Cardiac Arrhythmias in Oncological Patients-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Management within the Context of the New ESC 2022 Guidelines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and management of cardiac arrhythmias in oncological patients within the context of the new European Society of Cardiology 2022 guidelines on cardio-oncology. RECENT FINDINGS: One of the side effects of different chemotherapeutics is their pro-arrhythmic activity. Both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias may be induced by cancer itself or by anticancer treatment. Recent studies report on the cardiotoxic activity of such promising therapies as BRAF and MEK inhibitors, or CAR-T therapy. Risk factors of arrhythmias in oncological patients overlap with cardiovascular diseases risk factors, but there are some groups of anticancer drugs that increase the risk of cardiotoxicity. It is crucial to be aware of the risks associated with the oncological treatment and know how to act in case of cardiotoxicity.

Role of copeptin in diagnosis and outcome prediction in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT: Heart failure (HF) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies was conducted to evaluate the role of copeptin in diagnosis and outcome prediction in HF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search for clinical trials reporting copeptin levels in HF patients was performed using EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. Articles from databases published by 2 January 2022, that met the selection criteria were retrieved and reviewed. The random effects model was used for analyses. RESULTS: Pooled analysis found higher mean copeptin levels in HF vs. non-HF populations (43.6 ± 46.4 vs. 21.4 ± 21.4; MD= 20.48; 95% CI: 9.22 to 31.74; p < 0.001). Pooled analysis of copeptin concentrations stratified by ejection fraction showed higher concentrations in HFrEF vs. HFpEF (17.4 ± 7.1 vs. 10.1 ± 5.5; MD= -4.69; 95% CI: -7.58 to -1.81; p = 0.001). Copeptin level was higher in patients with mortality/acute HF-related hospitalization vs. stable patients (31.3 ± 23.7 vs. 20.4 ± 12.8; MD= -13.06; 95% CI: -25.28 to -0.84; p = 0.04). Higher copeptin concentrations were associated with mortality and observed in all follow-up periods (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed that elevated copeptin plasma concentrations observed in HF patients are associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, thus copeptin may serve as predictor of outcome in HF.

Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review.

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is a cornerstone of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention. Although LLT might lead to different reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in women and men, LLT diminishes cardiovascular risk equally effectively in both sexes. Despite similar LLT efficacy, the use of high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors is lower in women compared to men. Women achieve the guideline-recommended LDL-C levels less often than men. Greater cholesterol burden is particularly prominent in women with familial hypercholesterolemia. In clinical practice, women and men with dyslipidemia present with different cardiovascular risk profiles and disease manifestations. The concentrations of LDL-C, lipoprotein(a), and other blood lipids differ between women and men over a lifetime. Dissimilar levels of LLT target molecules partially result from sex-specific hormonal and genetic determinants of lipoprotein metabolism. Hence, to evaluate a potential need for sex-specific LLT, this comprehensive review (i) describes the impact of sex on lipoprotein metabolism and lipid profile, (ii) highlights sex differences in cardiovascular risk among patients with dyslipidemia, (iii) presents recent, up-to-date clinical trial and real-world data on LLT efficacy and safety in women, and (iv) discusses the diverse medical needs of women and men with dyslipidemia and increased cardiovascular risk.

Same-day discharge coronary interventions: How to succeed?

Percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI) are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with coronary artery disease, generating substantial costs for the healthcare system. Considerable improvement in PCI technique, stent technology and antiplatelet therapy led to a complication rate of <5%, a success rate of >95% and lack of routine cardiothoracic surgical support. Thereby, the concept of same-day discharge following PCI has been proposed due to comparable efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic benefits to inpatient PCI. Although single-vessel disease was the primary indication for outpatient (OP) PCI, more complex scenarios such as multivessel disease, left main disease and chronic total occlusions were shown to be feasible and safe in OP setting as well. Currently available data shows that OP PCI leads to cost optimization, increased PCI center capacity, decrease in nosocomial infections rate and increased patient satisfaction, along with good clinical outcomes. Although OP PCI seems promising in a subset of well-prepared and compliant patients without severe comorbidities, there are some challenges to overcome before its routine implementation. To prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and unsafe same-day discharges, interventional cardiology teams should be trained to perform reliable risk-benefit assessments. Standardized forms should be created to obtain informed consent and instruct OP PCI patients and their relatives about postprocedural management. Here, we summarize the available data on OP and inpatient PCI outcomes, discuss the opportunities and challenges of OP PCI and propose a periprocedural patient management checklist, with the goal of facilitating OP PCI implementation in interventional cardiology centers.