Feasibility of Using Population Pharmacokinetics-Based Virtual Control Groups in Organ Impairment Studies.

This work aimed to assess the feasibility of using population pharmacokinetics (popPK) to generate virtual healthy control groups in organ impairment studies. Data from 11 organ impairment studies containing 18 organ impairment arms and 13 healthy control groups across 7 drugs were analyzed. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were calculated from popPK-simulated individual concentration-time profiles for participants in the healthy control groups, accounting for the participant's specific covariate(s) (N = 1000 replicates). The AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios (GMRs; simulated healthy control/observed healthy control and observed organ impairment/simulated healthy control) were calculated. The simulated healthy control group geometric mean exposures were within 30% of the observed geometric mean exposures in 8 of the 11 studies (73%). The number of organ impairment arms for which the observed GMR (observed organ impairment/observed healthy control) and median of simulation-based GMRs (observed organ impairment/simulated healthy control) for AUC and Cmax being within the same fold change were 12 (67%) and 13 (72%) arms, respectively. The number of organ impairment arms for which the median of simulation-based AUC and Cmax GMRs were within the 90% confidence interval of the observed GMRs were 14 (72%) and 15 (83%), respectively. Poor concordance was observed for 1 drug (3 arms), where healthy participants' data were not incorporated in the popPK model. This work supports using popPK-based virtual control groups in organ impairment studies. Subsequent work should aim to establish best practices for constructing popPK-based virtual control groups.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Firsocostat, an Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase Inhibitor, in Participants with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Hepatic Impairment.

Firsocostat is an oral, liver-targeted inhibitor of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides play a significant role in the disposition of firsocostat with minimal contributions from uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase and cytochrome P450 3A enzymes. This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of firsocostat in participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment. Participants with stable mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, B, or C, respectively [n = 10 per cohort]) and healthy matched controls with normal hepatic function (n = 10 per cohort) received a single oral dose of firsocostat (20 mg for mild and moderate hepatic impairment; 5 mg for severe hepatic impairment) with intensive pharmacokinetic sampling over 96 h. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Firsocostat plasma exposure (AUCinf) was 83%, 8.7-fold, and 30-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, relative to matched controls. Firsocostat was generally well tolerated, and all reported adverse events were mild in nature. Dose adjustment is not necessary for the administration of firsocostat in patients with mild hepatic impairment. However, based on the observed increases in firsocostat exposure, dose adjustment should be considered for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, and additional safety and efficacy data from future clinical trials will further inform dose adjustment.

Evaluation of the Effects of Meal Type and Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Cilofexor, a Selective Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist.

Cilofexor is a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor agonist being developed in combination with firsocostat/semaglutide for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This phase 1 study evaluated the effects of food and acid-reducing agents (ARAs) on the pharmacokinetics of cilofexor (100- or 30-mg fixed-dose combination with firsocostat) in healthy participants. Cohorts 1 (n = 20, 100 mg) and 2 (n = 30, 30 mg) followed a 3-period, 2-sequence crossover design and evaluated effects of light-fat and high-fat meals. Cohort 3 (n = 30, 100 mg fasting) followed a 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design and evaluated the effects of a 40-mg single dose of famotidine. Cohort 4 (n = 18, 100 mg) followed a 3-period, 2-sequence crossover design and evaluated the effects of a 40-mg once-daily regimen of omeprazole administered under fasting conditions or following a light-fat meal. Administration with light-fat or high-fat meals resulted in no change and an ∼35% reduction in cilofexor AUC, respectively, relative to the fasting conditions. Under fasting conditions, famotidine increased cilofexor AUC by 3.2-fold and Cmax by 6.1-fold, while omeprazole increased cilofexor AUC by 3.1-fold and Cmax by 4.8-fold. With a low-fat meal, omeprazole increased cilofexor exposure to a lesser extent (Cmax 2.5-fold, AUC 2.1-fold) than fasting conditions. This study suggests that caution should be exercised when cilofexor is administered with ARAs under fed conditions; coadministration of cilofexor (100 or 30 mg) with ARAs under fasting conditions is not recommended with the current clinical trial formulations.

Gender Affirming Hormones Do Not Affect the Exposure and Efficacy of F/TDF or F/TAF for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: A Subgroup Analysis from the DISCOVER Trial.

