Performance of MAST, FAST, and MEFIB in predicting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To identify individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) or "at-risk" MASH among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), three noninvasive models are available with satisfactory efficiency, which include magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]- AST (MAST), FibroScan-AST (FAST score), and magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] plus FIB-4 (MEFIB). We aimed to evaluate the most accurate approach for diagnosing MASH or "at-risk" MASH. METHODS: We included 108 biopsy-proven MASLD patients who underwent simultaneous assessment of MRE, MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and FibroScan scans. Compared with the histological diagnosis, we analyzed the AUC of each model and assessed the accuracy. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 64.8% of MASH and 25.9% of "at-risk" MASH. When analyzing the performance of each model for the diagnostic accuracy of MASH, we found that the AUC [95% CI] of MAST was comparable to FAST (0.803 [0.719-0.886] vs 0.799 [0.707-0.891], P = 0.930) and better than MEFIB (0.671 [0.571-0.772], P = 0.005). Similar findings were observed in the "at-risk" MASH patients. The AUCs [95% CI] for MAST, FAST, and MEFIB were 0.810 [0.719-0.900], 0.782 [0.689-0.874], and 0.729 [0.619-0.838], respectively. The models of MAST and FAST had comparable AUCs (P = 0.347), which were statistically significantly higher than that of MEFIB (P = 0.041). Additionally, the cutoffs for diagnosis of MASH were lower than "at-risk" MASH. CONCLUSION: MAST and FAST performed better than MEFIB in diagnosing "at-risk" MASH and MASH using lower cutoff values. Our findings provided evidence for selecting the most accurate noninvasive model to identify patients with MASH or at-risk MASH.

Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease: NHANES 2007‒2018 results.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D insufficiency is a prevalent issue in patients suffering from CKD. The purpose of this study was to determine whether serum 25(OH)D levels are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD. METHODS: To examine the associations between 25(OH)D levels and cardiovascular mortality, this retrospective cohort study used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the National Death Index (NDI) 2007‒2018 database. A total of 2,668 eligible subjects were included in this study, with follow-up conducted until December 31, 2019. The associations were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, restricted cubic splines, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and competing risks survival analysis. Furthermore, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 72 months in a weighted population of 11,715,452 eligible participants, there were 665 deaths from any cause, including 196 cardiovascular-related deaths. After adjusting for covariates, lower levels of 25(OH)D were significantly associated with increased risks for both all-cause mortality (HR= 0.85, 95 % CI 0.77∼0.94) and cardiovascular mortality (SHR= 0.80, 95 % CI 0.67∼0.94). Consistent results were also observed when analyzing 25(OH)D as a categorical variable (quartile). Compared to group Q1, both group Q3 (HR = 0.71, 95 % CI 0.54‒0.93) and group Q4 (HR = 0.72, 95 % CI 0.55‒0.94) exhibited a significantly reduced mortality risk. Weighted restricted cubic splines revealed an inverse J-shaped linear association between levels of 25(OH) D and all-cause mortality ((PNonliner > 0.05). Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis yielded similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease-related mortality were significantly increased by lower 25(OH)D levels, both as continuous and categorical variables. 25(OH)D has an inverse J-shaped linear association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Inflammation activity affects liver stiffness measurement by magnetic resonance elastography in MASLD.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is recognized as the most precise imaging technology for assessing liver fibrosis in individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We aimed to investigate the clinical factors and pathological characteristics that may impact LSM in MASLD patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 124 patients who concurrently performed MRE, MRI-PDFF, and biopsy-proven MASLD. Linear regression models, Spearman's correlation, and subgroup analysis were employed to identify the variables affecting LSM. RESULTS: The AUROC (95 % CI) of MRE for diagnosing fibrosis stage ≥ 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 0.80 (0.70-0.90), 0.76 (0.66-0.85), 0.92 (0.86-0.99), and 0.99 (0.99-1.00), with corresponding cutoffs of 2.56, 2.88, 3.35, and 4.76 kPa, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that AST was the only independent clinical variable significantly correlated with LSM. Furthermore, LSM exhibited a notable association with the grade of lobular inflammation and hepatocellular ballooning. Subgroup analysis showed that when AST ≥ 2 ULN or inflammation grade ≥ 2, LSM of patients with early fibrosis stages showed a slight but significant increase. CONCLUSION: MRE demonstrates significant diagnostic accuracy in predicting liver fibrosis stages for MASLD patients, especially for advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. However, elevated AST and the severity of liver inflammation may impact its accuracy in staging early liver fibrosis.