The correlation between SNPs within the gene of adrenergic receptor and neuropeptide Y and risk of cervical vertigo.

BACKGROUND: The current investigation was aimed to explore the potential associations of SNPs within ADRB2, ADRB1, NPY, and ADRA1A with risk and prognosis of cervical vertigo. METHODS: Altogether 216 patients with cervical vertigo and 204 healthy controls were gathered, and their DNAs were extracted utilizing the whole-blood DNA extraction kit. Besides, the PCR reactions were conducted using the TaqManR single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assays, and the SNPs were detected on the 7900HT real-time fluorogenic quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) instrument. Finally, the severity of cervical vertigo was classified according to the JOA scoring, and the recovery rate (RR) of cervical vertigo was calculated in light of the formula as: [Formula: see text] RESULTS: The SNPs within ADRA1A [rs1048101 (T>C) and rs3802241 (C>T)], NPY [rs16476 (A>C), rs16148 (T>C), and rs5574 (C>T)], ADRB1 [rs28365031 (A>G)] and ADRB2 [rs2053044 (A>G)] were all significantly associated with regulated risk of cervical vertigo (all P < .05). Haplotypes of ADRA1A [CT and TC] and NPY [CCT and ATT] were also suggested as the susceptible factors of cervical vertigo in comparison with other haplotypes. Furthermore, the SNPs within ADRA1A [rs1048101 (T>C)], NPY [rs16476 (A>C), rs16148 (T>C)], as well as ADRB1 [rs28365031 (A>G)] all appeared to predict the prognosis of cervical vertigo in a relatively accurate way (all P < .05). Ultimately, the haplotypes of ADRA1A (CC) and NPY (CCT) tended to decrease the RR. CONCLUSIONS: The SNPs within ADRB2, ADRB1, NPY, and ADRA1A might act as the diagnostic biomarkers and treatment targets for cervical vertigo.

On the use of bolus for pacemaker dose measurement and reduction in radiation therapy.

Special attention is required in planning and administering radiation therapy to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), such as pacemaker and defibrillator. The range of dose to CIEDs that can induce malfunction is large among CIEDs. Clinically significant defects have been reported at dose as low as 0.15 Gy. Therefore, accurate estimation of dose to CIED and dose reduction are both important even if the dose is expected to be less than the often-used 2-Gy limit. We investigated the use of bolus in in vivo dosimetry for CIEDs. Solid water phantom measurements of out-of-field dose for a 6-MV beam were performed using parallel plate chamber with and without 1- to 2-cm bolus covering the chamber. In vivo dosimetry at skin surface above the CIED was performed with and without bolus covering the CIED for three patients with the CIED <5 cm from the field edge. Chamber measured dose at depth ~0.5-1.5 cm below the skin surface, where the CIED is normally located, was reduced by ~7-48% with bolus. The dose reduction became smaller at deeper depths and with smaller field size. In vivo dosimetry at skin surface also indicated ~20%-60% lower dose when using bolus for the three patients. The dose measured with bolus more accurately reflects the dose to CIED and is less affected by contaminant electrons and linac head scatter. In general, the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation underestimated the dose to CIED, but it predicts the CIED dose more accurately when bolus is used. We recommend the use of 1- to 2-cm bolus to cover the CIED during in vivo CIED dose measurements for more accurate CIED dose estimation. If the CIED is placed <2 cm in depth and its dose is mainly from anterior beams, we recommend using the bolus during the entire course of radiation delivery to reduce the dose to CIED.

Study of a spherical phantom for Gamma knife dosimetry.

Four 16 cm diameter spherical phantoms were modeled in this study: a homogenous water phantom, and three water phantoms with 1 cm thick shell each made of different materials (PMMA, Plastic WaterTM and polystyrene). The PENELOPE Monte Carlo code was utilized to simulate photon beams from the Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) unit and to determine absorbed dose to water (Dw) from a single 18 mm beam delivered to each phantom. A score spherical volume of 0.007 cm3 was used to simulate the dimensions of the sensitive volume of the Exradin A-16 ionization chamber, in the center of the phantom. In conclusion, the PMMA shell filled with water required a small correction for the determination of the absorbed dose, while remaining within the statistical uncertainty of the calculations (+/- 0.71). Plastic WaterTM and polystyrene shells can be used without correction. There is a potential advantage to measuring the 4 mm helmet output using these spherical water phantoms.

Monte Carlo dosimetry modeling of focused kV x-ray radiotherapy of eye diseases with potential nanoparticle dose enhancement.

PURPOSE: Eye plaque brachytherapy is the most common approach for intraocular cancer treatment. It is, however, invasive and subject to large setup uncertainty due to the surgical operation. We propose a novel-focused kV x-ray technique with potential nanoparticle (NP) enhancement and evaluate its application in treating choroidal melanoma and iris melanoma by Monte Carlo (MC) dosimetry modeling. METHODS: A polycapillary x-ray lens was used to focus 45 kVp x rays to achieve pinpoint accuracy of dose delivery to small tumors near critical structures. In addition to allowing for beam focusing, the use of kV x rays takes advantage of the strong photoelectric absorption of metallic NPs in that energy regime and hence strong radiosensitization. We constructed an MC simulation program that takes into account the x-ray optic modeling and used GEANT4 for dosimetric calculation. Extensive phantom measurements using a prototype-focused x-ray system were carried out. The MC simulation of simple geometry phantom irradiation was first compared to measurements to verify the x-ray optic lens modeling in conjunction with the Geant4 dosimetric calculation. To simulate tumor treatment, a geometric eye model and two tumor models were constructed. Dose distributions of the simulated treatments were then calculated. NP radiosensitization was also simulated for two concentrations of 2 nm gold NP (AuNP) uniformly distributed in the tumor. RESULTS: The MC-simulated full width at half maximum (FWHM) and central-axis depth dose of the focused kV x-ray beam match those measured on EBT3 films within ~10% around the depth of focus of the beam. Dose distributions of the simulated ocular tumor treatments show that focused x-ray beams can concentrate the high-dose region in or close to the tumor plus margin. For the simulated posterior choroidal tumor treatment, with sufficient tumor coverage, the doses to the optic disc and fovea are substantially reduced with focused x-ray therapy compared to eye plaque treatment (3.8 vs 39.8 Gy and 11.1 vs 53.8 Gy, respectively). The eye plaque treatment was calculated using an Eye Physics plaque with I-125 seeds under TG43 assumption. For the energy spectrum used in this study, the average simulated dose enhancement ratios (DERs) are roughly 2.1 and 1.1 for 1.0% and 0.1% AuNP mass concentration in the tumor, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to eye plaque brachytherapy, the proposed focused kV x-ray technique is noninvasive and shows great advantage in sparing healthy critical organs without sacrificing the tumor control. The NP radiation dose enhancement is considerable at our proposed kV range even with a low NP concentration in the tumor, providing better critical structure protection and more flexibility for treatment planning.