Balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization (B-TACE) and conventional TACE (C-TACE) in treating single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 523 patients who underwent C-TACE and 44 who underwent B-TACE as first-line treatment for single HCCs between November 2017 and December 2019. After propensity score matching (PSM), initial tumor response rates, local tumor progression (LTP), and major complication rates were evaluated in the 32 pairs of PSM matched population. RESULTS: In the 32 pairs of PSM cohort, B-TACE showed distinct superiority over C-TACE in treating single HCCs, with significantly higher initial complete response (CR) rates (93.8% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.005). During a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 12.7-46.5 months), 13 patients (40.6%) who underwent B-TACE and 16 (50%) who underwent C-TACE showed LTP of treated lesions. Size-based sub-group analysis showed that the median times to LTP in patients with medium- to large-sized tumors (> 3 cm) were significantly longer in the B-TACE (27 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7-34.3 months) than in the C-TACE (13 months; 95% CI, 3.9-22.1 months) group (p = 0.019). The major complication rate was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: B-TACE had a higher initial CR rate than C-TACE in treating single HCCs. Moreover, size-based subgroup analysis showed that time to LTP was significantly longer in patients with medium- to large-sized HCCs (> 3 cm) who underwent B-TACE rather than C-TACE. KEY POINTS: • B-TACE was superior to C-TACE in treating single HCC, with a significantly higher initial complete response rate after one session of treatment. • In size-based subgroup analysis, time to LTP was significantly longer in patients with medium- to large-sized HCCs (>3 cm) who underwent B-TACE rather than C-TACE. • B-TACE should be considered an alternative treatment option for medium- to large-sized single HCCs (>3 cm) in patients with a nonresectable condition and those who prefer nonsurgical treatment.

Intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: safety and efficacy of chemoembolization.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemoembolization in patients with intermediate-stage infiltrative Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated outcomes in treatment-naïve patients who received chemoembolization as first-line treatment for intermediate-stage infiltrative HCC between 2002 and 2022. Of the 2029 treatment-naïve patients who received chemoembolization as first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC, 244 (12%) were identified as having the infiltrative type. After excluding two patients lost to follow-up, 242 patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Median post-chemoembolization overall survival (OS) was 16 months. Multivariable Cox analysis identified four factors predictive of OS: Child-Pugh class B (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; p = 0.001), maximal tumor size ≥ 10 cm (HR, 1.67; p < 0.001), tumor number ≥ 4 (HR, 1.42; p = 0.037), and bilobar tumor involvement (HR, 1.64; p = 0.003). These four factors were used to create pretreatment prediction models, with risk scores of 0-1, 2-4, and 5-7 defined as low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. Median OS times in these three groups were 34, 18, and 8 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The objective tumor response rate following chemoembolization was 53%. The major complication rate was 9% overall and was significantly higher in the high-risk group (22%) than in the low (2%) and intermediate (3%) risk groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Chemoembolization is safe and effective in selected patients with intermediate-stage infiltrative HCC. Chemoembolization is not recommended in high-risk patients with intermediate-stage infiltrative HCC because of poor OS and high rates of major complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A pretreatment prediction model was developed using four risk factors associated with overall survival following chemoembolization for intermediate-stage infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma. This model may provide valuable information for clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: • Four risk factors (Child-Pugh score B, maximal tumor size ≥ 10 cm, tumor number ≥ 4, and bilobar tumor involvement) were used to create pretreatment prediction models, with risk scores of 0-1, 2-4, and 5-7 defined as low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. • Median overall survival (OS) times and major complication rate in these three groups were 34, 18, and 8 months, and 2%, 3%, and 22%, respectively (p < 0.001). Chemoembolization is not recommended in high-risk patients with intermediate-stage infiltrative Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because of poor OS and high rates of major complications.

