RESUMO
Objective: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) with a high mortality and postoperative complications remains presently no effective indicators to conjunctly predict the short-term mortality and the prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the predictive role of α-HBDH on in-hospital mortality and postoperative Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with AAD. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 369 enrolled patients from 2015 to 2021 were divided into three groups (T1: low, T2: medium and T3: high) based on the tertiles of α-HBDH levels on admission. In terms of the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative indicators among 3 groups, the relationship between α-HBDH and studying endpoints was determined by logistic regression models, along with the consolidation using Kaplan-Meier and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis for predicting the in-hospital death and MACE complications. Last, subgroup analysis further verified the predictive value of α-HBDH. Results: Logistic regression analysis showed that α-HBDH was independently associated with in-hospital mortality of patients with AAD [OR(95CI): 4.771(1.043-21.832), P = 0.044] and MACE [OR(95CI): 9.869(2.148-45.349), P = 0.003]. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed an increased α-HBDH levels associated with poor survival within 30 days (log rank test, P < 0.01), especially in acute Stanford A dissection. RCS presented that 204 U/L was the optimal cut-off value of α-HBDH for in-hospital mortality and postoperative MACE, which facilitated clinical stratification of patients with AAD. Subgroup analysis confirmed a stable correlation between α-HBDH level and hospital mortality and MACE (P > 0.05). Conclusions: α-HBDH is a predictor of the in-hospital mortality and postoperative MACE, guiding admission stratification of patients with AAD.
RESUMO
Background: Evidence indicates that the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy reduces cardiovascular events. However, the impact of ezetimibe-statin combination therapy on coronary plaque regression, plaque stabilization, and diameter stenosis remains a matter of controversy. Methods: We performed electronic searches in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify eligible trials assessing the effects of ezetimibe-statin combination therapy versus statin monotherapy reporting at least one outcome among total atheroma volume (TAV), minimum fibrous cap thickness (FCT), lumen volume (LV), and lumen area (LA) derived from intravascular imaging modalities of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We used the random-effects model and performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) during this meta-analysis. Results: Eleven articles with a total of 926 individuals (460 in the dual-lipid-lowering therapy group and 466 in the statin monotherapy group) were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared to statin monotherapy, ezetimibe-statin combination therapy was associated with significantly decreased TAV [WMD = -3.17, 95% CI (-5.42 to -0.92), and p = 0.006], with no effect on the LV of the coronary artery [WMD = -0.52, 95% CI (-2.24 to 1.21), and p = 0.56], the LA of the coronary artery [WMD = 0.16, 95% CI (-0.10-0.42), and p = 0.22], or minimum FCT thickness [WMD = 19.11, 95%CI (-12.76-50.97)]. Conclusion: In patients with coronary artery disease, ezetimibe-statin combination therapy resulted in a significant regression in TAV compared to statin monotherapy, whereas no overall improvements of minimum FCT or lumenal stenosis were observed.
RESUMO
Minimal research exists on polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure from traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), despite their significant contributions to domestic and international health protection. This study is the first to investigate the levels, profiles, and health risks of PCB residue in Pheretima, a typical TCM produced from earthworm. Seventy-seven Pheretima samples from different regions of China were analyzed for 45 PCB congeners. PCBs were found in all samples exhibiting species-dependent discrepancies. ∑45PCBs was ranging from 0.532 to 25.2 µg/kg (mean 4.46 µg/kg), with CB-11 being the most abundant congener contributing 71.8% ± 10.8% to ∑45PCBs, followed by CB-47, which were all non-Aroclor congeners called unintentionally produced PCBs (UP-PCBs). The average estimated daily intake of ∑45PCBs, ∑7ID-PCBs (indicative polychlorinated biphenyls), and CB-11 were 0.71, 0.04, and 0.51 ng/kg bw/d, respectively. The ∑HQ of PCBs in Pheretima samples was 2.97 × 10-4-2.46 × 10-2 (mean 2.77 × 10-3, 95th 4.21 × 10-3), while the ∑RQ ranged from 1.19 × 10-8 to 2.88 × 10-6 (mean 4.87 × 10-7, 95th 2.31 × 10-6). These findings indicate that Pheretima ingestion does not pose significant non-carcinogenic risks. However, certain individual samples exhibit an acceptable level of potential risks, particularly when considering that PCBs are recognized as endocrine disruptors and classified as probable carcinogens. These results contribute to the safety evaluation of traditional medicines and suggest the potential use of Pheretima as a bioindicator for PCB pollution. It is advisable to monitor UP-PCBs as indicator congeners and gather additional toxicological data.