Purpose: Transgender women are disproportionately affected by HIV and are underutilizing preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The lower uptake of PrEP by transgender women may be, in part, owing to the perception that taking PrEP may lower the efficacy of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or to provider concerns that GAHT may lower the efficacy of PrEP. Methods: DISCOVER was a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial comparing emtricitabine (FTC, F) and tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) versus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) as PrEP among transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM). This nested substudy of the DISCOVER trial compared the exposure of the active intracellular metabolites of FTC and tenofovir (TFV), FTC triphosphate (FTC-TP) and TFV diphosphate (TFV-DP), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) among transgender women receiving GAHT versus MSM within the F/TAF and F/TDF groups. Results: Our results demonstrate that TFV-DP and FTC-TP levels in PBMC were comparable between transgender women on GAHT and MSM receiving F/TAF, and between transgender women on GAHT and MSM receiving F/TDF. TFV-DP concentrations remained above the EC90 of 40 fmol/106 cells across all groups. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions of GAHT were observed with either F/TAF or F/TDF in this subanalysis. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the clinical pharmacology of GAHT, FTC, TDF, and TAF reported in previous studies, and support the continued use of F/TAF and F/TDF for PrEP in transgender women.Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02842086.

An integrated approach for establishing dosing recommendations: paliperidone for the treatment of adolescent schizophrenia.

The Food and Drug Administration recently approved Invega for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents 12 to 17 years. If dosing recommendations for this population would have been based only on the results of the single efficacy trial included in this program, paliperidone dosing in adolescents might have been limited to 3 mg/d in adolescents less than 51 kg and to 6 mg/d in adolescents greater than or equal to 51 kg. This article provides an illustration of a more integrated approach to arrive at dosing recommendation that included practical considerations, modeling and simulation of data from the clinical trial, and the totality of evidence for both paliperidone and the parent drug, risperidone. On the basis of this integrated approach, the agency approved a starting dose of 3 mg/d in both adolescent weight groups and subsequent dosing in a range of 3 to 6 mg/d for adolescents less than 51 kg and 3 to 12 mg/d for adolescents greater than 51 kg, although the 3-mg dose was not evaluated in the greater than or equal to 51-kg group.

Characterization of the US Food and Drug Administration Post-Marketing Commitments and Requirements for Pregnancy and Lactation.

Enactment of the US Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) in 2007 and the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) in 2015 are important milestones giving the FDA the authority to request studies in pregnant and lactating women. Our objective was to characterize trends of pregnancy and lactation-related postmarketing commitments (PMCs) and postmarketing requirements (PMRs) for new molecular entities approved by the FDA between 2000 and 2022. Approval letters of original New Drug Applications (NDAs, N = 488) for new molecular entities were obtained from the FDA website. NDAs with pregnancy and lactation-based PMCs/PMRs were identified, and data extracted. Data included: PMC/PMR timelines and attributes of requested study(ies) (type, design elements, and outcomes) when available. Fifty-nine NDAs included 92 PMCs/PMRs related to pregnancy and lactation. Forty-one NDAs had pregnancy-related PMRs/PMCs, 4 had lactation-related PMRs, and 14 had both. Most PMRs/PMCs were for nervous system medications (N = 33). Forty-seven NDAs specified safety data collection in infants in at least the first year of life. All pregnancy-related PMRs were issued after 2008, most PMCs (N = 8) were issued before 2008. Only one PMC requested a pharmacokinetic study in pregnant women. All lactation-related PMRs (N = 18) requested measurement of drug concentrations in breast milk with one also requiring measurement of maternal blood concentrations. Eighty-nine percent of lactation-related PMRs were requested after 2015. There was a steady increase in pregnancy and lactation-related PMRs following enactment of FDAAA and PLLR. Additions involved information collection pertaining to safety of the medication in pregnant and lactating women and children exposed to medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Design and conduct considerations for studies in patients with hepatic impairment.

Despite the liver being the primary site for clearance of xenobiotics utilizing a myriad of mechanisms ranging from cytochrome P450 enzyme pathways, glucuronidation, and biliary excretion, there is a dearth of information available as to how the severity of hepatic impairment (HI) can alter drug absorption and disposition (i.e., pharmacokinetics [PK]) as well as their efficacy and safety or pharmacodynamics (PD). In general, regulatory agencies recommend conducting PK studies in subjects with HI when hepatic metabolism/excretion accounts for more than 20% of drug elimination or if the drug has a narrow therapeutic range. In this tutorial, we provide an overview of the global regulatory landscape, clinical measures for hepatic function assessment, methods to stage HI severity, and consequently the impact on labeling. In addition, we provide an in-depth practical guidance for designing and conducting clinical trials for patients with HI and on the application of modeling and simulation strategies in lieu of dedicated trials for dosing recommendations in patients with HI.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of cilofexor, a novel nonsteroidal Farnesoid X receptor agonist, in healthy volunteers.