Indices of ACTH-stimulated adrenal venous sampling as predictors of postsurgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of indices of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) on postsurgical outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This retrospective study determined biochemical and clinical outcomes based on ACTH-stimulated AVS parameters (lateralisation index [LI], contralateral ratio [CLR], and ipsilateral ratio [ILR]) in 251 patients with PA at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Modified complete biochemical success was achieved in 8 of 12 (66.7%) patients with LI = 3-4, 39 of 47 (83.0%) with LI = 4-10, and 155 of 169 (91.7%) with LI ≥ 10 (p = .004 for trend). Modified complete biochemical success was achieved in 29 of 38 (76.3%) patients with CLR ≥ 1 and ILR ≤ 2, 73 of 86 (84.9%) with CLR = 0.25-1 and ILR > 2, and 100 of 104 (96.2%) with CLR < 0.25 and ILR > 2 (p = .001 for trend). After adjusting for confounders, modified complete biochemical success was associated with an LI ≥ 10 (odds ratio [OR] = 6.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-29.93) using LI = 3-4 as a reference and combined CLR < 0.25 and ILR > 2 (OR = 11.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.49-53.01) using combined CLR ≥ 1 and ILR ≤ 2 as a reference. Using combined CLR ≥ 1 and ILR ≤ 2 as a reference, complete clinical success was associated with combined CLR < 0.25 and ILR > 2 (OR = 3.10; 95% CI = 1.03-9.28) and combined CLR = 0.25-1 and ILR > 2 (OR = 4.92; 95% CI = 1.64-14.76). CONCLUSION: LI ≥ 10 may be appropriate for achieving biochemical success. With ILR > 2, CLR < 0.25, and CLR < 1 may be appropriate for achieving biochemical and clinical success, respectively.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Benign Chronic Inflammatory Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory joint pain via systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain treated with TAE. Meta-analyses of pain score changes, changes in proportions of patients on analgesic medications, range of motion changes, technical success rates, and adverse events rates were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to pain site (knee versus shoulder). RESULTS: Fourteen observational studies, which included 346 patients, were reviewed. The pooled technical success rate was 95.8%, and no major adverse events were observed. The pooled mean difference in pain score at 1 week was 3.1. At 1, 3, and 6 months, the difference in score was 4.0, 4.2, and 5.1, respectively. At 1 year, the difference was 5.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that shoulder embolization was associated with greater reduction of pain than knee embolization at 3 and 6 months (P < .001 and P = .018, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference between the sites at 1 month (P = .734). The pooled proportions of patients on analgesic medication at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 81.1%, 36.3%, 42.3%, 28.2%, and 22.4%, respectively. The pooled estimated increase in the range of motion among patients who underwent shoulder embolization was 55.6° for anterior elevation and 64.7° for abduction. CONCLUSIONS: TAE is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain.

Percutaneous stent-in-stent placement with large cell-type stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: To overcome the technical difficulty of bilateral stent-in-stent placement, large cell-type biliary stents have been developed. However, most of the studies using large cell-type stents were conducted with endoscopic method. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous stent placement with a stent-in-stent method using large cell-type stents in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From December 2015 and October 2018, 51 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction were retrospectively studied. All of the patients underwent bilateral (n=46) or unilateral (n=5) stenting in a T, Y, or X configuration with a stent-in-stent method using large cell-type stents. Technical success, complications, successful internal drainage, stent patency, and patient survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 118 stents were successfully placed in 51 patients (100.0%). Three patients had minor complications with self-limiting hemobilia. Major complications were not observed in any patient. Successful internal drainage was achieved in 45 patients (88.2%). Clinical follow-up information until death or the end of the study was available for 50 of 51 patients. The median patient survival was 285.5 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 197-374). Stent dysfunction occurred in 16 patients (35.6%) due to tumor ingrowth (n=9) or tumor ingrowth combined with biliary sludge (n=7) among the patients who achieved successful internal drainage. Median stent patency was 179 days (95% CI 104-271). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous stent-in-stent placement with large cell-type stents is technically feasible and safe, and can be an effective technique in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

