[Changes in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery(GKRS)in Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors before and after COVID-19].

The spread of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)is a concern as it may delay the detection of malignant tumors due to delayed medical checkups. We examined changes in the treatment of metastatic brain tumors before and after COVID- 19. A retrospective review of 211 patients with metastatic brain tumors who underwent initial gamma knife radiosurgery between July 2019 and December 2021 was conducted. Data collected include patient age, gender, the Karnofsky performance status(KPS), primary tumor control, number, total volume, and outcome during the COVID-19 emergency declaration period and outside of it. The patient number was 164 outside of the emergency period and 47 during the period. Symptomatic cases(KPS<90)and poor control of the primary site increased during the COVID-19 period. The treatment number and volume of brain metastasis did not change. Metastatic control after 4 months of treatment also showed no difference. The number of symptomatic patients increased during the emergency declaration period, suggesting that COVID- 19 may have reduced the rate of asymptomatic patients being seen. However, these were not enough to affect the prognosis at 4 months. Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic had a small impact on the provision of stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors.

A Nationwide Questionnaire Survey on Awake Craniotomy in Japan.

The number of awake craniotomies is increasing because of its beneficial features. However, not enough information is available regarding the current status of awake craniotomy in Japan. To evaluate the current status of awake craniotomy in institutes, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted. From June to August 2019, we conducted a questionnaire survey on awake craniotomy in the neurosurgery department of 45 institutes that perform awake craniotomies in Japan. Responses were obtained from 39 institutes (response rate, 86.7%). The main methods of awake craniotomy were almost the same in all institutes. Twenty-six institutes (66.7%) had fewer than 10 awake craniotomies (low-volume institutes) per year, and 13 high-volume institutes (33.3%) performed more than 10 awake craniotomies annually. Some institutes experienced a relatively high frequency of adverse events. In 11 institutes (28.2%), the frequency of intraoperative seizures was more than 10%. An intraoperative seizure frequency of 1%-9%, 10%-29%, and over 30% was identified in 12 (92%), 0 (0%), and 1 (8%) of the high-volume institutes, which was significantly less than in 16 (62%), 10 (38%), and 0 (0%) of the low-volume institutes (p = 0.0059). The routine usage of preoperative antiepileptic drugs was not different between them, but the old type was used more often in the low-volume institutes (p = 0.0022). Taken together, the annual number of awake craniotomies was less than 10 in over two-thirds of the institutes. Fewer intraoperative seizures were reported in the high-volume institutes, which tend not to preoperatively use the old type of antiepileptic drugs.