Unknown, so also unvalued? Blood donation awareness and attitudes of potential donors of Dutch and African descent.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many Western countries face a shortage of African blood donors, while their specific blood groups are needed to transfuse chronic transfusion patients of similar ethnic background. Blood donation awareness and attitudes greatly impact the decision to become a blood donor, but how they are related and differ across ethnic groups is understudied. This study investigated blood donation awareness and attitudes of individuals of Dutch and African descent in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey data of 257 African and 152 Dutch non-donors measuring donation awareness (i.e. being familiar with the Dutch blood bank organization and knowing others who donated blood), cognitive (evaluative judgements) and affective (emotional reactions) attitudes were included. t-Tests, chi-square tests, linear and logistic regressions were conducted to study differences and associations between donation awareness and attitudes. RESULTS: African individuals were less often aware of the Dutch blood bank organization (43%; p < 0·05) or others who donated blood (51%; p < 0·05) than Dutch individuals (55% and 68%, respectively). African individuals had lower cognitive donation attitudes compared with Dutch individuals (p < 0·001), but no differences were found for affective attitudes (p = 0·55). High donation awareness was associated with higher cognitive (p < 0·001) and affective (p < 0·05) donation attitudes among African minorities, but not among Dutch individuals. CONCLUSION: The lower donation awareness and cognitive attitudes of African minorities should be taken into consideration in donor recruitment. Raising awareness through effective communication strategies might be essential in the donor decision making process of this target group.

Dietary intake of heme iron is associated with ferritin and hemoglobin levels in Dutch blood donors: results from Donor InSight.

Whole blood donors, especially frequently donating donors, have a risk of iron deficiency and low hemoglobin levels, which may affect their health and eligibility to donate. Lifestyle behaviors, such as dietary iron intake and physical activity, may influence iron stores and thereby hemoglobin levels. We aimed to investigate whether dietary iron intake and questionnaire-based moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were associated with hemoglobin levels, and whether ferritin levels mediated these associations. In Donor InSight-III, a Dutch cohort study of blood and plasma donors, data on heme and non-heme iron intake (mg/day), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (10 minutes/day), hemoglobin levels (mmol/L) and ferritin levels (µg/L) were available in 2,323 donors (1,074 male). Donors with higher heme iron intakes (regression coefficients (ß) in men and women: 0.160 and 0.065 mmol/L higher hemoglobin per 1 mg of heme iron, respectively) and lower non-heme iron intakes (ß: -0.014 and -0.017, respectively) had higher hemoglobin levels, adjusted for relevant confounders. Ferritin levels mediated these associations (indirect effect (95% confidence interval) in men and women respectively: 0.074 (0.045; 0.111) and 0.061 (0.030; 0.096) for heme and -0.003 (-0.008;0.001) and -0.008 (-0.013;-0.003) for non-heme). Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was negatively associated with hemoglobin levels in men only (ß: -0.005), but not mediated by ferritin levels. In conclusion, higher heme and lower non-heme iron intake were associated with higher hemoglobin levels in donors, via higher ferritin levels. This indicates that donors with high heme iron intake may be more capable of maintaining iron stores to recover hemoglobin levels after blood donation.

Impact of risk-dependent interventions on low haemoglobin deferral rates in whole blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors with a relatively low haemoglobin (Hb) level at their previous donation attempt have an increased risk of Hb deferral at the subsequent donation attempt. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the interventions prolongation of donation interval and/or a dietary advice decrease the Hb deferral rate. METHODS: 11 897 whole blood donors with Hb levels from below to 0·2 mmol/l above the cut-off level for donation received either no intervention, a prolongation of the donation interval to six or twelve months, a dietary advice, or both. Deferral rates for low Hb levels at the subsequent donation attempt were compared in the different intervention groups. Additionally, the effects of the interventions on Hb deferral risk and donor return for a subsequent donation attempt were analysed using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The Hb deferral rate was substantially lower in the group that received a prolongation of the donation interval to six months than in the Control Group (12·9% vs. 6·3% in men and 20·4% vs. 13·4% in women). However, the additional benefit of twelve over 6-month interval prolongation was small, and no benefit of a dietary advice showed up. On the other hand, receiving a dietary advice increased the likelihood of donor return for a subsequent donation attempt. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a protocol for the prolongation of donation intervals to six months for donors with Hb levels from below to slightly above the cut-off level for donation may reduce the deferral rate for low Hb levels while keeping donor lapse at a minimum.