The safety and efficacy of haemostasis with a catechol-conjugated, chitosan-based haemostatic dressing versus a chitosan-based haemostatic dressing after transfemoral approach for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the haemostatic efficacy (i.e. efficacy to prevent access site complications) of the InnoSEAL haemostatic pad and Clo-Sur PLUS P.A.D. after femoral arterial puncture for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of an InnoSEAL haemostatic pad (n = 48) and a Clo-Sur PLUS P.A.D. (n = 52) for haemostasis of arterial puncture sites after TACE with femoral arterial access using a 5-Fr sheath. Primary endpoints were incidence of major (necessitating surgery) and moderate access site complications (ASC) (necessitating blood transfusion/thrombin injection). Secondary endpoints were incidence of minor ASC (no therapy required) and time to haemostasis. RESULTS: No major or moderate ASC was seen with either device. Minor ASC (6.3% [3/48] vs. 19.2% [10/52], p = 0.075) and ecchymosis (classified as minor ASC; 4.2% [2/48] vs. 17.3% [9/52]; p = 0.053, p-value cut-off after Bonferroni correction = 0.025) were less frequently observed with the InnoSEAL haemostatic pad. The time to haemostasis did not differ significantly between the 2 devices (5.6 ± 1.0 vs. 5.3 ± 0.7 minutes; p = 0.118). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed a lower risk of ASC with the InnoSEAL pad (adjusted OR, 0.174; 95% CI: 0.034-0.890; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: No major ASC was seen with either pad, and no significant difference of minor ASC was observed between 2 pads.

Clinical Significance of the Initial and Best Responses after Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Preserved Liver Function.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical implications of initial and best responses during repeated transarterial chemoembolization procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 726 patients who received a diagnosis of intermediate-stage HCC with Child-Pugh class A liver function between 2007 and 2016, and who were treated with transarterial chemoembolization as the first-line treatment. Evaluation of treatment response was based on the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Overall survival (OS) was compared between response categories after implementation of landmark analysis. RESULTS: Of the 726 patients, an objective response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) was observed as the initial response in 78.1% of patients. Regarding the best response during the transarterial chemoembolization series, 87.2% of patients were overall responders. The median OS of initial responders (n = 483) was not significantly different from that of subsequent responders at the 1-year landmark (stable disease [SD] after first transarterial chemoembolization but CR or PR after repeated transarterial chemoembolization; n = 61; 46.2 vs 40.1 months, respectively; P = .145). Likewise, the median OS of initial CR patients (n = 326) was not significantly different from that of the subsequent CR group (n = 126) at the 1-year landmark (PR or SD after first transarterial chemoembolization but CR after repeated transarterial chemoembolization; 53.4 vs 46.3 months, respectively; P = .455). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that the objective responses, the initial responses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.638; P = .001), and the best responses (HR, 0.304; P < .001) had the significant prognostic significance for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Both the initial and best responses during repeated transarterial chemoembolization were significantly associated with OS in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and preserved liver function.

Outcome of Rectal Arterial Embolization for Rectal Bleeding in 34 Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study over 20 Years.

PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of rectal artery embolization (RAE) for the treatment of rectal bleeding and the prognostic factors related to recurrent bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 patients in a single center who underwent RAE for treatment of rectal bleeding between September 1998 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Procedure details including angiographic findings and embolic materials used, technical success rate, bleeding control rate during hospital stay, major adverse event rate, and prognostic factors associated with recurrent bleeding were evaluated. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 97.1% (33 of 34). Bleeding control during hospital stay was achieved in 64.7% of patients (n = 22). The most common bleeding focus was in the superior rectal artery. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 11 patients. Incomplete initial angiography with only an inferior mesenteric or internal iliac angiogram had been performed in 90.9% of patients with recurrent bleeding (10 of 11) and 52.2% of patients with bleeding control (12 of 23; P = .053). The use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate was related to a significantly lower incidence of recurrent bleeding (P = .014), whereas coagulopathy (P = .001) and transfusion of > 10 U of packed red blood cells (PRBCs; P = .003) were related to higher recurrent bleeding rates. One patient had a puncture site-related complication, and no bowel infarction was noted during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RAE was feasible and safe. The use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, presence of coagulopathy, and transfusion of > 10 U of PRBCs were significant factors related to recurrent bleeding. Bilateral inferior mesenteric artery and internal iliac artery angiography is highly recommended in the initial RAE session to achieve a high rate of bleeding control.

