RESUMO
BACKGROUND: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may have numerous risk factors for acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and developing severe outcomes, but current data are conflicting. METHODS: Health-care providers enrolled consecutively, by nonrandom sampling, people living with HIV (PWH) with lab-confirmed COVID-19, diagnosed at their facilities between 1 April and 1 July 2020. Deidentified data were entered into an electronic Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system. The primary endpoint was a severe outcome, defined as a composite endpoint of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, or death. The secondary outcome was the need for hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 286 patients included; the mean age was 51.4 years (standard deviation, 14.4), 25.9% were female, and 75.4% were African American or Hispanic. Most patients (94.3%) were on antiretroviral therapy, 88.7% had HIV virologic suppression, and 80.8% had comorbidities. Within 30 days of testing positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), 164 (57.3%) patients were hospitalized, and 47 (16.5%) required ICU admission. Mortality rates were 9.4% (27/286) overall, 16.5% (27/164) among those hospitalized, and 51.5% (24/47) among those admitted to an ICU. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 17.5% (50/286) of all patients and 30.5% (50/164) of hospitalized patients. Older age, chronic lung disease, and hypertension were associated with severe outcomes. A lower CD4 count (<200 cells/mm3) was associated with the primary and secondary endpoints. There were no associations between the ART regimen or lack of viral suppression and the predefined outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Severe clinical outcomes occurred commonly in PWH with COVID-19. The risks for poor outcomes were higher in those with comorbidities and lower CD4 cell counts, despite HIV viral suppression. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04333953.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Idoso , Feminino , HIV , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Timing of detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and their use to support the diagnosis are of increasing interest. We used the Gold Standard Diagnostics ELISA to evaluate the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies in sera of 82 hospitalized patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Serum samples were collected 1-59 days post-onset of symptoms (PoS) and we examined the association of age, sex, disease severity, and symptoms' duration with antibody levels. We also tested sera of 100 ambulatory hospital employees with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and samples collected during convalescence, 35-57 days PoS. All but four of the admitted patients (95.1%) developed antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Antibodies were detected within 7 days PoS; IgA in 60.0%, IgM in 53.3%, and IgG in 46.7% of samples. IgG positivity increased to 100% on Day 21. We did not observe significant differences in the rate of antibody development in regard to age and sex. IgA levels were highest in patients with a severe and critical illness. In multiple regression analyses, only IgA levels were statistically significantly correlated with critical disease (p = .05) regardless of age, sex, and duration of symptoms. Among 100 ambulatory hospital employees who had antibody testing after 4 weeks PoS only 10% had positive IgA antibodies. The most frequently isolated isotype in sera of employees after 30 days PoS was IgG (88%). IgA was the predominant immunoglobulin in early disease and correlated independently with a critical illness. IgG antibodies remained detectable in almost 90% of samples collected up to two months after infection.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/imunologia , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , Convalescença , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Cutibacterium acnes is an anaerobic bacterium commonly thought of as a culture contaminant rather than a pathogen. We present a case of Cutibacterium acnes pericarditis in a 22-year-old immunocompetent woman managed with surgical pericardial window and a 4-week course of penicillin G and review related literature on Cutibacterium acnes pericarditis.