Prognosis of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 after failure of high-flow nasal cannula: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is an argument whether the delayed intubation aggravate the respiratory failure in Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to investigate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure before mechanical ventilation on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included mechanically ventilated patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between February 2020 and December 2021 at Asan Medical Center. The patients were divided into HFNC failure (HFNC-F) and mechanical ventilation (MV) groups according to the use of HFNC before MV. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the worst values of ventilator parameters from day 1 to day 3 after mechanical ventilation between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 158 mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 were included in this study: 107 patients (67.7%) in the HFNC-F group and 51 (32.3%) in the MV group. The two groups had similar profiles of ventilator parameter from day 1 to day 3 after mechanical ventilation, except of dynamic compliance on day 3 (28.38 mL/cmH2O in MV vs. 30.67 mL/H2O in HFNC-F, p = 0.032). In addition, the HFNC-F group (5.6%) had a lower rate of ECMO at 28 days than the MV group (17.6%), even after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.83; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, HFNC failure before mechanical ventilation was not associated with deterioration of respiratory failure.

Changes in quality of life 1 year after intensive care: a multicenter prospective cohort of ICU survivors.

BACKGROUND: With survival rates of critical illness increasing, quality of life measures are becoming an important outcome of ICU treatment. Therefore, to study the impact of critical illness on quality of life, we explored quality of life before and 1 year after ICU admission in different subgroups of ICU survivors. METHODS: Data from an ongoing prospective multicenter cohort study, the MONITOR-IC, were used. Patients admitted to the ICU in one of eleven participating hospitals between July 2016 and June 2021 were included. Outcome was defined as change in quality of life, measured using the EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, and calculated by subtracting the EQ-5D-5L score 1 day before hospital admission from the EQ-5D-5L score 1 year post-ICU. Based on the minimal clinically important difference, a change in quality of life was defined as a change in EQ-5D-5L score of ≥ 0.08. Subgroups of patients were based on admission diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 3913 (50.6%) included patients completed both baseline and follow-up questionnaires. 1 year post-ICU, patients admitted after a cerebrovascular accident, intracerebral hemorrhage, or (neuro)trauma, on average experienced a significant decrease in quality of life. Conversely, 11 other subgroups of ICU survivors reported improvements in quality of life. The largest average increase in quality of life was seen in patients admitted due to respiratory disease (mean 0.17, SD 0.38), whereas the largest average decrease was observed in trauma patients (mean -0.13, SD 0.28). However, in each of the studied 22 subgroups there were survivors who reported a significant increase in QoL and survivors who reported a significant decrease in QoL. CONCLUSIONS:  This large prospective multicenter cohort study demonstrated the diversity in long-term quality of life between, and even within, subgroups of ICU survivors. These findings emphasize the need for personalized information and post-ICU care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The MONITOR-IC study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03246334 on August 2nd 2017.

The INTOXICATE study: methodology and preliminary results of a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no practice-based, multicenter database of poisoned patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). The INTOXICATE study, endorsed by the ESICM and EAPCCT, aimed to determine the rate of eventful admissions among acutely intoxicated adult ICU patients. METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained for this multicenter, prospective observational study, and data-sharing agreements were signed with each participating center. An electronic case report form was used to collect data on patient demographics, exposure, clinical characteristics, investigations, treatment, and in-hospital mortality data. The primary outcome, 'eventful admission', was a composite outcome defined as the rate of patients who received any of the following treatments in the first 24 h after the ICU admission: oxygen supplementation with a FiO2 > 40%, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, renal replacement therapy (RRT), cardiopulmonary resuscitation, antidotes, active cooling, fluid resuscitation (> 1.5 L of intravenous fluid of any kind), sedation, or who died in the hospital. RESULTS: Seventy-eight ICUs, mainly from Europe, but also from Australia and the Eastern Mediterranean, participated. A total of 2,273 patients were enrolled between November 2020 and June 2023. The median age of the patients was 41 years, 72% were exposed to intoxicating drugs. The observed rate of patients with an eventful ICU admission was 68% (n = 1546/2273 patients). The hospital mortality was 4.5% (n = 103/2273). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients survive, and approximately one third of patients do not receive any ICU-specific interventions after admission in an intensive care unit for acute intoxication. High-quality detailed clinical data have been collected from a large cohort of acutely intoxicated ICU patients, providing information on the pattern of severe acute poisoning requiring intensive care admission and the outcomes of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: OSF registration ID: osf.io/7e5uy.