Drug-Eluting Microsphere Versus Cisplatin-Based Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with 30- to 60-µm drug-eluting microspheres with those of cisplatin-based TACE in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 607 patients who underwent drug-eluting microsphere (30-60 µm, loaded with doxorubicin) TACE (n = 119) or cisplatin-based TACE (n = 488) as first-line treatment of unresectable HCC between April 2017 and April 2018. With a propensity model correcting for selection bias, patients were selected from each treatment group to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting microsphere TACE with that of cisplatin TACE. RESULTS. In the entire study population, the rates of major complications (1.7% vs 1.8%, p > 0.999), objective tumor response (80.7% vs 79.7%, p = 0.899), and time to progression (p = 0.536) were not significantly different between the drug-eluting microsphere TACE and cisplatin TACE groups. However, the drug-eluting microsphere TACE group had significantly higher objective tumor regression rates in subgroups with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease (p = 0.033) and a maximal tumor size larger than 5 cm (p = 0.011). After adjustment by propensity score matching, the rates of major complications, objective tumor response, and time to progression remained similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION. Both TACE with 30- to 60-µm drug-eluting microspheres and cisplatin TACE were safe and effective for treating unresectable HCC. In patients with BCLC stage C disease and patients with large (> 5 cm) HCCs, TACE with 30- to 60-µm drug-eluting micro-spheres may have a better chance of obtaining an objective tumor response than conventional TACE performed with the protocol used in this study.

Chemoembolization Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation for Medium-Sized Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity-Score Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes of patients with single medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) who underwent treatment with transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency (RF) ablation, or a combination of the 2 therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2016, 538 patients underwent combined chemoembolization and RF ablation (n = 109), chemoembolization alone (n = 314), or RF ablation alone (n = 115) as first-line treatment for a single medium-sized (3.1-5.0 cm) HCC. Baseline demographic data (age, sex, etiology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, presence of liver cirrhosis, and serum bilirubin, albumin, and α-fetoprotein levels) were similar among groups except for Child-Pugh class, albumin level, and tumor size. Propensity-score analysis with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce any bias in treatment selection and other potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 46.2 months. Before IPW, overall survival (OS) durations were significantly different among the 3 groups (median, 85 months for combined therapy, 56.5 months for chemoembolization alone, and 52.1 months for RF ablation alone; P = .01). The 10-year OS rates were 40.1%, 25.5%, and 19.5% for the combined, chemoembolization-only, and RF ablation-only groups, respectively. After IPW, OS remained superior in the combined chemoembolization/RF ablation group compared with the monotherapy groups (10-y OS, 41.8% with combined therapy, 28.4% with chemoembolization alone, and 11.9% with RF ablation alone; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Chemoembolization plus RF ablation may provide better survival outcomes than chemoembolization or RF ablation monotherapy, and can be considered a viable alternative treatment for unresectable single medium-sized HCCs.

Angiographic management of percutaneous renal procedure-related bleeding: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: To present the radiological and clinical results of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with active bleeding after percutaneous renal procedures. METHODS: A total of 79 consecutive patients who underwent angiography for percutaneous renal procedure-related bleeding were included in the present retrospective analysis. Patient characteristics, angiographic management and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: On angiography, bleeding foci were observed in 81.0% of the patients (64/79), all of whom underwent transcatheter arterial embolization. Among the 15 patients (19.0%) with negative angiographic findings, empirical transcatheter arterial embolization was carried out in six patients (40.0%). The technical success rate in 64 patients with positive angiographic findings was 100%, and the clinical success rate in 70 patients who underwent transcatheter arterial embolization was 85.7% (60/70). A total of 14.3% (10/70) of patients with clinical failure underwent repeat transcatheter arterial embolization and all achieved clinical recovery. There were no major complications. There was no statistical difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate values before the percutaneous renal procedure and those measured 7 days after transcatheter arterial embolization (43.4 ± 24.4 to 44.6 ± 25.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; P = 0.189). Clinical failure was not associated with age, sex, type of renal procedures, bleeding tendency, presence of active bleeding on angiography, latency time and embolic agents used (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter arterial embolization is a safe and effective method of treating percutaneous renal procedure-related bleeding without renal function deterioration.

