Multicenter cross-sectional study of the clinical features and types of treatment of spinal cord-related pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We termed chronic neuropathic pain (NeP) in patients with diseases associated with spinal cord damage as "spinal cord-related pain syndrome". We conducted a survey of patients with the syndrome to assess the type and severity of NeP and its effect on QOL, and treatment modalities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 185 patients recruited from 15 medical institutions. We analyzed the questionnaires sent to clinicians (basic information, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, type and effectiveness of medications) and patients [modified Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) and short form (SF)-36 healthy survey]. RESULTS: The incidence of spinal cord-related pain syndrome was highest in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and spinal cord injury. The number of patients with at-level pain was higher than those with below-level pain; dysesthesia/paresthesia, spontaneous and evoked pain types were mainly seen in patients with at-level pain and dysesthesia/paresthesia was common among those with below-level pain. NPSI score was higher than 10 in the majority of patients, and the subscore for dysesthesia/paresthesia was significantly the highest. The NPSI score was the highest in patients with severe hyperintense signal increase on MRI. The scores of all SF-36 sub-items were significantly lower than the national average. The majority of patients used non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and gabapentin/pregabalin; the latter was significantly effective for allodynia, compared with other medications, regardless of the pain level. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with spinal cord-related pain syndrome suffered from severe NeP, which affected physical activity. The pain phenotype varied according to the level of the lesion and dysesthesia/paresthesia was the most intense. Compared with other medications, gabapentin/pregabalin was significantly effective especially for dysesthesia/paresthesia and evoked pain regardless of the pain level.

Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals.

PURPOSE: This study aims to establish normative data for parameters of spino-pelvic and spinal sagittal alignment, gender related differences and age-related changes in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: A total of 626 asymptomatic volunteers from Japanese population were enrolled in this study, including 50 subjects at least for each gender and each decade from 3rd to 8th. Full length, free-standing spine radiographs were obtained. Cervical lordosis (CL; C3-7), thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1-12), lumbar lordosis (LL; T12-S1), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. RESULTS: The average values (degrees) are 4.1 ± 11.7 for CL, 36.0 ± 10.1 for TK, 49.7 ± 11.2 for LL, 53.7 ± 10.9 for PI, 14.5 ± 8.4 for PT, and 39.4 ± 8.0 for SS. Mean SVA is 3.1 ± 12.6 mm. Advancing age caused an increase in CL, PT and SVA, and a decrease in LL and SS. There was a significant gender difference in CL, TK, LL, PI, PT and SVA. From 7th decade to 8th decade, remarkable decrease of LL & TK and increase of PT were seen. A large increase of SVA was also seen between 60' and 70'. CONCLUSION: Standard values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment were established in each gender and each decade from 20' to 70'. A remarkable change of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment was seen from 7th decade to 8th decade in asymptomatic subjects.

The nature of osteoporotic low back pain without acute vertebral fracture: A prospective multicenter study on the analgesic effect of monthly minodronic acid hydrate.

BACKGROUND: Patients with osteoporosis but no evidence of fracture can sometimes report low back pain. However, few studies have evaluated the nature of osteoporotic low back pain in a clinical situation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the nature of osteoporotic low back pain without fracture, and the analgesic effect of minodronic acid hydrate on such pain. METHODS: The current study examined 136 patients with osteoporotic low back pain and no lower extremity symptoms. The following factors were evaluated before and after minodronic acid hydrate administration: the nature of osteoporotic low back pain was evaluated using the painDETECT questionnaire, numeric rating scale (NRS) score for low back pain at rest and in motion, bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, and the serum concentration of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) as a bone metabolism marker. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were enrolled. The painDETECT questionnaire revealed the percentage of patients with nociceptive pain and neuropathic or mixed pain was approximately 85% and 15%, respectively. the average NRS scores for low back pain at rest decreased significantly 2 months after treatment (p = 0.01), while those in motion decreased significantly 1 month after treatment (p = 0.04). The average lumbar spine BMD tended to increase after treatment, but not significantly. On the other hand, the changes in the average serum concentration of TRACP-5b did significantly decrease 1 month after treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between the rate of NRS score improvement for low back pain at rest, and the rate of improvement in serum concentration of TRACP-5b (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic low back pain consisted of 85% nociceptive pain and 15% neuropathic or mixed pain. The pain is strongly related to pain at rest rather than that in motion.