Composite outcome measures in high-impact critical care randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of composite outcome measures (COM) in clinical trials is increasing. Whilst their use is associated with benefits, several limitations have been highlighted and there is limited literature exploring their use within critical care. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the use of COM in high-impact critical care trials, and compare study parameters (including sample size, statistical significance, and consistency of effect estimates) in trials using composite versus non-composite outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of 16 high-impact journals was conducted. Randomised controlled trials published between 2012 and 2022 reporting a patient important outcome and involving critical care patients, were included. RESULTS: 8271 trials were screened, and 194 included. 39.1% of all trials used a COM and this increased over time. Of those using a COM, only 52.6% explicitly described the outcome as composite. The median number of components was 2 (IQR 2-3). Trials using a COM recruited fewer participants (409 (198.8-851.5) vs 584 (300-1566, p = 0.004), and their use was not associated with increased rates of statistical significance (19.7% vs 17.8%, p = 0.380). Predicted effect sizes were overestimated in all but 6 trials. For studies using a COM the effect estimates were consistent across all components in 43.4% of trials. 93% of COM included components that were not patient important. CONCLUSIONS: COM are increasingly used in critical care trials; however effect estimates are frequently inconsistent across COM components confounding outcome interpretations. The use of COM was associated with smaller sample sizes, and no increased likelihood of statistically significant results. Many of the limitations inherent to the use of COM are relevant to critical care research.

Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.

Immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with cancer, represent a momentous and increasing portion of the population, especially as cancer incidence rises with population growth and aging. These patients are at a heightened risk of developing severe infections, including sepsis and septic shock, due to multiple immunologic defects such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and T and B-cell impairment. The diverse and complex nature of these immunologic profiles, compounded by the concomitant use of immunosuppressive therapies (e.g., corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, and immunotherapy), superimposed by the breakage of natural protective barriers (e.g., mucosal damage, chronic indwelling catheters, and alterations of anatomical structures), increases the risk of various infections. These and other conditions that mimic sepsis pose substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Factors that elevate the risk of progression to septic shock in these patients include advanced age, pre-existing comorbidities, frailty, type of cancer, the severity of immunosuppression, hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and type and timing of responses to initial treatment. The management of vulnerable cancer patients with sepsis or septic shock varies due to biased clinical practices that may result in delayed access to intensive care and worse outcomes. While septic shock is typically associated with poor outcomes in patients with malignancies, survival has significantly improved over time. Therefore, understanding and addressing the unique needs of cancer patients through a new paradigm, which includes the integration of innovative technologies into our healthcare system (e.g., wireless technologies, medical informatics, precision medicine), targeted management strategies, and robust clinical practices, including early identification and diagnosis, coupled with prompt admission to high-level care facilities that promote a multidisciplinary approach, is crucial for improving their prognosis and overall survival rates.

Hospital Outcomes in Patients Who Developed Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Purpose: To identify risk factors for and outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: This is a retrospective study using the Premier Healthcare Database between 2016 and 2020. Patients diagnosed with pneumonia, requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), antimicrobial therapy, and hospital admission ≥2 days were included. Multivariable regression models were used for outcomes including in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and days on MV. Results: 1924 (2.7%) of 72 107 patients with CAP developed ARDS. ARDS was associated with higher mortality (33.7% vs 18.9%; adjusted odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16-2.66), longer hospital LOS (13 vs 9 days; adjusted incidence risk ratio (aIRR) 1.24; 95% CI 1.20-1.27), ICU LOS (9 vs 5 days; aIRR 1.51; 95% CI 1.46-1.56), more MV days (8 vs 5; aIRR 1.54; 95% CI 1.48-1.59), and increased hospitalization cost ($46 459 vs $29 441; aIRR 1.50; 95% CI 1.45-1.55). Conclusion: In CAP, ARDS was associated with worse in-patient outcomes in terms of mortality, LOS, and hospitalization cost. Future studies are needed to explore outcomes in patients with CAP with ARDS and explore risk factors for development of ARDS after CAP.

