Training in obstetrics and gynecology between reality and vision: results of a JAGO-NOGGO survey in 601 physicians (NOGGO-Monitor-12 trial).

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to establish a benchmark by collecting baseline data on surgical education in obstetrics and gynecology in Germany, including factual number of operations performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nationwide anonymous survey was conducted in Germany between January 2019 and July 2019 utilizing a specially designed questionnaire which addressed both residents and senior trainers. RESULTS: A total of 601 participants completed the survey, comprising 305 trainees and 296 trainers. The trainees reported performing a median of 125 non-obstetric surgeries (IQR: 41-332) and 75 obstetric procedures (IQR: 27-168) independently. While most last-year residents managed to meet the targeted numbers for minor surgical procedures outlined in the logbook, they fell short of achieving the required numbers for major operations, such as hysterectomies or more complex laparoscopies. Although both trainees and trainers emphasized the significance of surgical training, the overall quality of the training was rated poorly, particularly by trainees. This was attributed to a high proportion of administrative tasks and a deficiency in teaching time within the operating theater. External fellowship and mentoring programs, as well as the implementation of regular, centralized reviews of residency training, were identified as potentially beneficial by both trainees and trainers. CONCLUSION: The findings of this survey should serve as a wake-up call both within and outside of Germany, highlighting the importance of comprehensive and structured surgical training to enhance long-term patient care and increase satisfaction among obstetrics and gynecology trainees.

Reconstructive breast surgery with partially absorbable bi-component Seragyn® BR soft mesh: an outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Synthetic meshes and acellular dermal matrices are increasingly used in implant-based breast reconstruction. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of complications following the implantation of the partially absorbable bi-component soft mesh SERAGYN® BR and assess risk factors for adverse operative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was performed: The SERAGYN® BR soft mesh was utilized in 148 operations (skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, and secondary reconstruction after mastectomy) in four different institutions in Germany from June 2012 to February 2014. We analyzed whether the results were affected by tumor morphology (e.g., grading), patient characteristics and comorbidities, previous surgery or therapies, and use of alloplastic materials. RESULTS: The SERAGYN® BR soft mesh was successfully implanted in 131 of 148 operations. The rate of reconstructive failure was 11.5%. The most common complication was seroma (25.7%), followed by hematoma and skin infection (each 14.2%). Wound-healing issues were detected in 13.5% cases, secondary wound infections in 10.8%. 83.8% of operations had no severe complications. Independent predictors for reconstructive failure were wound-healing issues, nipple- or skin necrosis, wound- or skin infections, a high volume of excised tissue, hematomas, seromas, and sentinel lymph node excisions. A higher body mass index was correlated with a higher rate of infection. CONCLUSION: SERAGYN® BR mesh can be used successfully in breast reconstructive surgery. Rates of major complications or reconstructive failure are comparable to the use of other synthetic or biological meshes.

Reducing trainee mistakes. Better performance with changing to a high-fidelity simulation system?

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage is a significant cause of both maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide and is increasing in incidence. This study aimed to assess improvement and identify shortcomings in trainee performance in different simulation systems in the management of postpartum hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To perform a pilot study evaluating and comparing high- and low-fidelity simulation models, assessing improvement in repeated performance with high-fidelity mode and identifying mistakes made assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills and thereby exploring what aspects of emergency management of postpartum hemorrhage should be prioritized in teaching settings and assessing what simulation setup is most effective in achieving competence. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized, single-blinded, single-institution trial in a population of 17 junior obstetrical trainees at the Charité University Hospital Obstetric Simulation Center in Berlin. Trainees were randomized into 2 groups, with either initial low-fidelity simulation or high-fidelity simulation, followed by repeated assessment of performance, using the high-fidelity model simulation system. Individual simulation sessions were video-recorded and transcribed, and the timing of interventions was documented. Strandardized Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills forms were used as a checklist for performance. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant general improvement in performance (P=.02; 24.7-27.2 of 31.0 points; average of 8.7%) in the second cycle of simulation assessment and a statistically significant training effect (P=.043; 24.4-28.4 of 31.0 points; average of 12.9%) in the group that underwent repeat simulation assessment from the initial low-fidelity system to the high-fidelity system compared with the group using the same high-fidelity setup (P=.276; 25.0-25.8 of 31.0; average of 2.4%). CONCLUSION: There was an improvement in the performance when trainees underwent a repeated cycle of simulation assessment changing from a low-fidelity system to a high-fidelity system. Simulation assessment can identify mistakes and learning gaps that are important for obstetrical trainees. This study found that trainees make the same mistakes, regardless of which simulation model was initially used.

Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients - a pooled analysis of individual patient data from eight prospectively randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies showed the high and independent impact of age (<40 years) on pathologic complete response (pCR) and prognosis for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Some physicians might not consider elderly patients (>65 years) for NACT due to poor prognosis or higher toxicity. The aim of this analysis is to help selecting appropriately elderly women who would benefit from NACT. Secondly, survival parameters are investigated in several histological subgroups. METHODS: From 1998 to 2010, eight prospectively randomized German Breast Group (GBG) trials of anthracycline- and taxane-based NACT were performed and analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Compared to the overall average, elderly women had significant larger tumors and more overall lymph node involvement. Histologically, they had more G2 tumors, more estrogen-receptor positive tumors. pCR (ypT0 ypN0) was strongly associated with age. The multivariable logistic regression analysis of clinical parameters showed that young age, clinical stage T4, invasive ductal cancer and poor differentiated breast cancer are predictive for high pCR. The multivariate analyses of molecular subgroups showed that age >65years is a predictor of significant lower pCR in HER2- breast cancers. Nonetheless, HER2+ patients showed pCR rates as high- and HR+/HER2+ even higher - pCR rates compared to younger patients. DISCUSSION: This study underlines the unfavorable impact of higher age on pCR, but it shows a realistic chance for pCR if NACT is applied - especially for HER2+ patients. Furthermore, elderly patients with non-TNBC showed a good prognosis (comparable to younger patients) regarding overall survival, even if they do not have pCR.