Resistance Mechanisms to Anti-PD Cancer Immunotherapy.

The transformative success of antibodies targeting the PD-1 (programmed death 1)/B7-H1 (B7 homolog 1) pathway (anti-PD therapy) has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, only a fraction of patients with solid tumors and some hematopoietic malignancies respond to anti-PD therapy, and the reason for failure in other patients is less known. By dissecting the mechanisms underlying this resistance, current studies reveal that the tumor microenvironment is a major location for resistance to occur. Furthermore, the resistance mechanisms appear to be highly heterogeneous. Here, we discuss recent human cancer data identifying mechanisms of resistance to anti-PD therapy. We review evidence for immune-based resistance mechanisms such as loss of neoantigens, defects in antigen presentation and interferon signaling, immune inhibitory molecules, and exclusion of T cells. We also review the clinical evidence for emerging mechanisms of resistance to anti-PD therapy, such as alterations in metabolism, microbiota, and epigenetics. Finally, we discuss strategies to overcome anti-PD therapy resistance and emphasize the need to develop additional immunotherapies based on the concept of normalization cancer immunotherapy.

Epigenome signature as an immunophenotype indicator prompts durable clinical immunotherapy benefits in lung adenocarcinoma.

Intertumoral immune heterogeneity is a critical reason for distinct clinical benefits of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Tumor immunophenotype (immune 'Hot' or 'Cold') suggests immunological individual differences and potential clinical treatment guidelines. However, employing epigenome signatures to determine tumor immunophenotypes and responsive treatment is not well understood. To delineate the tumor immunophenotype and immune heterogeneity, we first distinguished the immune 'Hot' and 'Cold' tumors of LUAD based on five immune expression signatures. In terms of clinical presentation, the immune 'Hot' tumors usually had higher immunoactivity, lower disease stages and better survival outcomes than 'Cold' tumors. At the epigenome levels, we observed that distinct DNA methylation patterns between immunophenotypes were closely associated with LUAD development. Hence, we identified a set of five CpG sites as the immunophenotype-related methylation signature (iPMS) for tumor immunophenotyping and further confirmed its efficiency based on a machine learning framework. Furthermore, we found iPMS and immunophenotype-related immune checkpoints (IPCPs) could contribute to the risk of tumor progression, implying IPCP has the potential to be a novel immunotherapy blockade target. After further parsing of the role of iPMS-predicted immunophenotypes, we found immune 'Hot' was a protective factor leading to better survival outcomes when patients received the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. And iPMS was also a well-performed signature (AUC = 0.752) for predicting the durable/nondurable clinical benefits. In summary, our study explored the role of epigenome signature in clinical tumor immunophenotyping. Utilizing iPMS to characterize tumor immunophenotypes will facilitate developing personalized epigenetic anticancer approaches.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor versus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has revolutionized the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, clinical trials suggest differential efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents versus anti-PD-L1 agents in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC in real-world practice. METHODS: Patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide combined with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 agents as first-line treatment in different centers of PLA General Hospital between January 2017 and October 2021 were included for this study. Survival outcomes and safety were compared between patients receiving anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 agents. RESULTS: Of the total 154 included patients, 68 received anti-PD-1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-1 group), and 86 received anti-PD-L1 agents plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 group). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort were 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-8.2 months) and 17.4 months (95% CI: 15.3-19.3 months), respectively. Median PFS and OS were comparable between the PD-1 group and PD-L1 group (PFS: 7.6 months vs. 8.3 months, HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.79-1.62, p = 0.415; OS: 26.9 months vs. 25.6 months, HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.63-1.47, p = 0.859. The objective response rate and disease control rate were comparable between the two groups: 79.4% vs. 79.1% and 92.6% vs. 94.2%, respectively. The 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month PFS and OS rates were slightly higher in the PD-L1 group than in the PD-1 group, while the 24-month PFS rate was slightly higher in the PD-1 group than in the PD-L1 group. Stratified analysis showed that locoregional thoracic radiotherapy and normal lactate dehydrogenase level were independent predictors of better OS in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus ICI. Adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 agents and anti-PD-L1 agents combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC are comparably effective and well tolerated.