Prolonged Fatigue and Mental Health Challenges in Critical COVID-19 Survivors.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the development of fatigue and mental illness between 3 and 12 months after critical COVID-19 and explore risk factors for long-lasting symptoms. Study Design and Methods: A prospective, multicenter COVID-19 study in southern Sweden, including adult patients (≥18 years) with rtPCR-confirmed COVID-19 requiring intensive care. Survivors were invited to a follow-up at 3 and 12 months, where patient-reported symptoms were assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist version 5 (PCL-5). The development between 3 and 12 months was described by changes in relation to statistical significance and suggested values for a minimally important difference (MID). Potential risk factors for long-lasting symptoms were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, 262 survivors (87%) participated, 215 (72%) returned at 12 months. Fatigue was reported by 50% versus 40%, with a significant improvement at 12 months (MFIS; median 38 vs. 33, P < .001, MID ≥4). There were no significant differences in symptoms of mental illness between 3 and 12 months, with anxiety present in 33% versus 28%, depression in 30% versus 22%, and posttraumatic stress disorder in 17% versus 13%. A worse functional outcome and less sleep compared to before COVID-19 were risk factors for fatigue and mental illness at 12 months. Conclusions: Fatigue improved between 3 and 12 months but was still common. Symptoms of mental illness remained unchanged with anxiety being the most reported. A worse functional outcome and less sleep compared to before COVID-19 were identified as risk factors for reporting long-lasting symptoms.

Two months outcomes following delirium in the pediatric intensive care unit.

The lasting consequences of delirium in children are not well characterized. This study aimed to compare the two-month outcomes in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors according to the presence of delirium. Post-hoc analysis of a single-center prospective study of mechanically ventilated (invasive ventilation or non-invasive ventilation) children followed at the CHU Sainte-Justine PICU follow-up clinic two months after PICU discharge, between October 2018 and August 2022. Delirium was defined as one or more Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) scores ≥ 9. Primary outcome was survivors' quality of life and secondary outcomes were sleep and posttraumatic stress and anxiety and depression in parents. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models assessed the independent associations between delirium and outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, diagnosis, severity of illness, PICU length of stay, and invasive mechanical ventilation. Of the 179 children included over a 47 month-period, 117 (65.4%) had delirium. Children with delirium were more commonly intubated (91.5% vs. 30.7%, p < 0.001) and had higher PELOD-2 scores (10 vs. 4, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, delirium was associated with a decreased quality of life at 2.3 months post discharge (p = 0.03). The severity of the delirium episode (higher scores of CAPD) was associated with a higher likelihood of sleep disturbances (OR 1.13, p = 0.01) and parental anxiety (OR 1.16, p = 0.01), in addition to lower quality of life (p = 0.03).Conclusions: Two months following their PICU stay, children with delirium had a lower quality of life, suggesting a lasting effect of delirium on children and their families.

In-hospital unfavorable outcomes of MIS-C during 2020-2022: a systematic review.

Studies on the severity in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) show heterogeneous results and may not reflect a global perspective. This systematic review aims to estimate the frequency of in-hospital unfavorable outcomes in patients with MIS-C over the 3 years since the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scielo, and preprint repositories until December 15, 2022. Study selection and data extraction were evaluated independently. The primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and death. Additionally, we evaluated cardiovascular-related outcomes. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis and assessed the certainty of the evidence. Fifty-seven studies (n = 13 254) were included. The frequency of ICU admission was 44.7% (95% CI 38.8-50.7), 11.9% for IMV (95% CI 9.6-14.4), and 2.0% for death (95% CI 1.3-3.0). The requirement of vasoactive/inotropic drugs was 40.1% (95% CI 35.9-44.4), 7.9% for coronary aneurysm (95% CI 4.1-12.7), 30.7% for decreased left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (95% CI 26.3-35.4), and 29.7% for myocarditis (95% CI 18.4-42.4). We assess the included evidence as being of very low certainty. Finally, excess COVID-19 mortality by country and the diagnostic criteria for MIS-C (CDC compared to WHO) were associated with a higher frequency of ICU admissions. The year of study conduction (2022 compared to 2020) was associated with a lower frequency of IMV. CONCLUSION: The frequency of in-hospital unfavorable outcomes in patients with MIS-C was high. Well-designed studies are needed to explore other heterogeneity sources. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: CRD42021284878. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a serious post-infectious condition linked to SARS-CoV-2. Studies on the severity of MIS-C show heterogeneous results. These findings may not be representative of the reality in other regions, making it challenging to draw generalizable conclusions. WHAT IS NEW: • Over the 3 years since the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, our systematic review has shown that the frequency of in-hospital unfavorable outcomes in patients with MIS-C is high, with a very low certainty of the evidence. Our results reflect the reality from a global perspective, across different countries with varying income levels. • The main sources of heterogeneity in the frequency of severe outcomes could be explained by the excess mortality due to COVID-19 in each country, the type of diagnostic criteria for MIS-C, and the year the study was conducted.