Lifestyle behaviours, ethnicity and menstruation have little added value in prediction models for low haemoglobin deferral in whole blood donors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the added value of questionnaire-based predictors to existing prediction models for low haemoglobin (Hb) deferral in whole blood donors. BACKGROUND: Prediction models for Hb deferral risk can be applied in the invitation process of donors for a blood donation. Existing prediction models are based on routinely collected data. The model performance might be improved by the addition of predictive factors. METHODS: The added value of food consumption, smoking, physical activity, ethnicity and menstruation in the prediction of Hb deferral was assessed by comparing the existing models with extended models using the following measures: model X2 , concordance (c)-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI). RESULTS: Addition of one candidate predictor to the models did not substantially improve the model performance. Addition of multiple new candidate predictors significantly increased the model X2 (from 137 to 159 for men, and from 157 to 199 for women) and resulted in a non-significant increase of the c-statistic (from 0.85 to 0.87 for men, and from 0.78 to 0.81 for women). The NRI for men was 11.4% and for women 1.5% after addition of multiple predictors. CONCLUSION: Addition of lifestyle behaviours, ethnicity or menstruation to prediction models for low Hb deferral in whole blood donors improved the model performance, but not substantially. For easy use in practice, we do not recommend addition of the investigated predictors to the prediction models.

Determinants of blood donation willingness in the European Union: a cross-country perspective on perceived transfusion safety, concerns, and incentives.

BACKGROUND: Willingness to donate blood depends on personal characteristics, beliefs, and motivations, but also on the cultural context. The aim of this study was to examine whether willingness to donate blood is associated with attitudes toward blood transfusion, personal motivators, and incentives and whether these factors vary across countries in the European Union (EU). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 27,868 participants, from 28 EU member states, who were interviewed about blood donation and transfusion-related issues for the 2014 round of the Eurobarometer, a country-comparative survey, collected on behalf of the European Commission. Participants were asked whether they would be willing to donate blood and for which reasons (motivators) and which incentives are appropriate to receive in return for a blood donation. RESULTS: Willingness to donate varied significantly across countries and was positively associated with perceived blood transfusion safety. Furthermore, helping family or people in need were the most powerful motivators for blood donation willingness in almost all countries. In contrast, the number of participants who were willing to donate to alleviate shortages or to contribute to research varied widely across countries. The wish to receive certain incentives, however, did not seem to be related to willingness to donate. CONCLUSION: Perceived blood transfusion safety and personal motivations may be stronger determinants of willingness to donate than receiving certain incentives. EU-wide strategies and guidelines for donor recruitment and retention should take both overall and country-specific patterns into account. For example, education on the importance of donation could be considered.

The supply chain of migrant blood donors: an organisational interview study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Migrant blood donors are underrepresented worldwide resulting in shortages of compatible blood products. Prior studies focused on individual barriers and motivators of potential blood donors, but no studies addressed organisational factors of the blood supply chain. This study explored the perceptions and experiences in recruitment and retention of migrant - and potentially rare-blood donors among staff members within the blood supply chain and identified obstacles and solutions in this chain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at Sanquin, the national blood supply organisation of the Netherlands. Qualitative in-depth interviews were done among key staff members (N = 17). Expert validity was assessed in three feedback meetings. RESULTS: Seven staff members believed there is a shortage of migrant blood donors, while five believed there is not. However, there was a consensus that it may become a problem in the future due to demographic changes. The perceived obstacles to recruit and retain migrant donors were difficulties in determining how many migrant donors are needed and recruiting them, excluding potentially rare donors prior to donation, limited use of extended phenotyping and high blood typing and frozen storage costs. The possible solutions to increase blood pool diversity lay in registering donor ethnicity, specialised information provision for donors, reconsidering eligibility criteria and optimising blood typing strategies. CONCLUSION: Whilst recruitment of migrant blood donors is perceived by staff as difficult, various organisational policies and guidelines seem to hinder retention. Improvements in the blood supply chain may be achieved by addressing logistics, current procedures and registration of ethnicity.