Differentially Expressed Genes Involved in Primary Resistance to Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced-Stage Pulmonary Cancer.

In the last few years, nivolumab has become the standard of care for advanced-stage lung cancer patients. Unfortunately, up to 60% of patients do not respond to this treatment. In our study, we identified variations in gene expression related to primary resistance to immunotherapy. Bronchoscopy biopsies were obtained from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously characterized as responders or non-responders after nivolumab treatment. Ten tumor biopsies (from three responders and seven non-responders) were analyzed by the differential expression of 760 genes using the NanoString nCounter platform. These genes are known to be involved in the response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy. All the patients were treated with nivolumab. Examining the dysregulated expression of 24 genes made it possible to predict the response to nivolumab treatment. Supervised analysis of the gene expression profile (GEP) revealed that responder patients had significantly higher levels of expression of CXCL11, NT5E, KLRK1, CD3G, GZMA, IDO1, LCK, CXCL9, GNLY, ITGAL, HLA-DRB1, CXCR6, IFNG, CD8A, ITK, B2M, HLA-B, and HLA-A than did non-responder patients. In contrast, PNOC, CD19, TP73, ARG1, FCRL2, and PTGER1 genes had significantly lower expression levels than non-responder patients. These findings were validated as predictive biomarkers in an independent series of 201 patients treated with nivolumab (22 hepatocellular carcinomas, 14 non-squamous cell lung carcinomas, 5 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, 1 ureter/renal pelvis carcinoma, 120 melanomas, 4 bladder carcinomas, 31 renal cell carcinomas, and 4 squamous cell lung carcinomas). ROC curve analysis showed that the expression levels of ITK, NT5E, ITGAL, and CD8A were the best predictors of response to nivolumab. Further, 13/24 genes showed an adverse impact on overall survival (OS) in an independent, large series of patients with NSCLC (2166 cases). In summary, we found a strong association between the global GEP of advanced NSCLC and the response to nivolumab. The classification of NSCLC patients based on GEP enabled us to identify those patients who genuinely benefited from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We also demonstrated that abnormal expression of most of the markers comprising the genomic signature has an adverse influence on OS, making them significant markers for therapeutic decision-making. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients are required to confirm the clinical utility of these biomarkers.

Fatty acids metabolism affects the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in tumor immune microenvironment in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a highly invasive and metastatic subtype of kidney malignancy and is correlated with metabolic reprogramming for adaptation to the tumor microenvironment comprising infiltrated immune cells and immunomodulatory molecules. The role of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and their association with abnormal fatty acids metabolism in ccRCC remains poorly understood. METHOD: RNA-seq and clinical data of KIRC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and E-MTAB-1980 from the ArrayExpress dataset. The Nivolumab group and Everolimus group of the CheckMate 025 study, the Atezolizumab arm of IMmotion150 and the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab group of IMmotion151 cohort were obtained for subsequent analysis. After differential expression genes identification, the signature was constructed through univariate Cox proportional hazard regression and simultaneously the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis and the predictive performance of our signature was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis, nomogram, drug sensitivity analysis, immunotherapeutic effect analysis and enrichment analysis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), qPCR and western blot were performed to measure related mRNA or protein expression. Biological features were evaluated by wound healing, cell migration and invasion assays and colony formation test and analyzed using coculture assay and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Twenty fatty acids metabolism-related mRNA signatures were constructed in TCGA and possessed a strong predictive performance demonstrated through time-dependent ROC and KM survival analysis. Notably, the high-risk group exhibited an impaired response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (Programmed death-1 receptor/Programmed death-1 receptor-ligand) therapy compared to the low-risk group. The overall levels of the immune score were higher in the high-risk group. Additionally, drug sensitivity analysis observed that the model could effectively predict efficacy and sensitivity to chemotherapy. Enrichment analysis revealed that the IL6-JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway was a major pathway. IL4I1 could promote ccRCC cells' malignant features through JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway and M2-like macrophage polarization. CONCLUSION: The study elucidates that targeting fatty acids metabolism can affect the therapeutic effect of PD-1/PD-L1 in TME and related signal pathways. The model can effectively predict the response to several treatment options, underscoring its potential clinical utility.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor as a predictive biomarker for poor efficacy of combination treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) suppresses effector T-cells. Few studies have assessed serum sIL-2R in patients receiving immunotherapy. We evaluated the association between serum sIL-2R levels and the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibody combined with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We prospectively enrolled NSCLC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between 8/2019 and 8/2020 and measured their serum sIL-2R. The patients were divided into high and low sIL-2R groups based on the median of sIL-2R levels at pretreatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the high and low sIL-2R groups were compared. The Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS were evaluated using the log-rank test. The multivariate analysis of PFS and OS was performed using the Cox proportional hazard models. Among 54 patients (median age 65, range 34-84), 39 were male and 43 had non-squamous cell carcinoma. The sIL-2R cut-off value was 533 U/mL. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.5 months) and 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-not reached [NR] months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.007), respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.0-NR months) and NR (95% CI, 10.3-NR months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.005), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high sIL-2R was significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS. SIL-2R may be a biomarker for the poor efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy.