Long-term cognitive and pulmonary functions following a lower versus a higher oxygenation target in the HOT-ICU and HOT-COVID trials: A protocol update.

BACKGROUND: The Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU) trial was a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group trial of a lower oxygenation target (arterial partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2 ] = 8 kPa) versus a higher oxygenation target (PaO2 = 12 kPa) in adult ICU patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure; the Handling Oxygenation Targets in coronavirus disease 2019 (HOT-COVID) tested the same oxygenation targets in patients with confirmed COVID-19. In this study, we aim to evaluate the long-term effects of these oxygenation targets on cognitive and pulmonary function. We hypothesise that a lower oxygenation target throughout the ICU stay may result in cognitive impairment, whereas a higher oxygenation target may result in impaired pulmonary function. METHODS: This is the updated protocol and statistical analysis plan of two pre-planned secondary outcomes, the long-term cognitive function, and long-term pulmonary function, in the HOT-ICU and HOT-COVID trials. Patients enrolled in both trials at selected Danish sites and surviving to 1 year after randomisation are eligible to participate. A Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status score and a full-body plethysmography, including diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, will be obtained. The last patient is expected to be included in the spring of 2024. CONCLUSION: This study will provide important information on the long-term effects of a lower versus a higher oxygenation target on long-term cognitive and pulmonary functions in adult ICU patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Adherence with post-hospitalization follow-up after pediatric critical illness due to respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: Adherence with follow-up appointments after a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission is likely a key component in managing post-PICU sequalae. However, prior work on PICU follow-up adherence is limited. The objective of this study is to identify hospitalization characteristics, discharge child health metrics, and follow-up characteristics associated with full adherence with recommended follow-up at a quaternary care center after a PICU admission due to respiratory failure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients ≤ 18 years with respiratory failure admitted between 1/2013-12/2014 to a quaternary care PICU. Post-hospitalization full adherence with recommended follow-up in the two years post discharge (1/2013-3/2017) at the quaternary care center was quantified and compared by demographics, baseline child health metrics, hospitalization characteristics, discharge child health metrics, and follow-up characteristics in bivariate and multivariate analyses. Patients were dichotomized into being non-adherent with follow-up (patients who attended less than 100% of recommended appointments at the quaternary care center) and fully adherent (patients who attended 100% of recommended appointments at the quaternary care center). RESULTS: Of 155 patients alive at hospital discharge, 140 (90.3%) were recommended to follow-up at the quaternary care center. Of the 140 patients with recommended follow-up at the quaternary care center, 32.1% were non-adherent with follow-up and 67.9% were fully adherent. In a multivariable logistic regression model, each additional recommended unique follow-up appointment was associated with lower odds of being fully adherent with follow-up (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91, p = 0.005), and each 10% increase in the proportion of appointments scheduled before discharge was associated with higher odds of being fully adherent with follow-up (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: After admission for acute respiratory failure, only two-thirds of children were fully adherent with recommended follow-up at a quaternary care center. Our findings suggest that limiting the recommended follow-up to only key essential healthcare providers and working to schedule as many appointments as possible before discharge could improve follow-up adherence. However, a better understanding of the factors that lead to non-adherence with follow-up appointments is needed to inform broader system-level approaches could help improve PICU follow-up adherence.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Bundled Treatments: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), defined as Hunt and Hess (HH) grades IV and V, is a challenging disease because of its high mortality and poor functional outcomes. The effectiveness of bundled treatments has been demonstrated in critical diseases. Therefore, poor-grade aSAH bundled treatments have been established. This study aims to evaluate whether bundled treatments can improve long-term outcomes and mortality in patients with poor-grade aSAH. METHODS: This is a comparative study using historical control from 2008 to 2022. Bundled treatments were introduced in 2017. We compared the rate of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 6 months and mortality before and after the introduction of the bundled treatments. To eliminate confounding bias, the propensity score matching method was used. RESULTS: A total of 90 consecutive patients were evaluated. Forty-three patients received bundled treatments, and 47 patients received conventional care. The proportion of patients with HH grade V was higher in the bundle treatment group (41.9% vs. 27.7%). Conversely, the proportion of patients with fixed pupils on the initial examination was higher in the conventional group (30.2% vs. 38.3%). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 31 pairs were allocated to each group. The proportion of patients with 6-month favorable functional outcomes was significantly higher in the bundled treatments group (46.4% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.04). The 6-month mortality rate was 14.3% in the bundled treatments group and 27.3% in the conventional group (p = 0.01). Bundled treatments (odd ratio 14.6 [95% confidence interval 2.1-100.0], p < 0.01) and the presence of an initial pupil reflex (odd ratio 12.0 [95% confidence interval 1.4-104.6], p = 0.02) were significantly associated with a 6-month favorable functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The bundled treatments improve 6-month functional outcome and mortality in patients with poor-grade aSAH.

Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting ICU Admission in Adults with New-Onset Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: Timely intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with encephalitis is associated with better prognosis. Therefore, our aim was to create a risk score predicting ICU admission in adults with encephalitis, which could aid in optimal management and resource allocation. METHODS: We initially identified variables that would be most predictive of ICU admission among 372 patients with encephalitis from two hospital systems in Houston, Texas (cohort 1), who met the International Encephalitis Consortium (IEC) criteria from 2005 to 2023. Subsequently, we used a binary logistic regression model to create a risk score for ICU admission, which we then validated externally using a separate cohort of patients from two hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland (cohort 2), who met the IEC criteria from 2006 to 2022. RESULTS: Of 634 patients with encephalitis, 255 (40%) were admitted to the ICU, including 45 of 113 (39.8%) patients with an autoimmune cause, 100 of 272 (36.7%) with an infectious cause, and 110 of 249 (44.1%) with an unknown cause (p = 0.225). After conducting a multivariate analysis in cohort 1, we found that the presence of focal neurological signs, new-onset seizure, a Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score ≤ 14, leukocytosis, and a history of chronic kidney disease at admission were associated with an increased risk of ICU admission. The resultant clinical score for predicting ICU admission had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.82, p < 0.001). Patients were classified into three risk categories for ICU admission: low risk (score 0, 12.5%), intermediate risk (scores 1-5, 49.5%), and high risk (scores 6-8, 87.5%). External validation in cohort 2 yielded an AUROC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICU admission is common in patients with encephalitis, regardless of etiology. Our risk score, encompassing neurologic and systemic factors, may aid physicians in decisions regarding intensity of care for adult patients with encephalitis upon hospital admission.

Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this document is to provide recommendations on the formal reliability of major clinical predictors often associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) neuroprognostication. METHODS: A narrative systematic review was completed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Setting questions. Predictors, which included both individual clinical variables and prediction models, were selected based on clinical relevance and attention in the literature. Following construction of the evidence profile and summary of findings, recommendations were based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. Good practice statements addressed essential principles of neuroprognostication that could not be framed in the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Setting format. RESULTS: Six candidate clinical variables and two clinical grading scales (the original ICH score and maximally treated ICH score) were selected for recommendation creation. A total of 347 articles out of 10,751 articles screened met our eligibility criteria. Consensus statements of good practice included deferring neuroprognostication-aside from the most clinically devastated patients-for at least the first 48-72 h of intensive care unit admission; understanding what outcomes would have been most valued by the patient; and counseling of patients and surrogates whose ultimate neurological recovery may occur over a variable period of time. Although many clinical variables and grading scales are associated with ICH poor outcome, no clinical variable alone or sole clinical grading scale was suggested by the panel as currently being reliable by itself for use in counseling patients with ICH and their surrogates, regarding functional outcome at 3 months and beyond or 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide recommendations on the formal reliability of predictors of poor outcome in the context of counseling patients with ICH and surrogates and suggest broad principles of neuroprognostication. Clinicians formulating their judgments of prognosis for patients with ICH should avoid anchoring bias based solely on any one clinical variable or published clinical grading scale.

