its role during critical illness has been investigated by prospective interventional studies, comparatively little systematic data is available on the role of HSV-1 for pneumonitis in outpatients with autoimmune disease under a maintenance regimen of immunosuppression. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of approximately 1400 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that were followed at the outpatient clinic of a German University hospital during the years 2000-2007. Episodes of admission to a ward resulting in the diagnosis of pneumonia/pneumonitis were identified, and the type of pneumonia and clinical features retrospectively studied. RESULTS: 63 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, or SLE were admitted to a ward and diagnosed to have pneumonia/pneumonitis. Using bronchoscopy a total of 6 cases of pulmonary infection associated with HSV-1 in the lower respiratory tract were identified. Among those, 2 cases suggested a causative role of HSV-1 as the sole agent causing pneumonitis that proved clinically responsive to antiviral treatment. In the remaining 4 cases HSV-1 appeared as a bystander of bacterial infection. Maintenance therapy with leflunomide, which inhibits HSV-1 assembly in vitro, was associated with a milder course of pneumonitis in one patient. Detection of HSV-1 was associated with stronger immunosuppressive regimens and vasculitic disease. CONCLUSION: The present study analyzed the frequency and hallmarks of cases of HSV-1 associated pneumonitis that occurred in a comparatively large cohort of patients with rheumatologic autoimmune diseases. In an area of controversy, this study provides further evidence that HSV-1 causes isolated pneumonitis in the immunocompromised. The study may provide an estimate on the frequency of relevant HSV-1 infection and bacterial agents in outpatients with autoimmune disease.

Ultrasound of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: advantages of the dorsal over the palmar approach to finger joints.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the dorsal and palmar ultrasound (US) examination of finger joints in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with regard to the concurrence of greyscale (GSUS) and power Doppler (PDUS) positivity, and to correlate both approaches with clinical variables. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed RA were assessed by clinical examination and US. GSUS and PDUS of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were performed using the dorsal and palmar approach. Findings of synovitis in GSUS and PDUS were graded semiquantitatively from 0 to 3. Clinical and sonographic reevaluation was performed after 6 months. RESULTS: With 44.6% versus 32.2% positive findings, palmar GSUS identified significantly more joints with synovitis than did dorsal GSUS. With 22.1% versus 8.9%, PDUS abnormalities were detected significantly more often from the dorsal side. With 71.2% versus 21.8% for the MCP and 57.5% versus 17.4% for the PIP joints, significantly more GSUS and PDUS double-positive joints were found with the dorsal as opposed to the palmar approach. These differences remained significant at Month 6. Both palmar and dorsal GSUS and PDUS correlated with comparable strength with clinical variables such as the Disease Activity Score 28, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Simple Disease Activity Index. CONCLUSION: Although the dorsal approach detected fewer GSUS findings than the palmar approach, PDUS signals were significantly more frequently detected by dorsal US. In addition, the prevalence of double-positive joints with concurrent GSUS and PDUS findings was significantly higher with the dorsal approach. These data argue in favor of the dorsal US approach to finger joints in RA.

Use of the 28-joint count yields significantly higher concordance between different examiners than the 66/68-joint count.

OBJECTIVE: Joint counts are the key outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is a great variability between different assessors of the same patient; this variability can be reduced by standardized training. The training effect is far less pronounced for the 66/68-joint count compared to the 28-joint count. We evaluated the reason for the higher interrater disagreement in the 66/68 compared to the 28-joint count. METHODS: Participants in joint examination seminars evaluated a patient with RA before and after training in the European League Against Rheumatism technique. Joints were rated positive or negative for tenderness and swelling. The number of positive joints and the variability between examiners before and after the training were compared. Concordance was calculated for every single joint using the Fleiss-Kappa test. RESULTS: In total, 256 health professionals were instructed in the 66/68-joint count and 84 in the 28-joint count. The disagreement between examiners was higher for swelling than for tenderness. After the training, there was a significant reduction of interrater variability, which was more pronounced in the 28 than in the 66/68-joint count. Comparisons between joint counts revealed that the joints of the feet were more likely to be rated negative, yet interrater disagreement was still high. CONCLUSION: Standardization of joint examination significantly reduces variability between assessors. The better performance of the 28-joint count is due to the lower number of joints examined, especially the foot joints, which remain difficult to assess reliably even after training.