Chemoembolization related to good survival for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading segmental portal vein.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival after TACE in a large cohort of 331 patients with HCC with segmental PVTT. METHODS: From 1997 to 2015, a total of 331 patients were included in this study from among 507 patients who underwent TACE as a first-line treatment for HCC with segmental PVTT. RESULTS: After TACE, the median survival of the whole cohort was 10.7 months, and the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 44.9%, 16% and 12% respectively. Objective tumour response after TACE was achieved in 53.8% of patients. Multivariable Cox regression analyses confirmed that up-to-11 criteria, extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh class, and tumour response to TACE were independent prognostic factors for patient survival. The expected median survival times among patients with 0, 1 and 2-4 risk factors were 29.1, 15.1 and 5.3 months respectively. The 30-day mortality and major complications rates after TACE were 0.9% and 5.4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TACE was well-tolerated and effective in selected patients with HCC with segmental PVTT. We found that four risk factors were associated with decreased length of patient survival after TACE: a major tumour burden (up-to-11 criteria out), extrahepatic spread, Child-Pugh class B liver function and nonregression to TACE. TACE may not be recommended for HCC patients with segmental PVTT with 2-4 risk factors because of poor survival outcome.

Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis: clinical outcomes of 271 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC). METHODS: The study population comprised 271 patients (mean age, 72 years; range, 22-97 years, male, n=169) with AAC treated with PC with or without subsequent cholecystectomy. Clinical data from total 271 patients were analysed, and outcomes were assessed according to whether the catheter was removed or remained indwelling. Patient survival and recurrence rates were calculated. RESULTS: Symptom resolution and significant improvement of laboratory test values were achieved in 235 patients (86.7%) within 4 days after PC. Complications occurred in six patients (2.2%). Interval elective cholecystectomy was performed in 127 (46.8%) patients. Among the remaining 121 patients, successful removal of the PC catheter was achieved in 88 patients (72.7%) at a mean of 30 days (range, 4-365 days). Of the catheter removal group, 86/88 (97.7%) were successfully treated with the initial PC, whereas two (2.3%) experienced recurrence of cholecystitis. Cumulative recurrence rates were 1.1%, 2.7%, and 2.7% at 1, 2, and 8 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The good therapeutic outcomes of PC and low recurrence rate suggest that PC can be a definitive treatment option in the majority of AAC patients. KEY POINTS: • Many patients with AAC are too ill to undergo cholecystectomy. • PC in AAC patients shows low complication and recurrence rate. • PC solely can be a definitive treatment option in the majority of AAC patients.

Endovascular treatment for the control of active vaginal bleeding from uterine cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Background Endovascular treatment has become a significant therapeutic option for the management of intractable bleeding in gynecologic malignancies. However, the endovascular treatment types were almost never mentioned when active bleeding from different arteries was identified. Purpose To present angiographic details and evaluate clinical efficacy of endovascular treatments to control active vaginal bleeding in uterine cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Material and Methods In this retrospective study, six, consecutive cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy who underwent endovascular treatment for active vaginal bleeding were included. Angiographic findings, endovascular treatment details, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Results Ten endovascular procedures were technically successful, in which bleeding arteries were the internal iliac artery/its branches (n = 5), external iliac artery (EIA) (n = 3), uterine artery (n = 1), and superior rectal artery (n = 1), and bleeding manifested as contrast extravasation (n = 6), pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), or both (n = 3). Three of the four repeated procedures showed different bleeding sites from the primary ones. Stent graft was inserted to preserve the patency of the bleeding EIA in two patients. For another EIA rupture, both proximal and distal embolization were performed, followed by femoral-to-femoral bypass to preserve blood flow. Bleeding control within one month was achieved in 80% (8/10). One minor complication, mild transient pelvic pain, occurred in one patient. Conclusions Various endovascular treatment was feasible and effective to control active vaginal bleeding from cervical cancer. Repeated procedures showed commonly different bleeding foci and stent graft insertion was effective for preserving the patency of the large bleeding artery.