The Impact of Nasal Intubation on Feeding Outcomes in Neonates Requiring Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

Neonates who require surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) frequently have difficulty with oral feeds post-operatively and may require a feeding tube at hospital discharge. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral or nasal intubation route on feeding method at hospital discharge. This was a non-blinded randomized control trial of 62 neonates who underwent surgery for CHD between 2018 and 2021. Infants in the nasal (25 patients) and oral (37 patients) groups were similar in terms of pre-operative risk factors for feeding difficulties including completed weeks of gestational age at birth (39 vs 38 weeks), birthweight (3530 vs 3100 g), pre-operative PO intake (92% vs 81%), and rate of pre-operative intubation (22% vs 28%). Surgical risk factors were also similar including Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category (3.9 vs 4.1), shunt placement (32% vs 41%), cardiopulmonary bypass time (181 vs 177 min), and cross-clamp time (111 vs 105 min). 96% of nasally intubated patients took full oral feeds by discharge as compared with 78% of orally intubated infants (p = 0.05). Nasally intubated infants reach full oral feeds an average of 3 days earlier than their orally intubated peers. In this cohort of patients, nasally intubated infants reach oral feeds more quickly and are less likely to require supplemental tube feeding in comparison to orally intubated peers. Intubation route is a potential modifiable risk factor for oral aversion and appears safe in neonates. The study was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research and was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05378685) on May 18, 2022.

Sex-related differences in clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients in acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate sex-related differences in the clinical characteristics and hospital outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). METHODS: This study was a retrospective study. Patients who underwent surgery for AAAD at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, from January 2014 to March 2023 were consecutively included. Data was extracted from electronic medical records. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcome measures included new-onset postoperative arrhythmia (POA), acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic dysfunction, neurological complications, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay. Patients were divided into two groups based on sex, and data analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 1137 subjects were included, with 863 males (75.9%) and 274 females (24.1%). There were statistically significant differences in age and BMI between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain at the onset between the two groups, but chest tightness in females was higher than in males (22.6% vs. 13.8%). Regarding primary outcomes, the in-hospital mortality rate was 11.1% for males and 10.6% for females (P = 0.803). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in ICU days, length of hospitalization, neurological complications, or liver dysfunction (P > 0.05). The rate of POA in females was 4.7%, higher than in males (2.2%), but AKI and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were both higher in males than in females (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age, white blood cell (WBC) counts, lactic acid, operation duration and prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) increased the risk of in-hospital mortality in male patients. Hypertension, WBC counts, lactic acid, and PMV increased the risk of in-hospital mortality in female patients. CONCLUSION: Despite significant baseline characteristic differences between male and female AAAD patients, there were no significant differences in onset symptoms. The in-hospital mortality rates were similar between male and female patients, but the risk factors for in-hospital mortality differed.

Severe acute maternal morbidity reporting in Australia: Why is it so hard?

Adverse outcomes associated with pregnancy, including severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) and mortality, are internationally regarded as important indicators of quality of maternity services. Varied definitions and processes are barriers for SAMM recording, reporting and review. Identifying and documenting these cases of SAMM is a critical first step. Case reviews allow exploration of factors contributing to SAMM. Translation of the lessons learnt into practice improvement strategies and dissemination of this knowledge is essential for continual quality improvement. This review will outline the current status of SAMM review internationally and in Australia.

Three-year mortality, readmission, and medical expenses in critical care survivors: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing number of critical care survivors, population-based studies on the long-term outcomes after discharge are necessary to inform local decision-making. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate mortality and its risk factors, readmissions, and medical expenses of intensive care unit survivors for 3 years after hospital discharge. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort in Korea. Of the 195,702 patients who survived and were discharged from hospital in 2012, 2693 intensive care unit patients were assigned to the case group for the study, and the remaining 193,009 were assigned to the comparison group. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality for 3 years after discharge. Secondary outcomes were all-cause hospital readmission and medical expenses in 3 years. We analysed risk factors for mortality using the Cox proportional hazard regression. The differences in hospital readmission and medical expenses between the case and comparison groups were analysed by multivariate logistic regression and independent t-tests. RESULTS: The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year cumulative mortality rates in the case group were 15.9%, 20.5%, and 24.4%, respectively, and older age, disability, medical admission, and longer hospital stay increased mortality. Almost 40% of intensive care unit survivors were readmitted to hospital within 6 months of discharge, and their odds of being readmitted were significantly higher than those of the comparison group. Medical expenses were also significantly higher in the case group, with the highest paid within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality, hospital readmission, and medical expenses for intensive care unit survivors were the worst within 6 months of discharge. In light of the long-term recovery trajectory of critical illness, it is necessary to investigate what factors may have contributed to the negative outcome during this period. Further research is needed to determine which services primarily contributed to the increase in medical expenses.