Donor InSight: characteristics and representativeness of a Dutch cohort study on blood and plasma donors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More insight into donor health and behaviour may contribute to more efficient and focused strategies regarding donor care and management. Donor InSight (DIS) is a Dutch cohort study of blood and plasma donors. We aimed to outline the objectives and methods of DIS, describe the cohort, and compare it to the active Dutch donor population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2007-2009 (DIS-I, n = 31 338) and 2012-2013 (DIS-II, 34 826, of whom 22 132 also participated in DIS-I) questionnaire data on demographics, donation, lifestyle, family composition, health and disease were collected. A second follow-up (DIS-III, n = 3046), including donors with differing haemoglobin trajectories, was completed in 2015-2016. DIS-III includes data on genetic determinants, iron and red cell indices. Representativeness of the DIS-I sample for the entire Dutch donor population was assessed by comparing characteristics of both. RESULTS: Donor InSight was initially set up because of a need for more detailed information and evidence as a basis for decision-making in blood banks. DIS-I sample is comparable to the total Dutch donor population in terms of age, body mass index, haemoglobin level, blood pressure, blood type and donation behaviour. CONCLUSION: Donor InSight is a cohort study representative of the Dutch donor population. It provides evidence to support evidence-based decision making.

The association between population density and blood lipid levels in Dutch blood donors.

BACKGROUND: In low and middle-income countries (LMIC), the total and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels of residents of urban areas are reported to be higher than those of rural areas. This may be due to differences in lifestyle behaviors between residents of urban areas and rural areas in LMIC. In this study, our aims were to (1) examine whether or not LDL cholesterol, total/HDL ratios and triglyceride levels of individuals in densely populated areas are higher than those of individuals living in less-densely populated areas in a high-income country (HIC) and (2) investigate the potential mediating roles of physical activity and sedentary behavior. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from 2547 Dutch blood donors that participated in Donor InSight-III. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between population density and LDL cholesterol, total/HDL cholesterol ratio and HDL cholesterol. The mediating roles of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior were investigated in a subsample (n = 740) for which objectively measured MVPA/sedentary behavior data was available. Multiple mediation with linear regression analyses were performed and the product-of-coefficients method was used to calculate direct and indirect effects. RESULTS: Mean LDL cholesterol and median total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and triglyceride levels were 2.89, 3.43 and 1.29 mmol/L, respectively. Population density was not associated with LDL cholesterol [ß 0.00 (- 0.01; 0.01)], log transformed total/HDL cholesterol ratio [ß 1.00 (1.00; 1.00)] and triglyceride levels [ß 1.00 (0.99; 1.00)]. No statistically significant direct or indirect effects were found. CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous findings in LMIC, no evidence was found that population density is associated with blood lipid levels in blood donors in the Netherlands or that MVPA and sedentary behavior mediate this association. This may be the result of socioeconomic differences and, in part, may be due to the good health of the study population and the relatively high population density in the Netherlands. Also, compared to LMIC, differences in physical activity levels in more versus less populated areas may be less pronounced in HIC.

Utility of zinc protoporphyrin in management of whole blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Deferral for low hemoglobin (Hb) increases the likelihood that donors do not return for future donations. Zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) has been described as a sensitive marker of iron-deficient erythropoiesis, before Hb decreases. It is a relatively cheap, rapid, and easy-to-perform measurement in a drop of whole blood. To assess the utility of ZPP measurement in donor management we examined whether ZPP and Hb levels among first-time donors differ from repeat donors. We further explored whether ZPP increases over subsequent donations at a donor population level and whether increasing ZPP levels coincide with decreasing Hb levels and donor deferral. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We included first-time (n = 4983) and repeat (n = 3533) whole blood donors from the ZPP and Iron in the Netherlands Cohort (ZINC) study. ZPP and Hb were measured at each subsequent donation during a 4-year period after inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Median ZPP levels were higher in repeat than in first-time donors. In first-time donors, especially women, ZPP levels were increased with a corresponding decline in Hb levels over subsequent donations. ZPP levels were increased among first-time donors deferred for low Hb. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that adding ZPP to Hb measurements in the daily blood collection setting, especially for first-time donors and first-time female donors may add to the identification of a donor subpopulation with low functional iron stores.

