Preoperative risk prediction models for acute kidney injury after noncardiac surgery: an independent external validation cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous models have been developed to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) after noncardiac surgery, yet there is a lack of independent validation and comparison among them. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search to review published risk prediction models for AKI after noncardiac surgery. An independent external validation was performed using a retrospective surgical cohort at a large Chinese hospital from January 2019 to October 2022. The cohort included patients undergoing a wide range of noncardiac surgeries with perioperative creatinine measurements. Postoperative AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC), calibration (calibration plot), and clinical utility (net benefit), before and after model recalibration through intercept and slope updates. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by including patients without postoperative creatinine measurements in the validation cohort and categorising them as non-AKI cases. RESULTS: Nine prediction models were evaluated, each with varying clinical and methodological characteristics, including the types of surgical cohorts used for model development, AKI definitions, and predictors. In the validation cohort involving 13,186 patients, 650 (4.9%) developed AKI. Three models demonstrated fair discrimination (AUROC between 0.71 and 0.75); other models had poor or failed discrimination. All models exhibited some miscalibration; five of the nine models were well-calibrated after intercept and slope updates. Decision curve analysis indicated that the three models with fair discrimination consistently provided a positive net benefit after recalibration. The results were confirmed in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three models with fair discrimination and potential clinical utility after recalibration for assessing the risk of acute kidney injury after noncardiac surgery.

Comparison of three concentrations of ropivacaine in posterior quadratus lumborum block: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: A conclusive evidence regarding the optimal concentration and volume of local anesthetic for quadratus lumborum block is lacking. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study, 60 patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to 3 different combinations of volume and concentration of ropivacaine (3 mg/kg) - Group 0.25%, Group 0.375% and Group 0.5%. All subjects received ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block prior to the induction. The primary outcome was the complete sensory block rate of surgical site measured at 30 min after quadratus lumborum block, after extubation, at 12, 24, and 48 h after operation. Secondary outcomes were the changes in hemodynamic parameters before and after incision (ΔSBP, ΔDBP and ΔHR), postoperative pain score, the sufentanil consumption after surgery, length of stay and adverse reactions. Results: The sensory block rate of surgical site at 5 time points differed significantly among the three groups (P < 0.001). Both Group 0.375% (P < 0.001) and Group 0.5% (P < 0.001) had a higher sensory block rate than Group 0.25%, but no significant difference was observed between the former two. Group 0.375% and Group 0.5% had lower postoperative pain scores, lower sufentanil consumption after surgery and shorter length of stay. No statistical difference was observed in ΔSBP, ΔDBP, ΔHR and the incidence of adverse reactions. Conclusions: 0.375% and 0.5% ropivacaine in posterior quadratus lumborum block provide better sensory block of surgical site when compared to 0.25% in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Trial registration number: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2100043949).

Modbed track: Visualization of modified bases in single-molecule sequencing.

Recent advances in long-read sequencing technologies have not only dramatically increased sequencing read length but also have improved the accuracy of detecting chemical modifications to the canonical nucleotide bases, thus opening exciting venues to investigate the epigenome. Currently, the ability to visualize modified bases from long-read sequencing data in genome browsers is still limited, preventing users from easily and fully exploring these type of data. To address this limitation, the WashU Epigenome Browser introduces the modbed track type, which provides visualization of modification details in each single read as well as aggregated modifications of individual or multiple molecules across a dynamic range of resolutions. The modbed file can be uploaded for visualization as a local track or viewed with an accessible URL freely on the WashU Epigenome Browser at https://epigenomegateway.wustl.edu/.