Acute kidney injury in patients with cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are widely used in anti-cancer therapy. While they have improved cancer prognoses, immune-related adverse events, which can cause acute kidney injury (AKI), cannot be ignored. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of AKI associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 were enrolled. Clinical information, combined medications, concomitant diseases, tumor types, and laboratory indicators were collected from patient records, and the incidence of AKI was determined. The risk factors for AKI were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Overall, 1418 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 112 days and 92 (6.5%) developed AKI. The median time from the initial anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment to AKI was 99.85 days. Head and neck cancer and combined use of diuretics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), lower hemoglobin level, and other types of chemotherapeutic drugs were independent risk factors for AKI. The complete recovery, partial recovery, non-recovery, and unknown AKI rates were 7.6%, 28.3%, 52.2%, and 11.9%, respectively. Kidney biopsies were performed on two patients with AKI and pathology confirmed diagnosis of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. In this cohort, AKI was not uncommon in patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies; therefore, it is necessary to monitor renal function and identify AKI early, especially in patients with head and neck tumors. Improving anemia and minimizing the use of diuretics, NSAIDs, and chemotherapeutics may reduce AKI.

How to overcome tumor resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy by immunotherapy modifying the tumor microenvironment in MSS CRC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-programmed cell death-1/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) therapy, have elicited impressive clinical outcomes in several malignancies. This is regarded as a pivotal breakthrough in cancer treatment. However, a vast majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are microsatellite stable (MSS) and respond poorly to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. Since ICIs serve as rescuers for immune cell-mediated cancer cell elimination, the limited efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments may be attributed to the privileged tumor microenvironment (TME), which is characterized by unavailable immunosurveillance. Thus, it is essential to modify the pre-existing disordered immune system prior to the application of an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. In this review, to overcome unsatisfactory immunotherapy in CRC patients with MSS, we discussed various combination therapies based on TME reconstruction for improving the susceptibility to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment.

Assessment of PD-L1 Expression on Circulating Tumor Cells for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer Receiving PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Therapies.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade immunotherapies have changed the landscape of cancer therapy. However, the main limitation of these therapies is the lack of definitively predictive biomarkers to predict treatment response. Whether PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with the clinical outcomes of immunotherapy remains to be extensively investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-five patients with different advanced cancers were enrolled in this study and treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. Using the Pep@MNPs method, CTCs were isolated and enumerated. The PD-L1 expression levels were analyzed by an immunofluorescence assay for semiquantitative assessment with four categories (negative, low, medium, and high). RESULTS: Prior to immunotherapy, 81.93% (127/155) of patients had PD-L1-positive CTCs, and 71.61% (111/155) had at least one PD-L1-high CTC. The group with PD-L1-positive CTCs had a higher disease control rate (DCR) (71.56%, 91/127), with a DCR of only 39.29% (11/28) for the remaining individuals (p = .001). The objective response rate and DCR in PD-L1-high patients were higher than those in the other patients (32.44% vs. 13.64%, p = .018 and 75.68% vs. 40.91%, p < .0001, respectively). The reduction in the counts and ratios of PD-L1-positive CTCs and PD-L1-high CTCs reflected a beneficial response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Furthermore, patients with PD-L1-high CTCs had significantly longer progression-free survival (4.9 vs. 2.2 months, p < .0001) and overall survival (16.1 vs. 9.0 months, p = .0235) than those without PD-L1-high CTCs. CONCLUSION: The PD-L1 level on CTCs may serve as a clinically actionable biomarker for immunotherapy, and its dynamic changes could predict the therapeutic response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study was designed to investigate the role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on circulating tumor cells in predicting and monitoring response to programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapies in patients with advanced cancer. The results of the study showed that PD-L1-high-expression circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were both a predictive biomarker and a prognostic factor in patients with advanced cancer treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. These observations suggest that PD-L1 level on CTCs is a potential clinical biomarker for immunotherapy.