Organ Donation Registration and Decision-Making Among Current Blood Donors in the Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: In the Netherlands, there is a constant shortage in donor organs, resulting in long waiting lists. The decision to register as organ donor is associated with several demographic, cultural, and personal factors. Previous research on attitudes and motivations toward blood and organ donations provided similar results. RESEARCH QUESTION: The current study investigated demographic, cultural, and personal determinants of organ donation registration among current Dutch blood donors. DESIGN: We used data from Donor InSight (2012; N = 20 063), a cohort study among Dutch blood donors, to test whether age, gender, religious and political preferences, donor attitude, and altruism predicted organ donor registration among current blood donors. RESULTS: Organ donors were more often represented in the blood donor population compared to the general Dutch population. Women showed a higher propensity to be registered as organ donor. Higher education as well as higher prosocial value orientation, prosocial behavior, that is, doing volunteer work, and awareness of need significantly associated with being registered as organ donor. Religious denomination negatively predicted organ donation registration across all faiths. DISCUSSION: Results are discussed in light of cultural context, and possible implications for improving information provision and recruitment are mentioned.

Hemoglobin assessment: precision and practicability evaluated in the Netherlands-the HAPPEN study.

BACKGROUND: Most donors do not like the invasive hemoglobin (Hb) measurement in fingerstick capillary samples. Alternative noninvasive devices have recently become available. In this study we assessed the precision and practicability of noninvasive devices and compared them with measurements in capillary and venous samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2589 blood donors were included in the study. Hb levels were measured with the noninvasive devices NBM 200 or Haemospect and compared with values obtained with the invasive devices HemoCue 201 and HemoCue 301 and with venous values. Precision was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and specificity for detection of Hb levels below the cutoff level for donation, taking venous values as "reference values." RESULTS: Hb levels measured with both invasive and noninvasive devices differed significantly from venous measurements. Measurements with invasive devices correlated stronger with venous values and were more precise. Sensitivity ranged from 30.1% (HemoCue 201) to 3.5% (Haemospect) in men and from 36.6% (HemoCue 201) to 10.8% (Haemospect) in women. Specificity ranged from 99.8% (HemoCue 201) to 95.5% (Haemospect) in men and from 98.9% (HemoCue 201) to 94.6% (NBM 200) in women. Most donors preferred the noninvasive measurement. CONCLUSION: Measurements with invasive devices showed stronger correlation and better agreement with venous values than noninvasive devices. Sensitivity was low for all measurement devices, particularly the noninvasive ones. In terms of precision invasive measurement would be preferred for donor screening, although a majority of donors preferred the noninvasive measurement.

Generalizability of Dutch Prediction Models for Low Hemoglobin Deferral: A Study on External Validation and Updating in Swiss Whole Blood Donors.

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific prediction models for low hemoglobin (Hb) deferral have been developed in Dutch whole blood donors. In this study, we validated and updated the models in a cohort of Swiss whole blood donors. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 53,772 Swiss whole blood donors were used. The predictive performance of the Dutch models was assessed in terms of calibration (agreement between predicted probabilities and observed frequencies) and discrimination (ability to discriminate between deferred and approved donors). The models were updated by revising the strength of the individual predictors in the models. RESULTS: A total of 1,065 men (3.3%) and 2,063 women (9.7%) were deferred from donation because of a low Hb level. Validation in Swiss donors demonstrated underestimation of predicted risks and significantly lower discriminative ability. The predictive effects of most predictors were weaker in Swiss donors. Updating the models increased the calibration for both men and women, and slightly increased the discriminative ability in men. CONCLUSION: Validation of the Dutch prediction models in Swiss whole blood donors showed lower, though adequate performance. In general, the Dutch prediction models can reliably predict the risk of Hb deferral, although for application in other countries small adaptations are necessary.

Minimum donation intervals should be reconsidered to decrease low hemoglobin deferral in whole blood donors: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Most donor deferrals are due to low hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Previously measured Hb levels and donation intervals are known to be associated with Hb deferral. However, this relationship has never been quantified. In this study, we related the prevalence of Hb deferral to previously measured Hb levels and donation intervals. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 220,946 whole blood donors were categorized into groups based on their Hb level at the previous donation and on the time interval since the previous donation. For each group, the prevalence of Hb deferral was assessed. RESULTS: Hb deferral rates were higher when Hb levels at the previous donation were lower and donation intervals were shorter. With a donation interval shorter than 3 months, the prevalence of Hb deferral was below the 10% threshold only when the previous Hb level was at least 0.3 mmol/L above the cutoff level for donation. CONCLUSION: To maintain appropriate Hb levels, the minimum donation interval of 56 days is only sufficient for donors with Hb levels far above the cutoff level for donation. Protocols for minimum donation intervals should be reconsidered and may be based on previously measured Hb levels. This may result in a decrease of low Hb deferral.

