Comparison of Three Grafting Options for Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective 3-Arms Case Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion achieves foraminal radicular and central medullary decompression and spinal stabilization in staged lesions. Many bone graft materials have been developed for the reconstruction of cervical lordosis and the restoration of intervertebral height after corpectomy. The PolyEtherKetoneEtherKetoneKetone (PEKEKK) is a semicrystalline thermoplastic polymer that can be reinforced with carbon fibers to create long and highly fenestrated rectangular cervical cages for corpectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological outcomes of an innovative PEKEEKK cage compared with others grafting options. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients who underwent surgery with PEKEKK cages between 2017 and 2019 at a spine institution, were matched with 15 patients with a titanium mesh cylindrical cage (TMC) and 15 patients with a tricortical structural iliac bone graft. The restoration of vertebral height and cervical lordosis postoperatively, and subsidence of the construct were evaluated. Complications were reported. RESULTS: The minimal follow-up was 5.1±2years. A better, but nonsignificant, postoperative gain in height was observed for PEKEKK (+8.1 ± 20%) and TMC cages (+8.2 ± 16%) than for iliac crest autograft reconstruction (+2.3 ± 15%, P = 0.119). The mean subsidence at the last follow-up was greater for TMC cages (-10.2 ± 13%), but was not significant, with -6.1 ± 10% for PEKEKK cages and -4.1 ± 7% for iliac crest autografts (P = 0.223). The gain in segmental cervical lordosis was significant (P < 0.001) and remained stable in all the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although an improvement in radiologic anatomical parameters can be achieved with all cage groups, the PEKEKK cage can be considered as a safe alternative for reducing subsidence.

Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-to-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated With Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the easily measurable radiographic landmarks of screw-to-vertebral body ratio and changes in screw angle to identify if they are associated with early subsidence following an Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing 1-3 level ACDF with allograft or PEEK cages. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 6-month postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure intradiscal height (or distance between 2 vertebral bodies) as an anterior vertebral distance (AVD), middle (MVD), and posterior (PVD), screw angle, screw-to-vertebral body length ratio, and interscrew distance. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 92 patients were included (42 single-level, 32 two-level, and 18 3-level ACDFs). In single-level ACDFs, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with a decrease in AVD (=.001) and MVD (P = .03). A decrease in the PVD was associated with a decrease in segmental lordosis (P < .001). For two-level ACDFs, a higher caudal screw-to-body ratio was associated with a lower MVD (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Six months following an ACDF for degenerative pathology, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with an increase in radiographic subsidence at the antero-medial aspect of the disc space albeit largely subclinical. This suggests that the caudal screw angle change may serve as a reliable radiographic marker for early radiographic subsidence. Furthermore, a greater screw-to-vertebral body ratio may be protective against radiographic subsidence in two-level ACDF procedures.

Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units as a Predictor of Reoperation and Graft Subsidence After Standalone and Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Standalone single and multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been increasingly applied to treat degenerative spinal conditions in a less invasive fashion. Graft subsidence following LLIF is a known complication and has been associated with poor bone mineral density (BMD). Previous research has demonstrated the utility of computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HUs) as a surrogate for BMD. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between the CT HUs and subsidence and reoperation after standalone and multilevel LLIF. METHODS: A prospectively maintained single-institution database was retrospectively reviewed for LLIF patients from 2017 to 2020, including single and multilevel standalone cases with and without supplemental posterior fixation. Data on demographics, graft parameters, BMD determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, preoperative mean segmental CT HUs, and postoperative subsidence and reoperation were collected. We used 36-in. standing radiographs to measure the preoperative global sagittal alignment and disc height and subsidence at last follow-up. Subsidence was classified using the Marchi grading system corresponding to disc height loss: grade 0, 0%-24%; grade I, 25%-49%; grade II, 50%-74%; and grade III, 75%-100%. RESULTS: A total of 89 LLIF patients had met the study criteria, with a mean follow-up of 19.9 ± 13.9 months. Of the 54 patients who had undergone single-level LLIF, the mean segmental HUs were 152.0 ± 8.7 for 39 patients with grade 0 subsidence, 136.7 ± 10.4 for 9 with grade I subsidence, 133.9 ± 23.1 for 3 with grade II subsidence, and 119.9 ± 30.9 for 3 with grade III subsidence (P = 0.032). Of the 96 instrumented levels in the 35 patients who had undergone multilevel LLIF, 85, 9, 1, and 1 level had had grade 0, grade I, grade II, and grade III subsidence, with no differences in the HU levels. On multivariate logistic regression, increased CT HU levels were independently associated with a decreased risk of reoperation after both single-level and multilevel LLIF (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.99; P = 0.044; and odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P = 0.017, respectively). Overall, the BMD determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was not associated with graft subsidence or reoperation. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve to separate the patients who had and had not required reoperation, the threshold HU level determined for single-level and multilevel LLIF was 131.4 (sensitivity, 0.62; specificity 0.65) and 131.0 (sensitivity, 0.67; specificity, 0.63), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower CT HUs were independently associated with an increased risk of graft subsidence after single-level LLIF. In addition, lower CT HUs significantly increased the risk of reoperation after both single and multilevel LLIF with a critical threshold of 131 HUs. The determination of the preoperative CT HUs might provide a more robust gauge of local bone quality and the likelihood of graft subsidence requiring reoperation following LLIF than overall BMD.

