RESUMO
The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation (ISF) is a multi-system framework that can guide research-to-practice efforts by building and supporting the work of three interacting systems: the Prevention Delivery, Support, and Synthesis and Translation Systems. The Synthesis and Translation system is vital to bridging science and practice, yet how to develop it and train support system partners to use it is under-researched. This article bridges this gap by offering a case example of the planning, development, and use of a synthesis and translation product called Promoting Science-based Approaches to Teen Pregnancy Prevention using Getting To Outcomes. The case presented documents the process used for developing the synthesis and translation product, reports on efforts to engage the Prevention Support system to use the product, and how we approached building interaction between the Synthesis and Translation System and the Support System partners. Practice-oriented evaluation data are also presented. Implications for practice, policy and research are discussed.
Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Gravidez na Adolescência/prevenção & controle , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are increasing worldwide. A lack of training and experience in NCDs among public health workers is evident in low- and middle- income countries. METHODS: We describe the design and outcomes of applied training in NCD epidemiology and control piloted in Tanzania that included a 2-week interactive course and a 6-month NCD field project. Trainees (n=14 initiated; n=13 completed) were epidemiology-trained Ministry of Health or hospital staff. We evaluated the training using Kirkpatrick's evaluation model for measuring reactions, learning, behavior and results using pre- and post-tests and closed-ended and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Significant improvements in knowledge and self-reported competencies were observed. Trainees reported applying competencies at work and supervisors reported improvements in trainees' performance. Six field projects were completed; one led to staffing changes and education materials for patients with diabetes and another to the initiation of an injury surveillance system. Workplace support and mentoring were factors that facilitated the completion of projects. Follow-up of participants was difficult, limiting our evaluation of the training's outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The applied NCD epidemiology and control training piloted in Tanzania was well received and showed improvements in knowledge, skill and self-efficacy and changes in workplace behavior and institutional and organizational changes. Further evaluations are needed to better understand the impact of similar NCD trainings and future trainers should ensure that trainees have mentoring and workplace support prior to participating in an applied NCD training.
Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Países em Desenvolvimento , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Competência Clínica , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Saúde Pública , Tanzânia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The Public Health Prevention Service is a three-year training program committed to developing a workforce that is skilled in planning, managing, and evaluating prevention programs. In 2000, a questionnaire was administered to participants to assess their training needs. According to the resultant data, training is preferred in traditional formats (e.g., case studies and group discussion) and in short installments (one to three hours). Topics identified for future training included software application, prevention effectiveness (i.e., economic analysis), program evaluation, budgeting, and consensus building.