Post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in SCLC patients at early phase.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) have been identified as predictors of treatment response in a variety of cancers. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the usefulness of NLR, PLR and SII at baseline and at 6 weeks post-treatment as predictors of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Data of 41 SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy as second- or later-line treatment were analyzed. The overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.2-6.2). The median PFS was significantly longer in patients with NLR < 5 than in patients with NLR ≥ 5 at 6 weeks post treatment (HR = 0.29, 95%CI 0.09-0.96, P = 0.04). However, median PFS was comparable between patients with NLR < 5 and patients with NLR ≥ 5 at baseline (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.24-2.26, P = 0.56). The median PFS was similar between patients with PLR < 169 and those with PLR ≥ 169 at baseline (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.25-1.80, P = 0.43) and at 6 weeks post treatment (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.25-1.86, P = 0.46). No statistically different PFS was found between patients with SII < 730 and those with SII ≥ 730 at baseline (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.26-1.89, P = 0.48) and at 6 weeks post treatment (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.013-1.09, P = 0.07). In conclusion, NLR at 6 weeks after start of treatment appears to be a biomarker of response in the early phase in SCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies as second- or later-line treatment.

Nephrotoxicity in patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have dramatically improved cancer therapy for many patients. Adverse kidney effects have been found to be an important complication but have unclear mechanisms. Methods We searched Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify potential eligible studies. All included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and/or chemotherapy. The relative risk (RR) was used to assess the risk of nephrotoxic events. Results We included 27 clinical trials (15,063 patients). Compared with chemotherapy, the RR of all-grade nephritis was significantly increased with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs (RR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.09-6.99, P = 0.03). Furthermore, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs plus chemotherapy can significantly increase the RR of all-grade nephritis (RR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.07-8.35, P = 0.04). There was also a significant increase in the RRs of all-grade increased blood creatinine (RR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.24-2.86, P = 0.003) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR =3.35, 95% CI: 1.48-7.60, P = 0.004). Conclusions Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs can significantly increase nephrotoxicity in patients with solid tumors, especially when combined with chemotherapy. During the application of these drugs, we should remain aware of nephrotoxicity for better efficacy. Trial registration number and date of registration Not applicable.

Dysregulated ferroptosis-related genes indicate potential clinical benefits for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent programmed cell death mechanism that influences the development of malignancy. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of lung cancer with no known cure. Anti-PD-1/PD-L immunotherapy is effective for patients with partial LUAD. Therefore, there is an immediate requirement of novel markers to predict the individualised benefits of immunotherapy. METHODS: We manually collected the ferroptosis-related gene (FERG) set and employed the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to identify the differentially expressed FERGs. Subsequently, we constructed a recursive partitioning and regression tree (RPART) model to predict the benefits of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Subsequently, the ROC curve and AUC were used to evaluate the model efficiency in an independent dataset. RESULTS: In this study, we found that the dysregulated FERGs were closely associated with multiple metabolic processes in LUAD. Furthermore, we identified three ferroptosis-related tumour subtypes (F1, F3 and F3). The F3 subtype exhibited higher immunoactivity and lower tumour purity, mutation count and aneuploidy and had better survival outcomes compared with the other two subtypes, implying that FERGs played an important role in intertumoral immune heterogeneity. We further explored the role of FERGs in the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. We identified a set of three-FERGs signature (CD44, G6PD and ZEB1) that acted as a promising indicator (AUC = 0.697) for the prediction of the benefits of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Ferroptosis, as emerging programmed cell death mechanism, was associated with cancer development. We used ferroptosis-related genes to predict the immunotherapy benefits that may facilitate the development of individualised anti-cancer treatment strategies.