Group Concept Mapping Conceptualizes High-Quality Care for Long-Stay Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients and Families.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and conceptualize high-quality care for long-stay pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients using group concept mapping (GCM). STUDY DESIGN: We convened an expert panel to elucidate domains of high-quality care for this growing patient population for which transitory care models fail to meet their needs. Thirty-one healthcare professionals and 7 parents of patients with previous prolonged PICU hospitalizations comprised a diverse, interprofessional multidisciplinary panel. Participants completed the prompt "For PICU patients and families experiencing prolonged lengths of stay, high quality care from the medical team includes ______", with unlimited free text responses. Responses were synthesized into individual statements, then panelists sorted them by idea similarity and rated them by perceived importance. Statement analysis using GCM software through GroupWisdom generated nonoverlapping clusters representing domains of high-quality care. RESULTS: Participants submitted 265 prompt responses representing 313 unique ideas, resulting in 78 final statements for sorting and rating. The resultant cluster map best representing the data contained 8 domains: (1) Family-Centered Care and Shared Decision Making, (2) Humanizing the Patient, (3) Clinician Supports and Resources, (4) Multidisciplinary Coordination of Care, (5) Family Well-Being, (6) Anticipatory Guidance and Care Planning, (7) Communication, and (8) Continuity of Care. CONCLUSIONS: GCM empowered a panel of healthcare professionals and parents to explicitly describe and conceptualize high-quality care for patients and families experiencing prolonged PICU stays. This information will aid the effort to address shortcomings of transitory PICU care models.

The end-tidal alveolar dead space fraction for risk stratification during the first week of invasive mechanical ventilation: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The end-tidal alveolar dead space fraction (AVDSf = [PaCO2-PETCO2]/PaCO2) is a metric used to estimate alveolar dead space. Higher AVDSf on the first day of mechanical ventilation is associated with mortality and fewer ventilator-free days. It is not clear if AVDSf is associated with length of ventilation in survivors, how AVDSf performs for risk stratification beyond the first day of ventilation, or whether AVDSf adds predictive value to oxygenation (oxygenation index [OI]) or severity of illness (Pediatric Risk of Mortality [PRISM III]) markers. METHODS: Retrospective single-center observational cohort study of children and young adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. In those with arterial or capillary blood gases, AVDSf was calculated at the time of every blood gas for the first week of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: There were 2335 children and young adults (median age 5.8 years [IQR 1.2, 13.2]) enrolled with 8004 analyzed AVDSf values. Higher AVDSf was associated with mortality and longer length of ventilation in survivors throughout the first week of ventilation after controlling for OI and PRISM III. Higher OI was not associated with increased mortality until ≥ 48 h of ventilation after controlling for AVDSf and PRISM III. When using standardized variables, AVDSf effect estimates were generally higher than OI for mortality, whereas OI effect estimates were generally higher than AVDSf for the length of ventilation in survivors. An AVDSf > 0.3 was associated with a higher mortality than an AVDSf < 0.2 within each pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome severity category. The maximum AVDSf within 12 h of intensive care unit admission demonstrated good risk stratification for mortality (AUC 0.768 [95% CI 0.732, 0.803]). AVDSf did not improve mortality risk stratification when added to PRISM III but did improve mortality risk stratification when added to the gas exchange components of PRISM III (minimum 12-h PaO2 and maximum 12-h PCO2) (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: AVDSf is associated with mortality and length of ventilation in survivors throughout the first week of invasive mechanical ventilation. Some analyses suggest AVDSf may better stratify mortality risk than OI, whereas OI may better stratify risk for prolonged ventilation in survivors than AVDSf.