Cilofexor is a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist being evaluated for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). This work characterized the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic, safety, and tolerability of cilofexor in healthy participants. Cilofexor single and multiple once-daily doses (10 to 300 mg fasting or fed and twice-daily doses [15 and 50 mg; fed]; tablet formulation) were evaluated. In each cohort, participants were randomized to active drug or placebo in a 4:1 ratio (planned n = 15/cohort). Multiple dosing was for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic samples were collected and safety and tolerability were assessed. Overall, 120 participants were enrolled in the study and 118 participants received at least one dose of study drug. Cilofexor pharmacokinetics followed bi-exponential disposition and its exposure increased in a less-than-dose-proportional manner over the 10 to 300 mg dose range, with no significant accumulation with repeated dosing. Moderate-fat meal reduced cilofexor area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) by 21% to 45%. Cilofexor increased plasma levels of fibroblast growth factor19 (FGF19) and reduced the serum bile acid intermediate 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and bile acids in an exposure-dependent manner. Cilofexor doses >30 mg appeared to achieve the plateau of intestinal FXR activation. Cilofexor was generally well tolerated; all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild or moderate in severity, with headache being the most frequently observed TEAE. The pharmacokinetics pharmacodynamic safety, and tolerability results from this study supported further evaluations, and informed dose selection, of cilofexor in phase II studies in patients with NASH and PSC.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cilofexor, a Selective Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist.

Cilofexor is a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor agonist in clinical development for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This work characterized the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of cilofexor in participants with normal hepatic function or hepatic impairment (HI). Participants with stable mild, moderate, or severe HI (Child-Pugh [CP] A, B, or C, respectively, [n = 10/group]) and healthy matched controls with normal hepatic function received a single oral dose of cilofexor (30 mg for CP-A or B; 10 mg for CP-C) with a standardized meal. Overall, 56 participants received cilofexor and completed the study. Cilofexor area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 76%, 2.5-fold, and 6.3-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI, respectively, relative to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in matched participants with normal hepatic function. Cilofexor unbound fraction was 38%, 2-fold, and 3.16-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, relative to participants with normal hepatic function. Moderate correlations were identified between cilofexor exposure and CP score or laboratory tests components of CP score. Serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one and plasma fibroblast growth factor 19 were similar in participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI and participants with normal hepatic function. Cilofexor was generally well tolerated; all cilofexor-related adverse events were mild in severity. Cilofexor can be administered to patients with mild HI without dose adjustment. Caution and dose modification are warranted when administering cilofexor to patients with moderate or severe HI.

Evaluation of the Potential for Cytochrome P450 and Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions for Cilofexor, a Selective Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) Agonist.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cilofexor is a selective farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist in development for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Our objective was to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions of cilofexor as a victim and as a perpetrator. METHODS: In this Phase 1 study, healthy adult participants (n = 18-24 per each of the 6 cohorts) were administered cilofexor in combination with either perpetrators or substrates of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes and drug transporters. RESULTS: In total, 131 participants completed the study. As a victim, cilofexor area under the curve (AUC) was 651%, 795%, and 175% when administered following single-dose cyclosporine (600 mg; organic anion transporting polypeptide [OATP]/P-glycoprotein [P-gp]/CYP3A inhibitor), single-dose rifampin (600 mg; OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor), and multiple-dose gemfibrozil (600 mg twice daily [BID]; CYP2C8 inhibitor), respectively, compared with the administration of cilofexor alone. Cilofexor AUC was 33% when administered following multiple-dose rifampin (600 mg; OATP/CYP/P-gp inducer). Multiple-dose voriconazole (200 mg BID; CYP3A4 inhibitor) and grapefruit juice (16 ounces; intestinal OATP inhibitor) did not affect cilofexor exposure. As a perpetrator, multiple-dose cilofexor did not affect the exposure of midazolam (2 mg; CYP3A substrate), pravastatin (40 mg; OATP substrate), or dabigatran etexilate (75 mg; intestinal P-gp substrate), but atorvastatin (10 mg; OATP/CYP3A4 substrate) AUC was 139% compared with atorvastatin administered alone. CONCLUSION: Cilofexor may be coadministered with inhibitors of P-gp, CYP3A4, or CYP2C8 without the need for dose modification. Cilofexor may be coadministered with OATP, BCRP, P-gp, and/or CYP3A4 substrates-including statins-without dose modification. However, coadministration of cilofexor with strong hepatic OATP inhibitors, or with strong or moderate inducers of OATP/CYP2C8, is not recommended.