Clinical Outcomes for Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Disease Using the Seal Thoracic Stent Graft: A Korean Multicenter Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the midterm outcomes of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) with the use of the Seal stent graft for four categories of thoracic aortic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study evaluated the records of 216 Korean patients who underwent TEVAR with the Seal stent graft during 2007-2010. The study outcomes were (i) perioperative death, (ii) endoleak, (iii) repeat intervention, (iv) aortic-related death, and (v) all sudden unexplained late deaths. RESULTS: The overall technical success rate was 94% (203 cases), and the disease-specific rates were 97% (88 cases) for aneurysms, 96% (71 cases) for dissections, 82% (32 cases) for traumatic aortic disease, and 100% (12 cases) for intramural hematoma and/or penetrating aortic ulcer. There were 6 acute surgical conversions (2 for aneurysms and 4 for dissections). There were 18 endoleaks, 4 retrograde ascending aortic dissections, and 6 stent graft-induced new entries. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 93% ± 3, 90% ± 4, and 90% ± 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR with the Seal thoracic stent graft provided a high technical success rate and low mortality and complication rates during midterm follow-up. However, additional long-term studies are needed to evaluate the durability and late complications associated with this device.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Associated with Gastric Carcinoma: Prognostic Factors Predicting Successful Hemostasis and Survival.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for gastric cancer-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and factors associated with successful TAE and improved survival after TAE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 43 patients (34 men; age 60.6 y ± 13.6) with gastric cancer-related GI bleeding undergoing angiography between January 2000 and December 2015. Clinical course, laboratory findings, and TAE characteristics were reviewed. Technical success of TAE was defined as target area devascularization, and clinical success was defined as bleeding cessation with hemodynamic stability during 72 hours after TAE. Student t test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of successful TAE and 30-day survival after TAE. RESULTS: TAE was performed in 40 patients. Technical and clinical success rates of TAE were 85.0% and 65.0%, respectively. Splenic infarction occurred in 2 patients as a minor complication. Rebleeding after TAE occurred in 7 patients. Death related to bleeding occurred in 5 patients. Active bleeding (P = .044) and higher transfusion requirement (3.3 U ± 2.6 vs 1.8 U ± 1.7; P = .039) were associated with TAE failure. Successful TAE predicted improved 30-day survival after TAE on univariate and multivariate analysis (P = .018 and P = .022; odds ratio, 0.132). CONCLUSION: TAE for gastric cancer-associated GI bleeding may be a lifesaving procedure. Severe bleeding with a higher transfusion requirement and active bleeding on angiography predicted TAE failure.

Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Control of Hematuria in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Nine patients with advanced prostate cancer (stage T4) underwent prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) for refractory prostatic hematuria. Angiograms showed prostatic neovascularity in all cases, and complete PAE was achieved in 8 cases (89% technical success rate). Gross hematuria ceased after PAE in 6 cases, translating to a 67% clinical success rate. There were no PAE-related complications. At 3-month follow-up, 2 cases showed recurrent hematuria, 4 patients had died from PAE-unrelated etiologies, and only 3 patients survived and were without gross hematuria. PAE could represent an alternative option for patients with advanced prostate cancer to control hematuria.

