Efficacy of short-term Peg-IFN α-2b treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients with ultra-low HBsAg levels: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Peginterferon alfa-2b (Peg-IFN α-2b) has demonstrated superior efficacy over nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), particularly among patients with low levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). This study aims to determine whether patients with ultra-low HBsAg levels (< 200 IU/mL) can achieve significantly higher clinical cure rates with abbreviated courses of Peg-IFN α-2b therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, CHB patients with HBsAg levels below 200 IU/mL were categorized into a Peg-IFN α-2b group and a control group. The Peg-IFN α-2b group received Peg-IFN α-2b for a minimum of 24 weeks, with the possibility of early discontinuation upon achieving HBsAg clearance, and were followed through week 48. The control group remained untreated for hepatitis B virus (HBV), and was observed for 24 weeks. HBsAg clearance rates were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors associated with HBsAg clearance . RESULTS: By week 24, the HBsAg clearance rate in the Peg-IFN α-2b group was notably 52.1% (38/73), contrasting sharply with the mere 1.3% (1/77) observed in the control group. Within the Peg-IFN α-2b group, a substantial 97.3% (71/73) of patients noted a reduction in HBsAg levels. Besides, the decision to continue or discontinue treatment after the 24-week mark had no significant impact on the HBsAg clearance rate at week 48. Multivariable analysis pinpointed baseline HBsAg levels (OR = 0.984, p = 0.001) and the presence of fatty liver (OR = 5.960, p = 0.033) as independent predictors of HBsAg clearance. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that a 24-week course of Peg-IFN α-2b yields robust efficacy in CHB patients with ultra-low HBsAg levels. Prolonging treatment beyond the 24-week threshold is deemed unnecessary. Both baseline HBsAg level and the presence of fatty liver emerged as significant predictors for HBsAg clearance.

Optimizing the therapeutic window of sirolimus by monitoring blood concentration for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.

Previous studies have demonstrated that sirolimus (SRL) is an effective agent for the treatment of refractory/relapsed (R/R) ITP. However, the therapeutic window of sirolimus in the treatment of ITP has not been established. As the toxicity of sirolimus increases with higher blood concentrations, it is crucial to determine the optimal therapeutic concentration of SRL for the treatment of ITP. Thus, in this study, we used a retrospective cohort of ITP patients treated with sirolimus to propose the therapeutic dosage window for sirolimus. A total of 275 laboratory results of SRL blood concentration from 63 ITP patients treated with SRL were analyzed retrospectively. The ITP patients were divided into five groups based on their SRL blood concentration: 0-4 ng/ml, 4-8 ng/ml, 8-12 ng/ml, 12-16 ng/ml and ≥16 ng/ml. In addition to the SRL blood concentration, platelet counts and adverse events that occurred during the first 6 weeks of SRL treatment were analyzed. These findings were then used to establish the decision matrix tables and ROC curves, which helped identify the therapeutic window of SRL. Based on the values and trends of true-positive rate (TPR) and false-positive rate (FPR) in the ROC curve, patients who achieved a SRL blood concentration of 4-12 ng/ml displayed a higher response rate compared to those with a SRL concentration of 0-4 ng/ml or ≥16ng/ml. Additionally, the response rate was better for patients with a SRL concentration of 8-12 ng/ml compared to 4-8 ng/ml. Adverse events were related to the concentration of SRL; however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the concentrations of 4-8 ng/ml and 8-12 ng/ml (P > .05). Regression analysis suggested that the concentration of SRL correlated with the patient's age, PLT count at the start of SRL administration, and the dose of SRL. It is suggested that the optimal blood concentration of SRL monotherapy for managing ITP is 8-12 ng/ml. This range may achieve a favorable balance between clinical efficacy and the severity of adverse events.

Although sirolimus (SRL) has been proven to be an effective alternative agent for refractory/relapsed immune thrombocytopenia (R/R ITP), there is currently no recommended optimal blood concentration during its administration. We collected data on SRL drug concentration, platelet response, and drug side effects in ITP patients, constructed ROC curves to evaluate the relationship between the SRL concentration and both efficacy and side effects, and finally suggested a most appropriate SRL blood concentration (8­12ng/ml). This concentration window ensured optimal efficacy of SRL in the treatment of ITP while maintaining tolerable side effects. Additionally, we conducted a multivariate analysis to explore factors that may influence SRL blood concentration. The present study made an important contribution to the precision therapy of ITP with sirolimus by clarifying the optimal blood concentration range.