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Firsocostat, an Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase Inhibitor, and Cilofexor, a Selective Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist.

Firsocostat, a liver-targeted acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor, and cilofexor, a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor agonist, are being developed in combination for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This phase 1 study evaluated firsocostat and cilofexor pharmacokinetics and tolerability in participants with severe renal impairment (SRI) and healthy matched controls (HMCs). Ten participants with SRI (estimated glomerular filtration rate by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ), and 10 HMCs received single oral doses of firsocostat (20 mg) on day 1 and cilofexor (100 mg) on day 7 in a fasted state. Plasma concentrations of firsocostat (and nonactive metabolite GS-834773) and cilofexor (and nonactive metabolites GS-716070 and GS-1056756) were collected over 96 hours and quantified; plasma exposures (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] and peak concentration [Cmax ]) and plasma protein binding were characterized. Firsocostat AUC was ≈40% higher in SRI versus HMC, while Cmax was 8% lower. Observed exposures of the firsocostat metabolite were ≈4.6-fold higher in SRI participants versus HMC. Exposures (AUC and Cmax ) of cilofexor and metabolites and percentages of protein binding of all analytes were similar between SRI and HMC groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild and not considered related to study drug. A <50% increase in firsocostat exposure was observed among SRI participants but was deemed not clinically relevant. There was no apparent effect of SRI on cilofexor exposure. Based on this trial, firsocostat and cilofexor dosing are not expected to require modification in patients who are renally impaired.

Clinical Pharmacology Applications of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Drug Development and Approval-An Industry Perspective.

Since the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law in 2016, real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) have attracted great interest from the healthcare ecosystem globally. The potential and capability of RWD/RWE to inform regulatory decisions and clinical drug development have been extensively reviewed and discussed in the literature. However, a comprehensive review of current applications of RWD/RWE in clinical pharmacology, particularly from an industry perspective, is needed to inspire new insights and identify potential future opportunities for clinical pharmacologists to utilize RWD/RWE to address key drug development questions. In this paper, we review the RWD/RWE applications relevant to clinical pharmacology based on recent publications from member companies in the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) RWD Working Group, and discuss the future direction of RWE utilization from a clinical pharmacology perspective. A comprehensive review of RWD/RWE use cases is provided and discussed in the following categories of application: drug-drug interaction assessments, dose recommendation for patients with organ impairment, pediatric plan development and study design, model-informed drug development (e.g., disease progression modeling), prognostic and predictive biomarkers/factors identification, regulatory decisions support (e.g., label expansion), and synthetic/external control generation for rare diseases. Additionally, we describe and discuss common sources of RWD to help guide appropriate data selection to address questions pertaining to clinical pharmacology in drug development and regulatory decision making.

Model-Informed Approaches and Innovative Clinical Trial Design for Adeno-Associated Viral Vector-Based Gene Therapy Product Development: A White Paper.

The promise of viral vector-based gene therapy (GT) as a transformative paradigm for treating severely debilitating and life-threatening diseases is slowly coming to fruition with the recent approval of several drug products. However, they have a unique mechanism of action often necessitating a tortuous clinical development plan. Expertise in such complex therapeutic modality is still fairly limited in this emerging class of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-based gene therapies. Because of the irreversible mode of action and incomplete understanding of genotype-phenotype relationship and disease progression in rare diseases careful considerations should be given to GT product's benefit-risk profile. In particular, special attention needs to be paid to safe dose selection, reliable dose exposure response (including clinically relevant endpoints), or creative approaches in study design targeting small patient populations during clinical development. We believe that quantitative tools encompassed within model-informed drug development (MIDD) framework fits quite well in the development of such novel therapies, as they enable us to benefit from the totality of data approach in order to support dose selection as well as optimize clinical trial designs, end point selection, and patient enrichment. In this thought leadership paper, we provide our collective experiences, identify challenges, and suggest areas of improvement in applications of modeling and innovative trial design in development of AAV-based GT products and reflect on the challenges and opportunities for incorporating MIDD tools and more in rational development of these products.

Glutathione conjugation of busulfan produces a hydroxyl radical-trapping dehydroalanine metabolite.