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Oncogenic Driver Mutations.

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy has emerged as a standard of care for stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past decade. Patient selection is usually based on PD-L1 expression by tumor cells and/or tumor mutational burden. However, mutations in oncogenic drivers such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, or MET modify the immune tumor microenvironment and may promote anti-PD1/PD-L1 resistance. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms associated with these mutations, which shape the immune tumor microenvironment and may impede anti-PD1/PD-L1 efficacy. We provide an overview of the current clinical data on anti-PD1/PD-L1 efficacy in NSCLC with oncogenic driver mutation.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint blockade in self-identified Black patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, race-based differences in efficacy for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been studied to date due to the underrepresentation of patients of minority backgrounds in pivotal trials. In the current study, the authors examined real-world differences in outcome in a diverse patient population. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with single-agent immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) between 2013 and July 2018 at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. Primary efficacy comparison between Black patients and White patients was performed using bivariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Data from 257 patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years; 50.6% of the patients were female, 63.4% were White, 29.5% were Black, and 7.1% of the patients were of "other" race. ICB was the first-line treatment in 51 patients (19.9%), the second-line treatment in 161 patients (62.6%), and the third-line treatment in 33 patients (12.9%). The most commonly used agents were nivolumab (49.0%), pembrolizumab (25.2%), and atezolizumab (21.3%). No differences with regard to OS (P = .839) and PFS (P = .235) were noted between Black and White patients. The sample overall response rate was 20.6% (15.2% in Black patients and 23.1% in White patients). No differences with regard to OS (P = .081) and PFS (P = .176) were observed between female and male patients. The rate of immune-related adverse events was found to be similar in Black and White patients (20.0% vs 29.9%; P = .148). On multivariate analysis, race was not found to be significantly associated with OS or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world analysis of the authors' institutional experience demonstrated similar efficacy and tolerability of ICB in Black versus White patients with advanced NSCLC. Larger multi-institutional studies including other US minority populations would make the findings of the current study more generalizable.

Radiation recall pneumonitis induced by PD-1/PD-L1 blockades: mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

BACKGROUND: The synergistic effect of radiotherapy (RT) in combination with immunotherapy has been shown in several clinical trials and case reports. The overlapping pulmonary toxicity induced by thoracic RT and programmed death 1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockades is an important issue of clinical investigation in combination treatment. Thus far, the underlying mechanism of this toxicity remains largely unknown. MAIN TEXT: In this review, we discuss the unique pattern of radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) induced by PD-1 blockade. The clinical presentation is different from common radiation pneumonitis (RP) or RRP induced by cytotoxic drugs. The immune checkpoint inhibitors may evoke an inflammatory reaction in patients' previously irradiated fields, with infiltrating lymphocytes and potential involvement of related cytokines. All RRP patients have showed durable response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1. RRP is manageable; however, interruption of checkpoint blockades is necessary and immunosuppressive treatment should be started immediately. Further analyses of the predictive factors, including RT dosimetric parameters, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and PD-L1 expression, are needed given the wide use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and high mortality from lung toxicity with the combination treatment. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors may evoke an RRP in the patients' previously irradiated fields. Interactions between immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy should be studied further.

Is Weak Acid Beneficial for Addressing Checkpoint Inhibitor-Triggered Cancer Hyper Progression in Anti-PD1/PD-L1 Immunotherapies?

Numerous cases of checkpoint inhibitor-triggered cancer hyperprogression have been documented. A previous hypothesis attributes cancer onset to the local buildup of hydrogen chloride, jointly mediated by hydrogen bond donors and acceptors and basic amino acids. The anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapies may have caused a surge of protons or chloride ions for the effective treatment of neoplasm, thus giving rise to the local formation of hydrogen chloride and subsequently cancer hyperprogression in some susceptible individuals. It was postulated that the local strength of acidity is critical for tumor growth and metastasis, as the intake of weak organic acids reduces cancer risks. The anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapies can be integrated with weak organic acids to reduce adverse reactions and generate better anticancer outcomes.