Narrow cervical canal in 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects: the relationship with spinal cord compression on MRI.

PURPOSE: Narrow cervical canal (NCC) has been a suspected risk factor for later development of cervical myelopathy. However, few studies have evaluated the prevalence in asymptomatic subjects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of NCC in a large cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study of 1211 asymptomatic volunteers. Approximately 100 men and 100 women representing each decade of life from the 20s to the 70s were included in this study. Cervical canal anteroposterior diameters at C5 midvertebral level on X-rays, and the prevalence of spinal cord compression (SCC) and increased signal intensity (ISI) changes on MRI were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the cut-off value of the severity of canal stenosis resulting in SCC. RESULTS: NCC (<14 mm) was observed in 123 (10.2 %) subjects. SCC and ISI were found in 64 (5.3 %) and 28 (2.3 %) subjects, respectively. The prevalence of NCC was significantly higher in females and older subjects, but the occurrence of severe NCC (<12 mm) did not increase with age. The canal size in subjects with SCC or ISI was significantly smaller than in those without SCC (p < 0.0001). The cut-off values of cervical canal stenosis resulting in SCC were 14.8 and 13.9 mm in males and females, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NCC was considerably lower among asymptomatic healthy volunteers; the cervical canal diameter in subjects with SCC or ISI was significantly smaller than in asymptomatic subjects; NCC is a risk factor for SCC.

Outcome of intradiscal condoliase injection therapy for patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare data from patients who received intradiscal condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) injection for primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and recurrent LDH. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Chemonucleolysis with condoliase for LDH is a treatment with relatively good results and a high safety profile; however, few studies have reported recurrence after LDH surgery. METHODS: The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4). CONCLUSIONS: Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

Failure of conservative treatment for thoracic spine fracture in ankylosing spondylitis: delayed neurological deficit due to spinal epidural hematoma.

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are prone to spinal fracture after even minor trauma. We report a case of thoracic spinal fracture in a patient with AS who developed a secondary neurological deficit due to delayed diagnosis and prolonged conservative treatment. When the neurological deficit occurred, the fractured segment showed no displacement, but a spinal epidural hematoma was present. Surgical treatment produced significant neurological improvement, although incomplete paralysis persisted.

Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish radiographic standard values for cervical spine morphometry, alignment, and range of motion (ROM) in both male and female in each decade of life between the 3rd and 8th and to elucidate these age-related changes. METHODS: A total of 1,230 asymptomatic volunteers underwent anteroposterior (AP), lateral, flexion, and extension radiography of the cervical spine. There were at least 100 men and 100 women in each decade of life between the 3rd and 8th. AP diameter of the spinal canal, vertebral body, and disc were measured at each level from the 2nd to 7th cervical vertebra (C2-C7). C2-C7 sagittal alignment and ROM during flexion and extension were calculated using a computer digitizer. RESULTS: The AP diameter of the spinal canal was 15.8 ± 1.5 [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] mm at the mid-C5 level, and 15.5 ± 2.0 mm at the C5/6 disc level. The disc height was 5.8 ± 1.3 mm at the C5/6 level, which was the minimum height, and the maximum height was at the C6/7 level. Both the AP diameter of the spinal canal and disc height decreased gradually with increasing age. The C2-C7 sagittal alignment and total ROM were 13.9 ± 12.3° in lordosis and 55.3 ± 16.0°, respectively. The C2-C7 lordotic angle was 8.0 ± 11.8° in the 3rd decade and increased to 19.7 ± 11.3 in the 8th decade, whereas the C2-C7 ROM was 67.7 ± 17.0° in the 3rd decade and decreased to 45.0 ± 12.5 in the 8th decade. The extension ROM decreased more than the flexion ROM, and lordotic alignment progressed with increasing age. There was a significant difference in C2-C7 alignment and ROM between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: The standard values and age-related changes in cervical anatomy, alignment, and ROM for males and females in each decade between the 3rd and 8th were established. Cervical lordosis in the neutral position develops with aging, while extension ROM decreases gradually. These data will be useful as normal values for the sake of comparison in clinical practice.

Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: Magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to establish standard MRI values for the cervical spinal canal, dural tube, and spinal cord, to evaluate age-related changes in healthy subjects, and to assess the prevalence of abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal and the sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural tube and spinal cord were measured on MRIs of 1,211 healthy volunteers. These included at least 100 men and 100 women in each decade of life between the third (20s) and eighth (70s). Abnormal findings such as spinal cord compression and signal changes in the spinal cord were recorded. RESULTS: The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal was 11.2 ± 1.4 mm [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]/11.1 ± 1.4 mm (male/female) at the mid-C5 vertebral level, and 9.5 ± 1.8/9.6 ± 1.6 mm at the C5/6 disc level. The cross-sectional area of the spinal cord was 78.1 ± 9.4/74.4 ± 9.4 mm² at the mid-C5 level and 70.6 ± 11.7/68.9 ± 11.3 mm² at the C5/6 disc level. Both the sagittal diameter and the axial area of the dural tube and spinal cord tended to decrease with increasing age. This tendency was more marked at the level of the intervertebral discs than at the level of the vertebral bodies, especially at the C5/6 intervertebral disc level. The spinal cord occupation rate in the dural tube at the C5 vertebral body level averaged 58.3 ± 7.0%. Spinal cord compression was observed in 64 cases (5.3%) and a T2 high-signal change was observed in 28 cases (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Using MRI data of 1,211 asymptomatic subjects, the standard values for the cervical spinal canal, dural tube, and spinal cord for healthy members of each sex and each decade of life and the age-related changes in these parameters were established. The relatively high prevalence of abnormal MRI findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals emphasizes the dangers of predicating operative decisions on diagnostic tests without precisely correlating these findings with clinical signs and symptoms.

An unusually rapid spontaneous recovery in a patient with spinal epidural hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous epidural hematoma is a rare condition, which usually requires urgent surgical treatment. OBJECTIVES: To report two cases of spontaneous epidural hematoma, one of which was treated conservatively, and the other surgically, and discuss the possibility of unusual spontaneous recovery and treatment decision-making. CASE REPORT: We encountered 2 patients with spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma, both of whom were taking an anti-platelet agent, producing severe paraplegia. One patient with a hematoma at C2-T3 experienced a rapid neurological recovery while a magnetic resonance imaging scan was being performed. A complete resolution of the hematoma and complete neurological recovery ensued without surgical intervention. A second patient with a hematoma at T10-12 showed no neurological recovery up to the time emergency surgery started and was treated surgically by T10-12 laminectomy and excision of the hematoma. Neurological function returned to normal in both patients. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of spontaneous recovery in some patients makes the decision for surgery difficult. Emergency physicians need to be aware of the possibility of spontaneous rapid neurological recovery in patients with spinal epidural hematoma. To avoid unnecessary surgery in patients who will spontaneously have neurological recovery, neurological evaluations need to be repeatedly performed up to the time the emergency surgery begins. However, unfortunately, there is no diagnostic tool at present to identify the patients who recover spontaneously, and the interval between onset and surgery is correlated with clinical results, therefore, conservative treatment should be prescribed only for those patients who exhibit improving neurological signs early in the clinical course.

Efficacy and Safety of Condoliase Disc Administration as a New Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