Embolization for Bleeding after Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and clinical efficacy of embolization for management of bleeding after hepatic radiofrequency (RF) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2014, 5,196 patients with 9,743 tumors underwent 8,303 RF ablation sessions. Of these patients, 62 experienced bleeding after hepatic RF ablation; 15 patients (12 men and 3 women; mean age 62 y; range, 49-76 y) underwent embolization and composed the final study cohort. Tumors were hepatocellular carcinomas in 13 (87%) patients and metastatic adenocarcinomas from colorectal cancer in 2 (13%) patients. Mean number of tumors was 1.5 (22 nodules; range, 1-3). Tumor locations were segment I (n = 1), segment II (n = 2), segment III (n = 1), segment IV (n = 1), segment V (n = 3), segment VI (n = 5), segment VII (n = 1), and segment VIII (n = 9). Mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (range, 0.9-5 cm). RESULTS: Median time interval between presentation and angiography was 22 hours (mean 38.4 h; range, 3-168 h). On angiography, contrast extravasation with or without pseudoaneurysm was seen in all 15 patients; 14 patients underwent transarterial embolization, and 1 patient underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. Successful hemostasis was achieved in all patients. There was no rebleeding within 30 days after embolization. No embolization-related major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization is safe and effective for controlling bleeding related to hepatic RF ablation without the need for surgery.

Arterial dissections during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 19-year clinical experience at a single medical institution.

Background Arterial dissections during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures are not rare and can limit the successful treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose To evaluate the incidence of arterial dissections during TACE procedures, the rate of spontaneous lumen recovery, and the predictive factors of dissecting stenosis during follow-up. Material and Methods Based on 69,651 TACE procedures from 1997 to 2016, patients who had procedure-related arterial dissections were identified by procedure report search. More than two months after the date of dissection, dissecting stenosis was evaluated using a three-grade scale: subclinical narrowing with diameter loss under 30%, overt stenosis with diameter loss over 30%, and occlusion. Pearson Chi-square and two-sample t-test were used to assess potential prognostic markers for dissecting stenosis. Results Eighty-four arterial dissections directly related to TACE were identified in 83 patients, resulting in an incidence of 0.12% (84/69651). After more than two months, normal or subclinical narrowing, overt stenosis, occlusion, and doubling were seen in 39 (46.4%), 26 (31.0%), 13 (15.5%), and one (1.2%) patients, respectively. No follow-up images were obtained for five (6.0%) patients. On univariate analysis, the dissection ratio (the ratio of the length to the diameter of the dissection) alone was related to dissecting stenosis ( P = 0.035). Conclusion The incidence of iatrogenic dissection during TACE was approximately 0.12%. Less than 50% of the iatrogenic dissections showed normal or subclinical narrowing during follow-up of at least two months. The dissection ratio alone was the predictive factor for dissecting stenosis during follow-up.

Endovascular management for significant iatrogenic portal vein bleeding.

Background Despite conservative treatment, hemorrhage from an intrahepatic branch of the portal vein can cause hemodynamic instability requiring urgent intervention. Purpose To retrospectively report the outcomes of hemodynamically significant portal vein bleeding after endovascular management. Material and Methods During a period of 15 years, four patients (2 men, 2 women; median age, 70.5 years) underwent angiography and embolization for iatrogenic portal vein bleeding. Causes of hemorrhage, angiographic findings, endovascular treatment, and complications were reported. Results Portal vein bleeding occurred after percutaneous liver biopsy (n = 2), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (n = 1), and percutaneous cholecystostomy (n = 1). The median time interval between angiography and percutaneous procedure was 5 h (range, 4-240 h). Common hepatic angiograms including indirect mesenteric portograms showed active portal vein bleeding into the peritoneal cavity with (n = 1) or without (n = 2) an arterioportal (AP) fistula, and portal vein pseudoaneurysm alone with an AP fistula (n = 1). Successful transcatheter arterial embolization (n = 2) or percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization (n = 2) was performed. Embolic materials were n-butyl cyanoacrylate alone (n = 2) or in combination with gelatin sponge particles and coils (n = 2). There were no major treatment-related complications or patient mortality within 30 days. Conclusion Patients with symptomatic or life-threatening portal vein bleeding following liver-penetrating procedures can successfully be managed with embolization.