Hypertrophic lichenoid dermatitis immune-related adverse event during combined immune checkpoint and exportin inhibitor therapy: A diagnostic pitfall for superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer treatment have revolutionized the field of medicine. However, an unintended but frequent consequence of ICI therapy is the development of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as lichenoid dermatitis irAEs (LD-irAEs). The hypertrophic variant of LD-irAE may be a diagnostic challenge since it can mimic superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A 79-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma who began treatment with an ICI-pembrolizumab-plus exportin-1 (XPO1) inhibitor presented after 1 month of therapy with symmetrical violaceous papules coalescing into plaques and with two nodules of the bilateral dorsal hands. Biopsy of the nodules revealed an actinic keratosis and atypical epidermal proliferation concerning for SCC. However, in the ensuing 3 weeks, the patient developed multiple new erythematous, violaceous, and scaly macules and papules, some coalescing into plaques on the extremities. Biopsies of these lesions revealed exuberant irregular epidermal hyperplasia with hypermaturation and lichenoid infiltrate concentrated at the base of the elongated, broadened rete ridges, consistent with hypertrophic LD-irAE. Treatment included topical fluocinonide ointment, intralesional triamcinolone injections and oral acitretin. Distinguishing hypertrophic LD-irAE and SCC can be challenging since both entities share histopathologic features; thus, correlation with clinical presentation is essential for diagnosis and optimal patient management.

Immune-Related Oral, Otologic, and Ocular Adverse Events.

Emerging immunotherapy agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown remarkable promise in the treatment of various malignancies. These drugs selectively target different steps in the immune response cascade to upregulate the body's normal response to cancer. Due to the novelty of these therapeutic agents, their toxicity profile is less well understood.Meta-analysis results reveal that the overall prevalence of oral mucositis, stomatitis, and xerostomia is lower with checkpoint inhibitors compared to conventional chemotherapy, and head and neck radiation therapy. However, the widespread use of immunotherapy reveals new oral mucosal barrier adverse events, including bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and lichenoid mucositis. Audiovestibular dysfunction can occur from autoimmune-mediated pathways of immunotherapy (adoptive cell) with limited treatment options. Such auditory complications can lead to speech recognition deficits and sensorineural hearing loss. Ocular toxicities are among the most common adverse events resulting from the use of these agents. The majority of ocular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are mild, low-grade, non-sight threatening, such as blurred vision, conjunctivitis, and ocular surface disease. Serious and sight-threatening events, including corneal perforation, optic neuropathy, and retinal vascular occlusion, can occur but are infrequent. In this chapter, we review the current evidence on the clinical manifestations of oral, audiovestibular, and ocular immune-related adverse events (i.e., irAEs).

Smokers or non-smokers: who benefits more from immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of malignancies? An up-to-date meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are a milestone in anti-cancer therapy, have been applied in the treatment of multiple malignancies. Real-world data have suggested that smoking status may be associated with the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Hereby, to evaluate "smoking benefit or not", we included numerous high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) without any restriction on category. METHODS: A systematic search of online database was performed from July 2010 to July 2019. Eligible studies included phase II/III RCTs comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple carcinomas and contained subgroup analysis of smoking status. Then, related hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) were pooled. RESULTS: In the initial meta-analysis, compared with chemotherapy, the OS of non-smokers (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98) and smokers (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83) were significantly prolonged with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Outcomes from subgroup analysis showed that in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy groups, non-smokers showed no significant improvement in OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.06), while the OS of smokers was significantly prolonged (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.85); in groups of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, the OS of non-smokers (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71) and smokers (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85) were significantly prolonged. Combined ipilimumab and chemotherapy showed no significance in both groups. CONCLUSION: Smokers benefit from either anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or the combined regimen compared with chemotherapy. Considering cost-effectiveness, monotherapy was recommended to smokers. For non-smokers, only the combined regimen was feasible in non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune-related dermatologic toxicities: to make a long story short.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated durable responses in some patient groups and gained regulatory approval for various cancer indications since 2011. Autoimmune and autoinflammatory adverse events, secondary to the use of such agents are known as "immune-related adverse events" (irAEs) and their incidence, severity and tolerability may vary among the classes of the checkpoint inhibitors. This short review provides an update and summarises the clinical manifestations and management of cutaneous irAEs induced by checkpoint inhibitors that are currently in use.