RESUMO
Objective: Managing endometrial cancer with suspected or gross cervical involvement lacks a standard approach. This study evaluated outcomes in patients with cervical and/or parametrial involvement treated with neoadjuvant radiation followed by hysterectomy. Methods: Fourteen patients from 2007 to 2022 with locally advanced endometrial cancer and cervical and/or parametrial involvement were retrospectively analyzed. They received neoadjuvant external beam radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy in 25-30 fractions) and high-dose rate brachytherapy (5.5-7.0 Gy per fraction in 3-4 fractions), followed by extrafascial hysterectomy. Clinical data, pathologic response, and survival outcomes were assessed, along with factors associated with pathologic response. Results: Most patients (86%) had stage III disease with cervical extension, 93% had parametrial involvement, and 14% had nodal involvement. Chemotherapy was given to 86% either concurrently or adjuvantly. Post-surgery, 86% had no pathologic cervical involvement, and 93% had negative surgical margins. Pathologic complete response was seen in 43%. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 14%. Median follow-up was 30 months, with recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates of 86% and 100%, respectively. Lower grade tumors significantly correlated with pathologic complete response (Φ = 0.72, p = 0.026). No significant correlation was found between pathologic complete response and other factors. No late grade 3-4 toxicities were reported. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant radiation followed by hysterectomy, with or without chemotherapy, is a viable strategy for managing endometrial cancer with cervical and/or parametrial involvement. This approach enhances resectability, yielding high rates of pathologic complete response and negative resection margins, showing promise for this challenging patient group.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy is essential in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. This study compares disease and toxicity outcomes in cervical cancer patients treated with 24 Gy/3 fractions (Fr) versus the conventional 28 Gy/4 Fr. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included 241 consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IB to IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation between April 2014 and March 2021. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), distant failure (DF), and G2+ gastrointestinal (GI), urinary and vaginal toxicity were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk and compared using Gray's test. RESULTS: Of the 241 patients, 42% received 24 Gy/3 Fr and 58% received 28 Gy/4 Fr. With a median follow-up of 3.2 (range, 0.2-9.2) years, there were 14 local, 41 regional nodal, and 51 distant failures in 63 (26%) patients. No significant differences were found between the 24 Gy/3 Fr and 28 Gy/4 Fr groups in 3-year DFS (77% vs 68%, P = .21), the 3-year cumulative incidence of LF (5% vs 7%, P = .57), DF (22% vs 25%, P = .86), G2+ GI toxicity (11% vs 20%, P = .13), or G2+ vaginal toxicity (14% vs 17%, P = .48), respectively. The 3-year cumulative G2+ urinary toxicity rate was lower in the 24 Gy/3 Fr group (9% vs 23%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical cancer treated with 24 Gy/3 Fr had similar DFS, LF, DF, GI, and vaginal toxicity rates and a trend toward a lower G2+ urinary toxicity rate compared with those treated with 28 Gy/4 Fr. A less resource-intensive brachytherapy fractionation schedule of 24 Gy/3 Fr is a safe alternative to 28 Gy/4 Fr for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.