Does obesity affect long-term outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion with posterior stabilization?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Obese patients can pose significant challenges to spine surgeons in lumbar fusion procedures. The increased risk of complications has led surgeons to be wary in pursing operative interventions in these patients. Since the advent of minimally-invasive techniques in lumbar fusion, surgeons are turning to these procedures in an attempt to minimize operative time, blood loss and overall cost. With an increased proportion of obese patients in the population, it is imperative to understand the long-term outcomes in these minimally-invasive approaches. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the obese. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 115 patients (53 nonobese and 62 obese) who underwent XLIF with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Patient reported outcome scores: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), (2) Reoperation rate, (3) Pelvic incidence (PI)- Lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch correction, (4) Graft subsidence and fusion rate METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent XLIF with percutaneous posterior stabilization since 2007 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Demographics including BMI were recorded and patients were subdivided into 2 cohorts: nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Functional outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative VAS and ODI scores. Reoperation rates were compared between cohorts. PI-LL mismatch was calculated from both pre- and postoperative radiographs. Rates of graft subsidence and fusion were measured at final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 115 consecutive patients were included (53 nonobese and 62 obese) with a mean follow up of 95.3 months. Mean BMI was 25.3 in the nonobese group and 35.3 in the obese group (p<.001). There were more females in nonobese cohort. VAS scores decreased by a mean of 5.7 in the nonobese cohort, and 5.4 in the obese cohort (p=.213). ODI improvement was also similar between the groups. 5.6% of nonobese patients required reoperation compared to 9.6% of obese patients (p=.503). Graft subsidence rates at final follow-up were 5.66% and 8.06% for the nonobese and obese groups, respectively (p=.613). Rates of successful fusion were 96.23% and 98.39% for the nonobese and obese groups, respectively (p=.469). Both cohorts achieved a similar proportion of PI-LL mismatch correction, 85% in obese versus 78% in nonobese patients (p=.526). CONCLUSION: Obese patients have similar surgical outcomes to nonobese patients with respect to functional outcome scores, reoperation rates, graft subsidence and correction of PI-LL mismatch after long-term follow-up. With similar outcome and reoperation profiles, minimally-invasive approaches to the spine, such as XLIF, may be an acceptable alternative to traditional open procedures in obese patients.