INTRODUCTION: Condoliase is a newly approved drug that improves symptoms associated with lumbar disk herniation (LDH) by intradiscal administration. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of condoliase injection, examine the adverse events, including cases that required surgery after condoliase administration, and verify cases in which condoliase could be effective. METHODS: We enrolled patients with LDH who were treated conservatively for at least six weeks and received condoliase. We assessed the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, disk height, and disk degeneration for up to 6 months, and we examined the complications. Furthermore, a 50% or more improvement in leg pain VAS score was considered effective. Factors related to symptom improvement were investigated by determining whether lower limb pain improved in six months. RESULTS: In total, 84 patients were recruited (52 men, 32 women; mean age, 44.2 ± 17.1 [16-86 years]). The duration of illness was 6.7 ± 6.8 (1.5-30) months. All patient-based outcomes significantly improved at 4 weeks after the administration compared with pretreatment. The intervertebral disc height decreased significantly at four weeks after condoliase administration compared with that before administration. Progression of intervertebral disc degeneration occurred in 50% of the patients. Eleven patients underwent herniotomy due to poor treatment effects. Moreover, treatment in 77.4% of the patients was considered effective. A logistic regression analysis revealed that L5/S1 disk administration (p = 0.029; odds ratio, 5.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-29.45) were significantly associated with clinical effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Condoliase disk administration improved pain and quality of life over time. Condoliase disk administration was more effective in L5/S1 intervertebral administration.

Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion versus non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis is widely performed. However, there have been no reports comparing posterolateral and anterior interbody fusion prospectively. We compared instrumented posterolateral fusion with anterior interbody fusion for L4 spondylolisthesis in a prospective study. METHODS: Forty-six patients diagnosed with L4 degenerated spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups. Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion using an iliac bone graft (ALIF; L4-L5 level), and 24 consecutive patients underwent instrumented posterolateral fusion with local bone (PLF; L4-L5 level). The rates of bone union, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), surgical invasion, and complications were evaluated before and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Age, VAS score, JOA score, and ODI were not significantly different between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05). Success of bone union between the two groups was not significantly different (P > 0.05). Blood loss during surgery was significantly less; however, periods of bed rest and hospital stay were significantly longer in the ALIF group (P < 0.05). Overall patient satisfaction, and low back and leg pain in both groups were significantly improved after surgery; however, low back pain showed greater improvement in the ALIF group compared with the PLF group (P < 0.05). Complications such as donor site pain (4 patients in the ALIF group) and dural tearing (3 patients in the PLF group) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: If single level fusion for L4 spondylolisthesis is performed, both anterior and posterior methods reduce patients' low back and leg pain. Improvement of low back pain was significantly greater after ALIF; however, periods of hospital stay and of bed rest were significantly longer.

Comparison of early and late surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation: is earlier better?

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for surgical intervention in cases of lumbar disc herniation is debatable. This retrospective study sought to determine whether early surgical intervention resulted in greater improvement in clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy were reviewed. Surgery was performed when leg pain persisted despite adequate conservative treatment. The patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of symptoms before surgery, the early group being symptomatic for 3 months. Surgical time, blood loss, severity of back pain, leg pain and numbness (visual analogue scale, or VAS), and a patient-oriented evaluation score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, or JOABPEQ) before and after surgery were compared. The JOABPEQ is a new evaluation method for lumbar spinal disorders based on Roland-Morris disability questionnaires and Short Form 36. RESULTS: There were 23 patients in each group. No significant differences were found between the groups in patients' demographics (age, sex, type of herniation), surgical time, blood loss, or pre- and postoperative VAS (lower-back pain, leg pain, numbness). There were no significant differences between the groups in the scores for the five subscales - pain-related disorders, gait disturbance, lumbar spine dysfunction, social life disturbance, psychological disorders - of the preoperative JOABPEQ. Postoperative scores for psychological disorders improved significantly (P < 0.05) in the late group (mean score 39.9) compared to the early group (mean score 22.1). Interestingly, no significant difference of improvement in the scores other than psychological disorder was found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical intervention did not result in greater improvement of clinical outcomes for patients with lumbar disc herniation. Later surgical intervention resulted in significant improvement of psychological disorders.