The Phase 2 drug metabolism of busulfan yields a glutathione conjugate that undergoes a ß-elimination reaction. The elimination product is an electrophilic metabolite that is a dehydroalanine-containing tripeptide, γ-glutamyldehydroalanylglycine (EdAG). In the process, glutathione lacks thiol-related redox properties and gains a radical scavenging dehydroalanine group. EdAG scavenged hydroxyl radical generated in the Fenton reaction in a concentration-dependent manner was monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The apparent rate of hydroxyl radical scavenging was in the same range as published values for known antioxidants, including N-acyl dehydroalanines. A captodatively stabilized carbon-centered radical intermediate was spin trapped in the reaction of EdAG with hydroxyl radical. The proposed structure of a stable product in the Fenton reaction with EdAG was consistent with that of a γ-glutamylserylglycyl dimer. Observation of the hydroxyl trapping properties of EdAG suggests that the busulfan metabolite EdAG may contribute to or mitigate redox-related cytotoxicity associated with the therapeutic use of busulfan, and reaffirms indicators that support a role in free radical biology for dehydroalanine-containing peptides and proteins.

Overview of Clinical Pharmacology Packages of New Drug Applications Approved for the Treatment of Rare Diseases.

There are more than 7000 rare diseases affecting approximately 30 million people in the United States. More than 90% of these diseases lack approved therapies. Several challenges face the development of "orphan drugs", such as the small populations of patients, high development costs, and long development timelines. This study evaluates clinical pharmacology assessments conducted during the development of drugs to treat rare diseases approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and 2021. Thirty-nine new drug applications (NDAs) have been identified and the associated regulatory reviews, approved labels, and approval letters were reviewed. Approximately, 95%, 74%, and 77% of these submissions contained at least one type of drug-drug interaction, the effect of organ impairment (hepatic and renal) on drug exposure, and QT liability assessment, respectively. Modeling and simulation approaches were utilized to address many clinical pharmacology questions, with population pharmacokinetic analyses used extensively in the evaluation of the effect of organ impairment on drug exposure and with physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses used mainly in assessing drug interaction risks. In general, the clinical pharmacology packages in the NDAs of orphan drugs are not optimal and more work is needed to obtain a complete clinical pharmacology package at the time of initial approval to ensure the safe and effective use of these drugs across the spectrum of the target patient population. This study provides insights into the clinical pharmacology studies needed for drugs to treat rare diseases and would help both the regulators and drug developers to identify challenges and opportunities in conducting clinical pharmacology assessments for drugs developed to treat rare diseases.

Trends in FDA Transporter-Based Post-Marketing Requirements and Commitments Over the Last Decade.

Characterizing interactions between new molecular entities (NMEs) and drug transporters is a critical element of drug development that helps in assessing potential transporter-based drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, not all NME new drug applications (NDAs) include a full characterization of NMEs transporter-based DDIs, which necessitates the issuance of post-marketing requirement (PMR)/post-marketing commitment (PMC) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to characterize these potential interactions. The objective of this analysis is to identify trends in transporter-based PMRs/PMCs issued by the FDA between 2012 and 2021. A decrease in the number of transporter-based PMRs/PMCs was observed from 2012 to 2016 and an increasing trend in the number of PMRs/PMCs was observed after 2017. The majority of these transporter-based PMRs/PMCs requested clinical evaluation (48%), some requested in vitro assessment (38%), and 2.5% requested modeling and simulation assessment. Most of the PMRs/PMCs requested evaluation of NMEs as perpetrator with the efflux transporters, P-gp and/or BCRP (53%). Forty-eight percent of the PMRs/PMCs were fulfilled with 67% resulted in labeling updates. On average, 2.5 years were needed for the information related to PMRs/PMCs to show in NMEs labeling. In conclusion, this analysis highlights the increased emphasis from the FDA on proper characterization of transporter-based DDI and call for the need of early characterization of NMEs-transporters interaction before initial NDA approval.

Time to Rethink the Current Paradigm for Assessing Kidney Function in Drug Development and Beyond.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important health issue that affects ~ 9.1% of the world adult population. Serum creatinine is the most commonly used biomarker for assessing kidney function and is utilized in different equations for estimating creatinine clearance or glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The Cockcroft-Gault formula for adults and "original" Schwartz formula for children have been the most commonly used equations for estimating kidney function during the last 3-4 decades. Introduction of standardized serum creatinine bioanalytical methodology has reduced interlaboratory variability but is not intended to be used with Cockcroft-Gault or original Schwartz equations. More accurate equations (for instance, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) for adults and bedside Schwartz or Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Schwartz equation for children) based on standardized serum creatinine values (and another biomarker-cystatin C) have been introduced and validated in recent years. Recently, the CKD-EPI equation refitted without a race variable was introduced. Clinical practice guidance in nephrology advocates a shift to these equations for managing health care of patients with CKD. The guidance also recommends use of albuminuria in addition to GFR for CKD diagnosis and management. Significant research with large data sets would be necessary to evaluate whether this paradigm would also be valuable in drug dose adjustments. This article attempts to highlight some important advancements in the field from a clinical pharmacology perspective and is a call to action to industry, regulators, and academia to rethink the current paradigm for assessing kidney function to enable dose recommendation in patients with CKD.

Evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration Drug Label Recommendations for Coadministration of Antivirals and Acid-Reducing Agents.

Coadministration with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine H2 -receptor antagonists (H2 blockers), and antacids has been demonstrated to reduce antiviral exposure and efficacy. Therefore, it is essential that US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels include recommendations to manage these drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This investigation analyzed information in FDA drug labels to manage DDIs between ARAs and antivirals approved from 1998 to 2019. To ascertain clinical adoption, we assessed whether FDA label recommendations were incorporated into current antiviral clinical practice guidelines. We identified 82 label recommendations for 43 antiviral approvals. Overall, 56.1% of recommendations were deemed clinically actionable, with the most common actionable management strategies being dose adjustment during coadministration (40.2%) and coadministration not recommended (9.8%). The sources informing DDI recommendations were clinical DDI studies (59.8%) and predictions of altered exposure (40.2%). Antivirals with low aqueous solubility were more likely to have label recommendations and were more commonly investigated using clinical DDI studies (P < 0.01). For recommendations informed by clinical DDI studies, changes in drug exposure were associated with actionable label recommendations (P < 0.01). The frequency of exposure changes in clinical DDI studies was similar across antiviral indications, but exposure changes were numerically higher for antacids (71.4%) relative to PPIs (42.9%) and H2 blockers (28.6%). Of DDI pairs identified within drug labels, 76.8% were included in guidelines, and recommended management strategies were concordant in 90.5% of cases. Our findings demonstrate that current regulatory oversight mostly (but not completely) results in actionable label recommendations to manage DDIs for high-risk antivirals.

Concordance of Exposure Changes Because of Renal Impairment Between Results of Dedicated Renal Impairment Studies and Population Pharmacokinetic Predictions.

This analysis compared the results from noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) predictions of exposure changes in patients with renal impairment (RI) for 27 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved between 2000 and 2015. Renal function was identified as a covariate in the final PopPK model for 17 NMEs. The final PopPK model was used to simulate (n = 1000 replicates/individual) the results of a dedicated PK study in subjects with renal impairment. For the majority of NMEs, concordance between observed, and predicted area under the curve (AUC) geometric mean ratio (GMR) was observed (ie, in 17, 11, and 11 NMEs for mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, the observed and predicted AUC GMR were within the same fold of change). Inclusion of colinear covariates in the PopPK model appeared to be the major driver for the NMEs for which there was discordance. PopPK, when done properly, is a valuable tool for supporting labeling recommendations for subjects with renal impairment.

Shortened Positive and Negative Symptom Scale as an Alternate Clinical Endpoint for Acute Schizophrenia Trials: Analysis from the US Food & Drug Administration.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the individual Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) items, and to assess the feasibility of using a shortened version of the PANSS as an alternative regulatory endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of drugs to treat schizophrenia. Design: Data from 32 randomized, placebo-controlled, multiregional trials from eight atypical antipsychotic programs (N=14,219) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration were used in the analyses. Item response theory analysis on baseline PANSS item scores was used to identify the best performing items of the PANSS to derive the shortened, or modified, PANSS (mPANSS). Concordance rates of mPANSS total with the PANSS total trial results at week 6 were examined, and implications of using mPANSS on trial sample size evaluated. Results: Five of the positive items, six of the negative items, and eight of the general items were assessed as sensitive to describe the underlying symptom severity and comprise mPANSS. The overall concordance rate between mPANSS and total PANSS results at week 6 was 97.6%. Using mPANSS resulted in a 32% reduction in samples size relative to using total PANSS. Conclusions: Based on this research, mPANSS may be considered a potential alternative clinical endpoint for acute schizophrenia trials. However, it will need psychometric validation before it can be fully implemented in clinical trials in place of total PANSS. If such implementation occurs, the development of new drugs for schizophrenia, a public health imperative, may be considerably improved.