Prediction of hemoglobin levels in whole blood donors: how to model donation history.

BACKGROUND: Recently, prediction models for hemoglobin (Hb) deferral risk have been developed. These models consider the previous Hb level plus change in Hb. Here, we investigated if the performance of models could be improved by considering more information on Hb level history. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data of 166,497 Dutch whole blood donors with sequential Hb measurements during 2 years (760,444 in total) were used to develop and internally validate three different regression models: two simple linear models with Hb level history included as 1) Hb at the previous visit plus change in Hb or 2) mean of all previous Hb levels and one mixed-effect model including measurements of all previous Hb levels. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of men and 21% of women were deferred because of a low Hb level at least once in 2 years. The simple linear models and the mixed-effect model performed similar, if an estimate of the random intercept of the mixed-effect model was used for individual donors to calculate the predicted Hb level. In men, the concordance (c)-statistic ranged from 0.87 to 0.89 and the R(2) ranged from 0.42 to 0.45. In women, the c-statistic ranged from 0.81 to 0.84. Values of R(2) in women were higher for the simple linear models than for the mixed-effect model, 0.37 and 0.40 versus 0.30, respectively. CONCLUSION: Previous Hb levels could be summarized with one predictor as the mean value of all previous Hb levels. This predictor can be used in an easy-to-use simple linear regression model.

External validation and updating of a Dutch prediction model for low hemoglobin deferral in Irish whole blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Recently, sex-specific prediction models for low hemoglobin (Hb) deferral have been developed in Dutch whole blood donors. In the present study, we validated and updated the models in a cohort of Irish whole blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 45,031 Irish whole blood donors were used. Hb cutoff levels for donation were approximately 0.35 mmol/L lower in Ireland than the Dutch cutoff levels (8.07 mmol/L vs. 8.40 mmol/L in men; 7.45 mmol/L vs. 7.80 mmol/L in women). The predictive performance of the models was assessed with calibration plots, calibration-in-the-large, and the concordance (c)-statistic. The models were updated by revising the strength of the individual predictors in the models. RESULTS: A total of 613 men (2.4%) and 1624 women (8.4%) were deferred from donation because of a low Hb level. Validation demonstrated underestimation of predicted risks and lower c-statistics for men and women compared to the Dutch cohort. The strength of most predictive factors, particularly previous Hb level, was lower in Irish donors. The updated models showed a c-statistic of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.84) for men and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74-0.77) for women. CONCLUSION: The performance of Dutch prediction models for Hb deferral was limited when validated in Irish whole blood donors. Updating the models resulted in different predictor effects. This improved mainly the model calibration; the improvement in discrimination was small.

Zinc protoporphyrin levels have added value in the prediction of low hemoglobin deferral in whole blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Increased zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) levels can indicate iron deficiency and may be predictive for low hemoglobin (Hb) deferral in blood donors. Prediction models for Hb deferral in whole blood donors have already been developed. In this study, we examined if addition of ZPP to these prediction models improves risk estimation of Hb deferral. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included 4598 Dutch whole blood donors. Information on ZPP levels measured at the previous visit was added to the existing prediction models to estimate the risk of Hb deferral. Models were compared using the following measures: concordance (c)-statistic, continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and clinical net benefit (NB). RESULTS: Seventy-six male donors (2.9%) and 69 female donors (3.5%) were deferred because of a low Hb level. Previous ZPP level was associated with risk of Hb deferral (odds ratio for interquartile range of previous ZPP level, men 2.0 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.7-2.3]; women 2.2 [95% CI, 1.9-2.4]) in a multivariable risk model. Addition of ZPP into the models resulted in an increase of the c-statistic from 0.93 to 0.94 for men and from 0.80 to 0.85 for women. The added value of ZPP was confirmed by measures of clinical usefulness. NRI for men was 0.42, and for women, 0.56. At relevant threshold probabilities between 10 and 15%, NB was higher for models considering ZPP. CONCLUSION: This study shows that ZPP measurements obtained at the previous visit may have added value in the risk prediction of Hb deferral in whole blood donors.

