Modification effect of receipt of diabetes care on the association between COVID-19 infection and HbA1c level during the first year of the coronavirus pandemic using a nationwide population-based database.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We assessed the modification effect of adherence to diabetes care on the association between HbA1c levels and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among individuals with diabetes using a population-based database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified individuals with diabetes during routine health checkups performed in 2019 in Japan using a population-based claims database (JMDC, Tokyo, Japan). We assessed the risk of COVID-19 infection in 2020 in relation to HbA1c levels during routine checkups, stratified by the presence/absence of follow-up for diabetes care in 2019. Several sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 65,956 individuals with an HbA1c ≥6.5% and fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL in routine checkups, including 52,637 and 13,319 with and without at least one physician consultation for diabetes care in 2019, respectively. Although high HbA1c levels were associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection in a dose-dependent manner among individuals without diabetes care in 2019 (odds ratios, 1.53 and 2.17 in individuals with HbA1c of 7.0-7.9% and ≥8.0%, respectively) with a reference to HbA1c of 6.5-6.9%, individuals with diabetes care had no such trend in 2019 (odds ratios, 0.99 and 0.97 among individuals with HbA1c of 7.0-7.9% and ≥8.0%, respectively). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results when the variable definitions were changed and after multivariable adjustment with multiple imputation. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study suggests that adherence to diabetes care may modify the association between HbA1c levels and the risk of COVID-19 infection.

Proteinuria screening and risk of bone fracture: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide population-based database.

Background and hypothesis: Proteinuria is associated with an increased risk of kidney function deterioration, cardiovascular disease, or cancer. Previous reports suggesting an association between kidney dysfunction and bone fracture may be confounded by concomitant proteinuria and were inconsistent regarding the association between proteinuria and bone fracture. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association using a large administrative claims database in Japan. Methods: Using the DeSC database, we retrospectively identified individuals with laboratory data including urine dipstick test between August 2014 and February 2021. We evaluated the association between proteinuria and vertebral or hip fracture using multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for various background factors including kidney function. We also performed subgroup analyses stratified by sex and kidney function and sensitivity analyses with Fine & Gray models considering death as a competing risk. Results: We identified 603 766 individuals and observed 21 195 fractures. With reference to the negative proteinuria group, the hazard ratio for hip or vertebral fracture was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.14] and 1.16 (95%CI, 1.11-1.22) in the trace and positive proteinuria group, respectively, in the Cox regression analysis. The subgroup analyses showed similar trends. The Fine & Gray model showed a subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.09 (95%CI, 1.05-1.14) in the trace proteinuria group and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.10-1.20) in the positive proteinuria group. Conclusions: Proteinuria was associated with an increased risk of developing hip or vertebral fractures after adjustment for kidney function. Our results highlight the clinical importance of checking proteinuria for predicting bone fractures.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Check-ups in 2021 and 2022: A Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Healthcare Facilities in Japan Society of Ningen Dock.

Introduction: Preventive programs, including screenings for cancer and diabetes, were disrupted globally due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020. We previously conducted a nationwide survey to investigate the initial impact of the pandemic on health check-ups; however, the impact in the second and third years of the pandemic has not yet been elucidated. Here, we conducted a follow-up survey targeting healthcare facilities to evaluate the impact of the pandemic until the end of 2022. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted between December 15, 2022, and February 10, 2023, targeting member facilities of Japan Society of Ningen Dock. The survey consisted of two parts. Part I comprised a web-based questionnaire, in which the facilities were asked about their commitment to COVID-19-related care, precautions against COVID-19, and whether the pandemic had a negative financial impact on the management of health check-ups. In Part II, the facilities were asked about the number of examinees who underwent health check-ups between 2019 and 2022, the proportion of those who needed and adhered to follow-up visits, and the number of cancer cases found between 2019 and 2021. Results: Of the 1,343 eligible facilities, 885 participated (response rate: 65.9%). The observation that the number of people undergoing mandatory check-ups increased while those undergoing nonmandatory check-ups (e.g., cancer screenings by local governments) decreased in 2021, compared with that of 2019, persisted into 2022. Approximately 60% of the facilities reported a negative financial impact on the management of health check-ups, even in 2022. Conclusions: In 2022, the pandemic's detrimental effects on health check-ups persisted.

Effective Oral Indicators With Medical and Dental Collaboration in Open Heart Surgery: A Representative Survey.

Purpose Postoperative infections pose an important problem for patients with cardiac disease. Moreover, oral health status is associated with the risk of longer hospital stays. Therefore, the oral health status of patients was assessed before open-heart surgery. This study aimed to determine the relationship between oral health status and postoperative status. Methods The study included 25 patients who underwent open-heart surgery at our university hospital in 2020. Upon admission, dentists conducted an oral examination and assessed the oral health status of the patients, also using the Japanese version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT-J), Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG), oral moisture level, oral bacteria, and other relevant factors. The study investigated the association with postoperative status. Findings Significant postoperative infections were found in patients aged ≥70 years, with an OHAT-J score of ≥5, OHAT-J lip score of ≥1, Streptococcus γ count of 1.0 × 10^6 or higher (CFU/mL), and increased Streptococcus γ before and after surgery. The duration of hospitalization correlated with the OHAT-J, OHAT-J gum and tissue, and ROAG scores. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stays correlated with the OHAT-J score. Conclusions The study demonstrates that OHAT-J scores are linked with predicting not just postoperative infection but also the length of hospitalization and ICU stay. As OHAT-J scores do not necessitate specialized dental instruments, they are straightforward and beneficial for healthcare professionals outside of dentistry.