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/complicações , Penicilina G/uso terapêutico , Pericardite/tratamento farmacológico , Pericardite/etiologia , Pericardite/cirurgia , Propionibacterium acnes/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Pericardite/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: T2Bacteria assay uses T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR) technology for the rapid diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs). This FDA cleared technology can detect 5 of the most prevalent pathogens causing bacteremia (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecium). Because the significance of discordant results between the T2Bacteria assay and blood culture (BC) remains a challenge, in this case series we reviewed the medical records of patients who had a positive T2Bacteria test and a concurrent negative BC. METHODS: Among 233 participants, we identified 20 patients with 21 (9%) discordant T2Bacteria-positive/BC-negative (T2+/BC-) results. We classified these results based on clinical cultures and clinical evidence. RESULTS: When we analyzed these 21 discordant results in-depth, 11 (52.5%) fulfilled criteria for probable BSI, 4 (19%) for possible BSI, and 6 (28.5%) were presumptive false positives. Among the probable/possible BSIs, discordant results were often associated with patients diagnosed with closed space and localized infections [pyelonephritis (n = 7), abscess (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 1), infected hematoma (n = 1), and osteomyelitis (n = 1)]. Also, within the preceding 2 days of the T2+/BC- blood sample, 80% (16/20) of the patients had received at least one dose of an antimicrobial agent which was active against the T2Bacteria-detected pathogen. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of discrepant results, the T2Bacteria assay detected a plausible pathogen that was supported by clinical and/or microbiologic data. Discrepancies appear to be associated with closed space and localized infections and the recent use of effective antibacterial agents. The clinical significance and potential implications of such discordant results should be further investigated.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemocultura , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Concomitant use of vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) has been associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized adults. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and EMBASE for pediatric studies examining this hypothesis, with reference to vancomycin monotherapy or in combination with another beta-lactam antibiotic. Out of 1381 non-duplicate studies, 10 met our inclusion criteria. We performed a random effects meta-analysis, based on crude odds ratios, and we accounted for both quality of included studies and publication bias. In primary analysis, concomitant vancomycin and TZP use yielded a statistically significant association with the development of AKI. More specifically, children with AKI had higher odds to have been exposed to vancomycin plus TZP, in comparison with vancomycin monotherapy (OR 8.15; 95% CI: 3.49-18.99), or vancomycin plus any other beta-lactam antibiotic (OR 3.48; 95% CI: 2.71-4.46). Based on the results of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale quality assessment, a secondary analysis including only higher quality studies (6 out of 10 studies) yielded again higher odds of exposure to vancomycin plus TZP, compared to vancomycin plus another beta-lactam antibiotic (OR 3.76; 95% CI: 2.56-5.51). Notably, even after controlling for possible publication bias our results remained statistically significant (OR 3.09; 95% CI: 2.30-4.14). In conclusion, the concomitant use of vancomycin and TZP could be associated with AKI development and the clinical significance of this potential association needs to be studied further in the pediatric population.
RESUMO
The performance of blood culture for monitoring candidemia clearance is hampered by its low sensitivity, especially during antifungal therapy. The T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR) assay combines magnetic resonance with nanotechnology to identify whole Candida species cells. A multicenter clinical trial studied the performance of T2MR in monitoring candidemia clearance compared to blood culture. Adults with a blood culture positive for yeast were enrolled and had blood cultures and T2MR testing performed on prespecified days. Thirty-one patients completed the trial. Thirteen of the 31 patients (41.9%) had at least one positive surveillance T2MR and/or blood culture result. All positive blood cultures (7/7 [100%]) had an accompanying positive T2MR result with concordance in the identified Candida sp., while only 7/23 (30.4%) T2MR results had an accompanying positive blood culture. There was one case of discordance in species identification between T2MR and the preenrollment blood culture with evidence to support deep-seated infection by the Candida spp. detected by the T2MR assay. Based on the log rank test, there was a statistically significant improvement in posttreatment surveillance using the T2MR assay compared to blood culture (P = 0.004). Limitations of the study include the small sample size and lack of outcome data. In conclusion, the T2MR assay significantly outperformed blood cultures for monitoring the clearance of candidemia in patients receiving antifungal therapy and may be useful in determining adequate source control, timing for deescalation, and optimal duration of treatment. However, further studies are needed to determine the viability of Candida species cells detected by the T2MR assay and correlate the results with patient outcomes. (This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02163889.).
Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Adulto , Idoso , Hemocultura , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Candidíase Invasiva/diagnóstico , Candidíase Invasiva/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nanotecnologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Bacteriemia , Sepse , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Hemocultura , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureusRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Microbiologic cultures, the current gold standard diagnostic method for invasive Candida infections, have low specificity and take up to 2-5 days to grow. We present the results of the first extensive multicenter clinical trial of a new nanodiagnostic approach, T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR), for diagnosis of candidemia. METHODS: Blood specimens were collected from 1801 hospitalized patients who had a blood culture ordered for routine standard of care; 250 of them were manually supplemented with concentrations from <1 to 100 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL for 5 different Candida species. RESULTS: T2MR demonstrated an overall specificity per assay of 99.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.1%-99.6%) with a mean time to negative result of 4.2 ± 0.9 hours. Subanalysis yielded a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI, 98.3%-99.4%) for Candida albicans/Candida tropicalis, 99.3% (95% CI, 98.7%-99.6%) for Candida parapsilosis, and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7%-100.0%) for Candida krusei/Candida glabrata. The overall sensitivity was found to be 91.1% (95% CI, 86.9%-94.2%) with a mean time of 4.4 ± 1.0 hours for detection and species identification. The subgroup analysis showed a sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI, 85.4%-96.6%) for C. albicans/C. tropicalis, 94.2% (95% CI, 84.1%-98.8%) for C. parapsilosis, and 88.1% (95% CI, 80.2%-93.7%) for C. krusei/C. glabrata. The limit of detection was 1 CFU/mL for C. tropicalis and C. krusei, 2 CFU/mL for C. albicans and C. glabrata, and 3 CFU/mL for C. parapsilosis. The negative predictive value was estimated to range from 99.5% to 99.0% in a study population with 5% and 10% prevalence of candidemia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: T2MR is the first fully automated technology that directly analyzes whole blood specimens to identify species without the need for prior isolation of Candida species, and represents a breakthrough shift into a new era of molecular diagnostics. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01752166.
Assuntos
Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Antifúngicos , Candida albicans/isolamento & purificação , Candida glabrata/isolamento & purificação , Candida tropicalis/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Limite de Detecção , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that colonization with C. difficile protects from infection. Nevertheless, the association between carriage of toxinogenic strains and ensuing C. difficile infections (CDIs) has not been studied. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases up to 20 June 2014, using the term "difficile". Our primary outcomes of interest included the prevalence of isolation of toxinogenic C. difficile or its toxins from asymptomatic patients on hospital admission through stool or rectal swab testing and the risk of ensuing infection among colonized and noncolonized patients. Data on previous hospitalization, antibiotic, and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and prior CDIs among colonized and noncolonized patients were also extracted. RESULTS: Nineteen out of 26,081 studies on 8,725 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of toxinogenic C. difficile colonization was 8.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-11.1%), with an increasing trend over time (P=0.003), and 10.0% (95% CI 7.1-13.4%) among North American studies. Patients colonized upon hospital admission had a 5.9 times higher risk of subsequent CDIs compared with noncolonized patients (relative risk (RR) 5.86; 95% CI 4.21-8.16). The risk of CDI for colonized patients was 21.8% (95% CI 7.9-40.1%), which was significantly higher than that of noncolonized patients (3.4%; 95% CI 1.5-6.0%; P=0.03), with an attributable risk of 18.4%. History of hospitalization during the previous 3 months was associated with a higher risk of colonization (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.13-2.34), as opposed to previous antibiotic (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.75-1.53) and PPI use (RR 1.44; 95% CI 0.94-2.23), as well as history of CDI (RR 1.45; 95% CI 0.66-3.18) that had no impact. CONCLUSIONS: Over 8% of admitted patients are carriers of toxinogenic C. difficile with an almost 6 times higher risk of infection. These findings update current knowledge regarding the contribution of colonization in CDI epidemiology and stress the importance of preventive measures toward colonized patients.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidade , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: ICUs are a major reservoir of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Our aim was to estimate costs and effectiveness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevention policies. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: We evaluated three up-to-date methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevention policies, namely, 1) nasal screening and contact precautions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-positive patients; 2) nasal screening, contact precautions, and decolonization (targeted decolonization) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers; and 3) universal decolonization without screening. We implemented a decision-analytic model with deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections averted, quality-adjusted life years gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves were plotted for various willingness-to-pay thresholds to address uncertainty. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At base-case scenario, universal decolonization was the dominant strategy; it averted 1.31% and 1.59% of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections over targeted decolonization and screening and contact precautions, respectively, and saved $16,203/quality-adjusted life year over targeted decolonization and 14,562/quality-adjusted life year over screening and contact precautions. Results were robust in sensitivity analysis for a wide range of input variables. In probabilistic analysis, universal decolonization increased quality-adjusted life years by 1.06% (95% CI, 1.02-1.09) over targeted decolonization and by 1.29% (95% CI, 1.24-1.33) over screening and contact precautions; universal decolonization resulted in average savings of $172 (95% CI, $168-$175) and $189 (95% CI, $185-$193) over targeted decolonization and screening and contact precautions, respectively. With willingness-to-pay threshold per quality-adjusted life year gained ranging from $0 to $50,000, universal decolonization was dominant over targeted decolonization in 67.5-75.4% and dominant over screening and contact precautions in 66.0-75.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In the ICU setting, universal decolonization outperforms the other two strategies and is likely to be cost-effective even at low willingness-to-pay thresholds. Assuming 700 annual ICU admissions in an average 12-bed ICU, the projected annual savings reach $129,500 to $135,100.
Assuntos
Controle de Infecções/economia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Árvores de Decisões , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have become important nosocomial pathogens causing outbreaks worldwide. Patients undergoing dialysis represent a vulnerable population due to their comorbid conditions, frequent use of antibacterial agents, and frequent contact with health care settings. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies of screening for VRE colonization. SETTING & POPULATION: Patients receiving long-term dialysis treatment. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify studies performing screening for VRE colonization among dialysis patients. PREDICTOR: Region, recent use of vancomycin or other antibiotics, previous hospitalization. OUTCOMES: (1) VRE colonization and (2) rate of VRE infection among colonized and noncolonized individuals. Relative effects were expressed as ORs and 95% CIs. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and provided data for 4,842 dialysis patients from 100 dialysis centers. The pooled prevalence of VRE colonization was 6.2% (95% CI, 2.8%-10.8%), with significant variability between centers. The corresponding number for North American centers was 5.2% (95% CI, 2.8%-8.2%). Recent use of any antibiotic (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.22-10.75), particularly vancomycin (OR, 5.15; 95% CI, 1.56-17.02), but also use of antibiotics other than vancomycin (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 0.99-8.55) and recent hospitalization (OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.93-10.74) significantly increased the possibility of a VRE-positive surveillance culture. Colonized patients had a significantly higher risk of VRE infection (OR, 21.62; 95% CI, 5.33-87.69) than their noncolonized counterparts. LIMITATIONS: In 19 of 23 studies, a low percentage of dialysis patients (<80%) consented to participate in the screening procedure. 4 of 8 studies in which patients were followed up for more than 1 month reported VRE infections and only 5 of 23 studies provided extractable data for antibiotic consumption prior to screening. CONCLUSIONS: VRE colonization is prevalent in dialysis centers. Previous antibiotic use, in particular vancomycin, and recent hospitalization are important predicting factors of colonization, whereas the risk of VRE infection is significantly higher for colonized patients.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Prevalência , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/métodos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Patients undergoing dialysis are particularly vulnerable to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We performed a meta-analysis of published studies to estimate the prevalence of MRSA colonization in dialysis patients, time trends, and long-term risk of subsequent MRSA infections. Our search of the PubMed and Embase databases returned 5743 nonduplicate citations, from which we identified 38 relevant studies that included data on 5596 dialysis patients. The estimated prevalence of MRSA colonization was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.2% to 8.5%). The prevalence increased over time but remained stable after 2000. Stratification of patients according to dialysis modality and setting revealed that 7.2% (95% CI, 4.9% to 9.9%) of patients on hemodialysis were colonized with MRSA compared with 1.3% (95% CI, 0.5% to 2.4%) of patients on peritoneal dialysis (P=0.01), and that a statistically significant difference existed in the percentage of colonized inpatients and outpatients (14.2% [95% CI, 8.0% to 21.8%] versus 5.4% [95% CI, 3.5% to 7.7%], respectively; P=0.04). Notably, the risk of developing MRSA infections increased among colonized hemodialysis patients compared with noncolonized patients (relative risk, 11.5 [95% CI, 4.7 to 28.0]). The long-term (6-20 months) probability of developing a MRSA infection was 19% among colonized hemodialysis patients compared with only 2% among noncolonized patients. In summary, 6.2% of dialysis patients are MRSA colonized, and the average prevalence of colonization has remained stable since 2000. Colonization in hemodialysis patients is associated with increased risk of MRSA infection.
Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial lock solutions may be an effective strategy to prevent catheter-associated infections. However, there remains concern about their efficacy and safety. METHODS: To investigate the efficacy of antimicrobial lock therapy to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from the earliest date up to 31 December 2013. Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials comparing antimicrobial lock solutions to heparin and if they provided an appropriate definition of infection. RESULTS: The 23 included studies reported data on 2896 patients, who were predominantly adult patients undergoing hemodialysis (16/23 studies), but also adult and pediatric oncology patients, critically ill neonates, and patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. The use of antimicrobial lock solutions led to a 69% reduction in CLABSI rate (relative risk [RR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], .24-.40) and a 32% reduction in the rate of exit site infections (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, .49-.95) compared with heparin, without significantly affecting catheter failure due to noninfectious complications (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, .65-1.06). All-cause mortality was not different between the groups (RR, 0.84; 95% CI .64-1.12). Neither the type of antimicrobial solution nor the population studied, affected the relative reduction in CLABSIs, which also remained significant among studies reporting baseline infection rates of <1.15 per 1000 catheter-days, and studies providing data for catheter-related bloodstream infections. Publication and selective reporting bias are a concern in our study and should be acknowledged. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial lock solutions are effective in reducing risk of CLABSI, and this effect appears to be additive to traditional prevention measures.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals who are colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have increased risk for MRSA infection. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to estimate the prevalence of MRSA colonization in this population. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched and studies reporting prevalence of MRSA colonization among HIV-infected individuals were included. RESULTS: Among 7940 citations, 32 studies reporting data on 6558 HIV-infected individuals were considered eligible for our meta-analysis. We found that 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-9.3) of individuals with HIV infection are MRSA carriers, with the corresponding figure across North American studies being 8.8% (95% CI, 6.0-12.2). History of hospitalization during the previous 12 months was associated with a 3.1 times higher risk of MRSA colonization (risk ratio [RR], 3.11 [95% CI, 1.62-5.98]). Previous or current incarceration was also associated with a higher risk for carriage (RR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.26-2.48]). Current antiretroviral therapy or use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not impact the risk of MRSA carriage (RR, 1.02 [95% CI, .64-1.63] and 1.45 [95% CI, .69-3.03], respectively). Extranasal screening increased the detection of MRSA colonization by at least 31.6% (95% CI, 15.8-50.0). The added yield from groin screening was 19.3% (95% CI, 11.5-28.5), from perirectal screening 18.5% (95% CI, 7.4-33.2), and from throat cultures 17.5% (95% CI, 12.0-24). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with HIV infection constitute a highly vulnerable population for MRSA colonization, and prior exposure to hospital or incarceration are significant factors. Nasal screening alone will underestimate the rate of colonization by at least one-third.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Humanos , América do Norte , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at high risk of contracting Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases through March 2014 and performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence and trends of CDI over time. Among 48 eligible articles that included 12,025 patients at risk, we estimated that 7.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5% to 9.5%) of HSCT patients are diagnosed with CDI during the peri-transplantation and late post-transplantation periods, an estimation that is relatively consistent across studies (τ(2) = .032). Prevalence of CDI is significantly higher among the 5120 allogeneic patients (9.3% [95% CI, 7.0% to 11.9%]), compared with the 4665 autologous patients (5.2% [95% CI, 3.8% to 6.9%]) (P = .02), and as many as 1 of 10 allogeneic transplant recipients are expected to be diagnosed with CDI compared with 1 of 20 autologous transplantation patients. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance when stratified data from the same centers were examined (P = .11). Importantly, we found an increasing trend of CDI diagnosis both worldwide (P = .02) and across studies conducted in North America (P = .03) over the last 34 years. Notably, studies with a follow-up period that extended through the late post-transplantation period (after day +100) had a similar prevalence of CDI as those that followed patients only during the peri-transplantation period (up to day +100) (P = .94). In summary, CDI is common in the hematopoietic transplantation setting and the majority of infections occur in the peri-transplantation period. The prevalence is almost 9-times higher than that reported among all hospital stays, with an increasing trend over time.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/etiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Clostridium/imunologia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/patologia , Humanos , Agonistas Mieloablativos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
Invasive aspergillosis is a difficult-to-diagnose infection with a high mortality rate that affects high-risk groups such as patients with neutropenia and hematologic malignancies. We performed a bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic data for an Aspergillus sp. PCR assay with blood specimens from high-risk hematology patients. We included all studies involving human subjects that assessed the performance of any PCR assay for invasive aspergillosis in whole blood or serum and that used the European Organization for the treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria as a reference standard. Three investigators independently searched the literature for eligible studies and extracted the data. Out of a total of 37 studies, 25 met strict quality criteria and were included in our evidence synthesis. Twenty-five studies with 2,595 patients were analyzed. The pooled diagnostic performance of whole-blood and serum PCR assays was moderate, with a sensitivity and specificity of 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75 to 91%) and 76% (95% CI, 65 to 84%), respectively, suggesting that a positive or negative result is unable, on its own, to confirm or exclude a suspected infection. The performance of a PCR assay of serum was not significantly different from that of whole blood. Notably, at least two positive PCR test results were found to have a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 64% for invasive infection, achieving a high positive likelihood ratio of 12.8. Importantly, the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative (EAPCRI) recommendations improved the performance of the PCR even further when at least two positive specimens were used to define PCR positivity. In conclusion, two positive PCR results should be considered highly indicative of an active Aspergillus sp. infection. Use of the EAPCRI recommendations by clinical laboratories can further enhance PCR performance.
Assuntos
Aspergillus/isolamento & purificação , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Adulto , Aspergillus/genética , Sangue/microbiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Humanos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
The additive role of non-culture-based methods for the diagnosis of candidemia remains unknown. We evaluated 2 clinical practices followed in our hospitals for the diagnosis of candidemia, namely practice#1 including a combination of blood cultures and T2Candida, and practice#2 that also included Beta-D-glucan (BDG). Three out of 96 patients testing positive with practice#1 received a complete antifungal course. Of the 120 patients evaluated with practice#2, 29 were positive. Only 55.2% of those received a complete course. We observed significant differences in antifungal utilization, with 268.5 antifungal days/1000 patient-days for practice#1, as opposed to 371.9 days for practice#2, a nearly 40% difference. However, we found similar rates of antifungal discontinuation among negative patients at 3 days of testing (36.8% and 37.0% respectively). No differences were detected in death and/or subsequent diagnosis of candidemia. In summary, addition of BDG was interpreted variably by clinicians, was associated with an increase in antifungal utilization, and did not correlate with measurable clinical benefits for patients.