High prevalence of subclinical iron deficiency in whole blood donors not deferred for low hemoglobin.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors that meet the hemoglobin (Hb) criteria for donation may have undetected subclinical iron deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of subclinical iron deficiency in whole blood donors with Hb levels above cutoff levels for donation by measuring zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) levels. In addition, prevalence rates based on other iron variables were assessed for comparison. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population comprised 5280 Dutch whole blood donors, who passed the Hb criteria for donation. During donor screening, Hb levels were measured in capillary samples (finger prick), and venous blood samples were taken for measurements of ZPP and other iron variables. These variables included ferritin, transferrin saturation, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), hepcidin, red blood cell mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and mean cell Hb (MCH). RESULTS: With a ZPP cutoff level of at least 100 µmol/mol heme, subclinical iron deficiency was present in 6.9% of male donors and in 9.8% of female donors. Based on other iron variables, iron deficiency was also observed. Prevalence rates ranged from 4.8% (based on transferrin saturation) to 27.4% (based on hepcidin concentration) in men and from 5.6% (based on sTfR concentration) to 24.7% (based on hepcidin concentration) in women. CONCLUSION: Results from this study showed that subclinical iron deficiency is prevalent among blood donors that meet the Hb criteria for blood donation, based on ZPP levels and on other iron variables. This finding needs attention because these donors are at increased risk of developing iron deficiency affecting Hb formation and other cellular processes.

Development and validation of a prediction model for low hemoglobin deferral in a large cohort of whole blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 5% of the invited blood donors is eventually deferred from donation because of low hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Estimating the risk of Hb deferral in blood donors can be helpful in the management of the donation program. We developed and validated a prediction model for Hb deferral in whole blood donors, separately for men and women. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from a Dutch prospective cohort of 220,946 whole blood donors were used to identify predictors for Hb deferral using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Validity of the prediction models was assessed with a cross-validation. RESULTS: A total of 12,865 donors (5.8%) were deferred because of a low Hb level. The strongest predictors of Hb deferral were Hb level measured at the previous visit, age, seasonality, difference in Hb levels between the previous two visits, time since the previous visit, deferral at the previous visit, and the total number of whole blood donations in the past 2 years for both men and women. The prediction models had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 for men and 0.84 for women. Cross-validation showed similar results and good calibration. CONCLUSION: Using a limited number of easy-to-measure characteristics enables a good prediction of Hb deferral risk in whole blood donors. The prediction models may guide the decision which donors to invite for a next donation and for which donors the invitation should be postponed. Potentially, this could decrease the number of Hb deferrals in blood donors.

Are lapsed donors willing to resume blood donation, and what determines their motivation to do so?

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the possibility of rerecruiting lapsed blood donors. Reasons for donation cessation, motivation to restart donation, and modifiable components of donation motivation were examined. We distinguished between lapsed donors who had passively withdrawn by merely not responding to donation invitations and donors who had contacted the blood bank to actively withdraw. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent to 400 actively lapsed donors and to 400 passively lapsed donors, measuring intention to restart donation and psychological correlates of restart intention. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The response rate among actively lapsed donors was higher than among passively lapsed donors (37% vs. 25%). Actively lapsed donors typically ceased donating because of physical reactions, while passively lapsed donors quit because of a busy lifestyle. Nonetheless, 51% of actively lapsed responders and 80% of passively lapsed responders were willing to restart donations. Multiple regression analysis showed that, for passively lapsed donors, cognitive attitude was the strongest correlate of intention to donate in the future (ß=0.605, p<0.001), with affective attitude (ß=0.239, p<0.05) and self-efficacy (ß=0.266, p<0.001) explaining useful proportions of the variance as well. For actively lapsed donors, cognitive attitude was also the strongest correlate of intention (ß=0.601, p<0.001), with affective attitude (ß=0.345, p<0.001) and moral norm (ß=-0.118, p<0.05) explaining smaller proportions of the variance. CONCLUSION: The majority of lapsed donors indicated a moderate to high intention to restart donations. Interventions focusing on boosting cognitive and affective attitudes and self-efficacy could further raise such intentions.

Donor vigilance: what are we doing about it?

Donor vigilance is the systematic monitoring of adverse reactions and incidents in blood donor care with a view to improving quality and safety for blood donors. Standard international definitions are available for surveillance purposes. In recent years advances have been made in determining risk factors for vasovagal and other adverse reactions to blood donation as well as in evaluating preventive measures. Blood establishments should record all adverse reactions in blood donors. Besides its use for individual donor care, this information can be reviewed within and between organisations to guide policy decisions and research for improving donor care.