Incidence of complications associated with spinal endoscopic surgery: nationwide survey in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

BACKGROUND: This report was conducted to elucidate the current status of spinal endoscopic surgery and relevant incidents through analysis of the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA). METHODS: Questionnaire forms were sent to 2011 training facilities nationwide certified by the JOA, and 1082 of these facilities returned the filled questionnaires (response rate 53.8%). Of these facilities, 257 (23.8% of the responding facilities) undertook spinal endoscopic surgery in 2007. These institutions were asked to fill in the survey form with the details of the operations and relevant incidents as well as the incident levels. RESULTS: In total, the 257 facilities performed 6239 spinal endoscopic surgeries during 2007. Posterior spinal endoscopic surgery constituted most of the operations (6217 cases, 98.2%) including 4336 cases of microendoscopic discectomy (MED), 1273 cases of microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 379 cases of transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The total number of incidents was 133 (2.13%). The numbers of incidents by operative method were 75 (56.4%) during MED, 57 (42.9%) during microendoscopic laminectomy or fenestration, and 1 (0.8%) during interbody fusion. Of 133 incidents, dural tear occurred in 99 (74.4%), injury of the cauda equina or a nerve root in 7 (5.3%), facet fracture in 7 (5.3%), hematoma and wrong level in 6 each (4.5%), and wrong side and bedsore in 1 each (0.8%). The incident level was level 1 in 6, level 2 in 24, level 3a in 82, level 3b in 16, level 4 in 5, and level 5 (fatal) in 0. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey revealed an increasing trend of spinal endoscopic surgery and a decreasing trend of the complication rates. The complication rates of spinal endoscopic surgery were not higher than those of conventional surgery, indicating the safety of this surgical method.

Effectiveness of L2 spinal nerve infiltration for selective discogenic low back pain patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that rat L5/6 lumbar discs are innervated mainly by L2 dorsal root ganglion neurons. We previously reported that L2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective for discogenic low back pain (DLBP) patients, although the diagnosis was based only on the results of physical examination, plain films, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate L2 spinal nerve block for DLBP patients retrospectively based on MRI findings and surgical results. METHODS: A total of 62 patients with only LBP and no accompanying radicular pain were investigated. Patients had only one level of disc degeneration on MRI. When pain was provoked during discography, we performed surgery at the next stage (40 patients). In all, 22 patients were excluded owing to negative discography results. Of the 40 patients, we evaluated 25 strictly selected patients suffering from DLBP. DLBP was diagnosed when the patient experienced pain relief at least 2 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Fifteen patients who did not show pain relief after surgery were used for the non-DLBP group. L2 spinal nerve infiltration using 1.5 ml of lidocaine was performed in all 40 patients before surgery. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score after L2 spinal nerve infiltration was recorded, and an association of L2 spinal nerve infiltration and DLBP was explored. RESULTS: Low back pain scores assessed using the VAS score, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and the Oswestry Disability Index score in the two groups were not significantly different. L 2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective for 27 patients but not effective for 13 patients; the VAS score after 15 min and 2 h improved in the DLBP group compared with that of the non-DLBP group (P < 0. 05). L2 spinal nerve infiltration was more effective in DLBP patients (21 patients, 84%) than in the non-DLBP group (6 patients, 40%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, L2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective in 84% of selected DLBP patients and is thought to be a useful tool for diagnosing DLBP. However, we should take into consideration that the L2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective in 40% of non-DLBP patients as well.

Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) has investigated the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to evaluate several aspects of low back pain in patients. The score includes five categories (25 items) selected from the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Short Form 36, and a visual analogue scale. Japanese physicians have recently used these scores to evaluate back pain; however, the efficacy has not been fully explored in large-scale studies. In the current study, we used the JOABPEQ to evaluate lumbar spinal disease in 555 patients (with lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, and lumbar disc degeneration/spondylosis) in multiple spine centers and compared the results based on age, sex, and type of disease. METHODS: A total of 555 patients who had low back or leg pain were selected in 22 hospitals in Chiba Prefecture. Spine surgeons diagnosed their disease type based on symptoms, physical examination, radiography images, and magnetic resonance imaging. In all, 486 patients were diagnosed with spinal stenosis (239 patients), disc degeneration/spondylosis (143 patients), or disc herniation (104 patients). The other 69 patients were diagnosed with spondylolysis (16 patients) or other diseases (53 patients). The pain score in all patients was evaluated using the JOABPEQ (from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst pain). RESULTS: The age of the patients was 56.1 +/- 13.3 years (mean +/- SD); the age of patients in the disc herniation and disc degeneration/spondylosis group was significantly lower than that in the spinal stenosis group. The average JOABPEQ scores in all patients were, for low back pain, 47.1; lumbar function, 53.6; walking ability, 54.8; social life function, 48.7; and mental health, 48.3. The low back pain score in men was significantly worse than that in women. In contrast, the mental health score in women was significantly higher than that in men. The low back pain score in patients <40 years old and the walking ability score in patients >65 years old were significantly lower than those scores in other patients. Based on the disease type, low back pain, lumbar function, social life function, and mental health scores for patients with disc herniation were significantly worse than for those with spinal stenosis. CONCLUSION: JOABPEQ scores were evaluated for several lumbar diseases. The average of five categories of JOABPEQ scores in all patients was similarly distributed. However, the average scores in the five categories were significantly different depending on age, sex, and type of disease. Compared with prior mass data (baseline data on the observational cohort of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial in the United States), many data were similar based on the type of disease in the current study. Furthermore, the JOABPEQ is easy to use compared with the SF-36. Hence, we concluded that the JOABPEQ could be used worldwide as a tool for evaluating low back pain.