Expandable Versus Static Cages in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Expandable cages for interbody fusion allow for in situ expansion optimizing fit while mitigating endplate damage. Studies comparing outcomes after using expandable or static cages have been conflicting. METHODS: This was a meta-analysis A systematic search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines identifying studies reporting outcomes among patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LIF). RESULTS: Fourteen articles with 1129 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared with MIS-LIFs performed with static cages, those with expandable cages had a significantly lower incidence of graft subsidence (expandable: incidence 0.03, I2 22.50%; static: incidence 0.27, I2 51.03%, P interaction <0.001), length of hospital stay (expandable: mean difference [MD] 3.55 days, I2 97%; static: MD 7.1 days, I2 97%, P interaction <0.01), and a greater increase in disc height (expandable: MD -4.41 mm, I2 99.56%; static: MD -0.79 mm, I2 99.17%, P interaction = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference among Oswestry Disability Index (expandable: MD -22.75, I2 98.17%; static: MD -17.11, I2 95.26%, P interaction = 0.15), fusion rate (expandable: incidence 0.94, I2 0%; static incidence 0.92, I2 0%, P interaction = 0.44), overall change in lumbar lordosis (expandable: MD 3.48 degrees, I2 59.29%; static: MD 3.67 degrees, I2 0.00%, P interaction 0.88), blood loss (expandable: MD 228.9 mL, I2 100%; static: MD 261.1 mL, I2 94%, P interaction = 0.69) and operative time (expandable: MD 184 minutes, I2 95.32%; static: MD 150.4 minutes, I2 91%, P interaction = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Expandable interbody cages in MIS-LIF were associated with a decrease in subsidence rate, operative time and greater in increase in disc height.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion versus Anterior Hybrid Fusion Surgery for Patients with Severe Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving Three or More Levels: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Various studies have found a high incidence of early graft dislodgement after multilevel corpectomy. Although a hybrid fusion technique was developed to resolve implant failure, the hybrid and conventional techniques have not been clearly compared in terms of perioperative complications in patients with severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving three or more levels. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) and anterior hybrid fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL. We therefore retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiologic data of 53 consecutive patients who underwent anterior fusion to treat cervical OPLL: 30 underwent ACCF and 23 underwent anterior hybrid fusion. All patients completed 2 years of follow-ups. Implant migration was defined as subsidence > 3 mm. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between the ACCF and hybrid groups. Early implant failure occurred significantly more frequently in the ACCF group (5 cases, 16.7%) compared with the hybrid group (0 cases, 0%). The fusion rate was 80% in the ACCF group and 100% in the hybrid group. Although both procedures can achieve satisfactory neurologic outcomes for multilevel OPLL patients, hybrid fusion likely provides better biomechanical stability than the conventional ACCF technique.

Increased Height of Fused Segments Contributes to Early-Phase Strut Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion for Multilevel Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior decompression and fusion have shown favorable neurologic outcomes in patients with cervical myelopathy. However, implant migration sometimes occurs immediately after multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF). Risk factors associated with early bone graft migration have not been precisely documented. The study aimed to investigate how frequently bone graft subsidence occurs after ACCF and to determine the factors affecting implant migration. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients who underwent ACCF for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament at our hospital between 2007 and 2015 and were able to complete 1 year of follow-up were enrolled. Patients treated with hybrid fixation were excluded. Data on demographics and radiographic findings, namely, fused segment angle and fused segment height (FSH), were collected. Implant migration was defined as subsidence of >3 mm. The patients were divided into 2-segment (2F), 3-segment (3F), and ≥4-segment (4F) groups. Results were compared between the groups using one-way analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.6 years in the 2F group (n = 17), 62.1 years in the 3F group (n = 21), and 69 years in the 4F group (n = 9). There were no significant between-group differences in demographics or clinical characteristics. Implant subsidence occurred in 3 cases (17.6%) in the 2F group, 4 (19%) in the 3F group, and 3 (33.3%) in the 4F group. Revision surgery was required in 2 cases (1 patient each in the 3F and 4F groups). Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association of increased FSH and increased risk of postoperative implant subsidence. CONCLUSIONS: A postoperative increase in FSH may affect graft stability and lead to early implant migration.

Expandable Polyaryl-Ether-Ether-Ketone Spacers for Interbody Distraction in the Lumbar Spine.

Study Design Retrospective case series. Objective StaXx XD (Spine Wave, Inc., Shelton, CT, United States) is an expandable polyaryl-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) wafer implant utilized in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. PEEK implants have been successfully used as interbody devices. Few studies have focused on expandable PEEK devices. The aim of the current study is to determine the radiographic and clinical outcome of expandable PEEK cages utilized for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods Forty-nine patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with implantation of expandable PEEK cages and posterior instrumentation were included. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including disk height, foraminal height, listhesis, local disk angle of the index level/levels, regional lumbar lordosis, and graft subsidence were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at latest follow-up. Results At an average follow-up of 19.3 months, the minimum clinically important difference for the ODI and VAS back, buttock, and leg were achieved in 64, 52, 58, and 52% of the patients, respectively. There was statistically significant improvement in VAS back (6.42 versus 3.11, p < 0.001), VAS buttock (4.66 versus 1.97, p = 0.002), VAS leg (4.55 versus 1.96, p < 0.001), and ODI (21.7 versus 12.1, p < 0.001) scores. There was a significant increase in the average disk height (6.49 versus 8.18 mm, p = 0.037) and foraminal height (15.6 versus 18.53 mm, p = 0.0001), and a significant reduction in the listhesis (5.13 versus 3.15 mm, p = 0.005). The subsidence of 0.66 mm (7.4%) observed at the latest follow-up was not significant (p = 0.35). Conclusions Midterm results indicate that expandable PEEK spacers can effectively and durably restore disk and foraminal height and improve the outcome without significant subsidence.