Perioperative Complications in 155 Patients Who Underwent Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery: Perspectives and Indications From a Retrospective, Multicenter Survey.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter survey. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perioperative complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OLIF has been widely performed to achieve minimally invasive, rigid lumbar lateral interbody fusion. The associated perioperative complications are not yet well described. METHODS: The participants were patients who underwent OLIF surgery under the diagnosis of degenerative lumbar diseases between April 2013 and May 2015 at 11 affiliated medical institutions. The collected data were classified into intraoperative and early-stage postoperative (≤1 mo) complications. The intraoperative complications were then subcategorized into organ damage (neural, vertebral, vascular, and others) and other complications, mainly related to instrumental failure. The collected data were also divided and analyzed based on whether the surgeon was certified to perform the surgery and the incidence of complications in the early (April 2013-March 2014) and late stages (April 2014-May 2015) of OLIF introduction. RESULTS: In the 155 included patients, 75 complications were reported (incidence rate, 48.3%). The most common complication was endplate fracture/subsidence (18.7%), followed by transient psoas weakness and thigh numbness (13.5%) and segmental artery injury (2.6%). Almost all these complications were transient, except for three patients who had permanent damage: one had ureteral injury and two had neurological injury. Postoperative complications included surgical site infection (1.9%) and reoperation (1.9%). Whether the primary operator was experienced did not affect the incidence of complications. Regarding the introductory stage, the incidence of complications was 50% in the early stage and 38% in the late stage. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of perioperative complications of OLIF surgery reached 48.3%, of which only 1.9% resulted in permanent damage. Our analysis based on surgeon experience indicated that the OLIF procedure could be performed without increasing incidence of complications, under the guidance of experienced supervisors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Relatively Large Cervical Spinal Cord for Spinal Canal is a Risk factor for Development of Cervical Spinal Cord Compression: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1211 Subjects.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the correlation of the cervical canal and spinal cord size, and evaluate whether the size of the spinal cord relative to the spinal canal is a risk factor for development of cervical spinal cord compression (SCC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is little knowledge regarding the relationship between cervical bony canal and spinal cord diameters. Although developmental canal stenosis has been recognized as a risk factor for SCC, the size of the spinal cord relative to the spinal canal has not been similarly discussed. METHODS: Cervical canal anteroposterior (AP) diameters on X-rays and AP diameters and cross-sectional areas of dural sacs and spinal cords on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were measured in 1211 healthy volunteers. Correlation between cervical canal diameter on X-rays and AP diameter and cross-sectional area of dural sacs and spinal cords on MRI were assessed. The ratio of the AP diameter of the spinal cord/dural sac was compared between subjects with and without SCC. RESULTS: Spinal canal diameters were not highly correlated with spinal cord AP diameters and cross-sectional areas, although spinal canal diameters were significantly correlated with dural sac AP diameters. The individual difference in the ratio of the AP diameter of the spinal cord/dural sac was large (35%-93%), and the ratio was significantly larger in the subjects with SCC. An AP diameter ratio more than 62% at the C2 to C3 disc level is a risk factor for developing SCC. CONCLUSION: The spinal cord diameter was independent of the spinal canal diameter and the relative size of a spinal cord and spinal canal differed on an individual basis. In addition, the ratio of spinal cord/dural sac in subjects with SCC was significantly larger. Therefore, a relatively large spinal cord could be a risk factor for SCC.

[Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low back pain].

There are various causes of low back pain, but if the cause of low back pain was determined as a discogenic pain, anterior lumbar interbody fusion was indicated. The surgical treatment should be determined after MRI and other radiological imaging studies and pain response, and also it is important to examine the social factor and psychological status. Extra-peritoneal approach is selected for above L(4)-L(5) level, and trans-peritoneal approach is selected for L(5)-S(1). Recent endoscopic approaches to the anterior lumbar spine is also presented.

Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of the cervical spines in 1211 asymptomatic subjects.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and distribution of abnormal findings on cervical spine magnetic resonance image (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neurological symptoms and abnormal findings on MR images are keys to diagnose the spinal diseases. To determine the significance of MRI abnormalities, we must take into account the (1) frequency and (2) spectrum of structural abnormalities, which may be asymptomatic. However, no large-scale study has documented abnormal findings of the cervical spine on MR image in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: MR images were analyzed for the anteroposterior spinal cord diameter, disc bulging diameter, and axial cross-sectional area of the spinal cord in 1211 healthy volunteers. The age of healthy volunteers prospectively enrolled in this study ranged from 20 to 70 years, with approximately 100 individuals per decade, per sex. These data were used to determine the spectrum and degree of disc bulging, spinal cord compression (SCC), and increased signal intensity changes in the spinal cord. RESULTS: Most subjects presented with disc bulging (87.6%), which significantly increased with age in terms of frequency, severity, and number of levels. Even most subjects in their 20s had bulging discs, with 73.3% and 78.0% of males and females, respectively. In contrast, few asymptomatic subjects were diagnosed with SCC (5.3%) or increased signal intensity (2.3%). These numbers increased with age, particularly after age 50 years. SCC mainly involved 1 level (58%) or 2 levels (38%), and predominantly occurred at C5-C6 (41%) and C6-C7 (27%). CONCLUSION: Disc bulging was frequently observed in asymptomatic subjects, even including those in their 20s. The number of patients with minor disc bulging increased from age 20 to 50 years. In contrast, the frequency of SCC and increased signal intensity increased after age 50 years, and this was accompanied by increased severity of disc bulging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Cervical Disc Protrusion Correlates With the Severity of Cervical Disc Degeneration: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1211 Relatively Healthy Volunteers.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate the frequency and degree of cervical disc degeneration and protrusion on cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) images and (2) to analyze the correlation between the severity of disc degeneration and disc protrusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical disc degenerative changes or protrusion is commonly observed on MR images in healthy subjects. However, there are few large-scale studies, and the frequency and range of these findings in healthy subjects have not been clarified. Moreover, there are no reports regarding the correlation between cervical disc degeneration and disc protrusion. METHODS: Cervical disc degeneration and protrusion were prospectively measured using magnetic resonance imaging in 1211 relatively healthy volunteers. These included at least 100 males and 100 females in each decade of life between the 20s and the 70s. Cervical disc degeneration was defined according to the modified Pfirrmann classification system, and the amount of disc protrusion was evaluated using the anteroposterior diameter of disc protrusion on sagittal MR image. RESULTS: Mild disc degeneration was very common, including 98.0% of both sexes in their 20s. The severity of cervical disc degeneration significantly increased with age in both sexes at every level. The disc degeneration predominantly occurred at C5-C6 and C6-C7. The difference between sexes was not significant except for individuals in their 50s. The average anteroposterior diameter of disc protrusion increased with aging, especially from the 20s to the 40s. The anteroposterior diameter of disc protrusion increased with a progression in the disc degeneration grade. CONCLUSION: Cervical disc degeneration and protrusion were frequently observed in healthy subjects even in their 20s and deteriorated with age. Cervical disc protrusion was significantly correlated with cervical disc degeneration, and spatial cervical disc protrusion was affected by biochemical degenerative changes as observed on MR images. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.